Chapter 8
IN THIS CHAPTER
Knowing the A-to-Zs of listing contracts
Checking out the different types of listing terms
Exploring broker compensation
Setting up your disclosure statements
The single most important contract that you sign throughout the entire process of selling your house is the one between you and the person who ultimately buys your property. Without that contract, you’d never be anything more than a property owner who wants to be a seller.
What’s the second most important contract? If you guessed the listing contract that you sign with the agent you hire to help sell your house, you win an all-expenses-paid trip to the next paragraph.
You’ve probably heard of listings, but most folks don’t really understand what listings are or how they operate. We’re not talking about a listing of names in a phone book. Nor does this listing have anything to do with transferring ownership of your property to buyers. This chapter spells out everything you need to know about listing contracts and tips on how you can negotiate commissions with agents.
In the context of selling property, a listing contract is a personal service contract between you and a licensed real estate broker. This contract authorizes the broker to act as your agent by finding someone to buy your house. The listing contract contains two basic promises: The broker promises to do his or her best to find a buyer for your property, and you promise to pay the broker a commission.
Sounds simple, doesn’t it? Legally speaking (because listings are meant to be legally binding agreements), the definition of a listing contract is a bit more complex:
A compensation agreement: Although the listing broker’s pay is almost always a commission based on a specified percentage of the sale price, compensation doesn’t have to be a commission. Other possible options include paying your broker a set fee for selling the property or compensating the broker on an hourly fee basis.
Regardless of how the broker is paid, compensation is a negotiable item decided by mutual agreement between you and the broker.
Although the listing contract doesn’t obligate you to sell your house, it may obligate you to pay the broker a commission even if you don’t sell. The key is whether the broker gets you an “acceptable” offer.
You may think that an acceptable offer is any offer a buyer makes to purchase your house that you’d be willing to sign. If an offer isn’t acceptable to you, you won’t sign it. But suppose that your broker brings you a valid, written offer made by a ready, willing, and able buyer who wants to purchase your house for the exact price and terms specified in your listing contract. You reject the offer solely because you don’t like the buyer’s red tennis shoes.
In this example, you probably owe the broker a commission, even though you didn’t accept the offer. Technically speaking, whether you ultimately sell the house to the buyer who submitted the offer doesn’t matter if the buyer met your price and terms.
“That’s not fair,” you say. “If I decide not to sell, why should I pay a commission?” The answer: Because you agreed to those terms when you signed the listing. The broker found a buyer who was ready to accept your terms, willing to enter into a contract of sale with you, and financially able to buy your property. The listing agreement doesn’t specify that you actually have to sell your property. If your broker fulfills his end of the contract by procuring an acceptable buyer, you must honor your promise and pay the broker.
Buyers and agents almost always cooperate with sellers who are forced to cancel a transaction because of the sudden occurrence of some dire unforeseen situation beyond their control, such as job loss or a death in the family. They may get upset, though, if a seller suddenly decides not to go through with a deal for no good reason.
Some brokers are so desperate for listings that they take oral listings. A broker may, for example, introduce himself to you at a party, tell you he has always admired your house, and ask if you’re interested in selling it. To brush him off, you say that you may sell “at the right price.” He responds that he’ll see what he can do for you.
The next thing you know, you’re besieged day and night by eager buyers waving lowball offers in your face. Take one guess about who told these vultures your house was for sale.
At first glance, you may think that you can choose from many different kinds of listings. Appearances are, as usual, deceiving. All your various listing options boil down to variations on two types of listings: exclusive listings and open listings. This section gives you the lowdown.
An exclusive listing is exactly that — an exclusive authorization giving only one broker the right to find a buyer for your house. As simple as it sounds, an exclusive listing contract can take two different forms.
The broker designated in an exclusive agency listing is the one and only agent authorized to sell your house during the term of the listing. If any other licensed real estate broker or agent finds a buyer, your broker gets paid. Even so, brokers think that this form of exclusive listing is just barely better than no listing at all.
About now you may be wondering about the downside from the broker’s perspectiv. After all, you authorize the broker to be your sole agent. You’re not playing the field with 50 or 100 other brokers on a winner-take-all basis. So what’s the problem? You, dear house seller.
An exclusive right to sell listing is also referred to as an exclusive authorization and right to sell or just a plain, old exclusive. The exclusive is the most widely used form of listing contract in the United States. It’s popular with sellers and brokers because it provides the following:
Maximum effort for seller: An exclusive right to sell listing gives your listing broker a strong monetary incentive to focus her time, energy, and advertising dollars on one priority — a fast, top-dollar sale of your house. To that end, the listing broker should immediately cooperate with any and all other brokers who may have buyers for your property by offering to split the compensation 50/50 (or whatever split is customary in your area) with the broker who generates a ready, willing, and able buyer.
You know you’re dealing with a bad broker if she wants to keep your listing quiet for several weeks before advertising it and opening it up to cooperating brokers. Greedy brokers sit on listings to give themselves and the agents in their offices time to sell your house to buyers with whom they’re working. They want someone in their office to generate an offer for your property so the listing office can get the entire commission. Brokers call this tactic “getting both ends of a deal.” From your perspective, a more apt description would be “getting the shaft.”
Chapter 11 reveals that the secret of getting a top-dollar price when you sell is to generate spirited buyer competition for your house by getting broad, immediate market exposure. Nothing is terribly wrong with giving your listing broker a day or two head start on other brokers, if you approve. A broker who wants to keep your listing in-house more than 48 hours, however, is unworthy of being your listing agent.
Exclusive right-to-sell listing contracts vary widely in length, wording, and complexity from one state to another and from city to city within any given state. Under these circumstances, the listing contract you ultimately sign probably won’t look exactly like the California Association of Realtors (C.A.R.) exclusive listing contract shown in Figures 8-1a, 8-1b, and 8-1c. The C.A.R. listing is, nonetheless, a fine example of a well-written, comprehensive listing agreement.
Regardless of the wording in your contract, here are a few fundamental facts to keep in mind about all exclusive listings:
A broker protection clause keeps everyone honest. Just as a few real estate agents are dishonest, some sellers and buyers also behave unethically. For example, a seller may tell an interested buyer that the listing contract with the broker is about to expire. Without a broker, the seller won’t have to pay a commission. The seller offers to pass on a portion of the savings to the buyer by lowering the asking price, if he signs the deal after the listing contract’s expiration date. Paragraph 3.A. (2) of the sample listing contract shown in Figure 8-1a is known as the broker protection clause. This clause prohibits (for a specified period of time) the homeowner from selling directly to a buyer. If a broker finds a suitable buyer for a property, the clause requires that the seller pay the broker’s commission according to the listing contract.
Brokers generally ask for at least a 90-day buffer period. The time frame is, however, negotiable. In most cases, 30 to 60 days gives the broker sufficient protection. Regardless of the buffer period you agree to, be sure the broker protection clause in your listing contract includes this statement: This section shall not apply if Seller enters into a valid listing agreement with another licensed real estate broker after the final termination of this agreement.
This clause protects you from the possibility of paying two commissions if you relist your house with a second broker and a dispute develops after the first broker’s listing expires.
A Multiple Listing Service (MLS) option offers benefits. Paragraph 5 of the form in Figure 8-1b gives sellers the option of having information about their listing put into the local MLS. Chapter 12 provides reasons why listing information about your property in the MLS is a good idea.
In some areas, brokers use the MLS contract to sign up their listings. If that’s the case in your area, signing your contract automatically places your property in the MLS database. In all other respects, a multiple-listing contract operates the same way as any other exclusive right-to-sell listing contract.
Title verification is critically important. Paragraph 21 of the sample listing contract in Figure 8-1e asks who has title to the property, because anyone who signs a listing contract obligates himself to pay a commission, even if that person ultimately can only convey a partial interest in the property.
Unless all the parties who hold title in a property join in the sale, a full interest in the property can’t be sold. To avoid future problems, the listing broker wants to be sure that all property owners sign the listing contract.
Just as death is nature’s way of warning you to slow down, a co-owner’s refusal to sign a listing is real estate’s way of warning you about a potential deal killer. If your spouse (or a co-owner in a tenancy-in-common partnership) won’t sign the listing, that person probably will also refuse to sign a sale contract. Don’t sign a listing until you resolve the co-owner’s problem, and all owners are willing to sign it.
An open listing is a nonexclusive authorization for brokers to find a buyer for your property. You can give as many brokers as you want an open listing on your house. It’s the real estate version of a winner-take-all horse race.
You’re obligated to pay a commission to the first broker who fulfills either of the following conditions:
If you find the buyer by yourself, you don’t have to pay any of the brokers. And you can cancel an open listing any time you want without penalty.
Limited advertising and marketing of your property: In many places, depending on the local rules, brokers can’t put open listings into the MLS. This restriction is a big disadvantage. As we note in Chapter 12, the MLS is a highly effective tool that brokers use to internally advertise listings to other MLS members who may have buyers for their listings. Nor do brokers produce fancy brochures or put big classified ads in the newspaper to tell the world about an open listing. Why should they? Potential buyers may end up going to another broker or directly to the seller to write up an offer. The seller may also suddenly decide to cancel the listing.
Brokers only advertise or market open listings as a last resort if they have nothing more promising to do. They disdainfully refer to open listings as pocket listings because brokers tuck them away “in their pocket” passively waiting for a buyer to come along. If you want a quick sale or a top price, an open listing isn’t the way to get either.
Your broker is your competitor: Because you don’t have to pay any broker if you sell the house yourself, brokers see you as a competitor. This adversarial relationship encourages brokers to work for buyers, not you. Brokers know that if they take care of their buyers, they’ll get a commission sooner or later. No such loyalty exists in their relationship with you.
An open listing is barely better than no listing at all. Unless you have an extremely compelling reason that you absolutely, positively must list your house with a bevy of brokers, you’ll be better served with an exclusive listing.
When most people hear the term broker compensation, they immediately think of a commission based on a percentage of the property’s sale price. Commissions are the most common method of broker compensation, so that’s a logical place to start. However, commissions aren’t the only way to pay brokers. Keep reading this section for a rundown on commissions.
In the following list, we try to answer questions you’ve had about commissions but may have been too embarrassed to ask. Don’t worry. Questions are good. If you didn’t have any questions, we wouldn’t get to write a book! Check out the following important questions:
Are commissions negotiable? Absolutely! If a real estate broker or agent tells you otherwise, dump ’em. In fact, most listing contracts contain language similar to the following notice contained in paragraph 3 of the C.A.R. listing: “Notice: The amount or rate of real estate commissions is not fixed by law. They are set by each Broker individually and may be negotiable between Seller and Broker (real estate commissions include all compensation and fees to Broker).”
The vast majority of people who use the services of real estate agents erroneously believe that commissions aren’t negotiable. In an Opinion Research Corporation survey for AARP, only 26 percent of respondents correctly chose the answer that commissions can be negotiated.
Knowing that commissions are negotiable is fine. By itself, however, that information is worthless. This section deals with ways to translate your knowledge into a lower commission.
What’s the going rate for commissions in your area? Straight 6 percent commissions on the sale price may be the norm in your neighborhood. A tiered commission schedule is possible, such as 6 percent on the first $100,000 of sale price, 5 percent on the next $50,000, and 4 percent on the balance. Or, to provide more incentive to agents, commissions may increase from 5 percent on the first $100,000 to 6 percent on the balance. Check local commission rates by questioning several real estate agents as well as friends and business associates who’ve sold property recently.
Note: In some areas, high-end houses are listed at a reduced commission rate. If, for example, you’re the proud owner of a $500,000 house, the standard commission rate on property in that price range may be 5 percent rather than the 6 percent commission for less-expensive houses.
Are you a package deal? If you intend to sell your house and purchase a new home through the same broker, you’re twice as valuable to the broker because you represent two deals: a listing and a sale. Brokers may take that fact into account and offer you a “volume discount” by reducing the listing commission.
As we discuss in Chapter 7, you need to select an agent who has the skills and experience required for your particular transaction. Unless you’re moving within the same geographical area, you’re buying a similar type of property, and your listing agent has the requisite skills to work as a buyer’s agent, you may need a different agent to represent you in the purchase of your new home.
Handled properly, a good commission reduction saves money without adversely affecting the length of time the house is on the market or the sale price. Bad commission cuts are false economies because they end up extending the selling process and reducing your ultimate sale price by cutting the incentive of cooperating brokers to show and sell your property.
Assume that the prevailing commission rate in your area is 6 percent for houses like yours. During the agent selection interviews, you point out to the prospective listing agents that your house is in excellent condition. You tell each of them that you want to price your house realistically for a fast sale because you want to buy a larger house in the immediate vicinity before your baby is born three months from now. By determining how the listing broker proposes to split the commission with selling brokers, you can know when a commission cut is good or bad. For example:
Suppose your house sells for $300,000. Each 1 percent of the sale price equals $3,000, which is significant money for you and the agents. If the listing agent volunteers to shave the listing-side commission by $1,500 (0.5 percent), that’s swell. But don’t mess with the selling side. Taking another 0.5 percent out of the selling-side commission may cost you more than $1,500 in reduced activity by cooperating agents.
Consider this premise when you’re trying to negotiate a lower commission with a prospective listing agent: If the agent can’t defend her money (the commission) by convincing you that she’s worth the commission she charges, how effectively will she defend your money from buyers who want to cut your asking price or get a bigger credit for corrective work? The agent who ultimately convinces you that she’s worth every penny of a full commission may be the best agent for your team — given that the agent satisfies all the other listing agent selection criteria in Chapter 7.
Unlike an open listing or an exclusive listing, a net listing isn’t a type of listing. Rather, a net listing is a way to pay brokers. Under the terms of a net listing, the seller and broker make this agreement: When property sells, the broker is paid all money received over and above a predetermined net amount that goes to the seller. Because the net listing is a payment method, it can be used with either open or exclusive listing contracts.
For example, you tell the listing broker that you want to net $200,000 from the sale of your house after paying off the existing $70,000 mortgage and all other expenses of sale except, of course, the brokerage fee. According to the broker, your house is worth around $300,000, and expenses of sale in your area typically run about $10,000.
If everything goes according to plan and your house actually sells for $300,000, the broker earns $20,000 — $300,000 less $70,000 to pay off the loan, $10,000 for expenses of sale, and $200,000 to you. As far as you’re concerned, you’re happy to pay a $20,000 brokerage fee if you can clear $200,000 for yourself.
Unfortunately, sales rarely go according to plan in the real world. For example, consider the following possibilities:
The broker overestimated your house’s value. What if no one will pay more than $280,000 for your property? That’s fine with you. You can pay off the loan, pay the $10,000 for expenses of sale, and still walk away with $200,000. Because no money is left, however, all your broker gets is a pat on the back.
Under the circumstances, a bad listing broker may discourage prospective buyers from offering $280,000 by falsely telling them that you absolutely won’t accept a penny less than $300,000. If a cooperating broker brings in a $280,000 offer, a bad listing agent may advise you not to accept the lowball offer and tell you to hold out for more money. Or worse yet, the broker may not even tell you about the offer in the first place. In either case, the broker is putting the commission (or lack thereof) ahead of your best interests as a seller.
So-called full-service real estate brokers, as their title indicates, handle many tasks and details related to your property’s sale and charge a full commission for their services. Here is a small sample of what a good listing broker does to sell your home:
Your job is to serve as supervisor and decision maker.
At the opposite end of the service spectrum is the For Sale By Owner (FSBO) option. As Chapter 6 discusses, FSBO sellers don’t have a listing broker. If you choose the FSBO option, you handle all the listing broker’s chores yourself and thus avoid paying the listing agent’s portion of a brokerage fee when your house sells. (As we note in Chapter 6, you may have to pay the buyer’s agent a brokerage fee to put your deal together.)
Discount brokers occupy the middle range of the real estate brokerage service spectrum. If you use a discount broker, you pick and choose the tasks you want to do yourself to market your house. The more work you’re willing to handle yourself, the less you typically pay the broker.
Your savings, although not as great as those offered by the FSBO option, may be better than simply cutting the commission on your house’s sale price from 6 to 5.5 percent. Discount brokers use different pricing programs:
Some full-service/full-commission brokers aren’t keen about working on discount broker listings. For one thing, their listings often offer lower fees for cooperating brokers. Even if the fee is equal to the prevailing local rate, however, full-service agents know they’ll probably have to do extra work because you don’t have a full-service broker handling your end of the deal. For these reasons, discount broker listings get less than enthusiastic showings by most full-service brokers.
www.assist2sell.com
www.helpusell.com
www.redfin.com
The days of caveat emptor — let the buyer beware — are gone forever. In fact, given the flood of federal, state, and local consumer protection laws enacted during the last couple of decades, this is the era of caveat vendor — let the seller beware. Prudent house sellers and agents must now follow two simple guidelines:
As a seller, you may think that some of the disclosure requirements are overly protective of buyers. Because, however, you probably intend to purchase a new home to replace the one you’re selling, you can benefit from disclosures as a buyer. All things considered, it’s a fair trade.
Disclosure statements aren’t identical throughout the United States. Like other real estate contracts and forms, disclosure statements vary enormously in scope and intricacy because the disclosures themselves differ widely from state to state and from one area to another within any given state.
The documents you give prospective buyers probably won’t look like the California Association of Realtors’ Real Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement, shown in Figure 8-2. The C.A.R. form, however, gives you an idea of the kind of disclosures you may have to make.
Generally speaking, the law requires that you disclose to prospective buyers any information you have that materially affects your property’s value or desirability. A material fact is anything that reasonably affects either a buyer’s decision to purchase your house or the price he’d pay. This disclosure must cover facts that you, as an owner, are expected to know about your property and the neighborhood that couldn’t be known by (or wouldn’t be apparent to) the buyer. For example:
Physical condition: Are your built-in appliances in good working order? Do you know about any hidden defects or malfunctions in your house’s major components (roof, foundation, electrical system, plumbing, sewer, insulation, windows, doors, walls, and so on)?
Although you certainly ought to know whether your air conditioner works properly, no one expects you to be a professional property inspector. Disclosure laws are just one more reason why, as we note in Chapter 7, getting a premarketing inspection of your house is wise. You (and your agent, if you’re using one) should also encourage buyers to conduct their own investigations and obtain inspections from their own experts instead of relying solely on your inspections or the information you provide about the property’s physical condition.
Health, safety, and environmental hazards: You must comply with federal, state, and local disclosure laws regarding property problems related to asbestos, formaldehyde, lead-based paints, underground fuel or chemical storage tanks, radon gas, contaminated soil or water, and other health hazards. Is your property in harm’s way from earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, or other natural disasters? Does your property comply with local energy or water conservation ordinances?
Don’t worry about running all over town to stock up on the various booklets, pamphlets, and forms the law requires you to give to prospective buyers. Your listing agent or real estate lawyer (if you’re selling without an agent) should provide all necessary disclosure information prior to marketing your property.
Legal condition: Are any lawsuits pending that affect your property? Did you make any modifications or alterations to your property without getting the necessary building permits? Do these modifications or alterations comply with state and local building codes? If you’re selling a condominium, you must give the buyer copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), the Homeowners Association bylaws, and the budget.
If you have any legal problems related to the property, clear them up before marketing your property if possible. Nobody wants to buy a lawsuit. Legal problems are deal killers. Buyers generally don’t want to inherit legal problems, which tend to take a long time to resolve and are expensive, to boot.
Subjective areas: Up to this point, you can provide objective answers to the various disclosure questions. Your roof either leaks or it doesn’t. You either have lead-based paint in your house or you don’t. Either you’re being sued or you aren’t. Now things get fuzzy. Is your neighborhood quiet? Can you find parking spaces easily near your house? Is car traffic excessive in the neighborhood? Would you call the morning commute horrendous? Are schools in the area overcrowded?
Subjective questions can’t be answered with a simple yes or no. The environment that you think is extremely quiet, the buyer may consider a boiler factory. Parking a block from your house may be close in your opinion, but a long walk to your buyer. How much traffic is excessive? And so it goes. Answer all subjective questions to the best of your ability, and then encourage buyers to familiarize themselves with the area so they can draw their own subjective conclusions about these issues.
Some state courts have ruled that certain unpleasant facts materially affect the desirability and value of property and insist that sellers disclose these facts. One such fact is a death on the property within several years of the sale — especially if the death was gruesome or violent. For example, the difference between an elderly man dying peacefully in his sleep and a homicide is obvious. Other examples of unpleasant material facts are high crime rates in the immediate area or the presence of known child molesters or rapists who’ve been released from prison and now live in the neighborhood.
If you’re not sure whether you have to make this type of disclosure about your property, consult your listing agent or a real estate lawyer.
Sometimes, lawsuits are unavoidable. Certain litigious lads and lasses will take you to court at the drop of a summons whether they have a case or not. Other than identifying them in advance as troublemakers and refusing to accept an offer from them, you can’t protect yourself from people who believe that a lawsuit is their only solution for real or imagined problems. If you have the misfortune of selling your house to one of these misguided souls, your best recourse is to get a good lawyer to defend you.
Put your disclosure in writing. Have the buyers affirm receipt of your disclosure statement by signing and dating it. Be sure to keep a copy for your file.
Don’t fight the problem. Like it or not, disclosure statements are a fact of real estate life. They’re here to stay. Handled properly, mandatory disclosures speed up the sale of your house and ensure that, when your house sells, it stays sold.