Chapter 38

Communication

Abstract

Good communications are the lifeblood of project management. This is highlighted by listing the possible communication failures due to cultural or language differences, technical jargon, geographical location, misunderstandings due to selective listening, attitude and perception, hidden agendas, poor leadership, unclear (ambiguous) instructions, messages or objectives and withholding of information.

Keywords

Communications; Information; Instructions; Jargon; Language differences
While it is vital that a project manager has a good information system, without an equally good communication system such information would not be available when it is needed.
Generally, all external communications of a contractual nature, especially changes in scope or costs, must be channelled via the project manager or his/her office. This applies particularly to communications with the client and suppliers/subcontractors. The danger of not doing this is that an apparent small change agreed between technical experts could have considerable financial or program (or even political) repercussions due to the experts not being aware of the whole picture.
Unless a project manager decides to do everything him/herself, which should certainly not be the case, he/she has to communicate his/her ideas, plans and instructions to others. This requires communication, whether verbally, in writing, by mail, electronically or by carrier pigeon.
Communications can be formal and informal, and while contractual, organizational and technical information should always follow the formal route, communication between team members is often most effective when carried out informally. There are many occasions when a project manager has the opportunity to meet his/her team members, client or other stakeholders, all of which will enable him/her to discuss problems, obtain information, elicit opinions and build up trusting relationships which are essential for good project management.
Management by walkabout is an accepted method of informal communication, which not only enables an exchange of information and ideas to take place, often in a relaxed atmosphere, but also has the advantage of seeing what is actually going on as well as setting the framework for establishing personal relationships.
Probably more errors occur in a project due to bad communications than any other cause. Ideas and instructions are often misunderstood, misinterpreted, misheard or just plainly ignored for one reason or another; in other words the communication system has broken down. Every communication involves a sender and a receiver. The sender has a responsibility to ensure that the message is clear and unambiguous, and the receiver has to make sure that it is correctly understood, interpreted, confirmed and acted upon.
There are a number of reasons why and how failures in communication can occur. The most common of these, generally known as communication barriers, are the following:
• Cultural differences
• Language differences
• Pronunciation
• Translation errors
• Technical jargon
• Geographical separation of locations
• Equipment or transmission failure
• Misunderstanding
• Attitude due to personality clash
• Perception problems due to distrust
• Selective listening due to dislike of sender
• Assumptions and prejudice
• Hidden agendas
• Poor leadership causing unclear instructions
• Unclear objectives
• Poor document distribution system
• Poor document retention system or archiving
• Poor working environment, such as background noise
• Unnecessarily long messages
• Information overload, such as too many e-mails
• Withholding of information
• Poor memory or knowledge retention
Clearly, some of these barriers are closely related. Some of these have been collected and will be discussed in more detail in the following sections, together with the techniques which can be used to overcome these communication problems.

Cultural Differences, Language Differences, Pronunciation, Translation and Technical Jargon

Problems may arise because different cultures have different customs, etiquettes and trading practices. In some instances, where two countries use the same language, a particular word may have a totally different meaning. This occurs not only between England and America but, for example, also between Germany and Austria, who are, as some cynics might say, all ‘divided by a common language’.
For example, a lift in England would be an elevator in the USA and a water tap would be a faucet. Most project managers will be familiar with the English term planned being called scheduled in the USA. In addition, regional accents and variations in pronunciation can cause misunderstandings in verbal communications. The solution is simple. Always speak clearly and confirm the salient points in writing.
Confusion can occur with dates. In the USA the month precedes the day, while in the UK the day precedes the month. It is best therefore to always write the month in words; i.e., 3 August 2016 instead of 3.8.2016.
Forms of address may be fairly informal in some countries like UK or the USA, but unless one knows the other party well, the formal personal pronoun sie or vous must be used in Germany or France, respectively. The incorrect form of address could easily cause offence. It is advisable, therefore, to seek guidance or attend a short course before visiting a country where such rules apply.
Incorrect translations are not only a source of amusement but can be a real danger. To overcome such errors, the translator should always be a native speaker of the language the text is translated into. This will enable the correct word for a particular context to be chosen and the right nuances to be expressed.
Most disciplines or industries have their own technical jargon which can cause difficulties or misunderstandings when the recipient is from a different environment or culture. There may be reluctance of the receiver to admit to his/her ignorance of the terms used, which can cause errors or delays in the execution of an instruction. The sender should, therefore, refrain from using jargon or colloquialisms, but by the same token, it is up to the receiver to request that any unfamiliar term be explained as it is mentioned.

Geographical Separation, Location Equipment or Transmission Failure

Where stakeholders of a project are located in different offices or sites, good electronic transmission equipment is essential. The necessary equipment must be correctly installed, regularly checked and properly maintained. Generally, it is worthwhile to install the latest updates, especially if these increase the speed of transmission, even if they do not reduce the often high-operating and high-transmission costs. Where persons in countries with different time zones have to be contacted, care must be taken to take these into consideration. A person, from whom one wants a favour, will not be very cooperative if woken up at four o’clock in the morning!

Misunderstanding, Attitude, Perception, Selective Listening, Assumptions and Hidden Agendas

Senders and receivers of communications are human beings and are therefore prone to prejudice, bias, tiredness and other failings, often related to their mood or health at the time. Misunderstandings can occur due to bad hearing or eyesight, or because there was not sufficient time to properly read and digest the message. Cases are known where, because the receiver did not like or trust the sender, the transmitted information was perceived as being unimportant or not relevant and was therefore not been acted upon with the urgency it actually required. The receiver may believe the sender to have a hidden agenda or indeed have his/her own agenda, and may therefore deliberately not cooperate with a request. To avoid these pitfalls, all parties must be told in no uncertain manner that the project has priority over their personal opinions. It also helps to arrange for occasional face-to-face meetings to take place.
It is not unusual for the receiver to make assumptions which were not intended. For example, the sender may request a colleague to book some seats to a theatre. The receiver may assume the sender wants the best seats when the opposite may be true. The fault here lies with the sender who was not specific in his/her request.

Poor Leadership, Unclear Instructions, Unclear Objectives, Unnecessarily Long Messages and Withholding of Information

Instructions, whether verbal or written, must be clear and unambiguous. They should also be as short as possible as the receiver’s as well as the sender’s time is often costly. Winston Churchill required all important documents to be condensed onto ‘one sheet of foolscap paper’ (approximately the size of an A4 sheet). Time is money, and the higher one is in the hierarchy, the more expensive time becomes. As with instructions, objectives must also be set out clearly and unequivocally. It is often advantageous to add simple sketches to written communications. These are often more explicit than long descriptions.
When information has to be communicated to a number of recipients, it may not be advisable to tell everything to everybody. For example, an instruction to a technical department may not include the cost of certain quoted components. Some information is often only disseminated on a ‘need to know’ basis. The sender therefore has the responsibility to decide which parts of the documentation are required by each receiver. Clearly, particular care has to be taken with sensitive or classified information, which may be subject to commercial distribution restrictions or even the Official Secrets Act.
It can be seen that while there are many potential communication barriers, they can all be overcome by good communication planning and sensitive project management.
An example of how ones attitude can be affected by receiving good or bad communications is clearly shown by the following scenario.
You are standing on a railway platform waiting for a late train, and you hear the usual bland announcement which simply says:
‘This train will be 40 minutes late. We are sorry for the inconvenience this has caused.’
This will probably make you angry and blame the train operators for incompetence.
If, on the other hand, the announcement says: ‘This train will be delayed by 40 minutes due to a young girl falling onto the line at the last station’, you will be mollified and probably quite sympathetic to the operators who now have the problem of dealing with a very unhappy circumstance.
The difference is that in the second announcement you were given an explanation.

Meetings

Meetings are an essential part of project management, as they enable two or more stakeholders to communicate and discuss issues in such a way that quick decisions can be made and implemented. The meeting may be face to face or via video link, teleconference or other virtual system.
The main types of meetings are as follows:
Board meetings at director level
Pre-bid meetings with prospective suppliers or subcontractors
Kick off meetings at the start of the project; these may be in the office or on site
Progress meetings at regular (usually monthly) intervals
Site meetings which may be ad hoc or related to progress
Ad hoc meetings to discuss unforeseen issues
Technical meetings between experts
Meetings with other stakeholders (clients, public authorities, contractors etc.)
Team or staff meetings
Whatever the type or purpose, meetings should always be structured, starting with apologies for absence, approval of the last meeting’s minutes and discussions arising from points relating to the previous meeting. A previously drawn-up agenda and attendance list should be distributed in advance to all attendees. The chairman/chairwoman of the meeting should ensure that the subject matter being discussed does not stray from the topic in question and must resist the temptation of spending too much time on their pet subject or on areas which are his/her base discipline or expertise. Similarly, unless the issue is urgent or crucial, discussions of details by experts should be cut short and deferred to a follow-up meeting at which the subject can be discussed and examined in greater depth.
If the project manager is not present at such a meeting, one of the attendees must issue a short report on the results of the discussions and the recommendations made.
For all meetings, minutes should be kept of all the topics discussed and circulated to all attendees within a few days of the meeting. All minutes of meetings should include an action column for each topic, which contains the name of the person designated to perform the action and the date by which it is to be completed.
Meetings are costly as they are usually attended by people of managerial rank, experts or specialists, all of whom command high salaries. For this reason, meetings should be attended only by persons related to the issues discussed and only for as long as their topic is being discussed. Once the discussion to which they contributed has been concluded, departmental managers and specialists should be allowed to return to their departments.
There is some truth in the old cynical saying which states that ‘The success of a meeting is inversely proportional to the number of people present’.
Guidelines for managing meetings should be a part of the company standards, which should include a standardized format for minutes of meetings.

Further Reading

De Vito J.A. The interpersonal communications book. Pearson; 2012.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset