1. Treisman, A.M. and Gelade, G. (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
2. Wolfe, J., Cave, K.R. and Franzel, S.L. (1989) Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15 (3), 419–433.
3. Wolfe, J. (1994) Guided search 2.0: A revised model of guided search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1 (2), 202–238.
4. Malsburg, C.v.d. (1981)The correlation theory of brain function (Report). Göttingen, West Germany: Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry.
5. Tsotsos, J.K. (2011) A Computational Perspective on Visual Attention, MIT Press.
6. Koch, C. and Ullman, S. (1985) Shifts in selective visual attention: toward the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4 (4), 219–227.
7. Carpenter, G.A., Grossberg, S. and Rosen, D.B. (1991) Fuzzy ART: fast stable learning and categorization of analog patterns by an adaptive resonance system. Neural Networks, 4, 759–771.
8. Muller, H.J. and Krummenacher, J. (2006) Visual search and selective attention. Visual Cognition, 14 (4–8), 389–410.
9. Smilek, D., Enns, J.T., Eastwood, J.D. and Merikle, P.M. (2006) Relax! Cognitive style influences visual search. Visual Cognition, 14 (4–8), 543–564.
10. Nothdurft, H.C. (2006) Salience and target selection in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14 (4–8), 514–542.
11. Theeuwes, J., Reimann, B. and Mortier, K. (2006) Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming. Visual Cognition, 14 (4–8), 490–513.
12. Kristjánsson, Á., Wang, D.L. and Nakayama, K. (2002) The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition, 85, 37–52.
13. Posner, M.I., Nissen, M.J. and Ogden, W.C. (1978) Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location, in Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information (eds J.H.I. Pick and E. Saltzman), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 137–157.
14. Tipper, S.P. (1985) The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 37, 571–590.
15. Maljkovic, V. and Nakayama, K. (1994) Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657–672.
16. Maljkovic, V. and Nakayama, K. (1996) Priming of pop-out: II. Role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977–991.
17. Maljkovic, V. and Nakayama, K. (2000) Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571–595.
18. Treisman, A.M. (2006) How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14 (4–8), 411–448.
19. Li, Z. and Itti, L. (2011) Saliency and gist features for target detection in satellite images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 20 (7), 2017–2029.
20. Siagian, C. and Itti, L. (2007) Rapid biologically inspired scene classification using features shared with visual attention. IEEE Transactions on. Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 29 (2), 300–312.
21. Klein, R. (1988) Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430–431.
22. Müller, H.J. and von Mühlenen, A. (2000) Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591–1605.
23. Takeda, Y. and Yagi, A. (2000) Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 927–934.
24. Gilchrist, I.D. and Harvey, M. (2000) Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10, 1209–1212.
25. Peterson, M.S., Kramer, A.F., Wang, R.F. et al.(2001) Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287–292.
26. Bichot, N.P. (2001) Neural mechanisms of top-down selection during visual search. Proceedings of IEEE Annual Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society International Conference, 1, pp. 780–783.
27. Treue, S. and Martinez-Trujillo, J.C. (2006) Visual search and single-cell electrophysiology of attention – Area MT, from sensation to perception. Visual Cognition, 14 (4–8), 898–910.
28. Zhaoping, L. and Snowden, R.J. (2006) A theory of a saliency map in primary visual cortex (V1) tested by psychophysics of color-orientation interference in texture segmentation. Visual Cognition, 14 (4–8), 911–933.
29. Achanta, R., Estrada, F., Wils, P. and Susstrunk, S. (2009) Frequency-tuned saliency region detection. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
30. Achanta, R. and Susstrunk, S. (2010) Saliency detection using maximum symmetric surround. Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2653–2656.
31. Cheng, M-M., Zhang, G.-X., Mitra, N.J. et al.(2011) Global contrast based salient region detection. Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
32. Goferman, S., Zelnik-Manor, L. and Tal, A. (2010) Context-aware saliency detection. Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
33. Mcllwain, I.J. (1964) Receptive fields of optic tract axons and lateral geniculate cells: peripheral extent and barbiturate sensitivity. The Journal of Neurophysiology, 27, 1154–1173.
34. Ikeda, H. and Wright, J.J. (1972) The outer disinhibitory surround of retinal ganglion cell receptive field. The Journal of Physiology, 226, 511–544.
35. Allman, J., Meizin, F. and Guinness, E.Mc. (1985) Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparison in vision neurons. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 8, 407–431.
36. Li, C.Y., Pei, X., Zhou, Y.X. and Von Mitzlaff, H.C. (1991) Role of the extensive area outside the X-cell receptive field in brightness information transmission. Vision Research, 31, 1529–1540.
37. Li, C.Y., Zhou, Y.X., Pei, X. et al.(1992) Extensive disinhibitory region beyond the classical receptive field of cat retinal ganglion cells. Vision Research, 32, 219–228.
38. Ghosh, K., Sarkar, S. and Bhaumik, K. (2006) A possible explanation of the low-level brightness-contrast illusions in the light of an extended classical receptive field model of retinal ganglion cells. Biological Cybernetics, 94, 89–96.
39. Wei, H., Wang, X.M. and Lai, L.L. (2012) Compact image representation model based on both nCRF and reverse control mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 23 (1), 150–162.
40. Liu, H. and Heynderickx, I. (2009) Studying the added value of visual attention in objective image quality metrics based on eye movement data. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.
41. Lu, Z., Lin, W., Yang, X. et al.(2005) Modeling visual attention's modulatory aftereffects on visual sensitivity and quality evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 14 (11), 1928–1942.
42. Moorthy, A.K. and Bovik, A.C. (2009) Visual importance pooling for image quality assessment. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 3 (2), 193–201.
43. Cater, K., Chalmers, A. and Ward, G. (2003) Detail to attention: Exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, pp. 270–280.
44. Kim, S.L. and Choi, G.J.S. (2009) Real-time tracking of visually attended objects in virtual environments and its application to LOD. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15 (1), 6–19.
45. Ninassi, A., Meur, O.L. and Callet, P.L. (2007) Does where you gaze on an image affect your perception of quality? Applying visual attention to image quality metric. Proceedings of 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.
46. Larson, E.C., Vu, C. and Chandler, D.M. (2008) Can visual fixation patterns improve image fidelity assessment? Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.
47. You, J., Korhonen, J. and Perkis, A. (2010) Attention modeling for video quality assessment: Balancing global quality and local quality. Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME).
48. Vu, C.T., Larson, E.C. and Chandler, D.M. (2008) Visual fixation pattern when judging image quality: Effects of distortion type, amount, and subject experience. IEEE Southwest symposia Image Anal. Interp, pp. 73–76.
49. Le Meur, O., Ninassi, A., Le Callet, P. and Barba, D. (2010) Do video coding impairments disturb the visual attention deployment? Signal Processing: Image Communication.