Chapter 5
The Value of Branding in the Music Business

Contributed by Tammy Donham

Contents

History of Branding

Branding Basics

Brand Architecture

Branding in the Music Industry

Successfully Creating an Artist’s Brand

Defining the Artist and Developing a Brand Identity

Defining the Artist’s Audience

Promoting and Building the Brand

Maintaining the Brand

The Role of Corporate Partnerships in the Music Industry

Finding the Right Brand Partner

Cause Marketing with a Brand

The Future of Music Partnerships

Conclusion

Glossary

References

Tammy Donham received her undergraduate degree in Marketing from Western Kentucky University and her Master’s degree in Business Administration from Middle Tennessee State University. Donham worked for Fruit of the Loom, Inc. in several marketing capacities before moving to Nashville in 1996 where she worked for nearly seventeen years for the Country Music Association (CMA).

She held various marketing-related positions within CMA ultimately rising to Vice-President of Marketing. While in her post as VP, she oversaw all marketing, creative services, and research efforts for the CMA Awards, CMA Music Festival and CMA Country Christmas events and television specials, including broadcast, digital, radio, out-of-home and print initiatives. She was CMA’s lead liaison with ABC Television Marketing, Synergy and Affiliate teams and worked closely with these and other event partners to maximize promotional and brand-building opportunities for CMA properties across all platforms. Donham is a graduate of Leadership Music, as well as a member of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences and the Country Music Association.

Donham began teaching Marketing of Recordings and Digital Strategies for the Music Business in the Recording Industry Department at Middle Tennessee State University in the fall of 2013.

The American Marketing Association defines a brand as a “Name, term, design, symbol, or any other feature that identifies one seller’s good or service as distinct from those of other sellers” (AMA, 2014). Branding an artist involves clearly communicating who that artist is and what they represent. An artist’s brand is how he or she is perceived by consumers, corporations, and the media. Branding strengthens and coalesces the perceptions of these groups when they hear or see an artist’s name.

By building a strong brand, an artist is able to leverage their name to generate additional sources of revenue from licensing deals, to endorsements, to business ventures where the artist owns the company to help offset the declining revenue. The music company also benefits from that strong brand since it opens the door to branding and positioning opportunities for the artist and their recorded music outside the traditional music retail space. More exposure in the media and non-traditional outlets executed through strategic partnerships creates a broader awareness of the artist which leads to a bigger audience and, in turn, the opportunity for increased sales and overall brand equity for the artist, all resulting in greater profitability for the music company.

Figure 5.1

Figure 5.1

Platinum-selling artist Jay-Z is a music celebrity on the top of the Forbes top celebrities list because of the income generated not just by his music sales, but from his corporate partnerships and business ventures like Roc Nation, a full service entertainment and sports management company, a chain of night clubs, and a branded cognac (Forbes, 2014a). In addition, a partnership with Samsung for his Magna Carta Holy Grail album resulted in the company purchasing 1 million copies to give to owners of its smartphones before the album’s official release (Houghton, 2013).

Top Earning Artist Brands in Music

Forbes Celebrity List Rank* Artist Earnings Major Businesses, Partnerships, and Endorsements

1 Beyoncé Knowles $115 M Fragrance line (Heat, Pulse, and Rise), House of Deréon clothing line, H&M endorsement, and Pepsi sponsorship
3 Dr. Dre $620 M Beats by Dr. Dre headphones and Beats Music (recently acquired by Apple)
6 Jay-Z $60 M Entertainment and sports company Roc Nation; 40/40 Clubs; D’Usse Cognac, and Armand de Brignac Champagne
8 Rihanna $48 M Women’s and men’s fragrance lines, Vita Coco coconut water endorsement
9 Katy Perry $40 M CoverGirl and PopChips endorsements, and her own fragrance Killer Queen

Source: Pomerantz, 2014

* Rankings are based on fame as well as income.

Taylor Swift changed the way the music industry thought about album promotion and the value of partnerships with an unprecedented effort to promote the launch of her album, Red. According to Nielsen SoundScan, the album sold 1.2 million copies in its first week of release. These were also the highest first week sales figures in the U.S. in 10 years. Arguably, this was due in large part to the leveraging of her brand partnerships across multiple product categories. The extensive promotional effort included a branded display in the front of Walgreen’s stores, an album-and-pizza promotion with Papa John’s that included album art on box tops, as well as a special offer to purchase the CD with every pizza order, her own shoe line for Keds promoted across multiple media outlets, a deluxe exclusive and branded display with Target, a promotion with American Greetings, and a four-sided corrugated cardboard floor display in Wal-Mart’s Action Alley. Swift also renewed her presence in fragrance departments with the launch of a new fragrance for Elizabeth Arden to follow the success of the artist’s Wonderstruck perfume (Hampp, 2012). The buzz and excitement generated around the album launch was largely credited to the comprehensive marketing campaign. The exposure value of the partner promotions was worth millions, it helped secure the album’s successful launch, and it increased Swift’s brand equity.

For her album 1989 released in 2014, Swift once again leveraged her promotional partnerships and massive social audience to sell nearly 1.3 million albums in the first week alone (Mansfield, 2014). This should be noted as an unusual feat in the challenged music sales environment. Swift’s promotional efforts around the album included a stream on Yahoo!, a number of “secret sessions” giving her most passionate fans a private listening party of the album before its release, teasers across all social media platforms, and support from corporate partners American Greetings and Keds. In addition, Diet Coke partnered with Subway for a month-long promotion leading up to the album release supported by in-restaurant promotion, as well as a media campaign on TV, radio, social, and online channels (Lukovitz, 2014).

Jay-Z, Taylor Swift, and many other artists have discovered the power of leveraging their names or brands into successful business ventures where the revenue potential can augment and sometimes dwarf their earnings from recorded music.

Branding is not just important to superstars. A strong brand can be leveraged by artists at every level—from local artists who are attempting to grow their audience or secure a partnership with a local retailer to mid-sized acts that are on the cusp of breaking out. Importantly, partnerships between artists and corporate brands can be critical to artists who are not seeing mainstream radio or sales success by generating awareness of and interest in the artist and their music. These partnerships can also help newer artists by providing in-kind support.

Many industry professionals believe branding will be a key focus for the future of music, so it is important to understand both the history of branding and how branding impacts marketing strategies at companies across all business spectrums.

History of Branding

Branding is often thought of having originated with cattlemen who would burn a distinctive symbol into an animal’s skin with a hot branding iron as a way of differentiating one’s cattle from another’s. Historically, however, all manner of goods and crafts were often imprinted by branding with the trademarks of the tradespeople who produced or crafted the product. Among other uses, these marks were a way to assure customers of the quality and the origin of a product.

While trademarks were applied to goods in other ways besides branding irons—and the practice of actually branding a trademark onto barrels, bags, sacks, and goods fell out of favor—the term “branding” remained.

The modern concept of branding products originated in the early 19th century when the advent of industrialization created the need for manufacturers who were mass-producing goods in factories to promote their goods visually to a larger number of consumers who may have been unfamiliar with their products. A few of the first manufacturers to embrace this “branding” concept were Campbell’s Soup®, Coca-Cola® and Ivory™ Soap (AEF, 2014).

Branding Basics

Brands like Apple, Disney, MTV, and Sony are just a few examples of strong identities whose brand marks, according to Forbes, are valued at millions of dollars and in the case of Apple, more than $100 million (Forbes, 2014b).

Individuals also have their own brands to manage, which is often referred to as personal branding. An individual artist’s or group’s brand involves how they are perceived by the public, fans, corporate America, and members of the press. The artist’s brand has to do with all aspects of their public image from how the artist’s website looks, to the album art, to style and brand of clothing that is worn. Logos, fonts, the look and feel of marketing materials and press kit, live performances, concert merchandise, hair style, videos, wardrobe, what the artist says and does in public, and the brands with which the artist is affiliated all play a role in the development of the artist’s brand (McQuicklin, 2011).

What are the images and words that come to mind when you think of your favorite music artist? What about Robin Thicke? Lady Gaga? The Rolling Stones? Katy Perry? Justin Bieber? Each of these artists has a strong brand that is vastly different. A strong brand increases a product, company, and an artist’s marketability and value. In fact, a brand can be one of the most valuable components on a corporation’s balance sheet even though it is an intangible asset. For example, Flowers Foods paid bankrupt Hostess Brands $350 million for its bread brands (including Wonderbread) and attributed 55%, or $193 million, of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets, mainly trademarks (Lavin, 2014).

Brand Architecture

Brand architecture is the structure and interrelationship of brands across an entire organization. It outlines the roles and relationships between all of the brands in the portfolio showing how the corporate brand and sub-brands relate to each other, support each other, and reinforce the main mission of the corporate brand. The way brands in a company are connected helps a company introduce new products by leveraging the brand equity and consumer loyalty of that product line and helps prevent the company from introducing new products that do not support the main brand’s core mission. This also helps to provide clarity for the consumer enabling them to easily differentiate one product from another in the line of offerings.

In their book Brand Leadership authors David Aaker and Erich Joachmisthaler outline the main brand relationship strategies (2009). The two most popular of these are a branded house or a house of brands.

A Branded House—In this approach the master brand is the dominant brand with sub-brands being descriptive in nature. Virgin is often used as one of the best examples of Branded House. Under the Virgin umbrella is Virgin Airlines, Virgin Music, Virgin Radio, Virgin Hotels, and Virgin Mobile Phones among others. All offerings under this approach include the master brand so the branded house offers clarity and leverage with the consumer. All products carry the overarching brand name and the brand values and attributes that come with it.

This approach enables companies to maximize resources by putting the majority of marketing effort into supporting and building the master brand. Although the synergy of this approach offers improved efficiencies that same close connection between brands also increases risk; if the master brand is damaged the negative connotations are extended throughout the entire portfolio.

House of Brands—Under a house of brands approach, the primary brand is used minimally on package and in communication with consumers. Instead, the sub-brands are the focus and are treated as distinct, independent entities with the parent company receiving little or no mention. The brands are independent and unconnected. Proctor & Gamble is probably the most famous example of a house of brands structure. Under the P&G “House” there are dozens of brand offerings including Charmin, Cascade, Pampers, Prilosec, Duracell, Gillette, and Tide, just to name a few. These brands are recognized by their brand names alone and not by “P&G’s Pampers” or “P&G’s Gillette razors.” This approach is often used to allow a company to position multiple products differently even in the same category.

There are also hybrid approaches to brand architecture where brands are combined in some way to be complementary. Aaker and Joachmisthaler note that using an endorsed brands strategy offers credibility to a brand while a sub-brand strategy allows a parent brand to compete in new categories that would have previously been inconsistent with the brand’s positioning.

Endorsed Brands

Endorsed brands take independent brand names and attempt to strengthen them by adding an organizational brand (e.g., Fairfield Inn by Marriott). An endorsement may be used to alter the image of the endorsed brand but its main role is to add credibility to the endorsed sub-brand in the eyes of the consumers. The endorsement signals to the consumer that the company will deliver on its brand promise particularly when the endorser company has established credibility in the same product category. With an endorsement both parties (the endorser and the endorsee) will each have their own name, logo, personality, and brand image. They will also each have their own marketing plans and messaging to consumers. Although each brand is distinct, the endorsing brand must have the higher-level brand promise to signal to the consumer that the endorsed brand is worthy of their consideration, but the endorser brand generally plays a minor driver role.

Sub-Brands

Sub-brands are brands connected to a master brand that add associations to make a brand seem more appealing to consumers or can be used to stretch a master brand, allowing it to compete in a different category. The master brand is the primary reference point but the sub-brands allow for additional associations. A sub-brand can also signal that a new product is newsworthy as it did when Crest introduced its Pro-HealthTM line of products.

Automotive companies often use a sub-brand approach. Ford Escort, Ford Mustang, Ford Fusion, and Ford Explorer are just a few offerings under the Ford umbrella. By using the Ford name, the underlying brand promise is conveyed but each sub-brand is allowed to develop its own identify.

Determining the right company structure and brand positions in the family of brands is an important decision that is based on many factors. Often, one of the main points to consider is how much the brand in question needs to be in the driver (or lead) role (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2009).

Branding in the Music Industry

In the music industry different structures and blended strategies are often utilized. Most label groups have different sub-labels or imprints that each target a different segment of the market. For example, the Universal Music Group (UMG) brand family includes diverse offerings like Blue Note Records that focuses on Jazz music and was formed to target the adult music consumer while the company’s Def Jam Recordings focuses primarily on a younger audience with Hip Hop and Urban music.

Building strong brands has become a central focus of marketers across the music landscape. Radio stations, radio personalities, concert venues, musical instrument manufacturers, and artists each have their own unique personality and attributes for which they are or want to be known. Through the use of imagery, words, slogans, logos, and style, these entities can create a powerful brand that consumers recognize and trust.

Why is branding such a cornerstone of marketing artists? Because a strong brand increases an artist’s value to the media, to fans, and to brand partners.

Successfully Creating an Artist’s Brand

Strong artist brands do not happen overnight. It takes years of cultivation on behalf of the artist and the artist’s team to develop a strong brand. To be successful at branding one must have a firm understanding of how to create the artist’s brand, how to promote and build the brand, and how to maintain the brand.

Defining the Artist and Developing a Brand Identity

The first step to developing an artist brand is to truly understand who the artist is. What values do they hold dear? Are they focused on family or a free spirit who loves adventure? What is their personality and style? Is the artist polished and fashion-forward, or rugged and disaffected? Are the artist’s live shows full of energy and high production or more laid back and intimate? Does the artist drink alcohol or publicly denounce any kind of vices?

What makes the artist stand out from others in the genre? What is their story? What makes the artist interesting to fans? What makes them interesting to the media? These and other such questions provide insight into the characteristics and personality of the artist. Unique characteristics can often be embraced as those differentiators help a consumer more easily recognize that brand when compared to others. Defining the artist and being clear about who they are authentically is the first step to building an image and developing a strong brand (Dahud, 2012).

Figure 5.2

Figure 5.2

Defining the Artist’s Audience

In addition to needing to know who the artist is, it is important to know who that artist serves. In other words, who is buying the music? Who is attending the concerts? Who is engaging with the artist on social networks?

Research plays a critical role in this step. One of the best methods of developing a deep understanding of the artist’s primary audience is through the use of surveys. Online surveys may be sent to the artist’s email list, mobile list, ticket purchaser database, or social network asking basic demographic, geographic, lifestyle, and behavior questions and intercept surveys may be conducted by a team of researchers as concert goers enter the building (See chapter 4 for more information.)

Through this research activity artist marketing teams can gain understanding of what their fans want from them and what characteristics and traits they love about the artist and the artist’s music, which will help the artist better meet their needs. They can also find out more about the audience that will help them better target both existing and potential fans. With this research a target market and customer profile can be developed. A customer profile is a persona or description of the ideal customer that includes demographic, geographic, and psychographic characteristics, as well as consumption patterns. This profile can be used to identify the best places to place paid advertising promoting new music and identify which categories and brands they like most. This information, in conjunction with the artist’s profile, helps the artist team identify which companies and brands would be a good brand fit; in other words, a company that shares the same personality and target audience.

Promoting and Building the Brand

Building a strong brand, goes beyond creating a logo or visual mark and placing paid advertising. It is about consistently shaping and promoting all of the associations of the brand both mental and physical.

Strong Brands are Authentic and Consistent

To build a strong brand, artists must be clear and consistent about who they are and what they represent. The artist’s brand identity should reflect the values, attitude, and personality of the artist in all communication with the public and industry. This step is critically important because of the strong bond an artist has with their fan base. That relationship is built on trust and an understanding of knowing whom the artist is.

The importance of consistency extends to all creative elements surrounding the artist. Logos, copywriting, tone of voice, and imagery all should remain consistent across all platforms and media (McQuilkin, 2011).

Strong Brands Are Active

Artists should actively communicate who they are. They should engage and interact with their audience on a regular basis and embrace social networks to communicate on a one-to-one basis particularly while building their fan base. They should be mindful of the “voice” used in all communications. It should also be consistent with the artist’s brand regardless of whether or not it is the artist himself speaking or a representative.

Labels and artists should actively look for opportunities to showcase the artist’s brand from including the logo and marks across all available media, to walk on roles in popular television programs, to getting the artist involved in a local charitable effort, all of which help build awareness and brand equity.

Strong Brands Develop a Deep, Emotional Connection with the Consumers

The best artists know how to meaningfully connect with their fans by sharing a story, a special moment, or just communicating an everyday frustration. These interactions are opportunities to promote the artist’s authenticity and create a lasting bond with loyal supporters. The fan base of the popular band One Direction has often been described by the media and insiders alike as one of the most passionate groups in the music business. The group often sends updates on projects to its social audience, recognizes its strongest supporters publicly, and engages with fans in creative ways like asking fans to submit video of themselves for a chance of being featured in a movie about them.

Maintaining the Brand

Strong Brands Monitor What Is Being Said About Them

TweetDeck, Hootsuite, Social Mention, Google Alerts, and Google Trends are just a few of the services and tools that make it easy to monitor social conversations about a brand. Set up a command post to monitor the artist’s name, album names, song titles, related hashtags and other strategic keywords to engage with consumers who are talking about the artist and to protect the brand by quickly diffusing any negative comments that may damage the brand.

Protecting the Brand

Pop Music Superstar Britney Spears certainly had her share of instances with the potential to damage her brand. From a head-shaving incident, to a 55-hour marriage to a high school friend, to a stint in rehabilitation, to other brand-damaging incidents, the artist and her team have had to work hard to protect her public image. Even with all of the negative publicity, Spears slowly rebuilt her brand over several years leading to a popular and lucrative run in Las Vegas. Then in July 2014, a YouTube clip that reportedly featured a Britney Spears song that had not yet been auto-tuned went viral. With criticism mounting and her brand again at risk, the song’s producer quickly issued a statement in Spears’ defense noting that the leaked track was actually not an official take but was a vocal warm-up session. The record company also took swift action by having the leaked video removed from YouTube to prevent further sharing.

While social media has made connecting with fans easier than ever before, today’s connected world means artists and the artist’s team must be vigilant to ensure that all messaging is “on brand” and that potentially damaging incidences are controlled quickly.

Linking Brands to Build Brand Equity

There are many opportunities to leverage the strength of two or more brands through strategic partnerships. These relationships take different forms with some of the most popular being co-branding, sponsorships, and artist endorsements.

At times it makes sense to partner with another entity to leverage the full strength of both brands. The Nike+iPod Sport Kit is an example of co-branding, which is when two or more brands from different organizations create a joint product for which each company plays a major role. While having multiple partners involved increases the exposure opportunity because more resources are being dedicated to the product’s marketing effort the design and implementation process can become very complex because each brand wants to ensure that the product is representative of their brand image and brand promise (Aaker and Jachimsthaler, 2009).

Sponsorships occur when an organization pays a sum of money toward the cost of an activity or event (such as a music festival, concert tour, or album launch) in return for the right to advertise and participate in the event. Sponsorships allow companies to connect with consumers by becoming part of an event. The brand hopes by being associated with an event, an audience likes and enjoys that the positive feeling about the event may get transferred to the brand. This is referred to as the association effect (Dimofte and Yalch, 2011).

Another way of linking brands is the celebrity endorsement. A celebrity endorsement is the act of giving one’s public support or approval to someone or something. With both sponsorships and endorsements in the music industry a company is essentially renting an artist’s audience in exchange for money and/or promotional support (Erogan, 1999).

The Role of Corporate Partnerships in the Music Industry

Music and brand partnerships continue to gain in popularity because they offer benefits for the brand, the label, and the management team and artist.

From the Brand’s Perspective

Corporate brands value partnering with music acts and events to build brand awareness among the artist’s fan base, engage with consumers, and build brand loyalty. Corporate brands understand the deep connection artists have with their fans, and they hope that by being involved in the artist’s activities and events they can enhance the brand’s image or improve the attitude toward the brand.

In recent years, the increased use of social networks to develop a strong direct relationship with a brand’s consumer base has made music partnerships even more attractive. Brands today are embracing content marketing strategies at a rapid rate seeking to build goodwill and drive a deep emotional connection to their customers by creating great content (primarily video) around topics in which their customers are most interested rather than pushing out sales messages. Since music partnerships offer both the connection aspect and video it is a natural choice.

The energy drink company Red Bull for instance has built a strong brand in recent years around music. The company’s efforts include the underwriting of a music festival (the Red Bull Music Academy), a record label that works with up-and-coming artists, and a music publishing arm. For 20 years skateboard shoe manufacturer Van’s has also created a bond with music fans through sponsorship of the Warped Tour (Diaz and Pathak, 2013).

The most successful music partnerships are those where there is a strong brand fit where artist and brand values and personalities align. The partnerships where the artist speaks to the brand’s customer base and where the brand appeals to the artist’s fan base provide a win-win scenario that each party can fully leverage for their benefit.

From the Record Label’s Perspective

In a world where consumers have an almost insatiable appetite for music and want to pay as little as possible for it artists and labels alike recognize the importance of building and leveraging a strong brand. Record labels have been seeing decreasing CD and single download sales as consumer behavior continues to migrate rapidly toward streaming. And the small payments offered on streams have not yet generated meaningful revenue for most artists or their labels.

For record labels, the importance of developing and building the artist’s brand has become increasingly critical. Because of decreased revenue, record labels are struggling to find a financial model that works. Marketing budgets for most albums are conservative and often consist of the advertising and promotional elements that have a strong correlation to sales, which typically includes radio, spot television, and online ads. In addition, traditional retail space in mass merchandising stores like Wal-Mart and Target continue to shrink and most record stores have either merged or gone out of business entirely. Labels today are actively seeking alternative sources of revenue and non-traditional promotional opportunities in order to generate awareness and ultimately sales.

Increasingly, when an artist is signed to a label brand partnerships are top of mind. Early on the partnerships team at the label will ask the artist a series of questions to gauge his or her affinity for certain products, interests, and values in order to begin to formulate a list of potential corporate partners for the album launch. The team wants to find a good brand fit for the product because that can help ensure an artist’s commitment to the partnership (or buy-in), which is a critical component to its success.

Labels look at corporate partnerships favorably because of the potential to generate additional revenue from a sponsorship fee. Notably, most agreements now offer the opportunity for the label to share in most of the artist’s revenue streams, not just sales of the recorded product. Equally, and perhaps more importantly, the music industry sees value in the wide distribution and significant promotion that corporations can bring to an artist and recorded music. In today’s market labels and artists often develop partnerships with corporations where the media and marketing support the corporate brand brings to the table are the only “currency” involved in the deal.

What is important is that in this scenario the artists and label may not be paid money at all. The media and promotional assets provided by the partner brands bring value to the artist which they might not otherwise have access to given the label’s limited marketing budget. Many corporate brands spend millions of dollars each year on in-store displays, television ads, radio campaigns, direct mail, outdoor advertising, and digital efforts dwarfing the amount generally spent annually by the label to promote a recording. By incorporating promotion of the album into the corporate brand’s messaging, the corporations offer the opportunity to expose the artist and the music to a wider audience, which translates into greater awareness; increased revenue from ticket sales, merchandise sales, record sales and streams; and the building of the artist’s brand.

For instance, consider that a billboard in Times Square costs tens, and sometimes hundreds, of thousands of dollars per month; a thirty second spot on NBC’s The Voice costs more than $200,000 and a full page, four color ad in People magazine has an open rate of more than $330,000 and you can start to see the tremendous value that brands can bring to the partnership table. These high-priced promotional vehicles are more easily attained by an artist with a limited budget when acquired through corporate partnerships.

It is common for each partner (artist/label camp and brand) to approach a potential partnership by throwing each of their assets on the virtual table and seeing which ones are interesting and valuable to the other party. Any cash payment involved as well as which assets are offered up depend on what the artist is asked to do (private concerts, commercial shoots, meet and greets, etc.). Most often, trade-only or in-kind deals are more popular with up and coming or mid-tier artists; some sort of cash and trade combination is standard for a well-known, mainstream artist.

From the Artist and Manager’s Perspective

As important as partnerships are for the labels in promoting the recorded music sales to the masses, managers and artists are also seeing the value brands provide in generating awareness of the artist, expanding the fan base, driving sales, and building brand equity. As noted, partnerships can be used to promote the artist in non-traditional product categories and places such as in the cosmetics counter of a department store, or on the shelves of a grocery or sporting goods retail store. This not only helps stimulate sales but also provides valuable impressions that help build brand equity. Partnerships may also provide an alternative source of revenue to help offset low royalty payments.

Finding the Right Brand Partner

Artists build strong brands in part by remaining consistent about who they are and partnering with brands that are a good brand fit. A bad fit can damage an artist’s brand just as much as a good fit can help build it.

As noted previously, a firm understanding of an artist’s brand identity, as well as the artist’s audience profile are the first steps to being able to hone in on the right category and brand for a potential partnership. Primary research of the fan base can provide valuable insight. In addition to primary research of the audience labels and management groups use other tools and services to help them develop the artist’s profile and identify the best brand fit for possible partnerships.

An alternative data collection source is using a third party provider of consumer behavior. There are several companies in the United States that specialize in surveying consumers and selling the results to interested parties. These parties include corporate brands, media outlets, agencies, and yes, record labels. Three of the most widely utilized databases in the advertising and marketing industry are GfK Mediamark Research and Intelligence (MRI), Nielsen Scarborough, and The NPD Group.

GfK MRI gathers information on consumer behavior through annual in-person, at home interviews of 26,000 consumers about their “media choices, demographics, lifestyle and attitudes, and usage of more than 6,000 products in 550 categories” (GfK MRI, 2014). The company licenses this database to companies and organizations that can pull data specific to their need (most major advertising and promotional agencies subscribe to MRI). For instance, a record label looking to secure a brand partnership for an EDM artist might run a crosstab report of all adults ages 18–45 who purchase or listen to EDM music with the brands and products they purchase, what television shows they watch, and what activities in which they like to participate during their spare time. The reports can be used to identify the most likely prospects for a partnership or to strengthen a partnership proposal.

Nielsen Scarborough is another market research service that offers consumer demographics and insight on media consumption, attitudes, and purchase behavior. Nielsen Scarborough captures consumer data on more than 2,000 product categories and brands collected from a sample size of more than 210,000 adults in 77 Designated Market Areas (DMAs) across the United States (Scarborough, 2014). The main difference between MRI and Scarborough is that Scarborough specializes in local market insight. For example, while MRI can tell you how many people who go to hockey games stream rock music heavily, Scarborough can tell you how many people who go to Seattle Seahawk games do so. This localized information is particularly helpful to radio stations that often use the data to sell ads to local businesses.

The NPD Group (formerly National Purchase Diary) is a consumer market research company that uses sales data from retailers and distributors, as well as consumer-reported purchase behavior through its online survey panel of more than two million consumers to provide its clients with “a comprehensive view of consumer behavior and attitudes across all distribution channels and demographics.” Of particular interest to the entertainment industry is that the company also tracks the awareness and product usage of more than 100 celebrities allowing artist managers and labels to provide detailed product usage and behavior information for fans of these specific artists (NPD, 2014).

The Importance of Brand Fit

Imagine a fan who is a passionate supporter of a popular artist. The fan was there from the beginning of the artist’s career—attending multiple concerts, buying all of the artist’s albums and following the artist on major social networks. The fan has a good idea of the artist’s brand: young, rebellious, taking pleasure in being the bad boy. He drinks, he smokes, and he lives life in the fast lane. His look is rugged; he has tattoos and piercings. His look is “bad” in a good way. The artist knows who he is and embraces his rough and tough image.

Now imagine that this artist teams up with Yoplait yogurt to sponsor his upcoming tour. He is in Yoplait’s commercial promoting the health benefits of yogurt and free yogurt samples are given to fans at the artist’s shows. His fans’ reaction is one of confusion because the pairing seems odd. It is not a strong brand fit. The fans start to lose faith in the artist because they do not know who he is. They begin to identify with him less and less.

Creating an Artist Brand Profile

An artist brand profile (also referred to as an artist brand presentation or artist brand deck) is a visual presentation of an artist that is often provided to corporate brands and agencies to offer some background on the artist’s career and personality. The information conveyed should help these stakeholders understand the attitude, style of music, preferred activities, and other characteristics of the artist even if the brand representatives have never seen or heard of the artist. The artist brand profile helps brands and agencies determine if a partnership is a good brand fit.

The presentation is usually brief (8–10 slides) and includes the following elements:

  • Links to the artist’s recent and most popular videos.
  • Highlights of the artist’s career and successes they have obtained—radio, sales, albums released, etc. (see Figure 5.3).
  • Social stats and fan reach and engagement.
  • Press coverage or other industry quotes that speak to the success or appeal of the artist.
  • Upcoming events including appearances in movies or television programs, album releases, collaborations with other artists, tours, etc. This is important information as it gives the brand an opportunity to compare their promotional calendar to see at which events they may be able to leverage their involvement.

A Brand Profile may also include product categories or brands that would be a good fit for the artist. Perhaps it denotes activities in which they like to engage, products they consume regularly, or brands that speak to their personality. It may also include the artist’s audience profile.

Cause Marketing with a Brand

While most artists have individually taken on a cause because it is something they believe in or by which they have been personally affected, many have found success in partnering with a corporate brand to jointly promote a cause. Corporate brands have money and media assets (magazine ad, television spots, and large social networks) that can be used to support an effort about which an artist is passionate. This cause marketing is often a more comfortable way for artists to create an affiliation with a brand, particularly those that fear their fans will see a corporate endorsement as the artist “selling out.” The brand often gets the benefit of creating goodwill amongst its customers and the artist’s fans for its support of a project. It is a win-win-win scenario for the artist, corporate brand, and the cause.

For instance, Granola products manufacturer Nature Valley formed the Preserve the Parks program to bring attention to and improve our open lands. Their project, The Quietest Show on Earth, was a special concert featuring the folk singers Andrew Bird and Tift Merritt performing in the Mojave Desert Land Trust. The concert was taped and distributed online to raise awareness for the Parks (Ferreiro, 2013).

Big Machine Label Group partnered with General Mills and Feeding America for the Outnumber Hunger campaign, which included special concert events and the label’s roster of artists being featured on selected boxes of General Mills cereal (General Mills, 2013).

Figure 5.4

Figure 5.4

The Future of Music Partnerships

Artist-Owned Brand Opportunities

Increasingly, instead of an artist renting or licensing their name to an organization, the artist chooses to take more of an ownership role by owning and controlling the brand. While the risk with this approach is greater for the artist the potential rewards are substantial.

Jimmy Buffet’s expansion of the Margaritaville brand is one example or this. Buffett has built an empire from the leveraging of the name, which includes massive merchandising efforts and a national restaurant chain.

Avril Lavigne has spent years building a brand that she was able to leverage into several businesses, including her own line of clothing and a line of fragrances (Sauer, 2013).

Instead of opting for another endorsement deal multi-platinum artist Kenny Chesney create his own Caribbean Premium Rum Company, Blue Chair Bay, inspired by his music and island lifestyle.

Figure 5.5

Figure 5.5

Chesney was able to use his connection with his loyal fan base to promote the brand. In fact, one of the key marketing tactics for the launch of Blue Chair Bay was a co-sponsorship of Chesney’s No Shoes Nation tour in 2013 where fans could sample the three flavors of rum before the show on the deck of a specially-created 20-foot sailboat, reaching an estimated 1.25 million fans in 42 markets nationwide (O’Malley Green-burg, 2013). The sampling program continued with the 2014 Nowhere But Here tour hitting 25 markets (Blue Chair Bay, 2014). Today, the spirit is cited as one of the fastest growing new brands in the liquor business (Bieler, 2014).

Product Placement in Videos

As record labels look to videos as not only a marketing vehicle for selling recorded music but also as a viable revenue stream, product placements continue to grow at a rapid pace. Whether it is Avril Lavigne answering her Sony Xperia phone that was sitting in a glass of water during her video for “Rock and Roll,” Brittney Spears’ integration of a dating site in “Hold it Against Me” or Lady Gaga’s numerous product integrations into her videos, artists are offering brands the opportunity to be featured in music content. Whereas previous product placements in music videos have been blatantly obvious, the best product integrations today tend to apply a more subtle approach of showing the products being used naturally by the artists.

True Partnerships

Indeed, an ongoing trend in music partnerships is getting the brand organically involved in the artist’s career and initiatives so that there is authenticity in the partnership.

Pepsi, a longtime supporter of music initiatives, signed megastar Beyoncé as a “brand ambassador” in a deal that was reportedly worth $50 million. The agreement was heralded as the future of music partnerships because of the star appearing on Pepsi products and commercials, having a guaranteed performance in the Pepsi-sponsored Super Bowl, and being provided a multimillion-dollar fund for Beyoncé to use to generate content from live events, for videos, or humanitarian efforts. The move fosters an even deeper spirit of collaboration amongst the parties by allowing the artist to drive the decision regarding how the funds will be used while Pepsi benefits from the brand equity and sales boost generated from the partnership (Coffee, 2012).

Conclusion

The importance of branding for an artist cannot be overstated. Today’s environment is challenging, retail space is scarce, and revenue from album sales is down resulting in significantly less profit for the label and artists alike.

A strong artist brand:

  • Assists an artist in building a passionate following.
  • Generates interest among the media resulting in increased publicity opportunities.
  • Allows the artists themselves to capitalize on the brand name they’ve developed and generate additional revenue.
  • Attracts the attention of corporate partners looking to expose their products to a passionate fan base. The increased marketing impressions lead to more brand equity for the artists.

Increased consumer awareness from broader exposure helps build brand equity that can be leveraged in many ways for greater profitability by both the artist and the label.

Glossary

Action alley—a term used most commonly within the Wal-Mart community of employees and suppliers that refers to the main aisles down the center of the store that separate the departments.

Artist brand profile (aka artist presentation or artist deck)—a visual presentation usually created in software such as PowerPoint or Keynote that is created to provide a snapshot of an artist’s background, lifestyle, sales success, career highlights and brand preferences. This presentation is most often used to educate members of the media, advertising agencies and brand marketers on the artist’s brand.

Brand—a name, term, design, symbol, or any other mark that uniquely identifies a seller.

Brand architecture—the structure and organization of brands across an entire organization that outlines how the company’s various brands interact with and support one another.

Branded display—a special section in a retail environment, usually at the end of an aisle or in the middle of a wide aisle that separates departments, that features select products and is branded with that product’s logo and photos.

Branded house—a brand relationship strategy where the master, or main brand is the dominant one with other brands being descriptive in nature, e.g., Virgin Music, Virgin Hotels, Virgin Mobile, Virgin Airlines, etc.

Brand fit—refers to how well two partnership brands align. A good brand fit refers to a partnership where the artist’s personality and fan base fit the personality of the corporate brand and vice versa.

Cause marketing—a form of marketing where an artist teams up with a charitable organization to raise awareness or resources for a social issue or problem.

Co-branding—when two or more brands from different organizations combine to create a special product.

Content marketing—a marketing tactic by which companies create, gather and distribute valuable and relevant content to its existing and desired target audience. The objective of content marketing is to establish goodwill, which will eventually lead to sales or other customer action.

Customer profile—a “persona” or detailed description of the ideal customer. Whereas a target market might be 18–21-year-old females who make a salary of less than $25,000 and live in suburban markets, a customer profile might be a 19-year-old female college student who likes top 40 pop music, shopping at Forever21, and dancing.

Endorsed brand—a brand relationship strategy where independent brand names are strengthened by attaching an organizational brand, e.g. Courtyard by Marriott allows the mid-priced hotel chain to leverage the quality association of the word “Marriott.”

Endorsement—the act of an artist giving his or her public support or approval to an individual, brand, or company (e.g., Jessica Simpson and Proactiv).

House of brands—a brand relationship strategy where the master, or main company brand is used minimally on packages and in advertising. The brands in the company’s portfolio each have their own distinct image and positioning, e.g., Facebook owns Instagram and Whatsapp but each brand is independent and is seen by most consumers as separate entities.

In-kind support—goods or services provided to an artist instead of money. Common examples include music equipment, lighting for stages, and travel services.

Master brand—the dominant brand identity under which all of the company’s other products and services fall.

Non-traditional outlets—online and offline stores where music is not generally sold, e.g., grocery stores, sporting goods stores, and clothing retail stores.

Open rate—the highest rate charged by an advertising medium such as a magazine or newspaper for placement in the publication. Contract customers, or those placing multiple ads throughout a specified timeframe, receive quantity discounts but non-contract advertisers (such as those who only run one ad) are charged the open rate.

Personal branding—the branding and self-positioning of the individual person. A personal brand involves all of the attributes and characteristics associated with an artist including their style, demeanor, and reputation.

Product category—a group of similar, like, or related items, e.g., Ford, Toyota, and GM all make products that fall under the “Automotive” category.

Sponsorships—the act of an organization paying a sum of money toward the cost of an activity or event such as a tour or music festival in exchange for assets surrounding the event like inclusion in advertising, on-site signage like stage banners, and the ability to engage with consumers onsite via booths and product sampling.

Sub-brand—brands connected to a master brand that add associations to make a brand seem more appealing to consumers or to stretch a master brand allowing it to compete in a different category, i.e., a record label that markets predominantly country music might add a separate sub-brand or sub-label to focus on the pop genre.

Target market—a broad group of potential customers usually defined by ranges (age, income, etc.) and is the group of people most likely to purchase a product of service.

References

Aaker, D., and Joachmisthaler, E. Brand Leadership. New York: The Free Press. 2009.

“A brief overview of the history of branding.” AEF Advertising Educational Foundation. AEF, 2009. Accessed November 14, 2014. http://www.aef.com/index.html.

American Marketing Association. www.ama.org. 2014.

Bieler, K., “High tide for Blue Chair Bay.” Beverage Media Group Blog, April 1, 2014. Accessed November 14, 2014. www.beveragemedia.com/index.php/2014/04/high-tide-for-blue-chair-bay.

Blue Chair Bay. “Blue Chair Bay Rum Launches 25-City Spring into Summer Sampling Tour.” April 24, 2014. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/blue-chair-bay-rum-launches-25-city-spring-into-summer-sampling-tour-256529591.html.

“Celebrity Endorsement: A Literature Review.” Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 15, No. 4 (1999), pp. 291–314.

Coffee, P. “Pepsi and Beyoncé: The New Sponsorship.” PR Newser, December 11, 2012. http://www.mediabistro.com/prnewser/pepsi-and-beyonce-the-new-sponsorship-model_b52383.

Dahud, H. “The 3 Cs of Effective Artist Branding.” Hypebot, August 6, 2012. Accessed August 14, 2014. www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2012/08/the-3-cs-of-effective-artist-branding.html.

Diaz, A.-C., and Pathak, S. “10 Brands that Make Music Part of their Marketing DNA.” Advertising Age, September 30, 2013. www.adage.com/article/special-report-music-and-marketing/licensing-10-brands-innovating-music/244336.

Dimofte, C. V. and Yalch, R. F. “The Mere Association Effect and Brand Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 21 (2011), pp. 24–37. http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~dimofte/jcp11.pdf.

Erdogan, B Z. “Celebrity Endorsement: A Literature Review.” Journal of Marketing Management 15.4 (1999): 291–314.

Ferreiro, L. “Andrew Bird Teams up with Nature Valley for the Quietest Show on Earth to Preserve National Parks.” Music for Good, November 8, 2013. http://musicforgood.tv/2013/11/andrew-bird-teams-up-with-nature-valley-for-the-quietest-show-on-earth-to-preserve-national-parks.

Forbes. Web. www.forbes.com/celebrities/list. 2014a.

Forbes. Web. www.forbes.com/powerful-brands. 2014b.

General Mills. “General Mills, Big Machine Label Group, and Feeding America Join Forces to Outnumber Hunger.” March 30, 2013. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120330005615/en/ADDING-MULTIMEDIA-General-Mills-Big-Machine-Label#.VYnL3E3wuM8.

GfK MRI. www.gfkmri.com. 2014.

Hampp, A. “From this Week’s Billboard: How Taylor Swift’s Red is Getting a Boost from Branding Mega-deals.” Billboard, October 22, 2012. Accessed November 14, 2014. www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/branding/1083319/from-this-weeks-billboard-how-taylor-swifts-red-is-getting-a.

Houghton, B. “Samsung Buys 1 Million Copies of Jay-Z New Album.” Hypebot, N.p., June 17, 2013. Accessed November 14, 2014. www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2013/06/samsung-buys-1-million-copies-of-jay-z-new-album-magna-carta-holy-grail.html.

Lavin, K. “What’s in a Name? Just ask Hostess Brands—The Value of Branding in Bankruptcy.” ABF Journal. www.abfjournal.com/articles/whats-in-a-name-just-ask-hostess-brands-the-value-of-branding-in-bankruptcy. 2014.

Lukovitz, K. “Subway, Diet Coke Team on Taylor Swift Promo.” Media Post. September 27, 2014. http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/234991/subway-diet-coke-team-on-taylor-swift-promo.html.

Mansfield, B. “Taylor Swift’s ‘1989’ Sells 1.287 Million in First Week.” USA Today, November 4, 2014. www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2014/11/04/taylor-swift-first-week-million-sales/18480613.

McQuicklin, J. “Understanding Image and Branding as a Musical Artist.” Artist Development Blog, N.p., January 27, 2011. Accessed September 9, 2014. http://artistdevelopmentblog.com/advice/understanding-image-branding-musical-artist/.

NPD. www.npd.com. 2014.

O’Malley Greenburg, Z. “Rum Diaries: Kenny Chesney Diversifies with Blue Chair Bay.” Forbes, July 1, 2014. http://www.forbes.com/sites/zackomalleygreenburg/2013/07/01/rum-diaries-kenny-chesney-diversifies-with-blue-chair-bay.

Pomerantz, D. “The World’s Most Powerful Celebrities.” Forbes, June 30, 2014. Accessed November 16, 2014. Forbes.com.

Sauer, A. “Avril Lavigne May Have Just Pulled off the Greatest (and Worst) Product Placement of All Time.” Brand Channel. August 20, 2013. http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/Avril-Lavigne-Product-Placement-Rock-N-Roll-082013.aspx.

Scarborough. www.scarborough.com. 2014.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset