Chapter 3

Smart Inorganic and Organic Pretreatment Coatings for the Inhibition of Corrosion on Metals/Alloys

Peter Zarras; John D. Stenger-Smith    Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWCWD), Polymer Science and Engineering Branch (Code 4L4200D), 1900N. Knox Road (Stop 6303), China Lake, CA, USA

Abstract

This chapter provides a comprehensive review of both inorganic and organic pretreatment coatings for metals and alloys. Aqueous and nonaqueous corrosion are introduced as well the economic costs associated with corrosion for several industrialized countries. Smart coating strategies currently employed to mitigate corrosion damage are shown as well as future materials and film development. Conversion coatings including chromate and phosphate conversion coatings are discussed as early examples of “smart coatings” for the inhibition of corrosion; and the latest use of lanthanide-based conversion coatings is discussed. The chapter also discusses the corrosion-inhibiting abilities of sol-gel and conductive polymer smart coatings. An examination of new methods to inhibit corrosion highlights self-assembling (SA) molecules, polyelectrolyte (PE) multilayers, the incorporation of “nanocontainers” in a coating formulation, and protective biofilms. These new innovative coatings can provide efficient barrier protection and/or controlled release of corrosion inhibitors, reducing the effects of corrosion via a self-healing mechanism.

Keywords

Corrosion

Inorganic

Organic

Smart coatings

Conversion coatings

Self-­assembling

Polyelectrolyte multilayers

Nanocontainers

Protective biofilms

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Office of the Director, Defense Research and Engineering.

3.1 Introduction

Metals and alloys play a significant role in today’s modern world. Metals and alloys have always had a role in past civilizations, but today’s complex world requires a variety of coated metals/alloys having multifunctional properties (smart properties). In order for metals and their alloys to effectively survive in many harsh operating conditions, coatings must be used to provide not only surface protection but also a decorative finish. In fact most everyday products are made usable and saleable by having a suitable coating via a surface treatment. Treatments of metals/alloys can impart surface protection of the material, which renders the product/material useful, inhibiting corrosion while retaining economic value. All of these factors have lasting economic impact that contributes to the health and economic well-being of today’s modern societies.

3.1.1 Corrosion—definition

Corrosion is normally defined as the “attack on a metallic material by reaction with its environment.”1 Usually one refers to metals when describing corrosion, but nonmetals such as ceramics, plastics, rubber, and so on, can also undergo destruction or deterioration when exposed to various environments. For purposes of this review we will restrict our examination to aqueous/wet environments and methods used to mitigate their corrosive effects.

As a general review we will introduce the several types of corrosion for metals/alloys and their various forms. Corrosion can be divided into three main groups:

 Wet corrosion

 Corrosion in other fluids

 Dry corrosion

“Wet corrosion” refers to metal corrosion occurring in a wet/aqueous environment.2 The process is almost always electrochemical, and it occurs when two or more electrochemical reactions take place on a metal surface. When a metal is exposed to a corrosive wet/aqueous environment, the metallic nature of the metal is fundamentally changed into a nonmetallic form becoming dissolved species or solid corrosion products. The energy of the system is lowered as the metal converts to a more stable form, in this case nonmetallic corrosion products. This electrochemical process can occur uniformly or nonuniformly across the metal surface, which is called the “electrode” and the ionically conducting liquid is called the “electrolyte.” A classic example of this process is the rusting of a steel substrate: the iron metal is converted into a nonmetallic form called “rust.”

“Corrosion in other fluids” refers to the corrosion of metals/alloys in nonaqueous environments, such as fused salts sometimes referred to as molten salts.3 In addition corrosion can also occur in liquid metals.4 Corrosion in fused salts such as nitrates, halides, carbonates, sulfates, hydroxides, and oxides can cause profound attack on metal alloys via several mechanisms: (1) pitting because of electrochemical attack, (2) mass transport due to thermal gradients, (3) reaction of the constituents of the fused salt with the metal alloy, and/or (4) reactions with impurities present in the fused salt. In addition to fused salts, exposure of metal alloys to liquid-metal environments can cause severe corrosion. Liquid metals are used in industrial applications such as high temperature reducing agents or as coolants due to their excellent heat transfer properties. Corrosion as a result of exposure to liquid-metals can be caused by dissolution, impurity or interstitial reactions, alloying, and compound reduction.

“Dry corrosion” refers to corrosion affecting metals/alloys that are exposed to air or other aggressive gases.5 For a relatively small number of metals, exposure to gases does not result in corrosion; however, for most metals, exposure to very high temperature gases increases the corrosion rate resulting in corrosion failure. The figure below shows the elements necessary for corrosion under different environments (Figure 3.1).

f03-01-9780124114678
Figure 3.1 Corrosion under different environments.

The three main types of corrosion have been identified and described in detail; we can now turn our attention to the most common forms of corrosion, which are found in wet or aqueous environments. There are eight forms of corrosion, which can be identified based on the appearance of the corroded metal or alloy. These corrosion types are listed below:

 Uniform or general corrosion

 Pitting corrosion

 Crevice corrosion (includes corrosion under tubercles or deposits and filiform and poultice corrosion)

 Galvanic corrosion

 Erosion-corrosion (cavitation and fretting corrosion)

 Intergranular corrosion (sensitization and exfoliation)

 Dealloying corrosion (dezincification and graphite corrosion)

 Environmentally assisted cracking corrosion (stress-corrosion cracking, corrosion fatigue, and hydrogen damage)

The above listed forms of corrosion do not take place independently; there is normally overlap and concurrent forms of corrosion occurring at any time during the corrosion process. Corrosion can also occur at the macroscopic level, which is visible to the naked eye and microscopic level where corrosion occurs in minute amounts and is not visible to the naked eye. In the latter case to examine these effects requires higher magnification before the damage is so severe that it is visible to the naked eye (Figure 3.2). Structural integrity is often compromised after the effects of corrosion become visible to the naked eye.

f03-02-9780124114678
Figure 3.2 Flow diagram representing macroscopic and microscopic forms of corrosion.

3.1.2 Costs of metallic corrosion/prevention

Metallic corrosion affects almost every U.S. industrial sector ranging from infrastructure to manufacturing.6 Aging infrastructure is currently the most important sector affected by corrosion. Recently state and federal agencies have made it a priority to extend their useful lifetimes.7 Additional sectors (including infrastructure) in today’s modern society affected by corrosion are:

 Infrastructure—highway bridges, gas/liquid transmission pipelines, waterways/ports, airports, railroads

 Utilities—gas distribution, drinking water/sewer systems, electrical utilities, telecommunication

 Transportation—motor vehicles, ships, aircraft, railroad cars, hazardous materials transport

 Production/Manufacturing—oil/gas exploration/production, mining, petroleum refining, chemical/petrochemical/pharmaceutical production, pulp/paper, agricultural production, food processing, electronics, home appliances

 Government—defense, nuclear waste storage

The cost for corrosion repair, maintenance, and replacement affects all facets of the United States and the industrialized world’s infrastructure. These costs are not only limited to severe damage compromising public safety, but also environmental damage. Corrosion can disrupt operations requiring extensive repair and replacement of failed assets. Direct corrosion costs in the United States have been estimated at ~$300 billion U.S. dollars annually, accounting for nearly 3.1% of gross domestic product (GDP).8 Extrapolating to the industrialized world, corrosion costs account for nearly $2.2 trillion U.S. dollars, which represents over 3% of the world’s GDP.

3.1.3 Corrosion costs to national economies

As was detailed above in Section 3.1.2, corrosion costs are estimated at ~$300 billion U.S. dollars annually for the United States. This often cited number produced by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Corrosion study of 1998 has been reviewed and updated.7 G2MT Laboratories have updated this estimate by including both the direct and indirect costs of corrosion and have estimated that all corrosion costs to the U.S. economy are over $1 trillion U.S. dollars for 2013.9 Additional studies have been conducted throughout the industrialized world. Similar percentage costs to GDP (2-5%) have been found across various economies.10 Table 3.1 lists several national economies and their associated corrosion costs.

Table 3.1

Cost of Corrosion for Several National Economies

CountryDirect Costs of Corrosion ($US Dollars)Percent (%) of GNP
United Kingdom11$3.2 Billion dollars (1969 US Dollars)~ 3.5%
Australia12$0.5 Billion dollars (1973 US Dollars)~ 3%
Japan13$9.2 Billion Dollars (1974 US Dollars)~ 1.8%

In order to reduce the costs of corrosion affecting various national economies, effective corrosion strategies need to be employed. These existing corrosion-inhibiting technologies include: (1) proper design; (2) proper selection of materials (alloys, metals, plastics, and so on); (3) cathodic protection; and (4) coatings, inhibitors, and surface treatment. The focus of this review is to provide the reader with an overview of “smart pretreatment coatings,” a necessary first step in the prevention and control of corrosion for metals/alloys.

3.2 Designing Smart Coatings for Corrosion Protection

Over the past several decades, coatings have undergone a transformation from simple barrier/decorative coatings to more specialized responsive coatings. These types of coatings that can react or respond to external stimuli are called “smart coatings.”14 Smart coatings have evolved over time from:

 modified coatings with specialized additives, to

 coatings that contain inert ingredients to impart unique properties normally not found in conventional coatings, and finally to

 coatings that can sense and respond to their environment in a consistent and predictable manner.15

Nature is the best example of stimuli responsiveness in which living cells have evolved with the ability to respond to continuous and/or intermittent forms of external stimuli. Cells have the ability through reorganization, rebuilding, signaling, and/or reshaping to survive permanent or temporary changes in their environment. This feat is accomplished by the cell membrane as the result of its hierarchically organized multifunctional molecular system.16 Current research efforts in the coating industry, academia, and government laboratories are trying to develop and adapt the unique features of nature into innovative “smart coatings” for the twenty-first century. These innovative “smart coatings” can have profound effects on everyday living to the most complex of industrial settings.17

3.3 Pretreatment Coatings

Pretreatment coatings such as conversion coatings are applied to various metal/alloy surfaces as a first defense against corrosion, but also as an adhesion promoting coating for primers and topcoats.18 Typically, primers and topcoats do not adhere very well to metal/alloy surfaces without a pretreatment coating. Therefore the following sections will deal exclusively with the pretreatment coating and its ability to act as a “smart coating.”

3.3.1 Selecting the proper metal alloy

Prior to depositing the pretreatment coating, the proper metal alloy must be selected. Different metal alloys are known to have various susceptibilities to corrosion depending on their composition. In order to mitigate these effects, different levels of corrosion protection are needed. The selection criteria are based on the most optimal material required, but this is never a straightforward process. There is the balance of adequate performance versus cost-effectiveness. The selection process is dependent on the type of industry and the corrosive environment that the metal/alloy will be exposed to. Figure 3.3 provides a flow diagram to follow for material selection criteria with the caveat that costs often outweigh the purchase of highly corrosion-resistant metal/alloys in most cases.19

f03-03-9780124114678
Figure 3.3 Flow diagram for materials selection.

3.3.2 Surface modification

Before we can discuss various “smart pretreatment coatings” on metals/alloys, we must first examine the methods to clean a surface. Before a coating is applied, the surface must be rendered suitable for the pretreatment coating (e.g., conversion coating). This process involves several steps: (1) assessment of surface condition; (2) inspecting for fabrication defects (3) pre-cleaning; and (4) final surface inspection.20

The assessment of the surface condition requires inspection of the entire surface to determine the level of contaminants present. These contaminants can be smut, grease, oil, dirt, rust, corrosion products, salt deposits, and die-release compounds. The presence of these contaminants can dramatically alter the adhesion properties of applied pretreatment coats and subsequent primers and topcoats.

Prior to surface cleaning, any design and/or fabrication defect in the part or substrate to be coated must be removed or repaired. These defects can include excessive pitting, dents, or defects in the metal/alloy component. There are several methods available to remove contaminants from the surface of metals/alloys, which include (1) solvent cleaning, (2) etching cleaners (alkaline and acid etch), (3) desmut or deoxidation, (4) physical cleaning (blasting, abrasion, and/or polishing), (5) acid pickling, and (6) rinsing.18 Solvent cleaning removes the bulk of smut, grease, oil, dirt, rust, corrosion products, salt deposits, and die-release compounds, but usually requires an additional step such as acid or alkaline etch to remove reactive species. Further cleaning via physical methods is required for the harder steel surfaces where thick or scaly residues are present. This process is not normally used for softer aluminum surfaces. After multiple cleaning processes are complete, a desmut, deoxidation, or pickling step is sometimes used on the metal/alloy to remove any contaminating species rendering an acceptable surface. This provides a surface without weak boundary layers or damage in a reasonable time and cost. A rinsing step is often employed in industrial settings to remove excess reagent(s) and/or solvent(s) from various bath steps and to prevent cross-contamination of the baths. Now that we have reviewed corrosion, metal alloy selection, and cleaning procedures, our next step is to focus on the core of this chapter, which are the various pretreatment coatings commercially available and under development that can act as “smart coatings” as the first line of defense for corrosion inhibition.

3.4 Nonmetallic-Inorganic Pretreatment Coatings

Nonmetallic-inorganic coatings consist of ceramic coating materials, conversion, and anodized coatings. Ceramic coatings such as chemical setting silicate cement lining and porcelain enamels are used for corrosion inhibition. Conversion coats are coatings that convert the natural oxide coating present on a metal surface into a different metal oxide or metal salt. Anodization refers to the oxidation of a metal surface either chemically or electrochemically to generate a thick, dense, passive oxide layer on the metal surface.21,22 We shall briefly expand on the anodization process for metals because of its importance to conversion coatings. Anodizing has been known since the 1930s, but did not gain widespread and commercial success until the 1970s.23 There are several metals that can be protected via anodic protection: steels, stainless steels, nickel, nickel alloys, chromium, and aluminum. The “hard anodization” process refers to electrochemically driven surface treatment,24 and the “standard” process refers to solutions of chromic, sulfuric, or phosphoric acids.2527 In response to current environmental and health warnings about chromium, specifically hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]28 nonchromium alternatives have been investigated and commercialized for the anodization of metals. These alternatives comprise lead-tin, cobalt, zirconium, titanium, and silicate processes.2932 Anodization converts the existing metal surface to its oxide form or increases the oxide layer thickness, resulting in the formation of a thicker coating. The anodization process provides improved corrosion resistance and paint adhesion, permits subsequent plating, and provides a lustrous decorative appearance to most surfaces. Its facile method, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness have resulted in its industrywide adaption.

3.4.1 Conversion coatings

Conversion coatings include chromate conversion coatings (CCCs), phosphate conversion coating, and lanthanide-based conversion coating and are deposited onto various metal/alloy substrates such as steel, zinc, aluminum, magnesium, copper, tin, silver, and nickel. Chemical conversion coatings processes are classified by their primary constituent. For example CCCs are mainly composed of chromates, whereas phosphate conversion coatings have as their main component phosphates.33 The metal/alloy surface is converted into coatings via a chemical or electrochemical process. These types of coatings are used for corrosion protection, increased surface hardness, and added decorative finish and/or as paint primers. Conversion coatings can be very thin 0.00001″ (0.254 μm) or thick coatings 0.002″ (50.8 μm) and can be grown either anodically or by repeated exposure in conversion baths.

Conversion coatings are adherent, insoluble, inorganic crystalline, or amorphous surface coatings that are an integral part of the metal/metal oxide surface. In such films a portion of the base metal is converted into a metal oxide that is less reactive to corrosion than the original metal and improves adhesion for primers. Conversion coatings have gained widespread industrial use due to their strong adhesion properties, high speed of coating formation, and very favorable economics, while providing reproducible and consistent coatings for large-scale industrial use.34

3.4.1.1 Chromate conversion coatings

CCCs are normally formed by either chemical or electrochemical treatment of metals/alloys in a solution containing hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] with other components.19,35 This process produces an amorphous protective coating that can be applied to various metals (e.g., steel or aluminum) via immersion or spraying. CCCs are applied to enhance bare or painted corrosion resistance, improve the adhesion of paint or primer coatings, and provide the metallic surface with an appealing decorative finish. The main components of the solutions used for forming CCC films are trivalent chromium [Cr(III)], Cr(VI), the base metal, various oxides, water, and several additional components such as phosphates, sulfates, and fluorides. CCCs provide excellent bare or painted corrosion protection to the metal. The level of protection afforded by CCCs depends on several factors: (1) type of substrate metal, (2) type of chromate coating used, and (3) chromium coating weight. The mechanism by which Cr(VI) provides corrosion protection has been investigated by numerous researchers over the past several decades. Over the past decade, a general consensus on the mechanism by which CCCs inhibit corrosion has been proposed by several researchers.3641 Their research supports the idea that soluble Cr(VI) in CCCs is released to the defect areas in a coating, providing a “self-healing” mechanism that thereby inhibits further corrosion. The soluble Cr(VI) present in CCCs and to a lesser degree in chromated primers acts as a reservoir capable of migrating to defects and inhibiting corrosion. The mechanism of CCCs consists of both a cathodic, inhibiting, insoluble Cr(III) oxide and an anodic, inhibiting, soluble, transportable Cr(VI) species acting in concert with each other. Cr(III) acts as the insoluble, durable, inert coating, and when damage occurs a pH-controlled transport mechanism is enabled releasing soluble Cr(VI) species. The release of the active Cr(VI) inhibitor species in CCC involves the reversible formation of a Cr(VI)-O-Cr(III) mixed oxide. This system is one of the earliest examples of “smart coatings” for corrosion control on various metal alloys.

CCCs have shown over these many decades outstanding corrosion inhibition, and their replacements have not performed as well. However, CCCs and chromate primers are all under increased scrutiny and regulatory oversight by both the U.S and international regulatory agencies. The Cr(VI) compound is a known carcinogenic and toxic material to both humans and the environment.4246 Chronic inhalation of Cr(VI) compounds increases the risk for lung cancer, soluble species can cause or exacerbate contact dermatitis, and ingestion can cause irritation and ulcers of the stomach and/or intestine. Cr(VI) is transported into cells via the “sulfate transport” mechanism. As a result of its toxicity, new Cr(VI) OSHA regulations as defined in the February 28, 2006 Federal Register, now covers occupational exposure to Cr(VI) for workers during an 8-h TWA period of no more than 5 μg/m3.47 As of January 24, 2013, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) had posted a document entitled “Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium.” NIOSH reviewed the critical health effect studies of Cr(VI) and updated its assessment of the potential health effects of occupational exposure to Cr(VI) compounds. The recommendation for the new PEL is 0.20 μg/m3 for a workplace environment.48 This recommendation by NIOSH was advisory only; NIOSH cannot issue a regulatory directive. The European Union (EU) Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulations (EC 1907/2006) were adopted in December 2006 and came into force in June 2007. REACH was introduced because many thousands of chemicals are used in the EU, some in very large quantities and with increased risks to human health and to the environment. Cr(VI) is one of the many substances that is highly regulated by the EU and is currently a substance of very high concern (SVHC). As a result of Cr(VI) toxicity and persistence in the environment, alternative nonmetallic pretreatment coatings have been developed and tested. We shall now review several of these coatings and compare them to CCCs.

3.4.1.2 Phosphate conversion coatings

The phosphating process has been known for over a century, and the bath process consists of dilute phosphoric acid based solutions.49,19,50 The formation of the phosphate coating requires the precipitation of a divalent metal and phosphate ions onto a metal surface. This treatment provides for a reasonably hard, electronically nonconducting surface coating composed of insoluble phosphate. The insoluble phosphate is contiguous and highly adherent to the underlying metal. The phosphate conversion coating is formed as a result of chemical reactions that transform the surface of the underlying base metal into a corrosion-resistant film. There are three types of phosphate conversion coatings:

 iron phosphates—lightweight, amorphous phosphate coatings that do not contain significant amounts of divalent metal ions

 zinc phosphates—medium-weight, crystalline phosphate coatings that contain divalent metal ions from solution and/or the metal surface

 heavy phosphates—coatings that contain divalent metal ions from solution and from the metal surface

Phosphate conversion coats are applied either via spraying or immersion for bare corrosion protection and/or painted corrosion protection on ferrous and nonferrous metals/alloys. Phosphate conversion coatings can provide effective barrier protection to metal/alloys provided the coating is applied properly. Thicker phosphate conversion coatings can provide better corrosion protection when combined with an overcoat of paint.

3.4.1.3 Lanthanide-based conversion coatings

Nonhexavalent chromium pretreatment coatings have been investigated for the past several decades. The rare earth (lanthanide) elements have received considerable attention due to their unique properties.18,51,52 The rare earth elements such as cerium (Ce), yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), neodymium (Nd), samarium (Sm), and praesodymium (Pr) have been investigated for their corrosion-inhibiting properties. The unique properties of the rare earth elements are:

 large atomic radii

 diverse allowable electronic configurations

 formation of multiple oxidation states such as + 3 and + 4 and occasionally + 2

 reactivity with water to form neutral oxides

 formation of stable insoluble mixed oxides

 complex coordination chemistry

 low reduction potential

 instability of lower valence states in alkaline conditions

 precipitates that contribute to the stability and protection of films

 relatively inexpensive

 low toxicity

 low environmental impact18,5355

The pioneering work of Hinton and Wilson used rare earth conversion coatings as alternatives to toxic CCCs.5659 Their work focused on cerium salt conversion coats for corrosion inhibition of zinc and aluminum metal/alloys. A cathodic mechanism was proposed by these two researchers to explain the formation of the rare earth oxide coating. The mechanism was based on cathodic reactions generating an alkaline environment, which led to localized precipitation of the rare earth oxides. The precipitated oxides enabled surface protection for the underlying metal alloy, thereby inhibiting corrosion. Further studies by Montemor et al. showed that the mechanism of rare earth oxide formation was a two-stage process, in which Ce-based conversion coatings undergo oxidation from Ce (III) to Ce(IV) state.6063

Cerium-based conversion coatings can be prepared via two routes: (1) deposition of conversion coating onto a metal/alloy substrate is achieved by immersion for several days in simple cerium salt solution at or near neutral pH, or (2) H2O2-assisted solution of acidified cerium salt solutions, which results in deposition of cerium-based conversion coating in ≤ 10 min.6467 Ce-based conversion coating have been studied for their corrosion-inhibiting properties on various metals with mixed results for corrosion protection.18,6871 Several studies have shown limited to moderate corrosion protection while other studies have shown evidence of poor adhesion limiting its corrosion-inhibiting properties.72,73

As was described in Section 3.4.1.1, CCCs inhibit corrosion by dissociation of chromium ions into solution especially in a chloride environment. This dissolution of soluble species can migrate to exposed metal, resulting in the inhibition of corrosion via a “smart release” of chromated species. Similar investigations into the precipitation and dissolution of cerium-based conversion coatings have been investigated by several groups as nonchromium alternatives possessing the same “smart release” mechanism as found for CCCs.18,74 These initial studies have shown evidence that the lanthanide ions form insoluble hydroxides, which can then provide corrosion protection in the form of cathodic inhibitors. The work based on Scully et al. showed evidence that coatings composed of Al, Co, and Ce did provide self-healing capabilities via a release of Ce ions at pH of 2.75 Additional work by Heller et al. demonstrated corrosion protection via the formation of an interfacial active layer between the aluminum substrate and the cerium conversion coating posttreated with 2.5 wt.% NaH2PO4 solutions after salt spray exposure.7678 However, the as-deposited cerium conversion coatings did not show any interfacial active layers after exposure to salt spray. Further work by Joshi et al. provided additional evidence for the dissolution of Ce species at pH 2, although at pH ≥ 3 no dissolution of Ce species was detected, and these results showed that the as-deposited coatings were composed of insoluble species that hindered the dissolution and migration of Ce species.79 The mechanism proposed to account for these results was not determined, but rather dissolution and migration of Ce species were ruled out as possible scenarios. Additional studies using rare earth elements other than Ce such as La, Sm, and Y have been investigated by several research groups.8082 Their results showed that like Ce species these compounds are capable of inhibiting corrosion via a conversion film formation.

3.4.1.4 Miscellaneous-based conversion coatings

Additional pretreatment coatings that are non-Cr(VI) have been investigated for several decades now, which include the following systems: pretreatments acting as passivating agents based on molybdates (Mo), permanganates (Mn), vanadates (V), and tungstate (W)83,84; fluotitante and fluozirconate conversion coatings85,86 and trivalent Cr(III) conversion pretreatment (TCP) coatings.87,88

Phosphate-permanganate and acidic—(HNO3 or HF)—potassium-permanganate conversion coatings have been studied by several groups.8991 Their results in NaCl solutions showed similar corrosion protection to CCC, however, if Mn is reduced to the divalent oxidation state resulting in the formation of the more soluble Mn(II) oxide species, its corrosion-inhibiting properties are reduced.92

The molybdates have been the most studied metal oxyanion compounds to date and their corrosion-inhibiting properties are due to the formation of Mo films that are passivating at anodic sites on a metal surface.93 Vanadates, molybdates, and tungstates can inhibit corrosion on aluminum when used with other compounds such as chromic species,94 sulfuric acid,95,96 and tetraborate solutions.97 These combinations showed improved corrosion resistance containing the chromate acid species. The chromate anions had exhibited a passivating effect on the aluminum alloy forming stable Al2O3 films with further formation of molybdate layers preventing attack of Cl ions. The tetraborate solutions showed improved corrosion resistance with thicker anodic films contaminated with higher concentration of molybdate ions.97

Conversion coatings based on the group IVB metals, such as titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), and hafnium (Hf), have been investigated.87,98100 Group IV metal coatings require shorter immersion times (≤ 10 min) and are a potentially green alternative to CCCs.101

In addition, trivalent chromium pretreatment (TCP) coatings have also been investigated and commercialized as a nontoxic, environmentally green alternative to CCCs.102105 TCP coatings are formed by solution immersion in a treatment bath composed of hexafluorozirconates, trivalent chromium oxides, chromium sulfate, and fluorborate salts. The solution is maintained in acidic medium (pH = 3.8-4.0) using either hydrofluoric (HF) or sulfuric acids (H2SO4). The color and thickness of the TCP coating can be modified depending on the solution composition, temperature, pH, and immersion time.106 TCP has been shown to inhibit corrosion on various metals/alloys and has been accepted by the U.S. military as an environmentally friendly, nontoxic alternative to CCCs. Recent work by Swain et al. has investigated the mechanism(s) by which TCP can inhibit corrosion on aerospace aluminum, specifically AA2024-T3.107 Their work using Raman spectroscopy suggests that mobile CrO4− 2 species are present in the TCP film and can diffuse to corroding sites inhibiting corrosion via a passivation mechanism.

3.5 Organic Pretreatment Coatings

We have discussed in detail the various “smart” inorganic pretreatment coatings that are available commercially and that are under investigation. We shall now turn our attention to organic-based “smart coatings.” There are various types of organic “smart coatings” that have been commercialized and are under development such as sol-gel and hybrid sol-gel coatings,108 conductive polymers (CPs),109 self-assembled films,110 polyelectrolyte multilayers,111 controlled release coatings,112 and biofilms,113 which all will be presented in the following sections.

3.5.1 Hybrid sol-gel coatings

Over the past two decades sol-gel-based thin films have been investigated by several groups for corrosion inhibition of metal alloys. This research has been spurred by the need for environmentally friendly and nontoxic alternatives to CCCs.28,4648,114116 Significant efforts have been employed to develop sol-gel coatings that can act as adhesion promoters between metal alloys and organic primers/topcoats as well as provide corrosion protection.117

There are two methods available to prepare sol-gel coatings via either a hydrolytic method in aqueous media or a nonhydrolytic process in organic media. Either method can produce various sol-gel coatings with different properties. These properties can be controlled via adjusting the composition of the reactive species, organic functionalization, temperature, time, and pH, affecting their potential applications for corrosion protection.118 Sol-gel based pretreatment coatings have been studied on various metals/alloys, such as copper,119,120 aluminum,121 magnesium,122 and carbon steel.123 These studies have shown that sol-gel pretreatment coatings exhibit corrosion- inhibiting properties.

The sol-gel process is based on the hydrolysis and condensation reactions of metal alkoxides [M(OR)n] where M = Si, Ti, Zr, or Al; and R = alkyl group (methyl, ethyl, butyl, and so on) (Figure 3.4).115,124 The sol-gel process involves two distinct and separate methods for the preparation of the “particles or films,” which consists of either an inorganic or organic approach, and the latter is the preferred method. The sol-gel process involves the initial formation of a colloidal suspension or solution referred to as the “sol,” which is followed by the formation of the integrated network referred to as the “gel” to give either discrete particles or network polymers.

f03-04-9780124114678
Figure 3.4 Hydrolysis and condensation reactions for producing sol-gel films.

The sol-gel process typically occurs in four stages:

 hydrolysis

 condensation and polymerization of monomers to form chains or particles

 growth of the particles or chains

 finally, agglomeration of the networks, thickening and formation of the gel115,118,124

Inorganic sol-gel pretreatment coatings have been investigated for their corrosion-inhibiting properties, but have suffered from cracking for thick coatings ≥ 200 nm. Cracking of the sol-gel film is formed during the heating stage when shrinkage of the gel occurs during solvent evaporation.125 In order for crack-free sol-gel films to be formed, the thickness of the pretreatment film must be ≤ 100 nm, but their barrier properties are compromised due to presence of micropores in the film. Films produced by the sol-gel method show excellent adhesion between the alloy/metal substrate and primer/paint system.126

In order to produce crack-free films, researchers have developed hybrid sol-gel-derived coatings that combine the unique properties of both the inorganics/ceramics with organic polymeric materials.127 The inorganic/ceramic coatings provide scratch resistance, durability, and improved adhesion between the metal/alloy substrate and organic primer/paint system, whereas the organic components increase flexibility and functional compatibility with the organic primer/paint system.128,129 There are two classes of organically functionalized sol-gel coatings: (1) nonfunctional organoalkoxysilane and (2) organo-functional alkoxysilanes. Nonfunctional organoalkoxysilane sol-gel coatings are prepared using methyl groups as the organic part for the preparation of the hybrid coatings,130 whereas, organo-functional alkoxysilanes incorporate such functionalities as epoxy,131,132 methacrylic,133,134 acrylics,135 amino,136,137 allyl,138 pyridine,139,140 or vinyl/phenyl moieties 138,141,142 as the precursor groups for sol-gel formation. These additional functional groups are also available for further polymerization producing sol-gel films with high crosslink densities, improved mechanical properties, and tailored compatibility of the sol-gel pretreatment coating to the organic primer/paint system. Corrosion resistance using sol-gel films has been dependent on obtaining crack-free films. The hybrid sol-gel films offers several advantages, but still has limitations associated with reduced wear resistance and lower mechanical properties. Incorporation of nanoparticles into a sol-gel network can improve their mechanical properties while providing for corrosion resistance of metals/alloys.143146 Further improvements in hybrid sol-gel networks’ corrosion-inhibiting properties have focused on introducing corrosion inhibitors with various degrees of success. Incorporation of inorganic inhibitors that are non-Cr(VI) such as phosphates,147 V,148 Ce,147,149153 and Mo154,155 compounds as well as organic corrosion inhibitors such as phenylphosphonic acid,156 mecaptobenzothiazole,149,157 benzotriazole,158 and 8-hydroxyquinoline159 have been investigated for their corrosion-inhibiting properties.

3.5.2 Conductive polymer coatings

Over the past three decades, evidence that CPs such as polyaniline (PANI) and polypyrrole (PPy) could inhibit corrosion has come from the pioneering work of Mengoli,160 DeBerry,161 and MacDiarmid.162,163 Mengoli showed that electrochemically deposited CP coatings on iron (Fe) anodes resulted in an adherent and corrosion-inhibiting film.160 Further proof was obtained by DeBerry in 1985161 who showed that PANI electrochemically deposited onto stainless steel showed a change in its corrosion behavior in a sulfuric acid solution, which provided concrete evidence that the PANI films provided anodic protection, thus maintaining a native passive film on the steel metal. There are numerous studies using CPs deposited onto metals/alloys under a variety of conditions such as electropolymerization, solvent-casting, water-dispersive formulations, spray, and dip-coating. These CPs are new “smart coatings” for corrosion protection of ferrous and nonferrous alloys. CPs can function by an anodic protection mechanism for ferrous alloys and therefore can potentially replace such corrosion-inhibiting compounds as Cr(VI) and cadmium (Cd), which are known carcinogenic and environmentally hazardous materials.4248,164166

The corrosion mechanism for ferrous alloys as mentioned in the preceding paragraph is via anodic protection for steel alloys, passivation for stainless steels,167169 and released dopant ions for mild steels.170,171 The corrosion protection mechanism for aluminum alloys is still under intense investigation. There are several proposed mechanism(s) by which CPs can potentially inhibit corrosion of aluminum alloys in corrosive aqueous environments.172 These proposed mechanism(s) are as follows: (1) ennobling of the aluminum alloy,173 (2) anodic protection/passivation,174 (3) galvanic and ion-exchange release of oxygen reduction inhibitors,175 and (4) barrier protection by the reduced form of the CP following an initial galvanic coupling.176

Most of the investigations into the corrosion-inhibiting properties of CPs have contained either a nonconductive primer and/or topcoat for enhanced corrosion protection.177 Additional work has focused on the corrosion mechanism of CPs via electrochemical and spectroscopic techniques that was also described in the preceding paragraph. There are fewer reports in the literature that focus exclusively on the corrosion-inhibiting properties of CPs as thin films with direct comparisons to the corrosion-inhibiting properties and performance of CCCs. Several recent reports highlight the corrosion-inhibiting properties of PANI, PPy, and PEDOT thin films (< 1.0-2.5 μm) deposited on steel alloys with and without topcoats.178181

Researchers at the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, CA synthesized,182184 coated, and evaluated a CPs performance both in laboratory103,185,186 and field testing environments,187 which was directly compared to CCC. This compound, poly(2,5-bis(N-methyl-N-hexylamino)phenylene vinylene) (BAM-PPV), (Figure 3.5) was shown to have promise as a viable nontoxic, environmentally friendly alternative to CCCs as reported by Zarras et al.182188 The neutral salt fog laboratory results showed that BAM-PPV coated on aluminum alloy could meet the military requirement as a replacement for CCCs. Electrochemical noise method analysis of BAM-PPV coatings showed evidence of a surface passivation mechanism similar to other CPs.186

f03-05-9780124114678
Figure 3.5 Polymerization conditions to obtain BAM-PPV.

However, when BAM-PPV was coated on aluminum alloy with a non-Cr(VI) primer and topcoat, the neutral salt fog survivability did not match a fully Cr(VI) military coating system [CCC + Cr(VI) epoxy primer + polyurethane topcoat]. A 1-year Air Force field test of BAM-PPV incorporated into a full military coating [BAM-PPV + non-Cr(VI) epoxy primer + polyurethane topcoat] on the C-5 cargo plane’s rear hatch door showed equal performance to the fully Cr(VI) military coating.187 There are several recent reviews available to the reader to get a more comprehensive understanding of CP coatings and their ability to act as “smart coatings” in a variety of corrosive environments.109,189191

3.5.3 Self-assembling pretreatment coatings

Self-assembling (SA) molecules are compounds that provide surface protection for the underlying metal or alloy from corrosive environments via the formation of thin films. These SA films can be very thin (~ 100 Ǻ) and produce flexible, densely packed, stable films capable of blocking electron transfer or inhibiting the transport of corrosive species to the underlying metal or alloy.192

SA films are generated when molecules with specific chemical groups are deposited onto a surface have strong affinities for the surface and undergo ordering due to chemical interactions between substrate and SA molecules. In addition to the chemical or physical affinities necessary to form strong interactions on the substrate surface, the type and strength of the intermolecular interactions between the SA molecules that hold the assembly together are equally as important.193 The SA molecules that are deposited onto substrates (metal or alloy surfaces) are either physically or chemically adsorbed. A significant portion of the research investigating SA films have focused primarily on the self-assembly of n-alkanethiolates and related structures on gold substrates. These well-ordered SA films are easily formed under ambient conditions due to the chemical inertness of the gold substrate and the affinity of thiol compounds to chemisorb onto gold.194

SA molecules have also been studied for their corrosion-inhibiting properties on various alloys. These SA molecules are specific for certain metals such as alkanethiols for gold,192195 silver,196 and copper197; alcohols; amines for platinum198; and phosphonate compounds for aluminum.199 The fabrication of SA films onto either a metal or alloy consists of finding suitable functional groups sandwiched between an aliphatic spacer unit capable of adhering onto the surface of the metal or alloy. The opposite functional group can then react further with the primer layer to form a more robust and durable film (Figure 3.6).

f03-06-9780124114678
Figure 3.6 Schematic representation of a SA film with primer and topcoat.

SA films can provide effective barriers against the diffusion of oxygen,200 and/or water.201 Cross-linking reactions can further enhance the durability and corrosion- inhibiting properties of the SA film.202 There are several studies of SA films for corrosion inhibition of copper metal using sodium 1-octadecyl-1H-benzimidazole,203 diethydithiocarbamate,204 which provided cathodic inhibitor protection, and hexane-1,6-diamine and 2-mercapto-ethanol, which provided evidence for enhanced corrosion inhibition on copper metals.205 Corrosion inhibition of aluminum metal using octadecylphosphonic acid monolayers was investigated by Grundmeier et al.206 The 1-tetradecylphosphonic acid SA films deposited on Al 2024 and 1060 showed corrosion inhibition during initial corrosion monitoring,207 and alkane diphosphonate monolayers on 1050 aluminum showed improved corrosion resistance when the aluminum surface was exposed to oxide formation treatments.208 Recent work on SA films coated onto iron and steel substrates has been investigated by several groups.209,210 Adipic acid SA molecules formed compact films onto carbon steel exhibiting reduced electrochemistry on the steel surface209; compact and superior seawater stability were found with SA polydopamine/dodecanethiol films on 304 stainless steel211; and triazinethiol SA monolayers coated onto zinc treated steel substrates showed improved corrosion resistance but poor water repellency.212 Brass alloys and magnesium alloys have also been investigated using SA films. In the case of brass alloys several silane SA films inhibited corrosion in 0.2 M NaCl,213 and SA nanophase particle films provided corrosion protection for AZ31B magnesium alloy in 0.005 M NaCl solution for 354 h.214

3.5.4 Polyelectrolyte multilayer films

Polyelectrolyte (PE) films are fabricated by a layer-by-layer (LbL) approach using alternating assemblies of polyelectrolyte pairs consisting of a polyanion and polycation (Figure 3.7).215 The adsorption of the alternating PE multiple layers is driven by electrostatic interactions, and assemblies of hundreds of alternating polyanions and polycations are possible.216 The LbL approach for multilayer PE films allows for the precise control over the physical properties of the film (e.g., film thickness and morphology).217

f03-07-9780124114678
Figure 3.7 Polyelectrolyte (PE) multilayer films.

The deposition by the LbL approach affords nanometer-scale precision with multifunctional capabilities for the PE multilayer coating, which can exhibit excellent adhesion to the metal or alloy and can “self-heal” to seal surface defects.218 The PE multilayer films exhibit pH-buffering activity and can stabilize the pH between 5 and 7.5 at the metal surface in a corrosive environment. The PE multiple layer coatings are relatively mobile and also have the ability to seal and eliminate mechanical cracks in the coating via a “self-healing” mechanism.219 Additionally, active inhibitors can be trapped in the PE multilayer films. The inhibitor is trapped to the layers closest to the substrate for release of inhibitors while maintaining effective substrate barrier properties for maximum corrosion efficiency.220223

3.5.5 Controlled release coatings containing inhibitor-loaded nanocontainers

Controlled release and encapsulation of various materials within an inert host containing the active ingredient, such as drugs, oils, perfumes, and so on, have been studied for several decades.224226 Recent efforts have focused on developing encapsulated inhibitors via LbL, polyelectrolytes, copolymer vesicles and interfacial polymerization methods for corrosion inhibition on various metals and alloys.227 These inhibitor microcapsules can be formulated into coating systems for controlled release of the inhibitor triggered by corrosion to provide a “self-healing” mechanism.228,229 The size of the microencapsulated inhibitor containers are normally too large (≥ 1 μm) to be effective in pretreatment, conversion, or multilayered coatings.

The development of “smart nanocontainers” offers a method by, which nanostructured materials can store the inhibitors, providing a new corrosion-inhibiting system based on a “passive matrix/active container structure” for use in pretreatment, conversion, or multilayered coating systems.230 Corrosion processes are normally accompanied by local pH changes on the surface of the metal or alloy. Nanocontainers placed near these surfaces can be activated via pH changes or mechanical damage to release the encapsulated inhibitor effectively inhibiting corrosion via a self-healing mechanism. There are numerous literature reports on nanocontainers based on cyclodextrins,231 mesoporous silica,232,233 halloysite clays,234 carbon nanotubes,235 layered double hydroxides,236and titanium dioxide,237 which have been synthesized and tested for their corrosion-inhibiting properties.112

3.5.6 Biofilms as pretreatment coatings

Corrosion control using beneficial biofilms has recently gained interest as a corrosion-inhibiting strategy that is promoted as an environmentally green and nontoxic alternative to current corrosion control methods.238 Biofilm formation is a natural process, which consists of a highly organized bacterial community with cells entrapped in a matrix formed by extracellular polymer.239 The formation of biofilms may impede or accelerate the corrosion process on metals or alloys.240 The factor that promotes corrosion is the bacteria colonization process on metal substrates. This colonization is nonuniform, producing colonies that are thinner or thicker resulting in anodic and cathodic regions promoting corrosion on the substrate. Additionally corrosion can be impeded if corrosion products formed by the biofilm produce passive layers.241 The interaction between the metal substrate and biofilm formation depends solely on the type of metal and the degree of microbial activity. The inhibition of corrosion on various metals and alloys using biofilms can be accomplished via several strategies: (1) biofilms secreting antimicrobials,113,242,243 (2) formation of protective layers,244,245 (3) biofilms secreting corrosion inhibitors,246,247 and (4) beneficial biofilms.248,249

3.6 Conclusions

A comprehensive review of corrosion inhibition on various metals and alloys using either inorganic or organic pretreatment methods has been presented. Surface pretreatment coatings,whether they are inorganic or organic, serve as the first line of defense in inhibiting corrosion. The selection of the proper pretreatment coating is essential in providing basic corrosion protection for the underlying metal or alloy and promoting adhesion and compatibility between the pretreatment and primer coating. There are a number of pretreatment coatings that are commercially available and are being investigated not only to better understand the complex relationship between metals/alloys and corrosion, but to design and commercialize new pretreatment coatings that are economically viable, environmentally friendly and nontoxic to both humans and ecosystems.

References

1 Bardal E. Introduction. In: Corrosion and protection. London: Springer-Verlag; 2004:1–4.

2 Marek MI. Thermodynamics of aqueous corrosion. In: Kori LJ, Olson DL, eds. ASM handbook. Materials Park, OH: ASM International; 18–28. Corrosion. 1998;vol. 13.

3 Kroger JW. Fundamentals of high-temperature corrosion in molten salts. In: Korb LJ, Olson DL, eds. ASM handbook. Materials Park, OH: ASM International; 50–55. Corrosion. 1998;vol. 13.

4 Tortorelli PF. Fundamentals of high-temperature corrosion in liquid metals. In: Korb LJ, Olson DL, eds. ASM handbook. Materials Park, OH: ASM International; 56–60. Corrosion. 1998;vol. 13.

5 Bradford SA. Fundamentals of corrosion in gases. In: Korb LJ, Olson DL, eds. ASM handbook. Materials Park, OH: ASM International; 61–76. Corrosion. 1998;vol. 13.

6 Kruger J. Cost of metallic corrosion. In: Revie RW, ed. Uhlig’s corrosion handbook. 3rd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Electrochemical Society Series; 2011:15–20.

7 Koch GH, Brongers MPH, Thompson NG, et al. Corrosion costs and preventive strategies in the United States. Houston, Texas: NACE International; 1998 Publication No. FHWA-RD-01-156. p. 1–12.

8 Verink Jr. ED. Economics of corrosion. In: Revie RW, ed. Uhlig’s corrosion handbook. 3rd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Electrochemical Society Series; 2011:21–30.

9 Jackson JE. Cost of corrosion annually in the US over $1 trillionG2MT laboratories report http://www.g2mtlabs.com/cost-of-corrosion/; June 2013.

10 Kruger J. Cost of metallic corrosion. In: Revie RW, ed. Uhlig’s corrosion handbook. 3rd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Electrochemical Society Series; 2011:18–19.

11 Hoar TP. Report of the committee on corrosion and protection. Department of Trade and Industry, H.M.S.O. London, UK; 1971.

12 Biezma MV, San Cristobal JR. Methodology to study costs of corrosion. Corrosion Eng Sci Tech. 2005;40(4):344–352.

13 Hoar TP. Corrosion of metals: its cost and control. Proc R Soc London, Ser A. 1976;348(1652):1–18.

14 Baghdachi J. Smart coatings. In: Provder T, Baghdachi J, eds. Smart coatings II. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2009:3–24. ACS symposium series 1002.

15 Brady Jr. RF. Twenty-first century materials: coatings that interact with their environment. In: Provder T, Baghdachi J, eds. Smart coatings. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2007:3–14. ACS symposium series 957.

16 Xia F, Jiang L. Bio-inspired, smart, multiscale interfacial materials. Adv Mater. 2008;20(15):2842–2858.

17 Baghdachi J. The bespoke design of smart coatings. Eur Coating J. 2010;9:17–23.

18 Schuman TP. Protective coatings for aluminum alloys. In: M Katz, ed. Handbook of environmental degradation of materials. Norwich NY: William Andrew Publishing; 2005:345–366.

19 Davis JR. Corrosion: understanding the basics. Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International; 2000 p. 331–358.

20 Khanna AS. Surface preparation for organic paint coatings. In: High performance organic coatings. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2008:27–40.

21 Grishina EP, Noskov AV. Electrochemical formation of passivating layers and surface condition during anodic oxidation and corrosion of metals. In: Willard T, ed. Solid state electrochemistry. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2010:1–61.

22 Munro JI, Shim WW. Anodic protection-its operation and applications. Mater Perform. 2001;40(5):22–25.

23 Riggs OL, Locke CE. Anodic protection. theory and practice in the prevention of corrosion. NY: Plenum Press; 1981 p. 1-260.

24 Montgomery DC. Anodizing. Plat Surf Finish. 2007;94(11):12.

25 Vincenzi F, Barba WD, Vincenzi F. A new anodizing process with energy saving. Aluminum Extrusion. 2003;8(4):54–58.

26 Konno H, Baba Y, Furuichi R. Formation of porous anodic oxide films containing chromium ions on aluminum. Mater Sci Forum. 1995;192–194:379–384.

27 Zhang J-S, Zhao X-H, Zuo Y, et al. The bonding strength and corrosion resistance of aluminum alloy by anodizing treatment in a phosphoric acid modified boric acid/sulfuric acid bath. Surf Coat Technol. 2008;202(14):3149–3156.

28 Environmental Protection Agency USA. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutant emissions: hard and decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks; and steel pickling-HCl process facilities and hydrochloric acid regeneration plants. Fed Regist. 2012;77(182):58220–58253.

29 Rabbetts A. Replacements for hexavalent chromium in anodizing and conversion coating. Trans Inst Metal Finish. 1998;76(1):B4–B5.

30 Critchlow GW. Alternatives to hexavalent chromium process to enhance the durability of bonded aluminum joints. Trans Inst Metal Finish. 1998;76(1):B6–10.

31 Matzdorf CA, Nickerson WC, Beck EN, et al. Non-chromium corrosion-resistant coatings for aluminum. Assignee: United States Department of the Navy, USA. US Patent Number 2007/0095436 A1; 2007.

32 Sturgill JA, Phelps AW, Swartzbaugh JT. Non-toxic corrosion protection conversion coats based on cobalt. Assignee: University of Dayton, Dayton OH (US). US Patent Number 7294211 B2; November 13, 2007.

33 Kuehner MA. Phosphate conversion coatings. Met Finish. 1985;83(8):15–18.

34 Suzuki I. Corrosion-resistant coatings technology. NY: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1989 p. 10–250.

35 Korinek KA. Chromate conversion coatings. In: Korb LJ, Olson DL, eds. ASM handbook. United States: ASTM International; 389–395. Corrosion. 1998;vol. 13.

36 Kendig M, Jeanjaquet S, Addison R, et al. Role of hexavalent chromium in the inhibition of corrosion of aluminum alloys. Surf Coat Technol. 2001;140:58–66.

37 Illevbare GO, Scully JR, Yuan J, et al. Inhibition of pitting corrosion on aluminum alloy 2024-T3: effect of soluble chromate additions vs. chromate conversion coating. Corrosion. 2000;56(3):227–242.

38 Kendig MW, Davenport AJ, Isaacs HS. The mechanism of corrosion inhibition by chromate conversion coatings from x-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES). Corros Sci. 1993;34(1):41–49.

39 Chidambaram D, Halada GP, Clayton CR. Spectroscopic elucidation of the repassivation of active sites on aluminum by chromate conversion coating. Electrochem Solid-State Lett. 2004;7(9):B31–B33.

40 Xia L, Akiyama E, Frankel G, et al. Storage and release of soluble hexavalent chromium from chromate conversion coatings equilibrium aspects of CrVI concentration. J Electrochem Soc. 2000;147(7):2256–2262.

41 Ramsey JD, Xia L, Kendig MW, et al. Raman spectroscopic analysis of the speciation of dilute chromate solutions. Corros Sci. 2001;43:1557–1572.

42 Saikia SK, Mishra AK, Tiwari S, et al. Hexavalent chromium induced histological alterations in Bacopa monnieri (L.) and assessment of genetic variance. J Cytol Histol. 2012;3(2):141.

43 Vignati Davide AL, Beye Dominik J., Pettine Mamadou L., et al. Chromium (VI) is more toxic than chromium (iii) to freshwater algae: a paradigm to revise. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;73(5):743–749.

44 Sanikow K, Zhitkovich A. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in metal cacinogenesis and cocarcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, and chromium. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21:28–44.

45 Blisiak J, Kowalik J. A comparison of the in vitro genotoxicity of tri- and hexavalent chromium. Mutat Res. 2000;469:135–145.

46 Wetterhahn KE. Hamilton JW, molecular basis of hexavalent chromium carcinogenicity: effect of gene expression. Sci Total Environ. 1989;86:113–129.

47 National emissions standards for chromium emissions from hard and decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks, environmental protection agency, Federal Register, RIN 2060-AC14; January 25, 1995.

48 AESF/EPA conferencehexavalent chrome PEL AESF presentation http://www.nasf.org/nasf-law-regulation.php; January 2004.

49 Naraayanan Sankara TSN. Surface pretreatment by phosphate conversion coatings—a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2005;9:130–177.

50 Cape TW. Phosphate conversion coatings. In: Korb LJ, Olson DL, eds. ASM handbook. United States: ASTM International; 383–388. Corrosion. 1998;vol. 13.

51 Harvey TG. Cerium-based conversion coatings on aluminum alloys: a process review. Corros Eng Sci Technol. 2013;48(4):248–269.

52 Buchheit R, Mahajanam SPV. Ion exchange compounds for corrosion inhibiting pigments in organic coatings. In: Zarras P, wood T, Brough R, Benicewicz BC, eds. New developments in coatings technology. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2007:108–134. ACS symposium series 962.

53 Zhang J-H, Zhang Y-J. Film forming mechanism analysis of cerium conversion coating on zinc coating. Adv Mater Res. 2012;557–559:1819–1824.

54 Williams G, McMurray HN, Worsley DA. Cerium (III) inhibition of corrosion-driven organic coating delamination studied using scanning kelvin probe technique. J Electrochem Soc. 2002;149(4):B154–B162.

55 Mansfeld F, Lin S, Kim S, et al. Surface modification of aluminum alloys and aluminum-based metal matrix composites by chemical passivation. Electrochim Acta. 1989;34(8):1123–1132.

56 Hinton B, Hughes A, Taylor R, et al. The corrosion protection properties of an hydrated cerium oxide coating on aluminum. In: International corrosion congress proceedings 13th Melbourne, November 1996; 1996:337/1–337/7.

57 Hughes AE, Taylor RJ, Hinton BRW, et al. XPS and SEM characterization of hydrated cerium oxide conversion coatings. Surf Inter Anal. 1995;23(7&8):540–550.

58 Hinton BRW, Wilson L. The corrosion inhibition of zinc with cerous chloride. Corros Sci. 1989;29(8):967–985.

59 Hinton BRW, Ryan NE, Arnott DR, et al. The inhibition of aluminum alloy corrosion by rare earth metal cations. Corros Australas. 1985;10(3):12–17.

60 Montemor MF, Simoes AM, Ferreira MGS, et al. Composition and corrosion resistance of cerium conversion films on the AZ31 magnesium alloy and its relation to the salt anion. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;254(6):1806–1814.

61 Montemor MF, Simoes AM, Carmezim MJ. Characterization of rare-earth conversion films formed on the AZ31 magnesium alloy and its relation with corrosion protection. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;253(16):6922–6931.

62 Ferreira MGS, Duarte RG, Montemor MF, et al. Silanes and rare earth salts as chromate replacers for pre-treatments on galvanized steel. Electrochim Acta. 2004;49(17–18):2927–2935.

63 Montemor MF, Simoes AM, Ferreira MGS. Composition and corrosion behavior of galvanized steel treated with rare-earth salts: the effect of cation. Prog Org Coat. 2002;44(2):111–120.

64 Scholes FH, Soste C, Hughes AE, et al. The role of hydrogen peroxide in the deposition of cerium-based conversion coatings. Appl Surf Sci. 2006;253:1770–1780.

65 Dabala M, Armelao L, Buchberger A, et al. Cerium-based conversion layers on aluminum alloys. Appl Surf Sci. 2001;172(3–4):312–322.

66 Aldykiewicz AJ, Davenport AJ, Isaacs HS. Studies of the formation of cerium-rich protective films using x-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy and rotating disk electrode methods. J Electrochem Soc. 1996;143(1):147–154.

67 Campestrini P, Terryn H, Hovestad A, et al. Formation of a cerium-based conversion coating on aa2024: relationship with the microstructure. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;176(3):365–381.

68 Lingjie LI, Jinglei LEI, Shenghai YU, et al. Formation and characterization of cerium conversion coatings on magnesium alloy. J Rare Earth. 2008;26(3):383–387.

69 Markley TA, Forsyth M, Hughes AE. Corrosion protection of AA2024-T3 using rare earth diphenyl phosphates. Electrochim Acta. 2007;52:4024–4031.

70 Pardo A, Merino MC, Arrabal R, et al. Carboneras M. Effect of Ce surface treatments on corrosion resistance of A3xx.x/SiCp composites in salt fog. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;200:2938–2947.

71 Mora N, Cano E, Polo JL, et al. Bastidas JM, corrosion protection properties of cerium layers formed on tinplate. Corros Sci. 2004;46:563–578.

72 Rivera BF, Johnson BY, O’Keefe MJ, et al. Deposition and characterization of cerium oxide conversion coatings on aluminum alloy 7075-T6. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;176:349–356.

73 Aballe A, Bethencourt M, Botana FJ, et al. On the mixed nature of cerium conversion coatings. Mater Corros. 2002;53:176–184.

74 Bethencourt M, Botana FJ, Calvino JJ, et al. Lanthanide compounds as environmentally-friendly corrosion inhibitors of aluminum alloys: a review. Corros Sci. 1998;40(11):1803–1819.

75 Scully JR, Presuel-Moreno F, Goldman M, et al. User-selective barrier, sacrificial anode, and active corrosion inhibiting properties of Al-Co-Ce alloys for coating applications. Corrosion. 2008;64(3):210–229.

76 Heller DK, Fahrenholtz WG, Geoff E, et al. Directly deposited cerium phosphate coatings for the corrosion protection Al 2024-T3. ECS Trans. 2010;28(24):203–215.

77 Heller DK, Fahrenholtz WG, O’Keefe MJ. The effect of post-treatment time and temperature on cerium-based conversion coatings on Al 2024-T3. Corros Sci. 2010;52(2):360–368.

78 Heller DK, Fahrenholtz WG, O’Keefe MJ. The effect of phosphate source on the post-treatment of cerium based conversion coatings on Al 2024-T3 and its correlation to corrosion performance. ECS Trans. 2009;16(43):47–60.

79 Joshi S, Kulp EA, Fahrenholtz WG, et al. Dissolution of cerium from cerium-based conversion coatings on Al 7075-T6 in 0.1 M NaCl solutions. Corros Sci. 2012;60:290–295.

80 Kong G, Liu L, Lu J, et al. Study of lanthanum salt conversion coating modified with citric acid on hot galvanized steel. J Rare Earth. 2010;28(3):461–465.

81 Pardo A, Merino MC, Arrabal R, et al. Effect of La surface treatments on corrosion resistance of A3xx.x/SiCp composites in salt fog. Appl Surf Sci. 2006;252:2794–2805.

82 Bethencourt M, Botana FJ, Cauqui MA, et al. Protection against corrosion in marine environments of AA5083 Al-Mg alloy by lanthanide chlorides. J Alloys Compd. 1997;250(1–2):455–460.

83 Almeida E, Diamantino TC, Figueiredo MO, et al. Oxidizing alternative species to chromium VI in zinc galvanized steel surface treatment. Part 1-A morphological and chemical study. Surf Coat Technol. 1998;106:8–17.

84 Almeida E, Fedrizzi L, Diamantinio TC. Oxidizing alternative species to chromium VI in zinc-galvanized steel surface treatment. Part 2-An electrochemical study. Surf Coat Technol. 1998;105:97–101.

85 Nordlein JH, Walmsley JC, Osterberg H, et al. Formation of a zirconium-titanium based conversion layer on AA 6060 aluminum. Surf Coat Technol. 2002;153:72–78.

86 Deck PD, Moon M, Sujdak RJ. Investigation of fluoacid based conversion coatings on aluminum. Prog Org Coat. 1998;34(1–4):39–48.

87 Pearlstein F, Agarwala VS. Trivalent chromium conversion coating for aluminum-a replacement for hexavalent chromium pretreatment. In: Tri-service conference on corrosion, Wrightsville Beach NC. November 17–21, 1997, vol. 2; 1997:12/1–1210.

88 Schlosser TM, Musingo EM. Trivalent chromium passivation and pretreatment composition for zinc-containing metals. Assignee: Bulk Chemicals Inc., USA. US Patent Number 20110100513 A1; May 5, 2011.

89 Hamdy AS, Hussien HM. Deposition, Characterization and electrochemical properties of permanganate-based coatings and treatments over ZE41 Mg-Zn-rare earth alloy. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2013;8:11386–11402.

90 Lin CS, Lee CY, Li WC, et al. Formation of phosphate/permanganate conversion coating on ZA31 magnesium alloy. J Electrochem Soc. 2006;153(3):B90–B96.

91 Chong KZ, Shih TS. Conversion-coating treatment for magnesium alloys by a permanganate-phosphate solution. Mater Chem Phys. 2003;80(1):191–200.

92 Srinivasan PB, Sathiyanarayanan S, Marikkannu C, et al. A non-chromate chemical conversion coating for aluminum alloys. Corros Prev Cont. 1995;42(2):35–36 49.

93 Wilcox GD, Gabe DR, Warwick ME. The role of molybdates in corrosion prevention. Corros Rev. 1986;6(4):327–365.

94 Zein El Abedin S. Role of chromate, molybdate and tungstate anions on the inhibition of aluminum in chloride solutions. J Appl Electrochem. 2001;31(6):711–718.

95 Moutarlier V, Gigandet MP, Normand B, et al. EIS characterization of anodic films formed on 2024 aluminum alloy, in sulfuric acid containing molybdate or permanganate species. Corros Sci. 2005;47(4):937–951.

96 Moutarlier V, Gigandet MP, Pagetti J. Characterization of pitting corrosion in sealed anodic films formed in sulphuric, sulphuric/molybdate and chromic media. Appl Surf Sci. 2003;206(1–4):237–249.

97 Moutarlier V, Pelletier S, Lallemand F, et al. Characterisation of the anodic layers formed on 2024 aluminum alloy, in tetraborate electrolyte containing molybdate ions. Appl Surf Sci. 2005;252:1739–1746.

98 Wang SH, Liu CS, Wang L. A comparative study of zirconium-based coating on cold rolled steel. Adv Mater Res. 2011;291–294(Pt. 1):47–52.

99 Hamdy AS, Farahat M. Chrome-free zirconia based protective coatings for magnesium alloys. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;204(16–17):2834–2840.

100 Wang SH, Liu CS, Shan FJ. Corrosion behavior of a zirconium-titanium phosphoric acid conversion coating on AA6061 aluminum alloy. Acta Metall Sin. 2008;21(4):269–274.

101 George FO, Skeldon P, Thompson GE. Formation of zirconium-based conversion coatings on aluminum and Al-Cu alloys. Corros Sci. 2012;65:231–237.

102 Bhaatia PP, Lomasney GM, Mason US. Trivalent chromium anticorrosive conversion coating for pretreated copper-containing aluminum alloy. Eur Pat ApplEP255200A1; February 2, 2013.

103 Zarras P, Prokopuk N, Anderson A, et al. Investigation of electroactive polymers and other pretreatments as replacements for chromate conversion coatings: a neutral salt fog and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study. In: Zarras P, Wood T, Richey B, Benicewicz BC, eds. New developments in coating technology. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2007:40–53. ACS symposium series 962.

104 Pearlstein F, Agarwala VS. Trivalent chromium solutions for applying chemical conversion coatings to aluminum alloys or for sealing anodized aluminum. Plat Surf Finish. 1994;81(7):50–55.

105 Pearlstein F, Agarwala VS. Non-chromate chemical conversion coatings for aluminum alloys. Proc Electrochem Soc. 1993;93–28:199–211.

106 Zhang X, van den Bos C, Sloof WG, et al. Comparison of the morphology and corrosion performance of Cr(VI)- and Cr(III)-based conversion coatings on zinc. Surf Coat Technol. 2005;199:92–104.

107 Li L, Kim DY, Swain GM. Transient formation of chromate in trivalent chromium process (TCP) coatings on AA2024-T3 as probed by Raman spectroscopy. J Electrochem Soc. 2012;159(8):C326–C333.

108 Zheludkevich ML, Salvado IM, Ferreira MGS. Sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of metals. J Mater Chem. 2005;15:5099–5111.

109 Tallman DE, Bierwagen GP. Corrosion protection using conducting polymers. In: Skotheim TA, Reynolds JR, eds. Handbook of conducting polymers. Conjugated polymers: processing and applications. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007:12-1–1242.

110 Rohwerder M, Stratmann M, Grundmeier G. Corrosion prevention by absorbed organic monolayers and ultrathin plasma polymer films. In: Corrosion mechanisms in theory and practice. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2012:617–667.

111 Farhat TR, Schlenoff JB. Corrosion control using polyelectrolyte multilayers. Electrochem Solid-State Lett. 2002;5(4):B13–B15.

112 Zheludkevich ML, Tedim J, Ferreira MGS. “Smart” coatings for active corrosion protection based on multi-functional micro and nanocontainers. Electrochim Acta. 2012;82:314–323.

113 Syrett BC, Arps PJ, Earthman JC, et al. Corrosion control using regenerative biofilms (CCURB): an update. Metall Ital. 2001;93(7–8):39–44.

114 Balgude D, Sabnis A. Sol-gel derived hybrid coatings as environmentally friendly surface treatment for corrosion protection of metals and their alloys. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2012;64(1):124–134.

115 Wang D, Bierwagen GP. Sol-gel coatings on metals for corrosion protection. Prog Org Coat. 2009;64(4):327–338.

116 Kasemann R, Schmidt H. Coatings for mechanical and chemical protection based on organic-inorganic sol-gel nanocomposites. New J Chem. 1994;18(10):1117–1123.

117 Fedel M, Deflorian F, Rossi S. Innovative silanes-based pretreatment to improve the adhesion of organic coatings. In: Sharma SK, ed. Green corrosion chemistry and engineering: opportunities and challenges. 1st ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmBH & Co.; 2012:181–209.

118 Kron J, Deichmann KJ, Rose K. Sol-gel derived hybrid materials as functional coatings for metal surfaces. Eur Fed Corros Publ. 2011;58(Self-Healing Properties of New Surface Treatments):105–118.

119 Li Y-S, Lu W, Wang Y, et al. Studies of (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane and bis(trimethoxysilyl)ethane sol-gel coating on copper and aluminum. Spectrochim Acta A. 2009;73:922–928.

120 Tan ALK, Soutar AM. Hybrid sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of copper. Thin Solid Films. 2008;516:5706–5709.

121 Feng Z, Liu Y, Thompson GE, et al. Sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of 1050 aluminum alloy. Electrochim Acta. 2010;55:3518–3527.

122 Tan ALK, Soutar AM, Annergren IF, et al. Multilayer sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of magnesium. Surf Coat Technol. 2005;198(1–3):478–482.

123 Norzita N, Haziq M, Zurina M. Development of hybrid nano-sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of carbon steel. Int J Chem Environ Eng. 2012;3(4):267–270.

124 Dimitrev Y, Ivanova Y, Iordanova R. History of sol-gel science and technology (review). J Univ Chem Technol Metall. 2008;43(2):181–192.

125 Kurisu T, Kozuka H. Effects of heating rate on stress evolution in alkoxide-derived silica gel-coating films. J Am Ceram Soc. 2006;89(8):2453–2458.

126 Mayrand M, Quinson JF, Roche A, et al. Heteropolysiloxane coatings on electrogalvanized steel: elaboration and characterization. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 1998;12(1):49–57.

127 Metroke TL, Parkhill RL, Knobbe ET. Passivation of metal alloys using sol-gel-derived materials—a review. Prog Org Coat. 2001;41(4):233–238.

128 Senani S, Campazzi E, Villate M, et al. Potentially of UV-cured hybrid sol-gel coatings for aeronautical metallic substrate protection. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;227:32–37.

129 Chen X, Zhou S, Shuxue Y, et al. Mechanical properties and thermal stability of ambient-cured thick polysiloxane coatings prepared by a sol-gel process of organoalkoxysilanes. Prog Org Coat. 2012;74(3):540–548.

130 Conde A, Duran A, de Damborenea JJ. Polymeric sol-gel coatings as protective layers of aluminum alloys. Prog Org Coat. 2003;46(4):288–296.

131 White SS Jr, Dang HT, Titman S. Abrasion-resistant coating compositions for optical substrates, their manufacture and coated articles therefrom. Assignee: Sailor International Companies General D’Optique, France. PCT IntApplWO 2000029496 A1; May 25, 2000.

132 Witucki GL, Vincent HL. Preparation of epoxy-functional silicone resin for powder coating. Assignee: Dow Corning Corporation, USA. US Patent Number 5280098A; January 18, 1994.

133 Chen Y-H, Liu L-X, Zhan M-S. The preparation and characterization of abrasion-resistant coatings on polycarbonate. J Coat Technol Res. 2013;10(1):79–86.

134 Chen J-I, Chareonsak R, Puengpipat V, et al. Organic/inorganic composite materials for coating applications. J Appl Poly Sci. 1999;74(6):1341–1346.

135 Smarsley B, Garnweitner G, Assink R, Brinker CJ. Preparation and characterization of mesostructured polymer-functionalized sol-gel-derived thin films. Prog Org Coat. 2003;47(3–4):393–400.

136 Yu J, Qiu J, Cui Y, et al. Preparation and electro-optic properties of hybrid sol-gel films containing imidizale chromophore. Mater Lett. 2009;63(29):2594–2596.

137 Menning M, Schmidt M, Kutsch B, et al. SiO2-coatings on glass containing copper colloids using the Sol-gel–technique. Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering. 1994;2288(Sol-Gel Optics III):120–129.

138 Joshua Du.Y., Tang Damron M., Zheng G, et al. Inorganic/organic hybrid coatings for aircraft aluminum alloy substrates. Prog Org Coat. 2001;41(4):226–232.

139 Kroke E. Novel sol-gel routes to non-oxide ceramics. Adv Sci Technol. 1999;15(Ceramics: Getting into the 2000’s, Pt. C):123–134.

140 Sugama T, Carciello N, Rast SL. Zirconocene-modified polysiloxane-2-pyridine coatings. Thin Solid Films. 1995;258(1–2):174–184.

141 Tamboura M, Mikhailova AM, Jia MQ. Development of heat-resistant anticorrosion urethane siloxane paints. J Coat Technol Res. 2013;10(3):381–396.

142 Sheffer M, Groysman A, Mandler D. Electrodeposition of sol-gel films on Al for corrosion protection. Corros Sci. 2003;45(12):2893–2904.

143 Curkovic L, Curkovic HO, Salopek S, et al. Enhancement of corrosion protection of AlSl304 stainless steel by nanostructured sol-gel TiO2 films. Corros Sci. 2013;77:176–184.

144 Balbyshev VN, Anderson KL, Sinsawat A, et al. Modeling of nano-sized macromolecules in silane-based self-assembled nano-phase particle coatings. Prog Org Coat. 2003;47(3–4):337–341.

145 Jang J, Park H. Formation and structure of polyacrylamide-silica nanocomposites by sol-gel process. J Appl Polym Sci. 2002;83(8):1817–1823.

146 Vreugdenhil AJ, Balbyshev VN, Donley MS. Nanostructured silicon sol-gel surface pretreatments for Al 2024-T3 protection. J Coat Technol. 2001;73(915):35–43.

147 Wittmar A, Wittmar M, Ulrich A, et al. Hybrid sol-gel coatings doped with transition metal ions for the protection of AA2024-T3. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2012;61(3):600–612.

148 Singh AK, Rout TK, Narayan R, et al. Anticorrosive hybrid sol-gel film on zinc substrates comprising sodium vanadate and colloidal silica. PCT IntApplWO 2009141830A1; November 26, 2009.

149 Matter EA, Kozhukharov S, Gyozova A, et al. AA2024 Corrosion protection by hybrid coatings incorporated with Ce(III) and Ce(IV) inhibitors. J Univ Chem Technol Metall. 2012;47(5):518–524.

150 Aparicio M, Rosero-Navarro NC, Castro Y, Duran A, Pellice SA. Hybrid Ce-containing silica- methacrylate sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of aluminum alloys. Eur Fed Corros Publ. 2011;58(Self-Healing Properties of New Surface Treatments):202–219.

151 Pirhady TN, Sanjabi S, Shahrabi T. Evolution of corrosion protection performance of hybrid silica based sol-gel nanocoatings by doping with inhibitor. Mater Corros. 2011;62(5):411–415.

152 Snihirova D, Lamaka SV, Taryba M, et al. Hydroxyapatite microparticles as feedback-active reservoirs of corrosion inhibitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2010;2(11):3011–3022.

153 Rosero-Navarro NC, Pellice SA, Duran A, et al. Effects of Ce-containing sol-gel coatings reinforced with SiO2 nanoparticles on the protection of AA2024. Corros Sci. 2008;50(5):1283–1291.

154 Moutarlier V, Neveu B, Gigandet MP. Evolution of corrosion protection for sol-gel coatings doped with inorganic inhibitors. Surf Coat Technol. 2008;202(10):2052–2058.

155 Voevodin NN, Grebasch NT, Soto WS, et al. Potentiodynamic evaluation of sol-gel coatings with inorganic inhibitors. Surf Coat Technol. 2001;140(1):24–28.

156 Sheffer M, Groysman A, Starosvetsky D, et al. Anion embedded sol-gel films on al for corrosion protection. Corros Sci. 2004;46(12):2975–2985.

157 Khramov AN, Voevodin NN, Balbyshev VN, et al. Hybrid organo-ceramic corrosion protection coatings with encapsulated organic corrosion inhibitors. Thin Solid Films. 2004;447–448:549–557.

158 Chen T, Fu JJ. An intelligent anticorrosion coating based on pH-responsive supramolecular nanocontainers. Nanotechnology. 2012;23(50):505705/1–50570512.

159 Galio AF, Lamaka SV, Zheludkevich ML, et al. Inhibitor-doped sol-gel coatings for corrosion protection of magnesium alloy AZ31. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;204(9–10):1479–1486.

160 Mengoli G, Munari MT, Bianco P, et al. Anodic synthesis of polyaniline coatings onto iron sheets. J Appl Polym Sci. 1981;26(12):4247–4257.

161 DeBerry DW. Modification of the electrochemical and corrosion behavior of stainless steels with an electroactive coating. J Electrochem Soc. 1985;132:1022–1026.

162 MacDiarmid AG, Ahmad N. Polyaniline film on metal surface for preventing corrosion. Assignee: Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, USA. US Patent Number 5645890; July 8, 1997.

163 Ahmad N, MacDiarmid AG. Inhibition of corrosion of steels with the exploitation of conducting polymers. Synth Met. 1996;78(2):103–110.

164 Jakubowski M. Zinc and cadmium compounds. In: 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 167–211. Patty’s toxicology. 2012;vol. 1.

165 Tokumoto M, Fujiwara Y, Shimada A, et al. Cadmium toxicity is caused by accumulation of p53 through the down-regulation of Ube3d family genes in vitro and in vivo. J Toxicol Sci. 2011;36(2):191–200.

166 Praveen CV, Pradeep Kiran JA, Bhaskar M. Cadmium toxicity-a health hazard and a serious environmental problem-an overview. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2012;2(4):235–246.

167 Hermas AA, Wu ZX, Nakayama M, et al. Passivation of stainless steel by coating with poly(o-phenyenediamine) conductive polymer. J Electrochem Soc. 2006;153(6):B199–B205.

168 Kraljic M, Zic M, Duic L. O-phenylenediamine-containing polyaniline coatings for corrosion protection of stainless steels. Bull Electrochem. 2004;20(12):567–570.

169 Wessling B. Passivation of metals by coating with polyaniline: corrosion potential shift and morphological changes. Adv Mater. 1994;6(3):226–228.

170 Cook A, Gabriel A, Laycock N. On the mechanism of corrosion protection of mild steel with polyaniline. J Electrochem Soc. 2004;151(9):B529–B535.

171 Kinlen PJ, Ding Y, Silverman DC. Corrosion protection of mild steel using sulfonic and phosphoric acid-doped polyanilines. Corrosion. 2002;58(6):490–497.

172 Yan MC, Tallman DE, Rasmussen SC, et al. Corrosion control coatings for aluminum alloys based on neutral and n-doped conjugated polymers. J Electrochem Soc. 2009;156(10):C360–C366.

173 Seegmiller JC, Pereira da Silva JE, Buttry DA, et al. Mechanism of action of corrosion protection coating for AA2024-t3 based on poly(aniline)-poly(methylmethacrylate) blend. J Electrochem Soc. 2005;152(2):B45–B53.

174 Cecchetto L, Delabouglise D, Petit J-P. On the mechanism of the anodic protection of aluminum alloy AA5182 by emeraldine base coatings evidences of a galvanic coupling. Electrochim Acta. 2007;52:3485–3492.

175 Kendig M, Hon M. Environmentally triggered release of oxygen-reduction inhibitors from inherently conducting polymers. Corrosion. 2004;60(11):1024–1030.

176 Cogan SF, Gilbert MD, Holleck GL, et al. Galvanic coupling of doped polyaniline and aluminum alloy 2024-T3. J Electrochem Soc. 2000;147(6):2143–2147.

177 Spinks GM, Dominis AJ, Wallace GG, et al. Electroactive conducting polymers for corrosion control. J Solid State Electrochem. 2002;6:85–100.

178 Aradilla D, Azambuja D, Estrany F, et al. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) on self-assembled alkanethiol monolayers for corrosion protection. Polym Chem. 2011;2:2548–2556.

179 Popovic MM, Grgur BN. Electrochemical synthesis and corrosion behavior of thin polyaniline-benzoate film on mild steel. Synth Met. 2004;143:191–195.

180 Tuken T, Arslan G, Yazici B, et al. The corrosion protection of mild steel by polypyrrole/polyphenol multilayer coating. Corros Sci. 2004;46:2743–2754.

181 Camalet J-L, Lacroix J-C, Aeiyach S, et al. Electrodeposition of polyaniline on mild steel in a two step process. Synth Met. 1999;102:1386–1387.

182 Irvin DJ, Anderson N, Webber C, et al. New synthetic routes to poly(bis(dialkylamino)phenylenevinylene)s (BAM-PPV). ACS PMSE Prepr. 2002;86:61–62.

183 Stenger-Smith JD, Miles MH, Norris WP, et al. Amino functional poly(para-phenylene vinylene)s as protective coatings. Assignee: United States Department of the Navy, USA. US Patent Number 5904990A; May 18, 1999.

184 Stenger-Smith JD, Merwin LH, Shaheen SE, et al. Synthesis and characterization of poly(2,5-bis(N-methyl-N-hexylamino)phenylene vinylene), a conjugated polymer for light-emitting diodes. Macromolecules. 1998;31(21):7566–7569.

185 Kus E, Grunlan M, Weber WP, et al. Evaluation of the protective properties of novel chromate-free polymer coatings using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. In: Zarras P, Wood T, Brough R, et al., eds. New developments in coatings technology. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2007:297–322. ACS symposium series 962.

186 Zarras P, He J, Tallman DE, et al. Electroactive polymer coatings as replacements for chromate conversion coatings. In: Provder T, Baghdachi J, eds. Smart coatings. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2007:P135–P151. ACS symposium series 957..

187 Zarras P, Anderson N, Webber C, et al. Electroactive materials as smart corrosion-inhibiting coatings for the replacement of hexavalent chromium. Coating Tech. 2011;8(1):40–44.

188 Zarras P, Anderson N, Webber C, et al. Novel conjugated polymers based on derivatives of poly(phenylene vinylene)s as corrosion protective coatings in marine environments. In: PACE. September 8–9, 2004, Cologne, Germany; 2004:175–181.

189 Khan MI, Chaudhry AU, Hashim S, et al. Recent developments in intrinsically conductive polymer coatings for corrosion protection. Chem Eng Res Bull (Dhaka). 2010;14(2):73–86.

190 Rohwerder M. Conducting polymers for corrosion protection: a review. Int J Mater Res. 2009;100(1):1331–1342.

191 Zarras P, Anderson N, Webber C, et al. Progress in using conductive polymers as corrosion-inhibiting coatings. Rad Phys Chem. 2003;68(3–4):387–394.

192 Jennings GK, Laibinis PE. Self-assembled organic monolayer films on underpotentially deposited metal layers. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. 1997;451(Electrochemical Synthesis and Modification of Materials):155–160.

193 Smith RK, Lewis PA, Weiss PS. Patterning self-assembled monolayers. Prog Surf Sci. 2004;75:1–68.

194 Poirier GE. Characterization of organosulfur molecular monolayers on Au(111) using scanning tunneling microscopy. Chem Rev (Washington, DC). 1997;97(4):1117–1127.

195 Rohwerder M, Stratmann M. Surface modification by ordered monolayers: new ways of protecting materials against corrosion. MRS Bull. 1999;24(7):43–47.

196 Burleigh TD, Shi C, Killic S, et al. Self-assembled monolayers of perfluoroalkyl amideethanethiols, fluoralkylthiols, and alkylthiols for the prevention of silver tarnish. Corrosion (Houston, TX, United States). 2002;58(1):49–56.

197 Srivastava P, Chapman WG, Laibinis PE. Molecular dynamics simulation of oxygen transport through n-alkanethiolate self-assembled monolayers on gold and copper. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113(2):456–464.

198 Sortino S, Petralia S, Conoci S, et al. Novel self-assembled monolayers of dipolar ruthenium (III/II) pentaamine(4,4′-bipyridinium) complexes on ultrathin platinum films as redox molecular switches. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125(5):1122–1123.

199 Wapner K, Stratmann M, Grundmeier G. Structure and stability of adhesion promoting aminopropyl phosphonate layers at polymer/aluminum oxide interfaces. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2007;28(1–2):59–70.

200 Ishibashi M, Itoh M, Nishihara H, et al. Permeability of alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers adsorbed on copper electrodes to molecular oxygen dissolved in 0.5 M Na2SO4 solution. Electrochim Acta. 1996;41(2):241–248.

201 Jennings GK, Laibinis PE. Self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiols on copper prove corrosion resistance in aqueous environments. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 1996;116(1/2):105–114.

202 Itoh M, Nishihara H, Aramaki K. Preparation and evaluation of two-dimensional polymer films by chemical modification of an alkanethiol self-assembled monolayer for protection of copper against corrosion. J Electrochem Soc. 1995;142(11):3696–3704.

203 Appa Rao BV, Narsihma Reddy M. Self-assembled 1-octadecyl-1H-benzimidazole film on copper surface for corrosion protection. J Chem Soc (Bangalore, India). 2013;125(6):1325–1338.

204 Laio QQ, Yue ZW, Yang D, et al. Inhibition of copper corrosion in sodium chloride solution by the self-assembled monolayer of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate. Corros Sci. 2011;53:1999–2005.

205 Tuken T, Kicir N, Elalan N, et al. Self-assembled film based on hexane-1,6-diamine and 2-mercapto-ethanol on copper. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;258(18):6793–6799.

206 Maxisch M, Thissen P, Giza M, Grundmeier G. Interface chemistry and molecular interactions of phosphonic acid self-assembled monolayers on oxyhydroxide-covered aluminum in humid environments. Langmuir. 2011;27:6042–6048.

207 Qu J-E, Wang H-R, Zhang Q, et al. Self-assembling behavior and corrosion inhibition of TDPA on differently structured surfaces of 2024 and 1060 aluminum alloys. Int J Mater Res. 2012;103(10):1257–1264.

208 de Souza S, Yoshikawa DS, Izaltino WAS, et al. Self-assembling molecules as corrosion inhibitors for 1050 aluminum. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;204:3238–3242.

209 Rajendran S, Sribharathy V, Krishnaveni A, et al. Corrosion inhibitive property of self assembled nano films formed by adipic acid molecules on carbon steel surface. Thin Film Technol. 2012;50:10509–10513.

210 Liu X, Chen S, Zhai H, et al. The study of self-assembled films of triazole on iron electrodes using electrochemical methods, XPS, SEM and molecular simulation. Electrochem Commun. 2007;7:813–819.

211 Chen Y, Chen SG, Chen Y., et al. Surface analysis and electrochemical behavior of the self-assembled polydopamine/dodecanethiol complex films in protecting 304 stainless steel. Sci China Tech Sci. 2012;55(6):1527–1534.

212 Matsuzaki A, Nagoshi M, Hara N. Corrosion resistance and structure of thiol self-assembly super thin film on zinc coated steel sheet. ISIJ Int. 2011;51(1):108–114.

213 Fan H, Li S, Zhao Z, et al. Inhibition of brass corrosion in sodium chloride solutions by self-assembled silane films. Corros Sci. 2011;53:4273–4281.

214 Guo X, An M. Experimental study of electrochemical corrosion behavior of bilayer on AZ31B Mg alloy. Corros Sci. 2010;52(12):4017–4027.

215 L’vov YM, Decher G. Assembly of multilayer ordered films by alternating adsorption of oppositely charged macromolecules. Crystallogr Rep. 1994;39(4):696–716.

216 Yoo D, Rubner MF. Layer-by-layer modification of surfaces through the use of self-assembled monolayers of polyions. Ann Tech Conf Soc Plast Eng. 1995;53(2):2568–2570.

217 Quinn A, Such GK, Quinn JF, et al. Polyelectrolyte blend multilayers: a versatile route to engineering interfaces and films. Adv Funct Mater. 2008;18:17–26.

218 Andreeva DV, Skorb EV, Shchukin DG. Layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte/inhibitor nanostructures for metal corrosion protection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2010;2(7):1954–1962.

219 Andreeva DV, Fix D, Mohwald H, et al. Self-healing anticorrosion coatings based on pH-sensitive polyelectrolyte/inhibitor sandwichlike nanostructures. Adv Mater. 2008;20:2789–2794.

220 Lari BR, Sabbaghi S. Investigation of corrosion behavior of PAA-PAH polyelectrolyte multilayer nano-film on steel substrates. World Appl Sci J. 2011;14(2):199–206.

221 Derakhshandeh R, Lari BR, Sabbaghi S, et al. Control of corrosion in steel substrates by using polyelectrolyte multilayer nano-film. World Appl Sci J. 2010;9(10):1129–1138.

222 Grigoriev DO, Kohler K, Skorb E, et al. Polyelectrolyte complexes as a “smart” depot for self-healing anticorrosion coatings. Soft Matter. 2009;5:1426–1432.

223 Faure E, Halusiak E, Farina F, et al. Clay and DOPA containing polyelectrolyte multilayer film for imparting anticorrosion properties to galvanized steel. Langmuir. 2012;28:2971–2978.

224 Dihora JO, Smets J, Schwantes TA, et al. Microcapsules comprising vinyl polymers for delivery of benefit agents such as perfumes. Assignee: The Proctor & Gamble Company, USA. WO 2010084480 A2; July 29, 2010.

225 Zhou M, Leong TSH, Melino S, et al. Sonochemical synthesis of liquid-encapsulated lysozyme microspheres. Ultra Sonochem. 2010;17(2):333–337.

226 Wang AJ, Lin YF, Jian CH, et al. Polymeric microspheres for encapsulation of drugs. Assignee: Industrial Technology Research, Taiwan. US Patent Number 20060141021 A1; June 29, 2006.

227 Yow HN, Routh AF. Formation of liquid core-polymer shell microcapsules. Soft Matter. 2006;2(11):940–949.

228 Calle LM, Li W, Buhrow JW, et al. The benefits of self-corrosion control: multifunctional paints react automatically and rapidly to corrosion. Eur Coat J. 2011;11:18–23.

229 Calle LM, Li WN, Buhrow JW, et al. Elongated microcapsules and their formation for use in paints or composites. Assignee: United States Aeronautics and Space Administration, USA. US Patent Number 20120207921 A1; August 16, 2012.

230 Puri RG, Meshram RD, Sirsam RS. Recent developments in smart coatings for corrosion protection. Paintindia. 2012;62(5):55–61.

231 Chen T, Fu JJ. An intelligent anticorrosion coating based on pH-responsive supramolecular nanocontainers. Nanotechnology. 2012;23(50):505705.

232 Chen T, Fu JJ. pH-responsive nanovalves based on hollow mesoporous silica spheres for controlled release of corrosion inhibitor. Nanotechnology. 2012;23(23):235605/1–235605/8.

233 Fu JJ, Chen T, Wang MD, et al. Acid and alkaline dual stimuli-responsive mechanized hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles as smart nanocontainers for intelligent anticorrosion coatings. ACS Nano. 2013;7(12):11397–11408.

234 Abdullayev E, Lvov Y. Halloysite clay nanotubes for controlled release of protective agents. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011;11(11):10007–10026.

235 Ling CC, Xue QZ, Jung NN, et al. Collapse and stability of functionalized carbon nanotubes on Fe(100) surface. RSC Adv. 2012;2(19):7549–7556.

236 Hang TTX, Truc TA, Nguyen TD, et al. Preparation and characterization of nanocontainers of corrosion inhibitor based on layered double hydroxides. Appl Clay Sci. 2012;67–68:18–25.

237 Balaskas AC, Kartsonakis IA, Tziveleka LA, et al. Improvement of anti-corrosive properties of epoxy-coated AA 2024-T3 with TiO2 nanocontainers loaded with 8-hydroxyquinone. Prog Org Coat. 2012;74(3):418–426.

238 Videla HA. Biocorrosion and microbial corrosion inhibition: a review. International Corrosion Congress, 18th, Perth, Australia. November 20–24, 2011; Volume 1: plenary 4/1-plenary 4/10.

239 Davey ME, O’Toole GA. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64(4):847–867.

240 Zuo R. Biofilms: strategies for metal corrosion inhibition employing microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;76:1245–1253.

241 Little B, Ray R. A perspective on corrosion inhibition by biofilms. Corrosion (Houston, TX, United States). 2002;58(2):424–428.

242 Ponmariappan S, Maruthamuthu S, Palaniappan R. Inhibition of corrosion of mild steel using Staphylococcus sp. Trans SAEST. 2004;39(4):99–108.

243 Mansfeld F, Hsu H, Ornek D, et al. Corrosion control using regenerative biofilms on aluminum 2024 and brass in different media. J Electrochem Soc. 2002;149(4):B130–B138.

244 Li FS, An MZ, Duan DX. Corrosion inhibition of stainless steel by a sulfate-reducing bacteria biofilm in sea water. Int J Min Met Mater. 2012;19(8):717–725.

245 Chongdar S, Gunasekaran G, Kumar P. Corrosion inhibition of mild steel by aerobic biofilm. Electrochim Acta. 2005;50(24):4655–4665.

246 Ornek D, Wood TK, Hsu CH, et al. Pitting corrosion control of aluminum 2024 using protective biofilms that secrete corrosion inhibitors. Corrosion (Houston, TX, United States). 2002;58(9):761–767.

247 Ornek D, Jayaraman A, Syrett BC, et al. Pitting corrosion inhibition of aluminum 2024 by Bacillus biofilms secreting polyaspartate or γ-polyglutamate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;58(5):651–657.

248 Garcia F, Lopez ALR, Guillen JC, et al. Corrosion inhibition in copper by isolated bacteria. Anti- Corros Meth Mater. 2012;59(1):10–17.

249 Wood TK, Ornek D, Mansfeld FB. Preventing corrosion on metal or alloy surface with beneficial bacteria biofilms. Assignee: Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. USA. WO 2002040746; May 23, 2002.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset