many people in OECD countries, the Internet has become the main source of media
consumption. According to GlobalWebIndex, in a large number of countries, the aver-
age user spends more time consuming media online than offline (see
Section 10.2).
While it is true that paper has simply been replaced by a screen on a laptop, electronic
reader or smart phone, this change in technology, though noteworthy, may not change
the underlying economics of media markets. If this were the only change, the economics
of Internet media would probably not deserve a full chapter. Similarly, if people watch a
live sports event on their laptop via some streaming service instead of using a television
screen, this also constitutes a change of device but would not be a reason by itself to
reconsider television media. Finally, if somebody listens only to Internet radio instead
of relying on radio frequencies, this constitutes a change in habit, but for our purposes
is otherwise irrelevant.
However, users may act differently on the Internet compared to how they consume
linear television programming, radio broadcasting, and newspapers. While multi-homing
is also often a feature of consumer behavior for television programming, the ad-financed
media on the Internet are particularly prone to encountering multi-homing users who
click themselves through different websites. Thus, the impact of multi-homing on media
competition is particularly relevant on the Internet.
Users search for media content primarily via search engines. Thus, the functioning of
these search engines is likely to affect media consumption. In particular, an important
question is whether search engines bias their results to search queries and whether this
affects market outcomes.
In general, consumers play a more active part in media consumption. Media content
on the Internet can be subject to reader feedback, which affects the further diffusion of
content. This can take the form of comments and recommendations. These also play out
on social networks, where user decisions determine the spread of content (e.g., users can
share an article or video with their friends). Here, users become, in a sense, curators of the
media environment. In addition, they become creators by uploading their own images or
videos, which may have news content for small online communities and thus may con-
stitute “local” news. This relates to the observation that, in general, a key characteristic of
media, in contrast to communication, is that information moves in only one direction,
from one sender to many receivers; and this distinction becomes less clear-cut on the
Internet, as social networks have resulted in (interactive) user-generated content and
limits to exposure. The former implies that some Internet media have incorporated ele-
ments of interactions. The latter implies that only a select group (e.g., the Facebook
friends of a particular person or cause) obtains access to the available information.
Third, as covered in
Section 10.5, media on the Internet match advertising to con-
tent. Most Internet media are primarily and exclusively financed through advertising,
which can be display advertising or search advertising, among other forms. The former
is similar to advertising in traditional media. However, in traditional media, content and
448 Handbook of Media Economics