IAS 38 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
1 SCOPE OF IAS 38
IAS 38 prescribes the accounting treatment for intangible assets. Intangible assets subject to the scope of another standard are excluded from the scope of IAS 38, e.g. (IAS 38.2–8.3):
In determining whether an asset that incorporates both intangible and tangible elements should be treated as property, plant, and equipment according to IAS 16 or as an intangible asset according to IAS 38, it is necessary to assess which element is more significant. For example, software for a computer-controlled machine tool that cannot operate without that specific software is considered an integral part of the related machine. The software is treated as part of the machine tool (i.e. as property, plant, and equipment) if the physical and not the intangible component is more significant. By contrast, when a physical and an intangible asset do not constitute an integral unit (e.g. application software for a computer) they are treated as two different assets (IAS 38.4).
Rights under licensing agreements for items such as motion picture films, video recordings, plays, manuscripts, patents, and copyrights are excluded from the scope of IAS 17 and are included within the scope of IAS 38 (IAS 38.6 and IAS 17.2).
2 THE TERM “INTANGIBLE ASSET”
An asset is a resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity (IAS 38.8 and F49a). An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset of the entity without physical substance. Monetary assets comprise money held and assets to be received in fixed or determinable amounts of money (IAS 38.8).
In practice, a large number of intangible items exists (e.g. software, patents, and customer loyalty). However, not all of them are intangible assets. According to the definitions above, an intangible item meets the definition of an intangible asset only if all of the following three criteria are met (IAS 38.8–38.17):
3 RECOGNITION AND INITIAL MEASUREMENT
3.1 Introduction
The question of whether an intangible item is recognized as an intangible asset in the statement of financial position is answered in two steps (IAS 38.18):
This procedure not only applies to the costs incurred initially to acquire or internally generate an intangible item, but also to those incurred subsequently to add to, replace part of, or service an intangible asset (IAS 38.18). However, in practice most subsequent expenditures for intangible assets will not meet the criteria for recognition in the statement of financial position (IAS 38.20).
An intangible asset is measured initially at cost (IAS 38.24).
3.2 Separate Acquisition of Intangible Assets
For separately acquired intangible assets, it is always presumed that the probability recognition criteria (IAS 38.21a) are met (IAS 38.25). Moreover, the cost of a separately acquired intangible asset can usually be measured reliably (IAS 38.26). The costs also include any directly attributable cost of preparing the asset for its intended use (IAS 38.27–38.32).
3.3 Acquisition of Intangible Assets as Part of a Business Combination
IAS 38.33–38.43 contain rules with respect to the acquisition of intangible assets as part of a business combination in addition to IFRS 3. These rules are in line with those of IFRS 3.1
3.4 Internally Generated Intangible Assets
In addition to the general requirements for the recognition and initial measurement of an intangible item, IAS 38 contains further requirements and guidance for internally generated intangible items (IAS 38.51).
First it is necessary to distinguish between research and development (IAS 38.8):
The following are examples of research activities (IAS 38.56):
The following are examples of development activities (IAS 38.59):
The internal generation of intangible assets is divided into two phases (IAS 38.8 and 38.52):
Although the terms “research” and “development” are defined in the standard, the terms “research phase” and “development phase” have a broader meaning (IAS 38.52). They are not restricted to the generation of new technology. Instead, these terms are used in a broader context, whereby the research phase is the early, conceptual phase of the generation of an intangible asset, and the development phase is the advanced phase, near to realization. Consequently, even the creation of a website consists of a research phase and a development phase (SIC 32) as well as the generation of human capital (e.g. competitive athletes and artists).
Sometimes an entity cannot distinguish between the research phase and the development phase of an internal project to create an intangible asset. In this case, the expenditure on that project is treated as if it were only incurred in the research phase (IAS 38.53).
Expenditure on research (or on the research phase of an internal project) is recognized as an expense when it is incurred (IAS 38.54).
An intangible asset arising from development (or from the development phase of an internal project) is recognized in the statement of financial position, if the entity can demonstrate all of the following (IAS 38.57):
The capitalization of development costs, i.e. the interpretation and application of the criteria above, is an area in which discretion is exercised. How the discretion is exercised depends on the profit situation of the entity and of the industry in which it operates. Huge differences in interpreting the criteria can be observed internationally between the pharmaceutical industry and the automotive industry.
An intangible asset is measured initially at cost (IAS 38.24). For this purpose, cost is the sum of expenditure incurred from the date when the intangible asset first meets the recognition criteria in IAS 38.21–38.22 and 38.57 (see above). The standard prohibits capitalization of expenditure initially recognized as an expense (IAS 38.65 and 38.71).
The cost of an internally generated intangible asset comprises all directly attributable costs that are necessary to create, produce, and prepare the asset to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management (IAS 38.66).
Goodwill resulting from a business combination has to be recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position.2 However, internally generated goodwill must not be recognized in the statement of financial position. Internally generated goodwill results from expenditures incurred to generate future economic benefits that do not result in the creation of an intangible asset that meets the recognition criteria of IAS 38 (IAS 38.48–38.50).
Irrespective of the criteria described in this chapter, recognition of the following internally generated items as intangible assets in the statement of financial position is always prohibited (IAS 38.63–38.64):
Criteria for the recognition of borrowing costs as an element of the cost of an internally generated intangible asset are specified in IAS 23 (IAS 38.66).
4 FURTHER PROHIBITIONS OF CAPITALIZATION
Further examples of expenditure that is recognized as an expense when it is incurred include (IAS 38.69):
Expenditure on an intangible item that was initially recognized as an expense must not be capitalized (i.e. must not be recognized as part of the cost of an intangible asset) at a later date (IAS 38.71).
5 MEASUREMENT AFTER RECOGNITION
5.1 Cost Model and Revaluation Model
After recognition, intangible assets are measured either according to the cost model or according to the revaluation model (IAS 38.72).
If an intangible asset is accounted for using the cost model, it is measured at its cost less any accumulated amortization and less accumulated impairment losses (IAS 38.74).
The main features of the revaluation model for intangible assets (IAS 38.75–38.87) are generally consistent with those of property, plant, and equipment (IAS 16.31–16.42).3
In contrast to IAS 16 for the purpose of revaluations according to IAS 38, fair value has to be determined by reference to an active market (IAS 38.75). An active market is a market that meets all the following criteria (IAS 38.8):
It is uncommon for an active market to exist for an intangible asset, although this may happen. For example, in some countries, an active market may exist for freely transferable taxi licenses, fishing licenses or production quotas. However, an active market cannot exist for brands, music and film publishing rights, newspaper mastheads, patents or trademarks because each of such intangible assets is unique (IAS 38.78).
If the revaluation model is applied to an intangible asset, all the other assets in its class also have to be accounted for according to the revaluation model, unless there is no active market for those assets. However, it is possible to apply the revaluation model to a particular class of intangible assets while other classes are accounted for using the cost model (IAS 38.72 and 38.81). A class is a grouping of intangible assets of a similar nature and use in an entity's operations (IAS 38.73 and 38.119).
In many countries, revaluations of intangible assets are rare or do not occur at all.4
5.2 Intangible Assets With Finite Useful Lives
Intangible assets with finite useful lives5 are amortized (IAS 38.89). In determining the useful life of an intangible asset, many factors are considered and the entity exercises discretion (IAS 38.90). Software and many other intangible assets are susceptible to technological obsolescence. Thus, it is likely that their useful lives are short. Uncertainty justifies estimating useful lives on a prudent basis, but does not justify choosing useful lives that are unrealistically short (IAS 38.92–38.93).
The useful life of an intangible asset that arises from contractual or other legal rights must not exceed the period of these rights, but may be shorter depending on the period over which the entity expects to use the asset. If these rights are conveyed for a limited term that can be renewed, the useful life includes the renewal period(s) only if there is evidence to support renewal by the entity without significant cost. The useful life of a reacquired right recognized as an intangible asset in a business combination is the remaining contractual period of the contract in which the right was granted and does not include renewal periods (IAS 38.94–38.96, IFRS 3.55, and 3.B35).
The depreciable amount (i.e. the cost or other amount substituted for cost less residual value – IAS 38.8) of an intangible asset with a finite useful life is allocated on a systematic basis over its useful life (IAS 38.97). In the case of an intangible asset with a finite useful life, residual value is normally zero (IAS 38.100–38.101).
Amortization of an intangible asset begins when it is available for use, i.e. when the asset is in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management (IAS 38.97).
Amortization of an intangible asset ceases at the earlier of the following dates (IAS 38.97):
The amortization method used has to reflect the pattern in which the future economic benefits of the intangible asset are expected to be consumed by the entity. The amortization method is applied consistently from period to period, unless there is a change in the expected pattern. If the pattern cannot be determined reliably, the straight-line method has to be applied (IAS 38.97–38.98).
Amortization is recognized in profit or loss unless IAS 38 or another Standard permits or requires it to be included in the carrying amount of another asset (IAS 38.97 and 38.99).
At least at the end of each financial year, the amortization period and the amortization method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life have to be reviewed. If the expected useful life is different from previous estimates, the amortization period has to be changed accordingly. If there has been a change in the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in the intangible asset, the amortization method has to be changed to reflect the changed pattern. These changes are treated as changes in accounting estimates according to IAS 8 (IAS 38.104–38.106).
5.3 Intangible Assets With Indefinite Useful Lives
The useful life of an intangible asset is indefinite when there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity (IAS 38.88). The term “indefinite” does not mean “infinite” (IAS 38.91).
Rights which are obtained only for a limited term but can be renewed at a low cost may have an indefinite life. A typical example is a brand protected by law only for 10 years but with an option to renew the protection several times for another 10 years without significant cost.
An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized (IAS 38.89 and 38.107). However, it is necessary to test such an asset for impairment by comparing its recoverable amount with its carrying amount annually, i.e. even if there is no indication of impairment. The same applies to intangible assets not yet available for use (IAS 38.108 and IAS 36.9–36.10).
In the case of an intangible asset that is not being amortized, its useful life has to be reviewed each period to determine whether it is still appropriate to assume that the useful life of the asset is indefinite. Reassessing the useful life as finite rather than indefinite is an indicator of impairment. Therefore, the asset is tested for impairment by comparing its recoverable amount with its carrying amount (IAS 38.109–38.110).
5.4 Impairment
The issue of impairment is dealt with in the chapter on IAS 36 in this book (IAS 38.111).
6 DERECOGNITION
An intangible asset is derecognized on disposal (e.g. by sale or by entering into a finance lease) or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. The gain or loss arising from derecognition (i.e. the difference between the net disposal proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the asset) is recognized in profit or loss when the asset is derecognized (unless IAS 17 requires otherwise on a sale and leaseback6). Gains must not be classified as revenue (IAS 38.112–38.114).
According to the recognition principle (IAS 38.21)7 if an entity recognizes the cost of a replacement for part of an intangible asset in the carrying amount of the asset, then it derecognizes the carrying amount of the replaced part (IAS 38.115).
7 EXAMPLES WITH SOLUTIONS
Reference to another chapter
With regard to the revaluation model, we refer to the chapter on IAS 16 (Examples 6 and 7).
Implementation of an advertising campaign | These costs are not capitalized, because IAS 38 prohibits the capitalization of expenditure on advertising and promotional activities (IAS 38.69c). |
Testing of a pre-production prototype | These activities are development activities (IAS 38.59a). The expenses are capitalized as part of the cost of the internally generated asset (IAS 38.24 and 38.65–38.67) if the entity can demonstrate that all of the criteria in IAS 38.57 are met. |
Internal generation of a brand | IAS 38.63–38.64 prohibit the recognition of internally generated brands as intangible assets. |
Search for alternatives for a production process | These activities are research activities (IAS 38.56c). Consequently, the expenditures are not capitalized (IAS 38.54–38.55). |
Jun 01, 01 until Nov 30, 01 | Dec, 01 | |
Administrative costs for the project management | 3 | |
Allocation of general administrative costs of E to the project | 3 | |
Costs of an advertising campaign for the new medicine | 7 |
1 See the chapter on IFRS 3, Section 6.2.
2 See the chapter on IFRS 3, Sections 6.1 and 6.4.
3 See the chapter on IAS 16, Section 4.1.
4 See Christensen/Nikolaev, Does fair value accounting for non-financial assets pass the market test?, working paper no. 09-12; ICAEW, EU implementation of IFRS and the fair value directive, a report for the European Commission, 2007, p. 122–123; and KPMG/von Keitz, The Application of IFRS: Choices in Practice, 2006, p. 11.
5 See Section 5.3 with regard to the distinction from an indefinite useful life.
6 See the chapter on IAS 17, Section 6.
7 See Section 3.1.
8 See PwC, IFRS Manual of Accounting 2008, 15.208.