1 Natural numbers (Section P.1 , page 3)
2 Inequalities (Section 1.6 , page 144)
3 Exponents (Section P.2 , page 20)
4 Series (Section 8.1 , page 723)
A scientist had two large jars before him on the laboratory table. The jar on his left contained a hundred fleas; the jar on his right was empty. The scientist carefully lifted a flea from the jar on the left; placed the flea on the table between the two jars; stepped back; and said in a loud voice, “Jump!” The flea jumped and was put into the jar on the right. A second flea was carefully lifted from the jar on the left and placed on the table between the two jars. Again, the scientist stepped back and said in a loud voice, “Jump!” The flea jumped and was put into the jar on the right. In the same manner, the scientist treated each of the hundred fleas in the jar on the left, and each flea jumped as ordered. The two jars were then interchanged, and the experiment was continued with a slight difference. This time the scientist carefully lifted a flea from the jar on the left; yanked off its hind legs; placed the flea on the table between the jars; stepped back; and said in a loud voice, “Jump!” The flea did not jump and was put into the jar on the right. A second flea was carefully lifted from the jar on the left, its hind legs were yanked off, and then it was placed on the table between the two jars. Again, the scientist stepped back and said in a loud voice, “Jump!” The flea did not jump and was put into the jar on the right. In this manner, the scientist treated each of the hundred fleas in the jar on the left, and in no case did a flea jump when ordered. So the scientist recorded the following inductive statement in his notebook: “A flea, if its hind legs are yanked off, cannot hear.”
(Source: Modified from Howard Eves, Mathematical Circles.)
This, of course, is an example of truly bad reasoning. The principle of mathematical induction, demonstrated in Example 2, is the gold standard for reasoning in proving that statements about natural numbers are true.
1 Prove statements by mathematical induction.
Suppose your boss wants you to verify that each of a thousand bags contains two specific gold coins. There is only one way to be absolutely sure: You must check every bag. That would take a very long time, but you can eventually finish the job. However, consider the problem of verifying that a statement about the natural numbers such as
is true for all natural numbers n. Let’s first test the statement for several values of n by comparing the value of 12+22+32+⋯+n2
n | 12+22+32+⋯+n2 |
n(n+1)(2n+1)6 |
Equal? |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 12=1 |
1(1+1)[2(1)+1]6=1 |
Yes |
2 | 12+22=5 |
2(2+1)[2(2)+1]6=5 |
Yes |
3 | 12+22+32=14 |
3(3+1)[2(3)+1]6=14 |
Yes |
4 | 12+22+32+42=30 |
4(4+1)[2(4)+1]6=30 |
Yes |
5 | 12+22+32+42+52=55 |
5(5+1)[2(5)+1]6=55 |
Yes |
We see that the statement is correct for the natural numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; furthermore, you can continue to verify that the statement is correct for any particular natural number n you try. But is it always correct? Clearly, we can’t check every natural number!
The principle of mathematical induction provides a method for proving that statements about natural numbers are true for all natural numbers. The principle is based on the fact that after any natural number n, there is a next-larger natural number n+1
A common physical interpretation is helpful in understanding why this principle works. Imagine an unending line of dominoes, as shown in Figure 8.6. Suppose the dominoes are arranged so that if any domino is knocked down, it will knock down the next domino behind it as well. What will happen if the first domino is knocked down? All of the dominoes will fall because
knocking down the first domino causes the second domino to be knocked down;
when the second domino is knocked down, it knocks down the third domino, and so on.
To successfully use the Principle of Mathematical Induction, you must be able to determine the statement Pk+1
then we have
It is important to recognize that because Pk
Find the statement Pk+1
Pk: k<2k
Pk: Sk=3k2+9
Pk: 1+2+22+23+⋯+2k−1=2k−1
Pk: 3+6+9+12+⋯+3k=3k(k+1)2
Pk: k<2k, Pk+1:k+1<2k+1Replace k with k+1.
Pk:Sk=3k2+9, Pk+1: Sk+1=3(k+1)2+9Replace k with k+1.
Pk:1+2+22+23+⋯+2k−1=2k−1,Pk+1:1+2+22+23+⋯+2(k+1)−1=2k+1−1Replace k with k+1.
Pk:3+6+9+12+⋯+3k=3k(k+1)2,Pk+1:3+6+9+12+⋯+3(k+1)=3(k+1)[(k+1)+1]2Replace kwith k+1.
Find Pk+1
Use mathematical induction to prove that for all natural numbers n,
First, we verify that this statement is true for n=1.
Check: 2(1)=1(1+1)Replace n with 1 in the original statement.2=2✓
The given statement is true for n=1,
The second condition for the principle of mathematical induction requires two steps.
Step 1 Assume that the formula is true for some unspecified natural number k:
Step 2 On the basis of the assumption that Pk
Begin by using Pk,
This last equation says that Pk+1
is true for every natural number n.
Use mathematical induction to prove that for all natural numbers n,
Use mathematical induction to prove that
for all natural numbers n.
First, we show that the given statement is true for n=1.
The inequality is true for n=1.
Next, we assume that for some unspecified natural number k,
Then we must use Pk
Now by the product rule of exponents, 2k+1=2k⋅21=2k⋅2;
So, 2k+1>k+1
By the principle of mathematical induction, the statement
is true for every natural number n.
Use mathematical induction to prove that 3n>2n
Mathematical induction can only be used to prove statements about the .
The first step in a mathematical induction proof that a statement Pn
The second step in a mathematical induction proof is to assume that Pk
The first step when using mathematical induction to prove that n∑k=16⋅7k=7(7k−1)
True or False. If Pn
True or False. The statement S about all natural numbers n, n≥4
True or False. The statement en≥n
True or False. The first step in proving that 2n≠n
In Exercises 9–12, find Pk+1
Pk: (k+1)2−2k=k2+1
Pk: (1+k)(1−k)=1−k2
Pk: 2k>5k
Pk: 1+3+5+⋯+(2k−1)=k2
In Exercises 13–44, use mathematical induction to prove that each statement is true for all natural numbers n.
2+4+6+⋯+2n=n2+n
1+3+5+⋯+(2n−1)=n2
4+8+12+⋯+4n=2n(n+1)
3+6+9+⋯+3n=3n(n+1)2
1+5+9+⋯+(4n−3)=n(2n−1)
3+8+13+⋯+(5n−2)=n(5n+1)2
3+9+27+⋯+3n=3(3n−1)2
5+25+125+⋯+5n=5(5n−1)4
1⋅2+3⋅4+5⋅6+⋯+ (2n−1)(2n)=13n(n+1)(4n−1)
1⋅3+2⋅4+3⋅5+⋯+(n)(n+2)=16n(n+1)(2n+7)
11⋅2+12⋅3+13⋅4+⋯+1n(n+1)=nn+1
12⋅4+14⋅6+16⋅8+⋯+12n(2n+2)=n4(n+1)
2≤2n
2n+1≤3n
n(n+2)<(n+1)2
n≤n2
n!n=(n−1)!
n!(n+1)!=1n+1
12+22+32+⋯+n2=n(n+1)(2n+1)6
13+23+33+⋯+n3=n2(n+1)24
2 is a factor of n2+n.
2 is a factor of n3+5n.
6 is a factor of n(n+1)(n+2).
3 is a factor of n(n+1)(n−1).
(1+a)n≥na, a>1
(1+a)n≥1+na, a>0
n∑i=13⋅4i=4(4n−1)
n∑i=18⋅9i=9(9n−1)
(1+11)(1+12)(1+13)(1+1n)=n+1
1√1+1√2+1√3+⋯+1√n≥√n
(ab)n=anbn
(ab)n=anbn
Counting hugs. At a family reunion of n people (n≥2).
Winning prizes. In a contest in which n prizes are possible, a contestant can win any number of prizes (from 0 to n). Use mathematical induction to show that there are 2n
[Hint: If n=1,
Koch’s snowflake. A geometric shape called the Koch snowflake can be formed by starting with an equilateral triangle, as in the figure. Assume that each side of the triangle has length 1. On the middle part of each side, construct an equilateral triangle with sides of length 13
Find a formula for the number of sides of the nth figure. Use mathematical induction to prove that this formula is correct.
Find a formula for the perimeter of the nth figure. Use mathematical induction to prove that this formula is correct.
Sierpinski’s triangle. A geometric figure known as Sierpinski’s triangle is constructed by starting with an equilateral triangle as in the figure. Assume that each side of the triangle has length 1. Inside the original triangle, draw a second triangle by connecting the midpoints of the sides of the original triangle. This divides the original triangle into four identical equilateral triangles. Repeat the process by constructing equilateral triangles inside each of the three smaller blue triangles, again using the midpoints of the sides of the triangle as vertices. Continuing this process with each group of smaller triangles produces Sierpinski’s triangle. Coloring each set of smaller triangles helps in following the construction. (Be sure to count blue as well as white triangles.)
When a process is repeated over and over, each repetition is called an iteration. How many triangles will the fourth iteration have?
How many triangles will the fifth iteration have?
Find a formula for the number of triangles in the nth iteration. Use mathematical induction to prove that this formula is correct.
Towers of Hanoi. Three pegs are attached vertically to a horizontal board, as shown in the figure. One peg has n rings stacked on it, each ring smaller than the one below it. In a game known as the Tower of Hanoi puzzle, all of the rings must be moved to a different peg, with only one ring moved at a time, and no ring can be moved on top of a smaller ring. Determine the least number of moves that will accomplish this transfer. Use mathematical induction to prove that your answer is correct.
Exam answer sheets. An exam in which each question is answered with either “True” or “False” has n questions.
If every question is answered, how many answer sheets are possible
If n=1
If n=2
Find a formula for the number of possible answer sheets for an exam with n questions (for any natural number n) and use mathematical induction to prove that the formula is correct.
In Exercises 51–59, use mathematical induction to prove each statement for all natural numbers n.
5 is a factor of 8n−3n.
24 is a factor of 52n−1.
64 is a factor of 32n+2−8n−9.
64 is a factor of 9n−8n−1.
3 is a factor of 22n+1+1.
5 is a factor of 24n−1.
a−b
[Hint: ak+1−bk+1=a(ak−bk)+bk(a−b).
If a=1,
n+1∑k=11n+k≤56
Consider the statement “2 is a factor of 4n−1
Assume that Pk
Thus, if Pk
Extended principle of mathematical induction. This principle states that if a statement Pn
Pm
Pk
In Exercises 61 and 62, use the extended principle of mathematical induction to prove the statement.
Prove that 2n>n2
Prove that n!>n3
In Exercises 63–66, verify each product by using the product rules.
(x+y)2=(x+y)(x +y)=x2+2xy+y2
(x+y)3=(x+y)(x +y)2=x3+3x2y+3xy2+y3
(x+y)4=(x+y)(x +y)3=x4+4x3y+6x2y2+4xy3+y4
(x+y)5=(x+y)(x +y)4=x5+5x4y+10x3y2+10x2y3+5xy4+y5
In Exercises 63–66, what is the pattern on the exponents of x?
In Exercises 63–66, what is the pattern on the exponents of y?
From the pattern of expansions in Exercises 63–66, if we expand (x+y)n
The sum of the exponents on x and y in each term
The number of terms in the expansion