This chapter describes how to develop, implement, and sustain a measurment and evaluation practice focused on results. Upon completion of this chapter, you will be able to
There are many paths you could have taken to get to this point of aspiring to develop and implement a comprehensive measurement and evaluation practice in your organization. You could have received a mandate from a senior leader to justify the budget for training in your organization and are currently sifting through volumes of data on participation, staffing, and financials to react to this request. You desire to start running the business of training in such a way that demonstrates the value of learning and development to your organization, seeking to position yourself with the information you need in advance of being asked. You could be concerned about whether your learning programs are truly targeting the right issues and performance goals and want to ensure that training is prescribed and delivered when appropriate, along with a plan to affect results. You could be involved in a major change initiative in your organization and want to ensure that team members don’t revert to previous processes or behaviors, but rather apply what they’ve learned on their jobs to achieve measurable results. You may have already engaged in one or more measurement projects, or you may just be at the beginning of your journey. Regardless of what brought you to this point, developing and implementing assessment, measurement, and evaluation processes as a systemic part of the learning process will improve the learning and development team’s effectiveness and reputation as valued business partners. Carefully consider the following to develop the right plan for your company.
Creating a strategy for measurement in your organization is important. To do so, you need to determine what you want to do, identify what to avoid, and develop specific outcomes.
Determining what you want to be able to do is a critical first step. Carefully select colleagues and leaders in your learning organization that you know are both supportive of and skeptical about measuring and evaluating learning, and collaborate with them to answer the following questions:
Equally important to knowing what you want to be able to do is to identify what to avoid. By deliberately exposing any barriers or baggage in your organization that could hinder your progress with measurement and evaluation, you will save time and significantly increase your chances of sustaining what you’re about to work hard to design and implement. Answer the following questions with this same group of colleagues and leaders:
Finally, you should develop specific and measurable outcomes you expect to achieve. This final step in defining your goals will allow you to not only define success, but will also assist you as you define the organizational scope of your efforts. Questions to consider include
Once you’ve compiled a draft of your goals, test them with colleagues in learning and development, human resources, and business unit leaders. Then, make revisions based on their input. Use these goals to equip you as you design a comprehensive measurement and evaluation practice tailored to your organization’s needs and gain much needed advocacy and support.
It is likely that during your work to define goals for measurement and evaluation in your organization, you identified individuals in learning and development; broader human resources; and hopefully, business units eager to begin working with information that equips them to partner and improve their group’s performance. These individuals can become early advocates and champions to provide the support necessary to secure resources and make this work an organizational priority.
To gain individual and organizational experience, select a challenging problem or opportunity to measure, creating a chain of impact from the learning event all the way through to business impact and ROI. Use results from this effort at appropriate points in time along the way to “show” rather than “tell” colleagues and leaders about the value of measurement and evaluation. Consider the following questions to help you select your first project:
Because companies spend large sums of money on new hire training, this topic is often chosen for initial measurement efforts. This is not the place to start for measuring business impact, however, unless you are measuring the difference between a former and new program, or measuring the difference between training or not training a group of new hires. That is not to suggest that new hire training should not be measured and evaluated, because it can be critical to ensure that learning has occurred, that individual team members are prepared to apply what they’ve learned on their jobs, and that they do in fact perform at an appropriate level once on the job. Without something to compare your results to, however, business impact and ROI results will lack credibility.
As you assess the problem or opportunity, ensure that skill or knowledge needs to be acquired by your target audience. If not, the program may be a good candidate for evaluating from an overall human performance improvement perspective, but it won’t help you show the value of training and development. Additionally, being able to link the program to specific business unit objectives, having access to obtain or collect related data, and getting active senior leader interest and commitment are critical for your first measurement and evaluation effort.
Once you’ve selected a project, engaging a subject matter expert with whom to partner provides important experience to guide the work, as well as produces results that are often more credible in the early stages of implementation. These experts can be engaged in a way that enables your long-term capability by not only leading this initial project, but also by coaching and mentoring individuals in your organization as they develop necessary skill and knowledge. Consider the following questions when selecting a subject matter expert:
Seek experts who use a process that is both simple and consistent with other processes your business unit leaders are familiar with. If you’re calculating a metric like the return-on-investment of a human performance improvement program, you should use the same formula an executive would use to calculate ROI on a business unit initiative. If multiple interventions are developed and executed to achieve the desired performance improvement (for example, training, plus a change in a compensation plan, plus new marketing tools), expect the expert to have valid methods to measure and attribute that portion of the improvement resulting from training and the other interventions separately. Whomever you partner with should be able to clearly and concisely articulate how their approach will achieve your goals, the process(es) they will use during the engagement, key deliverables and related timing, and demonstrate flexibility given your unique set of circumstances. Be skeptical of experts who build themselves up by tearing other experts down, and always ask for and review relevant examples and references.
Having access to individuals who either have specific subject matter expertise in the business unit (for example, product specialists), or being assured of leadership support to both set expectations and inspect results are critical to any successful training and development effort. For measurement and evaluation efforts, it can make the difference between having or not having access to the information you need to engage. For any measurement project you participate in, be sure to answer the following questions:
Consider asking the most senior leader involved in your program to introduce the learning opportunity either in writing or by kicking off the session. Contract with them to make the program a topic of discussion at lead team meetings before, during, and after the learning event. Set expectations with them for specific communications, and solicit their support for securing assistance from other teams if necessary to collect and report on required data.
How you communicate results has both short- and long-term effects on your implementation. Because some colleagues may have had experience with measurement processes that didn’t equip them with information they could tangibly use to facilitate performance improvement, or they may view measurement as an academic process and not a business process, it’s very important to develop communications that “show,” not just “tell.” Use measurement results along the way to inform and equip leaders to intervene if necessary where there is concern and to encourage and reward where things are progressing as planned. Carefully plan and execute your communications considering the following questions:
Every organization discovers programs that do not achieve intended results, and communicating with leaders in these situations can drive needed change. These situations often expose other issues in the organization that need to be addressed, ranging from how needs were assessed, to how decisions were made to develop training as a solution to the performance issue, to organizational communication about changes that could drastically affect employee morale or even the target population. Although you should navigate carefully to avoid unnecessary repercussions, these opportunities should be addressed with candor and transparency, not with fear and blame. You will likely be surprised at how much support for measurement will result from these often dreaded but truly opportunistic situations.
Finally, don’t forget about those individuals you identified in step one who could be classified as “skeptics” for pursuing this important work. If they remain skeptical, their opinions could create unnecessary obstacles, or even sabotage your efforts. You should deliberately seek opportunities to engage them in the work in such a way that they experience the business value of information produced, perhaps even equipping them with information that will allow them to facilitate critical communications at some appropriate point in the project. It is not uncommon for them to become some of the greatest and most outspoken champions, with relevant and compelling testimonies that develop advocacy and support.
Assessment, measurement, and evaluation span the entire performance improvement cycle from the initial assessment of the performance issue, to the final analysis and reporting of business results. If your processes are not integrated, you risk designing and implementing programs that are not linked with the problem or opportunity and will struggle to develop an effective measurement plan. Consider figure 21-1 for overall performance improvement, and answer the following questions to discover where your organization should develop more robust processes to support this work:
Maintaining a focus on overall performance improvement as you identify and adopt required processes is critical to your success. Remember, you want the processes to support the work and the information gained from applying the processes to be used to achieve improved performance for your clients and partners.
You’ll require a variety of resources to implement your measurement strategy, including human resources and technology.
The implementation of a results-based approach may require updated roles and responsibilities for all individuals and groups involved in initiating, designing, developing, delivering, and supporting learning in the organization. Human resources partners must assess performance problems and opportunities and prescribe relevant performance improvement interventions targeting specific business measures. During the design and development of training, designers and vendors must develop materials directly linked to the measurable and criterion-referenced performance and learning objectives. Facilitators must focus their presentations, exercises, and activities on relevant business issues and collect information required to measure readiness and learning. Managers must support and reinforce the learning process by expecting and inspecting behavior change. The ultimate responsibility for the success of a learning opportunity must rest with business unit leaders, and the learning organization must support them with performance data to guide them to specific action. Consider the following questions to determine the effect on roles in your organization:
Technology has enabled efficient data collection in most companies, while mergers and acquisitions have created data quality issues because of multiple systems of record, data redundancy, and lack of consistent data standards. Having data to analyze is required, and should be collected from various sources. Consider the following questions to identify potential technology needs to support data collection:
Carefully identify, plan, and budget for technology to ensure you are able to collect or secure the data you need. To learn about deciding on the appropriate technology for your evaluation needs, read chapter 22, “Selecting Technology to Support Evaluation.”
To implement and sustain a comprehensive measurement and evaluation practice, human resources must be aligned and equipped to offer support and develop expertise. Consider the following questions to determine the best approach for your organization:
At this point, you have considered a wide range of issues to define your goals for measuring and evaluating learning in your organization, gaining advocacy and support for the work, and have identified new processes and resources required to support your implementation. You are ready to develop an implementation plan covering the following milestones to ensure a successful execution:
This work is about so much more than collecting data and producing reports; rather, it is about equipping individual learners and leaders in your company with the information they need to know, whether they are well positioned to succeed or are at risk of not achieving desired results. Many great ideas and valiant efforts result in little more than good intentions and significant time spent trying to implement them. Diligently consider the questions in this chapter and the checklist in table 21-1, and allow your discoveries to establish a reasonable plan for using measurement and evaluation results to drive greater accountability and improved results in your company’s learning organization.
Table 21-1. Checklist for Implementing and Sustaining a Measurement Practice
1. Create a strategy for measurement in your organization.
2. Gain advocacy and support.
3. Identify necessary processes and adapt them to your organization.
4. Identify resources and roles needed to support implementation.
5. Develop implementation plan and execute.
Align each activity listed below with one of the following key components of a comprehensive assessment, measurement, and evaluation practice implementation. Check your answers in the appendix.
Key Components:
1. Create a strategy for measurement in your organization.
2. Gain advocacy and support.
3. Identify necessary processes and adapt them to your organization.
4. Identify resources and roles needed to support implementation.
5. Develop implementation plan and execute.
Activities:
Secure senior leader involvement and engagement. | |
Create and support a measurement community. | |
Develop measurement and evaluation processes. | |
Develop goals. | |
Select a subject matter expert to partner with. | |
Identify technology required to support data collection and communication. | |
Develop and implement required learning. | |
Integrate new processes with existing program design and development processes. | |
Develop specific and measurable outcomes. | |
Determine the impact on organizational structures. | |
Develop individual and organizational experience. | |
Identify what you want to avoid. | |
Develop rollout plans and measurement criteria for each business unit. | |
Develop assessment processes. | |
Identify human resources required to support your strategy. | |
Follow through with concise and targeted communication. |
Debi Wallace has more than 23 years’ experience in leading and evaluating strategic human performance interventions in the financial services industry, along with a strong analytics, learning and development, human resources, and communications background. She has led the strategic and tactical development and implementation of an enterprise assessment, measurement, and evaluation practice to measure the impact of learning and other human resource programs, conducting dozens of linkage and ROI studies since 1995. She most recently created and led Wachovia’s Advanced Analytics and Research Practice in HR Workforce Analytics as a senior vice president in their human resources division, where she partnered with other leaders to set Wachovia’s strategic analytical direction for HR-related information, striving to consistently demonstrate how to use HR data and measurement systems to drive fact-based decision making. Her team led HR business impact analysis projects, as well as complex enterprise analytics initiatives. She regularly speaks at industry conferences and has published a number of case studies on related topics. She can be reached at [email protected].
Blanchard, K. (2002). Zap the Gaps. New York: HarperCollins.
Phillips, J. J. (1998). Implementing Evaluation Systems and Processes. Alexandria, VA: ASTD.