The design, Dossier and the client decided, would move the con-
sumer too far from the existing system, causing confusion and
potential loss of brand recognition. The change, they agreed, had
to be evolutionary, rather than revolutionary.
A second round of designs was based on color coding, as AG had
done in the past, but with far fewer categories—five to represent
each product grouping versus one for each of the 34 subbrands.
The designers experimented with such interesting effects as de-
pressed areas in the bottle where an imprinted rubber band
would sit, providing color coding and traction, and a depressed
area in the bottle to hold a debossed sticker.
In a third series of experiments, the final type treatment started
to be worked out. Here uniquely shaped containers with arched
sides were studied. The client loved the logo and type treat-
ments, but from ergonomic and production-cost standpoints, the
more uniquely shaped bottles were impractical. But Chisholm
says that these studies were fruitful in stretching the notion of
what the container could actually be.
Squared-off bottles were also tried, but eventually the team decided
on an elegantly round-shouldered bottle, a standard tube, and a
squat jar for the final designs. “These were clean and contemporary,
with an upscale, elegant shape which fits with the simple European
design,” says Chisholm. “The tapered shape elevates the brand,
providing it with a refined sensibility and a simple Zen elegance that
targets a fashionable and sophisticated consumer.”
The subbrands are color coded in a subtle way, using just enough
color to guide the buyer yet still maintain a cool, clean polished
presence on the salon store shelf. This classic approach is a de-
parture from the pool of competitors’ packaging designs, many of
which relied on novelty shapes and colors.
The white bottles were also a nod to AG’s former design, but in
this redesign, a pearlized white was chosen. “White is used to
symbolize a lab coat or the professional formulation of the prod-
uct. We stayed with white, but added the pearlized finish to give
the packages a more premium feel,” Chisholm says.
The tallest bottles in the line were adorned with a mysterious little
extra: a plastic cap that fits onto its bottom. Right now, Chisholm
explains, the cap is purely cosmetic, but in future products it may
be a functional part of the product, used for mixing or measuring.
The frosted, translucent cap on the tube and silvery lid on the jar
mimic the subtle shine of the bottle’s seat.
“Color coding has been a huge part of AG’s business, and this
new design still allows consumers to ‘cherry pick’ what they want,
following the ‘prescription’ of their stylist,” Chisholm says. “But
with this system, consumers will have an easier time seeing the
products on the shelves and gravitating toward and remember
the subbrand they prefer.”
This design was anchored by an umlaut
over the letters “AG.” A system of dots
formed a matrix that, in turn, formed
letters, such as V for “Volumizing.”
This design incorporated an indented
area where a sticker, printing, or even
an imprinted rubber band could sit.
Although the designers liked this round
of designs, it proved to be ergonomically
inadvisable: The bottles were hard to
hold onto, especially when wet.
This trial showed how relating the
line through subbrands would work.
Although the Plastique line, Waxx
line, and 1ne lines would all have a
distinctive look and color, it is appar-
ent that the three products clearly
come from the same family.
One distinctive feature of this new
design is that the tallest bottles in
some lines have a clear plastic cap
that fits over the bottom of the bot-
tle. Right now, the cap is for appear-
ance only, but for future products it
may be functional as well, serving as
a measuring cup or mixing container.
Two examples of separate, but clearly related, subbrands.
96 97
THE LITTLE BOOK OF BIG PACKAGING IDEAS
(RAY)
Job:10-91261 Title:Rockport : Little Book Of Packaging Ideas
175#_P Dtp:44 Page:97
001-157_91261.qxp 10/16/06 1:30 PM Page 97