In the book and subsequent movie, The Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, a group of boys are marooned on an island. After several weeks, they resort to tribal behavior with each other. The stronger, more influential, and more assertive children take the lead. The weak, passive children become the whipping boys. The culture that ensues is not a pleasant one—it’s built on a hierarchy based on strength and influence. The lower castes are stigmatized and brutalized. By the end of the story, if it were not for adult intervention, the weak, passive types would have been killed.
Now, about you and your peers at work. Being assertive is going to make a big difference in how you’re treated, what advantages come your way, and what kind of relationships you form. This chapter tells all.
To be one of the guys or gals, you have to be able to stand your ground as well as any of the other guys or gals, maybe even better. Although you may have less trouble being assertive with your peers than you do with your boss, chances are there’s a thing or two more you could be doing to be more assertive with your peers.
Many studies reveal that if one co-worker feels slighted or upset because of the actions of another co-worker, the first party is likely to engage in any one of a number of activities, many of which are not helpful or productive to either party. For example, when upset with a co-worker, professionals report that at various times they have resorted to:
Make It So
Being assertive in your home life, with friends, and relatives, in your community, and everywhere you roam can certainly help you get more of what you want more of the time. Being assertive in the workplace, particularly among your peers, is not just helpful, it’s mandatory.
These are not happy outcomes. The strategy that makes the most sense most of the time is to talk about the situation directly with the person involved. If that comes hard for you, then this chapter is for you.
Although you may have been slighted, offended, or otherwise upset, not all conflict at work is necessarily bad. People sometimes believe that conflict means that there’s a breakdown in communications or that one party simply doesn’t get it. Even fully functioning, rational people, however, can view a situation differently. Thus, conflict may help bring differing views and opinions to the surface so that ultimately a team can achieve great synergy and the desired results.
To get a handle on how you might be perceived by others at work, think about four or five terms others might use to describe you. Would they call you aggressive, sensitive, loud, caring, egotistical, intelligent, careless, thoughtful, or uninspired?
Handle with Care
There may be some co-workers with whom you will never see eye to eye. This doesn’t mean you can’t be effective working with and around them. You both can be assertive if you understand that your individual differences need to be subdued for the overall good of the project, team, or organization.
Taking the notion a bit further, what would your co-workers see as your four or five strengths? Might it be your tenacity, accuracy, inventiveness, listening ability, assurance, leadership, or simply positive attitude? Then, what would they see as your four or five most notable weaknesses? Be honest here. Might it be that you rush your work, are always looking for shortcuts, are not a team player, miss deadlines too frequently, or don’t plan your time well in general?
I once had a job where one co-worker in particular flat out didn’t like me. It didn’t matter what I did or said, or whether I tried to avoid or befriend this person. Maybe I looked too much like someone from the past. Who knows?
After a couple weeks of subtle hostility, I decided to assert myself. Rather than confront this person directly, I determined that the best strategy would be to write a note. It simply said:
I acknowledge your personal dislike for me. We are both professionals and I believe we can put aside our differences for the good of the firm.
Yours truly,
Jeff Davidson
It must have worked. Although we never discussed it, I was thereafter able to have semi-pleasant exchanges with this person in the hallways.
Of course, it doesn’t always work this easily. I could have written that note, and ended up fanning the flames even hotter. I felt I had to do something, however. By acknowledging that I knew I wasn’t liked, and then drawing upon the fact that we were both dedicated, hard-working, talented management consultants, I “bonded us” in a novel way under less than ideal circumstances.
Your decision to be one of the gang is uniquely up to you. Many people go along with the crowd because they feel that it gives them social advantages. When they want or need to stand up for themselves it’s certainly a heck of a lot easier if they’re doing it within their own circle. For most people it seems “safer” as well.
There could be problems with trying to be one of the gang when you’re the boss. Employees always treat the boss a bit differently and may not welcome your efforts to befriend them, so play it by ear.
Yet, “being one of the guys or gals” is not a prerequisite to effectively asserting yourself with individuals within the group or with the whole group itself. I’m sure you’ve known mavericks, lone wolves, or outsiders who, when they needed to assert themselves, could do perfectly well.
If you want to form a stronger relationship with your co-workers or simply to get to know them more quickly, you have lots of strategies. You can engage in any one of the following:
Each of these strategies can bring you closer to another person.
Much has been written on networking as a strategy for career advancement. Networking works best when there is truly some element of friendship involved. There are few people I can think of offhand with whom I network on a regular basis who I’m not otherwise friends with or at least friendly with. It’s probably the same for you.
Focus on activities and behaviors that tend to give you a stronger bond with your co-workers, with the understanding that for most people it’s easier to be assertive with a friend than a nonfriend.
Among a boat-load of strategies for upping your friendship quotient with your co-workers, here are several, many of which may be right for you:
Word Power
Networking is strategically connecting with others for purposes of friendship, career advancement, or information exchange.
Just the Facts
Dr. Bernard Guerin, a member of the Department of Psychology at the University of Waikato in New Zealand, recently conducted a study in which he found that participants were able to be more assertive with a friend than with a stranger. Hence, a sound strategy for being more assertive among your co-workers if this has been a lingering problem for you is to get to know them better, and even become more friendly with them.
The greatest single courtesy you can give to a co-worker and at the same time lay the groundwork for you to be assertive when you need to be is to be a better listener.
I’ve alluded to listening throughout the book, and in the context of working with others, listening takes on an added measure of importance. After all, to meet tough challenges, critical deadlines, and stay profitable, you need to work as effectively and efficiently as possible much of the time. Being a good listener is effective and efficient.
With all the talk about teamwork today, many people don’t realize there are times when individual assertiveness is called for.
In the quest to avoid conflict, do you find yourself not speaking up with co-workers when your insides are telling you to do so? Here’s a quick quiz to see if you’re being too reluctant to speak up with your co-workers:
If you answered yes to three or more questions, assertiveness with your co-workers is a problem for you. If you answered yes to four or five questions, you need to reread all the chapters in this book several times (just kidding).
Make It So
Recognize that conflicts at work are not only normal, but can actually be healthy in terms of finding solutions more quickly, airing grievances that would have otherwise festered, and staying focused on the best way to meet challenges.
Because being assertive is part and parcel to open and straightforward interpersonal communications, I suggest that you reexamine this quiz. Then, the next time any of the situations described in the quiz occur, level with your co-workers. Tell them how you feel and what outcome you think can be accomplished.
Here are some phrases you can use in situations where you need to speak up with a co-worker or the group and you’re concerned that you might upset the harmony or balance that seems to prevail:
What is it about the language of the preceding phrases that makes them effective? You’re being vulnerable and respectful, yet assertive.
For a particularly sticky situation where you feel you need to assert yourself, use language that draws the other person in. For example:
The unifying theme of these statements is that you ask for help.
Generally speaking, it’s easier to be assertive with a single co-worker than with a group of co-workers, likewise with a friend than with a stranger. Thus, if you’re reluctant to assert yourself among a group of co-workers, for now, don’t do it. Start with just another co-worker, one on one.
When someone lets you have it, either fairly or unfairly, constructively or nonconstructively, first consider who is making the charges. In his book, A Strategy for Winning, Carl Mays suggests that you assess each of your co-workers by asking yourself the following questions:
If the co-worker who is criticizing you scores well after you’ve made this assessment, then give him or her the benefit of the doubt, and listen as closely as you can.
If this co-worker does not score well when assessing him based on these questions, continue to listen as best you can. Remember, there are always grains of truth in even the most malevolent of criticism. While you’re listening to the co-worker, try to engage in some of the following behaviors:
What can you say to assert yourself, stand your ground, let the other party know how you feel, and not exacerbate the situation? Plenty!
First, acknowledge the other person’s input. You can say something reasonably nice along the lines of, “I acknowledge you for what you’ve said, but I don’t see it that way.” Or acknowledge any part of what they said that you can agree with while expressing your lack of agreement for the rest. Acknowledging the other person’s input is important and effective because on some level, everyone loves acknowledgment.
Next, take five to cool down or collect your thoughts. Tell the other party, “You’ve laid a lot on me and I’m going to need time to ponder what you’ve said. I’ll get back in touch with you after the weekend.”
If the criticizer wants more immediate responsiveness, try saying something like, “Okay, that’s a lot to drop on somebody. I just can’t respond this moment, let me take it up again with you in a few minutes.” In those few minutes you can regain your composure, perhaps, or approach the issue with greater objectivity.
You also have the option of asking the other party to refine her observation. For example, say, “Could you say that a different way?” or “Could you elaborate on that?” In both instances, you may get the other party to shed more light on the situation.
Another response (one that you should practice with greater frequency) is saying, “You know, you’re right. I flubbed that one. It’s my responsibility to get things back on track.”
Sam Horn, an author from Hawaii who has written the helpful and amusing Tung Fu: The Art of Verbal Self-Defense, says that when you make a blunder, sometimes the best and easiest thing to do is just to say, “Oops! I really blew that one.”
There may be times when someone who is criticizing you is being totally unfair, and it’s someone who is not supportive of you anyway.
Make It So
Agreeing with your criticizer when he has valid points, even if he comes on a little too strong, will disarm most rational people. They won’t have much to say after you’ve admitted responsibility for the faux pas.
I don’t advocate escalating any situation so that you have a permanent long-standing enemy within your organization. That’s highly counterproductive. Try using one of the following phrases:
Every now and then, a co-worker might ask you a question to which they already know the answer: “Did you turn in the report on time?” (when he or she knows that you didn’t). Or they might really be trying to get at something else. If you dutifully respond, you play right into their hands. Short-change the process by using one of the following responses:
Said without emotion, all of these represent fair and effective assertive replies. Stand up for yourself without trampling on the rights of others. You also have the option to offer a short answer, such as a yes or no, and say nothing more.
You don’t have to tolerate coy behavior, but don’t be rude, either. If you do offer a short answer, do so with sincerity and a smile, and then turn to something else.
What should you do if, to the best of your knowledge, your entire group is headed in the wrong direction? Here’s where you earn your stripes. There’s a variety of strategies for asserting yourself for the good of the group. Let’s tackle them one by one.
If the group is assembled, take the floor, and, using everything you know, make your case. If the group is scattered, send an e-mail, write a memo, or connect by conference call.
Trying to redirect a group is the fastest way to evoke change, but also the riskiest. You risk the distinct possibility of one person disagreeing and others joining in. You also risk being subject to group-think, wherein the group simply can’t make a change because they’re so heavily invested in the plans already in place.
Proceed with caution, however. If you’re not the most senior person, it could be dangerous to send such an e-mail to superiors. You may commit career suicide by trying to tell your superiors that they’re going the wrong way. You might try calling first, tempering your message one-on-one over the phone, and then send a follow-up e-mail if appropriate.
With this strategy, you visit or communicate with each member of the group, one on one, one at a time. Obviously, this takes longer and requires more effort on your part, but the risk is lower. If you can convince one person, you can use that victory to go to the next person, and so on.
Eventually, when you have half the group or more on your side, or even one of the most influential people in the group on your side, it’s a safe bet that you’ll be able to sway the rest.
Again, proceed with caution. You run the risk of people (especially those who may have championed the strategy you’re disagreeing with) feeling that you’re sneaking around. Once you get some people on your side, tell the rest that these people agreed with you. There is strength in numbers!
In this scenario, you approach the group, perhaps when you’re already meeting. You voice your concerns as if you’re not absolutely certain, but you have strong reason to believe that xyz will happen. Although a response like this may seem to go against the notion of assertiveness, sometimes the best tactic is to act less certain than you are, especially if you sense you’ve come on too strong in the past.
You then ask the group to consider this possibility and various alternatives they might take if it were true. If you have the opportunity, you might ask them to engage in brainstorming.
Your quest is to get the group to grapple with the issue that you raise, so that by the time they’re through talking, it’s a group concern and not necessarily your concern.