Protocol Choices Between the ACS Server and the Client (the Router)

Traditionally, and in common practice, if you are authenticating and authorizing administrators for command-line access, it is likely that you will configure TACACS+ on both the ACS server and the router for their communication with each other. A large reason for this is because TACACS+ has clearly defined and separate techniques and configurations for each aspect of AAA. For example, if you want to tell the router to check authorization for each individual command before allowing an administrator to put that command in, and only give the administrator a subset or portion of commands, TACACS+ and its authorization component allows extremely granular control in communicating which commands would be allowed. RADIUS, however, does not have the same level of granular control as TACACS+ command-by-command authorization.

If you are authenticating and authorizing end users who just want their packets to go through a network device (when authentication and authorization are required), it is likely that you are using RADIUS as the communications method between the ACS server on the router. You may configure the router and ACS server to use both TACACS+ and RADIUS simultaneously between the ACS server and its client, the router.

Table 3-2 compares these two protocols.

Image
Image

Table 3-2 TACACS+ Versus RADIUS

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset