Conclusions

The highly symbolic transition from the term ‘knowledge’ to that of ‘knowing’ has opened the way for a view of knowledge as first a process and, subsequently, as a practical activity. In this way, the community of organizational learning and knowing scholars has appropriated the concept of practice to develop a practice theory of organization.

In the foregoing brief description of the developments brought and promises offered by the ‘practice turn,’ I have shown how ‘practice’ is a polysemous term with a long pedigree in sociology which ideally continues the sociological contribution to the study of organizational learning. The polysemy of the term may be an obstacle, but it is also a source of interpretative richness.

The richness of the term is evidenced by the proliferation of labels intended to unify and synthesize the approach, which by so doing have set the bandwagon of studies on practice in motion. We may therefore assume the expression ‘practice-based studies’ (PBS) as an umbrella-term which covers a host of practice-based studies. Within these studies two orientations are apparent: one which considers practices to be the object of empirical analysis (the site of learning and knowing) and one which assumes practice as epistemology.

In privileging the second of these meanings, I have highlighted that it subtends a relational vision and an ecological model of inquiry within which practice is regarded as a phenomenon emerging from the entanglement of knowing and doing. If we consider the becoming of a practice and its function as a guide for knowledgeable collective doing, we can show that the epistemology of practice enables appropriate exploration of sensible and tacit knowledge enacted in practice, together with the body as an active source of knowing, as well as materiality and sociomaterial relations.

I have then explored whether and how a practice theory of organizations could come about and the theoretical and substantive contribution that it could make. Further reflection should indicate directions for future analysis. But given the way in which this field is flourishing in such disorderly and haphazard manner, I would say that exploration in any direction is justified. When the one hundred flowers have given way to more mature theoretical inquiry, the problems and aspects that should be explored systematically will become clearer.

References

Alby, F. and Zucchermaglio, C. (2006) Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let’s fix it: How situated work practices shape group decision making. Organisation Studies, 27(7): 943–966.

Antonacopoulou, E.P. and Pesqueux, Y. (2010) The practice of socialization and the socialization of practice. Society and Business Review, 5(1): 10–21.

Barad, K. (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3): 801–831.

Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the University Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

Bernstein, N.A. (1996) On dexterity and its development. In M.L. Latash and M.T. Turvey (eds.), Dexterity and its Development. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence, Erlbaum.

Billett, S. (2001) Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction 11 (6): 431–452.

Bjørkeng, K., Clegg, S., and Pitsis, T. (2009) Becoming (a) practice. Management Learning, 40(2): 145–160.

Blackler, F. and Regan, S. (2009) Intentionality, agency, change: Practice theory and management. Management Learning, 40(2): 161–176.

Borzeix, A. and Cochoy, F. (2008) Travail et theories de l’activité: Vers des workspace studies? Sociologie du Travail, 50(3): 273–286.

Bourdieu, P. (1972) Esquisse d’une Théorie de la Pratique Précédé de Trois Etudes de Ethnologie Kabyle, Switzerland: Librairie Droz S.A. (English trans. Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and bureaucratization. Organization Science, 2: 40–57.

Brown J. S., and Duguid, P. (1998) Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40: 90–111.

Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2):198–213.

Carlile, P.R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13: 442–455.

Charreire-Petit, S.C. and Huault, I. (2008) From practice-based knowledge to the practice of research: Revisiting constructivist research works on knowledge. Management Learning, 39(1): 73–91.

Chia, R. (2003) Ontology: organization as ‘World Making’. In R. Westwood and S. Clegg (Eds.). Debating organization: Point–Counter-Point in Organization Studies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 98–113.

Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2008) On managerial knowledge. Management Learning, 39(2): 141–158.

Clegg, S.R., Kornberger, M., and Rhodes, C. (2005) Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization, 12(2): 147–167.

Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., and Rhodes, C. (2007) Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18: 107–122.

Clot, Y. (2002a) Clinique de l’activité et répétition. Cliniques Méditeranéennes, 66: 31–53.

Clot, Y., Fernandez, G., and Carles, L. (2002b), Crossed self-confrontation in the ‘Clinic of Activity’. In proceedings of the 11th European congress of cognitive ergonomics (cognition, culture and design), 7–10 September, Catania, Italy.

Cohen, I. J. (1996) Theories of action and praxis. In B.S Turner (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 111–142.

Contu, A. and Willmott, H. (2000) Comment on Wenger and Yanow. Knowing in practice: a ‘Delicate Flower’ in the organizational learning field. Organization, 7(2): 269–276.

Cook, S. and Brown, J.S. (1999) Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4): 381–400.

Cook, S. and Yanow, D. (1993) Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4): 373–390.

Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., and Verzelloni, L. (2010) Through the practice lens: How the bandwagon of practice-based studies was set in motion and where it is heading. Management Learning, forthcoming.

Davidson, D. (1984) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., and Nicolini, D. (2000) Organizational learning debates: Past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6): 783–796.

Engeström, Y. (2000) From individual action to collective activity and back: developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, and C. Heath, (eds.), Workplace Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, S. (2006). Inquiries of every imaginable kind: Ethnomethodology, practical action and the new socially situated learning theory. The Sociological Review, 54(3), 426–445.

Fox, S. (2008) That miracle of familiar organizational things: Social and moral order in the MBA classroom. Organization Studies, 29(5): 733–761.

Fujimura, J. H. (1988) Molecular biological bandwagon in cancer research: Where social worlds meet. Social Problems, 35(3): 261–283.

Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Garfinkel, H. (ed.) (1986) Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Garfinkel, H. (1996) Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1): 5–21.

Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970) On formal structures of practical actions. In J. McKinney and E.A. Tiryakian (eds.) Theoretical Sociology, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 337–366.

Geiger, D. (2009) Revisiting the concept of practice: Toward an argumentative understanding of practising. Management Learning, 40(2): 129–144.

Gherardi, S. (2000) Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations: An introduction. Organization, 7(2): 211–223.

Gherardi, S. (2006) Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Blackwell: Oxford.

Gherardi, S. (2008) Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise? In D. Barry and H. Hansen (eds.), Sage Handbook of the New and Emerging in Management and Organization. London: Sage, 516–527.

Gherardi, S. (2009) Practice? It’s a matter of taste! Management Learning, 40(5): 535–550.

Gherardi, S. (2011) Ways of knowing: Gender as a politics of knowing? In E. Jeanes, D. Knights, and P.Y. Martin (eds.), Handbook of Gender, Work and Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2000) The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(1): 7–18.

Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2001) The sociological foundation of organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin-Antal, J. Child, and I. Nonaka (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 35–60.

Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2002) Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? Journal of Management Studies, 39(4): 419–436.

Gibson, J.G. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Giglioli, P.P. (1990) Rituale, Interazione, Vita Quotidiana. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Goodwin, C. (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3): 606–633.

Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. H. (1996) Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–95.

Grosjean, S. and Bonneville, L. (2009) Saisir le processus de remémoration organisationnelles des actants humain et non humain au cœur du processus. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 3(2): 317–347.

Heath, C. and Luff, P. (2007) Ordering competition: The interactional accomplishment of the sale of art and antiques at auction. British Journal of Sociology, 58: 63–85.

Hennion, A. (2007) Those things that hold us together: Taste and sociology. Cultural Sociology, 1(1): 97–114.

Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. (2007) Video-based studies of work practice. Sociology Compass, 1: 1–18.

Hotho, S. and Pollard, D. (2007) Management as negotiation at the interface: Moving beyond the critical-practice impasse. Organization, 14(4): 583–603.

Iedema, R. (2007) On the multi-modality, materiality and contingency of organizational discourse. Organization Studies, 28(6): 931–946.

Katz, A. and Shotter, J. (1996) Resonances from within the Practice: Social Poetics in a Mentorship Programme. Concepts and Transformations, 1(2/3): 239–247.

Kirsh, D. (1995) The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2), 31–68.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Labatut, J., Aggeri, F., Astruc, J.M., Bibé, B., and Girard, N., (2009) The active role of instruments in articulating knowing and knowledge: The case of animal qualification practices in breeding organizations. The Learning Organization, 16(5): 371–385.

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Law, J. (1994) Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Llewellyn, N. and Hindmarsh, J. (2010) Work and organisation in real time: An introduction. In N. Llewellyn, and J. Hindmarsh, (eds.) Organization, Interaction and Practice: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Llewellyn, N. and Spence, L. (2009) Practice as a members’ phenomenon. Organization Studies, 30(12): 1419–1439.

Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., and Yanow, D. (2009) Re-turn to practice: An introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12): 1309–1327.

Mondada, L. (2003) Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions. Visual Studies 18: 58–73.

Mouzelis, N. (1989) Restructuring structuration theory. The Sociological Review, 37(4): 613–634.

Nicolini, D. (2009) Articulating and writing practice through the interview to the double. Management Learning, 40(2):195–212.

Nyberg, D. (2009) Computers, customer service operatives and cyborgs: Intra-actions in call centers. Organization Studies, 30(11): 1181–1199.

Olsen, D.S. (2009) Emerging interdisciplinary practice: Making nanoreactors. The Learning Organization, 16(5): 398–408.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4): 404–428.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13: 249–273.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007) Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, 28(9): 1435–1448.

Orlikowski,W. and Iacono, C. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research – A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12: 121–134.

Orr, J. (1993) Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: War stories and community memory among service technicians. In D.S. Middleton and D. Edwards (eds.), Collective Remembering: Memory in Society. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 169–189.

Østerlund, C. and Carlile, P. (2005) Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. The Information Society, 21: 91–107.

Pickering, A. (1992) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rabardel, P. (1995) Les Hommes et les Technologies, Approche Cognitive des Instruments Contemporains. Paris: Armand Colin.

Raelin, J.A. (1997) A Model of Work-Based Learning. Organization Science, 8(6): 563–578.

Raelin, J.A. (2007). Toward an Epistemology of Practice. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(4): 495–519.

Rasche, A. and Chia, R. (2009) Researching strategy practices: A genealogical social theory perspective. Organization Studies, 30(7): 713–734.

Rawls, A. (2008) Harold Garfinkel, ethnomethodology and workplace studies. Organisation Studies, 29(5): 701–732.

Reckwitz, A. (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2): 243–263.

Rouse, J. (2001) Two concepts of practices, in T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina and E. von Savigny (eds.) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 189–198.

Sandberg, J. and Dall’Alba, G. (2009) Returning to practice anew: A life-world perspective. Organisation Studies, 30(12): 1349–1368.

Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E. (eds.), (2001) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London and New York: Routledge.

Schutz, A. (1946) The well-informed citizen: An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research 13(4): 463–478.

Schutz, A. (1962) Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Nijhoff.

Shotter, J. and Katz, A. (1996) Articulating A Practice From Within The Practice Itself: Establishing Formative Dialogues By The Use Of A ‘Social Poetics’. Concepts and Transformation, 1(2/3): 213–237.

Sole, D. and Edmondson, A. (2002) Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British Journal of Management, 13 S2: 17–34.

Star, S. L. (1995) Ecologies of Knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Strati, A. (2007). Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning, 38(1): 61–77.

Strauss, A.L. (1991) Creating Sociological Awareness. Collective Images and Symbolic Representations. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.

Styhre, A. (2009) Tinkering with material resources: Operating under ambiguous conditions in rock construction work. The Learning Organization, 16(5): 386–397.

Suchman, L. (2000) Organizing alignment: A case of bridge-building. Organization, 7(2): 311–328.

Sulkunen, P. (1982) Society made visible. On the cultural sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Acta Sociologica, 25(2): 103–115.

Svabo, C. (2009) Materiality in a practice-based approach. The Learning Organization, 16(5): 360–370.

Teil, G. (1998) Devenir expert aromaticien: Y a-t-il une place pour le goût dans le goûts alimentaires? Sociologie du Travail, 4: 503–522.

Tsoukas, H. (1998) Forms of knowledge and forms of life in organized contexts. In R. Chia (ed.), In the Realm of Organization. London: Routledge, 43–66.

Turner, S. (1994) The Social Theory of Practices. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Wacquant, L. (1992) The structure and logic of Bourdieu’s sociology. In P. Bourdieu and L. Wacquant (eds.) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Weick, K.E. (1991) The non-traditional quality of organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 116–123.

Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Whalen, J., Whalen, M., and Henderson, K. (2002) Improvisational choreography in teleservice work. British Journal of Sociology, 53: 239–258.

Whittington, R. (1996) Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5): 731–735.

Yanow, D. (2003) Seeing organizational learning: a ‘Cultural View.’ In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, and D. Yanow (eds.) (2003) Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-based Approach. Armonk. NY: ME Sharpe.

Yanow, D. (2004) Translating local knowledge at organizational peripheries. British Journal of Management, 15(1): 9–25.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset