10 2. TILTING MECHANISMS AND ACTUATORS
Figure 2.4: Suspension tilting systems in different modes: (a) upright mode, (b) tilting mode,
and (c) going over a bump during tilting.
2.3 CHALLENGES IN TILTING MECHANISM DESIGN
After a review of various tilting mechanisms, common challenges in tilting system designs are
summarized below.
Effective Tilting for Vehicle Safety Improvements
As mentioned, compared with full-vehicle tilting schemes, partial-tilting solutions [21, 25, 26]
are less effective for the roll stability control of NTVs. Only a small portion of the whole vehicle
mass is involved in tilting to balance the load, which limits its potential for the emergent and
harsh rollover mitigation. However, if the motivation for adopting the tilting system is riding
comfort enhancement or driving fun improvement, partial-tilting is still a cost-effective solu-
tion due to its relative simple structure and the similarity with conventional vehicles in chassis
designs.
System Packaging and Modularity
Parallelogram tilting mechanisms adopted in [9, 11, 14, 23, 26] provide a directly coupled mo-
tion between chassis and cabin, and thus generate the full vehicle tilting. However, mechanical
linkages for motion synchronization introduce additional complexities to NTVs. Apart from
the extra weights added by the system, the connection rods also occupy the cabin space, and
impose body design restrictions.
e modularity of the suspension system is also sacrificed by such mechanical designs.
Much effort has been devoted to develop urban vehicles in a modularized manner [27–29] to
promote the re-usability of their subsystems. e broad adoption of X-by-wire technologies
(e.g., steer-by-wire, drive-by-wire, brake-by-wire) removes the steering rod and driving shafts
which used to mechanically connect the wheel modules on both sides. Similar technology is
expected to simplify the tilting mechanisms for NTVs.