References
Alexander, S., Hedberg, J.G. Evaluating technology-based learning: Which model? In: Beattie K., McNaught C., Wills S., eds. Interactive multimedia in university education: Designing for change in teaching and learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1994:233–244.
Allen, C., Tracing the evolution of social software, 2004. Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2004/10/tracing_the_evo.html
Amory, A. Game object model version II: A theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2007; 15:51–77.
Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Wittrock, M.C., A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, New York, 2001.
Aubusson, P., Schuck, S., Burden, K. Mobile learning for teacher professional learning: Benefits, obstacles and issues. ALT-J. 2009; 17(3):233–247.
Bain, J. Introduction: Learning-centred evaluation of innovation in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development. 1999; 18(2):165–172.
Barnes, C., Tynan, B. The adventures of Miranda in the brave new world: Learning in a Web 2.0 millennium. ALT-J. 2007; 15(3):189–200.
Bates, A.W. Technology, e-learning and distance education. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2005.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L. The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2008; 39(5):775–786.
Benson, R., Brack, C. Developing the scholarship of teaching: What is the role of e-teaching and learning? Teaching in Higher Education. 2009; 14(1):71–80.
Benson, R., Samarawickrema, G. Addressing the context of e-learning: Using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education. 2009; 30(1):5–21.
Biggs, J., Tang, C. Teaching for quality learning at university, 3rd ed. Maidenhead: SRHE & Open University Press; 2007.
Boud, D. Implementing student self assessment (HERDSA Green Guide No. 5). Kensington, NSW: HERDSA; 1991.
Boud, D. Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In: Knight P., ed. Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page; 1995:35–48.
Boud, D. Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In: Boud D., Falchikov N., eds. Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. London: Routledge; 2007:14–25.
Boud, D., Falchikov, N. Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006; 31(4):399–413.
Brew, A. Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan; 2006.
Carless, D. Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2007; 44(1):57–66.
Chickering, A.W., Gamson, Z.F. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin. 1987; 39(7):3–7.
Crooks, T. Assessing student performance (HERDSA Green Guide No. 8). Kensington, NSW: HERDSA; 1988.
Dewey, J. Experience and education. New York: Collier; 1963. [(original work published 1938).].
Dron, J. Control and constraint in e-learning: Choosing when to choose. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing; 2007.
Dron, J., Designing the undesignable. Social software and control. Educational Technology & Society. 2007;10(3):60–71. http://www.ifets.info/journals/10_3/5.pdf
Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D.H. Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In: Duffy T.M., Jonassen D.H., eds. Constructivism and the technology of instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992:1–16.
Earl, L.M. Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2003.
Falchikov, N. Improving assessment through student involvement. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2005.
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. E-learning in the 21st century. London: Routledge; 2003. [(pp. 22–31)].
Garrison, D.R., Kanuka, H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2004; 7:95–105.
Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S., Habeshaw, T. 53 Interesting ways to assess your students. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services Ltd; 1988.
Grabinger, R.S. Rich environments for active learning. In: Jonassen D.H., ed. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Macmillan; 1996:665–692.
Harvey, J., Evaluation Cookbook. Edinburgh. Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative. 1998 Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/cookbook/
James, R., McInnis, C., Devlin, M., Assessing learning in Australian universities. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The Australian Universities Teaching Committee. 2002 Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/docs/AssessingLearning.pdf
Jonassen, D.H. Objectivism vs constructivism: Do we need a philosophical paradigm shift? Educational Technology Research and Development. 1991; 39(3):5–14.
Jones, G., Edwards, G., Reid, A. How can mobile SMS communication support and enhance a first year undergraduate learning environment? ALT-J. 2009; 17(3):201–218.
Kember, D. Action learning and action research: Improving the quality of teaching and learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2000.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Waycott, J., Judd, T., Chang, R., Educating the net generation. A handbook of findings for practice and policy. 2009 20 January 2010 from. http://www.netgen.unimelb.edu.au/downloads/handbook/NetGenHandbookAll.pdf
Kennedy, G.J., Peer-assessment in group projectsYoung A., Tolhurst D., eds. Is it worth it? Conferences in Research in Practice in Information Technology. 2005 Vol. 42. Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV42Kennedy.pdf
Knight, P. The local practices of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006; 31(4):435–452.
Knight, P., Yorke, M. Learning, curriculum and employability in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2004.
Kravtsov, G.G., Kravtsova, E.E. Cultural-historical psychology in the practice of education. In: Fleer M., Hedegaard M., Tudge J., eds. Childhood studies and the impact of globalization: Policies and practices at global and local levels. New York: Routledge; 2009:202–212.
Laurillard, D. Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge; 1993.
Laurillard, D. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2002.
Laurillard, D. The teacher as action researcher: Using technology to capture pedagogic form. Studies in Higher Education. 2008; 33(2):139–154.
Li, L.K.Y. Some refinements on peer assessment of group projects. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2001; 26(1):5–18.
Marsh, H.W. Students’ evaluation of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In: Perry R.P., Smart J.C., eds. The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007:319–383.
Marton, F., Booth, S. Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997.
Mason, R., Kaye, A., Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford, Pergamon, 1989.
Mathur, S., Murray, T. Authentic assessment online: A practical and theoretical challenge in higher education. In: Williams D.D., Howell S.L., Hricko M., eds. Online assessment, measurement and evaluation: Emerging practices. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing; 2006:238–258.
Middleton, A. Beyond podcasting: Creative approaches to designing educational audio. ALT-J. 2009; 17(2):143–155.
Moore, M. Theory of transactional distance. In: Keegan D., ed. Theoretical principles of distance education. Routledge: London; 1993:22–38.
Moore, M. Constructivists: Don’t blame the tools!. The American Journal of Distance Education. 2004; 18(2):67–72.
Moore, M.G. The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 89–105), 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.
Murray, R., he scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press. 2008.
Nichols, M. Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning diffusion. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2008; 39(4):598–609.
Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane-Dick, D. Formative assessment and self- regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education. 2006; 31(2):199–218.
Oliver, R.Sims R., O’Reilly M., Sawkins S., eds. When teaching meets learning: Design principles and strategies for web-based learning environments that support knowledge construction. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ASCILITE Conference. Learning to choose: Choosing to learn. Southern Cross University Press, Lismore, 2000:17–28.
Oliver, R., Herrington, J., Teaching and learning online. A beginner’s guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. Mt Lawley, WA: Centre for Research in Information Technology and Communication, Edith Cowan University., 2001.. http://industry.flexiblelearning.net.au/Guide/Resources/Oliver_Herrington.pdf
O’Reilly, T., What is Web 2.0. Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. 2005 Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
Owen, J.M. Program evaluation: Forms and approaches. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin; 2006.
Panko, M. Learning and assessment: A case study - going the full Monty. In: Roberts T.S., ed. Self, peer and group assessment in e-learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing; 2006:85–100.
Parlett, M., Hamilton, D. Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programmes. In: Hamilton D., Jenkins D., King C., MacDonald B., Parlett M., eds. Beyond the numbers game: A reader in educational evaluation. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1977:6–22.
Phillips, R., Bain, J., McNaught, C., Rice, M., Tripp, D. Handbook for learning centred evaluation of computer facilitated learning projects in higher education. Perth: Murdoch University and ASCILITE; 2000.
Prensky, M., Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon. 2001;9(5) Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://www.marprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
Raban, R., Litchfield, A. Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2007; 23(1):34–47.
Ramsden, P. Learning to teach in higher education, 2nd ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2003.
Reeves, B., Malone, T.W., O’Driscoll, T. Leadership’s online labs. May: Harvard Business Review; 2008. [59–66].
Reeves, T.C., Hedberg, J.G. Interactive learning systems evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications; 2003.
Richardson, J.T.E. The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research. 1999; 69(1):53–82.
Richardson, W. Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2009.
Roberts, T.S. Self, peer and group assessment in e-learning: An introduction. In: Roberts T.S., ed. Self, peer and group assessment in e-learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing; 2006:1–16.
Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: The Free Press; 2003.
Rowntree, D. Assessing students: How shall we know them?. London: Harper & Row; 1977.
Salmon, G. E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page; 2002.
Salmon, G. E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online, 2nd ed. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2003.
Schön, D.A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1983.
Schön, D.A. Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
Schön, D. The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change. 1995; 27(6):26–34.
Scriven, M. The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler R.W., Gagné R.M., Scriven M., eds. Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1967:39–83.
Serafini, F., Three paradigms of assessment: Measurement, procedure, and inquiry. International Reading Association. Preparing reading professionals. International Reading Association, Newark, DE, 2004. [(pp. 207–16)].
Sharples, M. Big issues in mobile learning. In: Report of a workshop by the Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham, Learning Sciences Research Institute; 2007.
Shirky, C., A group is its own worst enemy, 2003. Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html
Sims, R. Interactivity on stage: Strategies for learner-designer communication. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. 1999; 15(3):257–272.
Squire, K. From content to context: Video games as designed experience. Educational Researcher. 2006; 35(8):19–29.
Stufflebeam, D.L. The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. SRIS Quarterly. 5(1), 1972.
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Chiou, S.-K., Hou, H.-T. The design and application of a web-based self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education. 2005; 45:187–192.
The Pennsylvania State University, Types of questions for on-line discussion. Penn State learning design community hub. 2007 Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://ets.tlt.psu.edu/learningdesign/crafting_question/quest_types
The TLT Group, Flashlight Program. Evaluation. Assessment. Action., 2009. Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://www.tltgroup.org/flashlightP.htm
Thompson, L., Podcasting: The ultimate learning experience and authentic assessmentAtkinson R.J., McBeath C., Soong S.K.A., Cheers C., eds. ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Centre for Educational Development, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2007:1019–1023 Retrieved 20 January 2010 from. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/thompson-poster.pdf
Tucker, R., Fermelis, J., Palmer, S. Designing, implementing and evaluating a Self-and-Peer Assessment tool for e-learning environments. In: Spratt C., Lajbcygier P., eds. E-learning technologies and evidence-based assessment approaches. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing; 2009:170–194.
Vygotsky, L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.