Table P.1 The sets of possible outcomes
Table 3.1 Distribution of the 22 recalled cases of near misses
Table 4.2 Differences in reasoning at the debriefing sessions after the staff exercises.
Table 6.1 Fatigue factors related to the hours of work
Table 6.2 Examples of actions at three decision levels and three risk mitigation levels
Table 11.1 Resilience concepts
Table 11.2 Matrix for extracted components
Table 11.3 Interpretation of the extracted components
Table 11.4 Names proposed for each component and confirmation level
Table 11.5 Definition of components
Table 13.1 FRAM descriptions of the functions ‘Risk Management’ and ‘Transfer Economic Resources’
Table 13.2 Two FRAM functions with assigned values
Table 13.3 The FRAM functions of a micro-prudential regulator (of Firm A)
Table 17.1 Table from the NRLS, with a list of contributing factors
Table 18.1 contrasting system perspectives
Table 18.2 Distribution of the 705 survey responses according to geographic region
Table 18.3 Distribution of the 705 survey responses according to job
Table E.1 Probing questions for the ability to respond
Table E.2 Probing questions for the ability to monitor