Staf๎ng and Scheduling โพ 89
but are most applicable in matters of sta๎ng and scheduling. ๎e most well-known regulatory
agency is the Joint Commission (JC; formerly known as the Joint Commission on Accreditations
of Hospital Organizations, or JCAHO). While the JC does not set sta๎ levels for hospitals or spe-
ci๎c areas, it does expect the organization to have a well-de๎ned and articulated sta๎ng plan. ๎e
focus of this plan is always about providing consistent and safe care to patients.
Another example of regulatory impact on sta๎ng and scheduling can be found in California.
In 2001, the California Nurse Association was successful in having mandated nurse-to-patient
ratios established as state law. In addition to mandated ratios, the law also addresses required break
times and ratios for other caregivers. ๎e law obviously makes scheduling decisions easier as they
are de๎ned by law. Implementation of these sta๎ng levels are impacted by many of the factors
discussed in this chapter. ๎e end result is that de๎ned sta๎ng levels cannot be achieved. ๎e dif-
๎culty for hospitals is most obvious in increased cost of care of the front end. ๎e impact on total
cost for a patient across a continuum is not well understood. Examples of where this cost could be
lowered would be through reductions of errors, rework, and readmissions. ๎ere has been ongoing
research regarding the implications of mandated ratios to mortality and morbidity in hospitals.
Even 12 years after the establishment of the law, the discussion is still ongoing with arguments for
and against the continuation and expansion of these ratios. It is likely that in an increasingly tight
reimbursement environment, signi๎cant expansion to other states is unlikely.
Self-Scheduling
A relatively recent development in hospitals has been the advent of self-scheduling of employees in
their areas of work. ๎is development is based on the idea of empowering employees, resulting in
happier, satis๎ed, and more productive employees. ๎is scheduling model is most commonly seen
in nursing areas. Self-scheduling can be approached in two di๎erent waysโcommittee and indi-
vidual employee. Many specialized areas like the intensive care unit (ICU), labor and delivery, and
emergency departments will have scheduling committees composed of sta๎-level employees. ๎e
committee members will create the initial schedule for a coming period (usually 4 weeks) for all sta๎
employees. ๎e initial schedule is then reviewed by individual sta๎ and managers for ๎nal approval.
Managers have the ๎nal approval authority and individual sta๎ can make requests for changes for
speci๎c reasons. Areas that allow individual employees to self-schedule will post a blank schedule
asking each employee to ๎ll in their hours for the coming period. Each person must meet their
hours commitment in the period based on their hours commitment (full-time, part-time, or PRN
as discussed earlier). ๎e ๎nal approval of individual hours and total schedule is made by managers.
Acuity Impact on Staf๎ng and Scheduling
In most industries, the complexity of a product built or service delivered determines the amount of
labor that is utilized. ๎is is particularly true in healthcare with the general measure of complexity
of care captured by acuity. A high-level, widely known measure of acuity in healthcare is CMI or
case mix index. ๎is measure is calculated on a facility-speci๎c basis as determined by data sub-
mitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). ๎ere are a number of other acuity
measures that give more speci๎c indication of complexity at an area or department level. Hospital
areas that have speci๎c acuity indicators include lab, nursing, radiology, respiratory therapy, sur-
gery, and emergency departments to name a few.