52 4. TILTING VEHICLE CONTROL
applied torque. e new LTR envelope boundaries considering the effect of tilting moments
are plotted in pink. Since it takes time for roll states to converge to the new equilibrium while
the LTR envelope changes instantly after the torque is applied, the LTR index gets even worse
during the transient phase.
e RHS zero, according to the definition of non-minimum phase systems, can be ex-
plicitly shown by combining Eqs. (3.9) and (3.14). e transfer function from tilting moment
to LTR index is written as
H.s/ D C
r
.
sI A
r
/
1
B
r
C D
r
D
2
.
I
x
s
2
m
s
h
s
g
/
.
m
s
Cm
u
/
T
w
g
.
I
x
s
2
CC
sCK
m
s
h
s
g
/
:
(4.17)
e zeros of the above transfer function can be solved as
s D ˙
p
m
s
h
s
g
=
I
x
; (4.18)
which indicates there always exists an RHS zero. A fundamental limitation between response
time and system overshoot exists according to [78]. Higher tilting moment helps to change
the roll dynamics quicker at the cost of more severe LTR index overshoot. From a physical
perspective, this can be explained by referring to the force analysis in Figure 3.2, as
1. to balance the lateral acceleration .a
y
/ with gravity, a clockwise roll angle in steady state
is desired;
2. the tilting torque applied to the sprung mass needs to be in the clockwise direction, so as
the roll acceleration;
3. treating the sprung and un-sprung mass as a whole, tilting moment as an internal force
does not change the load distribution directly, but the inertia moment due to the roll
acceleration makes the LTR index worse; and
4. the fundamental limitation exists between the steady-state target (achieve desired roll angle
as soon) and the transient objective (small roll accelerations to avoid LTR overshoot).
A quick reaction time is definitely desired for emergent rollover mitigation, while the tran-
sient overshoot should be carefully monitored and bounded in the controller design. To address
this, an optimal controller based on the vehicle roll model is proposed to compromise between
these conflicting targets. e prediction capability in the controller is considered quite beneficial
since it can foresee the arriving of the envelope violation and applies the tilting moment at an
early stage to minimize the overshoot.