Appendix 4

Digital information retrieval: sources & techniques

(Sample—The Apple Style: a creditbearing library course syllabus)

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This course introduces major reference databases in academic libraries as well as selected reliable reference and information sources on the Internet. Contents include an overview of online reference databases and networks; standard search methods using access points; formulating search queries; search strategies and techniques; introduction to reliable ready-reference sources on the Internet; open-access academic journals; criteria for selecting and evaluating reference databases and Internet sources; and online bibliographic tools.

METHOD OF INSTRUCTION

The course consists of lectures, readings, class discussions, online demonstrations, hands-on exercises, assignments, a midterm exam, and a final project.

COURSE OBJECTIVES

By the completion of this course the student will be able to:

■ demonstrate familiarity with major reference databases in academic libraries

■ choose relevant reference databases and formulate appropriate search statements

■ conduct a reference database search by using controlled vocabulary, access points, Boolean Logic Operators, nesting, truncation, and other advanced search techniques

■ select reliable and relevant Internet sources for his / her research topic by using evaluation criteria

■ find, analyze, and utilize digital information effectively and critically

■ demonstrate familiarity with open-access academic journals

■ utilize online bibliographic tools.

TEXTBOOK

Katz, William A. (2001). Introduction to Reference Work, Volume II: Reference Services and Reference Processes, 8th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072441437.

READING LIST

Bush, Vannevar (1945). ‘As We May Think,’ The Atlantic July: 101–8. <http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/computer/bushf.htm > .

Drobnicki, John A., and Richard Asaro (2001). ‘Historical fabrications on the Internet: recognition, evaluation, and use in bibliographic instruction.’ Reference Librarian 35/74: 121–64.

Piper, Paul S. (2000). ‘Better Read That Again: Web Hoaxes and Misinformation.’ Searcher 8: 40–9.

Straw, Joseph E. (2001). ‘From Magicians to Teachers: The Development of Electronic Reference in Libraries: 1930–2000.’ The Reference Librarian 35/74: 1–12.

Su, Di (1999). ‘Electronic Stacks: Using Web Sources in Reference Service.’ The Reference Librarian 31/65: 161–76.

Su, Di (2010). ‘Standardization of Keyword Search Mode.’ Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 22/1: 2839.

Tyburski, Genie (2000). ‘Honest Mistakes, Deceptive Facts: Judging Information on the World Wide Web.’ Legal Assistant Today March/April: 54–60.

Watts, Margit M. ed. (2008). Information Literacy: One Key to Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

PREREQUISITES

Computer literacy: Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, and common Internet applications.

REQUIREMENTS & POLICIES

■ Class attendance and participation is expected.

■ Assignments and final project will be completed out of class.

■ Midterm exam will be taken in the classroom.

■ Bibliographies must adhere to the specified style, e.g. APA.

■ Plagiarism is prohibited. Violation of academic integrity will result in failing the course.

GRADING

The final grade will be determined by the level of participation in class discussions, grades on assignments, quality of written papers, midterm exam, and final project.

■ Class participation 20%

■ Assignments 30%

■ Midterm exam 20%

■ Final project 30%

SCHEDULE AND TOPICS

[Week 1] Introduction to electronic reference and information resources

[Week 2] Interpretation of information sources

[Week 3] Online public access catalog (OPAC)

[Week 4] Bibliographic utility networks and consortiums

[Week 5] Research databases: EBSCO, JSTOR, Lexis-Nexis, ProQuest, Gale, and more

[Week 6] Database search strategies and techniques

[Week 7] The Internet and World Wide Web

[Week 8] Midterm exam

[Week 9] Web source selection and evaluation

[Week 10] Web source vs. print: advantages and

disadvantages

[Week 11] Resources for Library and Information Science on the Internet

[Week 12] Selected reliable ready-reference sources on the Internet

[Week 13] Open-access academic journals

[Week 14] Online tools for bibliography

[Week 15] Final project.

INSTRUCTOR’S SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Antelman Kristin. Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?’. College & Research Libraries. 2004;65(5):372–382.

2. Gargouri Yassine, Hajjem Chawki, Larivière Vincent, et al. Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLoS One. 2010;5/10:e13636 <http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0013636>; Accessed: February 10.

3. Gross Melissa, Latham Don. What’s Skill Got to Do with It?: Information Literacy Skills and Self-Views of Ability among First-Year College Students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 2012;63(3):574–583.

4. Harnad Stevan, Brody Tim. Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals’. D-lib Magazine. 2004;10/6 <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html>; Accessed: Feb. 10 2013.

5. Kay Heidi, DelVecchio Karen. The World at Your Fingertips: Learning Research and Internet Skills Fort Atkinson, WI: Upstart Books; 2002.

6. Mokhtar Intan Azura, Majid Shaheen. Information Literacy Standards, Guidelines and Their Implementation: An Analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology. 2008;28(2):5–12.

7. Monoi Shinichi, O’Hanlon Nancy, Diaz Karen R. Online Searching Skills: Development of an Inventory to Assess Self-Efficacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2005;31(2):98–105.

8. Morris-Babb Meredith, Henderson Susie. An Experiment in Open-Access Textbook Publishing: Changing the World One Textbook at a Time. Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 2012;43(2):148–155.

9. Mortimore Jeffrey M. Making Research Make Sense: Guiding College Students into Information Literacy through the Information Search Process. The Southeastern Librarian. 2010;58(3):3–13.

10. Novotny Eric, Cahoy Ellysa Stern. If We Teach, Do They Learn? The Impact of Instruction on Online Catalog Search Strategies. Portal. 2006;6(2):155–167.

11. Pariera Katrina L. Information Literacy on the Web. Communications in Information Literacy. 2012;6(1):34–48.

12. Partridge Helen, Edwards Sylvia, Baker Andrew, McAllister Lynn. The Reflective Online Searching Skills (ROSS) Environment: Embedding Information Literacy into Student Learning through an Online Environment. IFLA Journal. 2008;34(1):55–71.

13. Rader Hannelore B, ed. Teaching and Assessing Information Skills in the Twenty-First Century: A Global Perspective. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science; 2002.

14. Suber Peter. Open Access Overview’. <http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm>; 2004; Accessed: February 10 2013.

15. Walsh Tiffany R. Evolution of an Information Competency Requirement for Undergraduates. Journal of Web Librarianship. 2011;5(1):3–23.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset