154 3. THE DIMENSION OF A COMPONENT WITH REQUIRED RELIABILITY
Table 3.21: e iterative results for the limit state function (b)
Iterative #
E
*
F
*
L
*
h
*
d
*
|∆d
*
|
1 27,600 25.12 15.25 0.375 2.467504
2 27,299.99 32.63592 15.25001 0.374927 3.241643 0.774139
3 27,210.93 32.54067 15.25001 0.374907 3.242937 0.001295
4 27,210.81 32.54054 15.25001 0.374907 3.242937 4.2E-08
According to the result for the strength issue obtained from the program, the mean of the
height with a reliability 0.99 is
d
D 3:243
00
: (e)
e iterative results for the strength issue are listed in Table 3.22.
Table 3.22: e iterative results for the limit state function (d)
Iterative #
S
y
*
F
*
t
*
d
*
|∆d
*
|
1 34.5 25.12 0.375 1.941643
2 30.37683 31.41671 0.374939 2.758402 0.81676
3 29.41902 30.58276 0.374934 2.772642 0.014239
4 29.40566 30.56907 0.374936 2.772645 3.74E-06
According to the result for the strength issue obtained from the program, the mean of the
height of the plate with a reliability 0.99 is
d
D 2:773
00
: (f)
e heigh d of the plate with the required reliability 0.99 under the specified loading will be
the larger value of Equations (c) and (f). erefore, the heigh d of the plate with the required
reliability 0.99 under the specified loading and deformation requirement is
d D 3:243 ˙ 0:005
00
:
3.3.3 COMPONENT UNDER STATIC DIRECT SHEARING
e limit state function of a component and its reliability calculation under direct shearing for
strength issue have been discussed in detail in Section 4.7 of Volume 1 [1]. After the limit
state function of a component under static direct shearing loading is established, we can run