1.3. OUR SOLUTIONS 3
ird is the model interpretability. To comprehensively fulfill the clothing matching task,
the compatibility modeling scheme should not only give the final decision on whether or not
the given fashion items are compatible, but also interpret the discordance of incompatible out-
fits. Nevertheless, most existing studies focus more on employing deep learning methods to
learn effective representations for fashion items, and hence suffer from the poor interpretabil-
ity, making them less useful in practice. Accordingly, how to enhance the interpretability of the
compatibility modeling scheme proves difficult.
Fourth is the user factor. In reality, different people may have different fashion tastes, and
their aesthetics can be rather subjective. For example, given a T-shirt, some people prefer jeans
to make an outfit, while others may like skirts. Additionally, people with different body shapes
tend to go with different types of fashion items, to highlight their figure strengths and weaken
the shortcomings. Consequently, how to incorporate the user factor, such as personal preference
and body shape, in the traditional item-based compatibility modeling framework, making the
matching results not only of high compatibility from the general item-item perspective but also
cater for user taste as well as body shape from the personal item-user angle, contributes a crucial
challenge.
e last challenge is the absence of a comprehensive benchmark. In fact, several fash-
ion datasets have been collected in existing studies, for example, the WoW [76], Exact
Street2Shop [29], and Fashion-136K [49]. However, most existing released datasets mainly in-
clude the visual metadata of fashion items but lack the contextual description, as aforementioned,
which also comprises a great deal of valuable information on items. In addition, the user context
is usually absent from most existing released datasets in the fashion domain, which hinders the
research on integrating the user factor into the compatibility modeling. erefore, it is necessary
to construct comprehensive benchmark datasets to fulfill the validation of compatibility models.
Furthermore, several other issues come into being, such as the confidence of various
knowledge rules in the guidance of compatibility modeling, user preference modeling, and user
body shape factor in compatibility modeling, which increase the challenge of the proposed prob-
lem.
1.3 OUR SOLUTIONS
To address the aforementioned research challenges, we present several state-of-the-art compat-
ibility modeling theories and verify them in different contexts, ranging from the general com-
patibility modeling, personalized compatibility modeling to personalized wardrobe creation.
To facilitate the evaluation of our proposed schemes, we first created three large-scale
real-world datasets from several online fashion-oriented communities for the above three tasks,
respectively. In particular, Dataset I is created by collecting the outfit compositions of fashion
experts on Polyvore. Considering that it lacks enough user context, we build Dataset II by crawl-
ing the historical outfits of 6,191 users from IQON. en to incorporate the user’s figure/body
shape and create suitable user wardrobe, we build Dataset III comprising purchase histories of