10
The Effective Practice of Assistive Technology to Boom Total Communication Among Children With Hearing Impairment in Inclusive Classroom Settings
Fr. Baiju Thomas
Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute, Faculty of Disability Management and Special Education, Vidyalaya Campus, SRKV Post, Coimbatore, India
Abstract
It is very significant to offer accurate and applicable education for the children with hearing impairment (CwHI). The current study discovers the effective practice of Assistive Technology (AT) to gain total communication among CwHI in inclusive classroom settings. AT displays an active role in the education of CwHI in inclusive schools. This study further refer to the self-motivated benefits and motives why the practice of AT for CwHI. AT is usually determined and covers any component that increases, preserves, or improves the capabilities of a CwHI. In an inclusive classroom environment, AT devises functions to improve the total communication technique in teaching CwHI in inclusive classroom settings. Inclusive classroom settings are being measured as the best preference for CwHI and other learners with disabilities. CwHI are those students who lost their hearing both due to infections or accidents. Inclusive classroom settings can be favorable for numerous CwHI with supports and continuous bond with AT. AT is any device used to rise, sphere, or improve the communication abilities of CwHI. Through decreasing students’ reliance on others, AT can endorse the outlook of elegant individuality and, thus, progress the prospect of inclusive education (IE) classroom setting. This paper discussed the model of the IE program as it marks CwHI and many trials and methods and endures facilities required for proper implementation in an inclusive program for CwHI. The study confirms that AT and IE proposes beneficial recommendations to educators who target to practice AT more outstandingly in IE. AT includes products and correlated services that progress in working with CwHI. At this juncture, the author mentions some approaches to overawe the barriers by enhancing capabilities and resources to reviewing the AT to be more flexible to supply the requirements of CwHI in an inclusive classroom setting.
Keywords: Effective practice, assistive technology, boom, total communication, inclusive education, and children with hearing impairment
10.1 Introduction
It is rightly essential to offer accurate and suitable education for the hearing-impaired persons. Nowadays, it seems that spending only traditional instruction approaches is not adequate for the education of hearing-impaired persons. The usage of recent technologies marks the preparation for hearing-impaired persons more beneficial. Viewing at the literature, it is understood that there is a restricted number of studies on the broad usage of technologies used in the education of hearing-impaired persons in inclusive classroom settings. Persons with hearing impairments now have access to a variety of assistive devices that have significantly improved their educational, vocational, and recreational activities. Assistive technologies (ATs) are products or equipment that are used to advance and improve the well-made abilities of disabled people. Persons with disabilities can benefit from AT, which uses adaptive technology to help them [1]. SwHI may face a number of significant challenges in school and in their community lives [2]. Additional considerations are made when deciding on assistive devices, such as what will be the special effects of technology in shape and what will be the effects of frame on technologies [3]. “Technology has opened many educational doors for children, especially those with disabilities. In certain ways, technology-based substitute resolutions are beneficial for physical, sensory, and reasoning impairments” [4]. Children with hearing impairments (CwHIs) are more motivated to use AT than children with other disabilities. AT enables people, regardless of their disability, to overcome obstacles in their lives and become more independent in all aspects of living a useful life [5] in order to be well-protected and have equal rights. There should be no discrimination based on gender or age when it comes to AT for people with special needs [6]. The expense of AT devices for people with disabilities has been proposed to restrict their opportunity to live a self-determined life outside of school or at home [7]. AT is not a remedy for learning matters, but it can support students toil around their trials while in performance to their powers. AT aids students become more effective, creative students. At the same time, their self-assurance and individuality can develop. The suitable AT tools can be powerful in aiding students to become more effective and independent and can support students in exhausting their capabilities to toil on to learn an independent life in inclusive classroom settings.
10.2 Students With Hearing Impairment
Hearing is the capability to perceive the powered vibrations denoted to as sound. Hearing impairment is usually recognized as “deafness”. It is an enclosed disability; it is difficult to identify a child with hearing impairment till relating with him/her or perceptive hearing benefits. Provisions may not be obvious as some hearing benefits are very tiny and located in or overdue the ear or have surgically fixed cochlear implants. Besides, not all persons with hearing impairments wear hearing aids. Hearing is the capability to distinguish sound. Person anguish from hearing impairment has struggle in observing or recognizing sound obviously due to hearing problems. The impairment may be independent or mutual. The sense of hearing delivers a contextual, which gives a sentiment of safety and involvement in life. It shows an acute role in the development of speech and language and nursing one’s speech. Hearing-impaired persons have in common, their trouble in hearing spoken and other sounds. They also are depending on what they see which they improvement to what they hear. Students with hearing loss are labeled as “special needs” students. Hearing loss hinders the development of the developing displays, particularly language and communication. However, students with hearing impairments’ speech and language abilities are critical for a detailed understanding of the depth and nature of hearing loss [8, 9]. Other issues that prevent the acquisition of social participations and limit the development of positive self-confidence include a lack of opportunities for communicating and interacting with others [10]. Hearing impairment is a broad term that refers to all degrees and types of hearing loss, as well as the condensed purpose of hearing and understanding speech and language that results from a hearing disorder [11, 12]. As a result, hearing impairment impairs students’ ability to learn and participate in school and society, and deaf and hard-of-hearing students can be hampered by society’s instructional structure and attitudes [13, 14]. Hearing loss and deafness are alarming to people of all ages, and they can worsen at any time, from early stages to old age. The impact of hearing loss is determined by the type, severity, and timing of the hearing loss. Some students will lose their hearing over time due to a variety of factors such as age or genetics. Others may have permanently lost their hearing due to factory noise or suffer from tinnitus, a high-pitched drumming sound in the ear. Cochlea implants or hearing aids may have enhanced, but not removed, certain people’s hearing. Educators must prioritize all classrooms of pupils and, as a result, students who are deaf or hard of hearing in order to make meaningful changes to conventional teaching methods. Established approaches, on the other hand, make for a flatter difference from conventional education for both learners and educators.
10.3 The Classifications on Hearing Impairment
Hearing loss is a general term of impairment with a diversity of hereditary (existing at birth) and developed reasons. In this short-term unit, we describe some associated figures regarding hearing loss. Hearing loss that is not determined, restrictions one or more everyday actions, and/or limits partaking, is a severe matter, mostly when it harmfully influences communication and general excellence of lifespan. Hearing loss is divided into three categories: conductive, sensorineural, and mixed. The system that mechanically transfers sound shaking into the interior ear is impaired in conductive hearing loss. The succeeding is cataloging on hearing impairments.
10.3.1 Conductive Hearing Losses
Conductive hearing losses are owed to the effects of illnesses or uncertain block in the outdoor or middle ear (the conduction paths for sound to the extent the interior ear). Conductive hearing losses normally distress all occurrences of hearing continuously and do not significance in severe losses. A person with a conductive hearing loss frequently is capable to use hearing devices well or can be aided medically or surgically. It does not upset the internal ear. In this circumstance, thus, if sound sensations can be conveyed in anyway straight to the internal ear without having to pass through the mid-ear, then the child hears. The person anguish from conductive hearing loss can be aided through procedure or over wearing bone transmission hearing aids behind the ears.
10.3.2 Sensorineural Hearing Losses
Damage to the gentle sensory hair cells of the internal ear or the nerves that supply it causes sensorineural hearing loss. Children with sensorineural hearing loss can experience difficulty hearing and speaking attentively. The severity of these hearing losses can range from mild to severe. They always interfere with a person’s ability to hear secure events rather than others. Sensorineural hearing loss in young children can ensue with firm infections before birth, from a shortage of oxygen during birth or inherited disorders. Sensorineural hearing loss repeatedly cannot be treated with medicine or operation. Whereas this kind of hearing loss is perpetual, most children will advantage from hearing devices and other hearing ATs, besides with speech, language, and healing therapies.
10.3.3 Central Hearing Losses
Central hearing impairment: Cerebral cortex is the portion of the brain where the feeling of sound is formed and inferred expressively. Therefore, if there is intervention with the path through which nerve fibers continue from the brain stem to the sequential lobes of the cerebral cortex, then it outcomes to central hearing loss. In other words, a mistake in the auditory middle in the brain bases central deafness.
10.3.4 Mixed Hearing Losses
Mixed hearing losses mean to a mixture of conductive and sensorineural loss and signify that a difficult occurs in both the outdoor or mid and interior ear. Mixed hearing impairment is the grouping of conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. An individual here has exterior or middle and inner ear difficult joint. Mixed hearing deafness is often difficult to know and treat because there are problems of both broadcast and release of sound. Mixed hearing loss is obvious by a grouping of conductive injury in the external or central ear and sensorineural wound in the internal ear (cochlea) or aural nerve (Table 10.1).
Table 10.1 The relevant terms.
| Deaf | Deafness | Hard of hearing |
| Deaf signifies to hearing impairments that eliminate effective treating of language information over audition, with or without a hearing provision. A person who is considered as “deaf” naturally has an intense hearing loss (beyond 90 dB) and is pre-lingual. In certain circumstances, deaf students may be able to speak or speech-read well. | This term refers to a profound hearing disability that greatly limits one’s ability to access language knowledge exclusively by hearing, with or without the use of hearing aids. Even though they appear to be hard of hearing, students with cochlear implants are listed as mentally deaf. Deafness is not affected simply by a lack of communication skills or the need to use sign language. The inability of parents, specialists, and the general public to recognize and acknowledge the individual with this condition is the most significant issue facing a hearing-impaired child or adolescent, since deafness is often wrongly correlated with powerlessness and the need for resistance [15]. | This word defines a degree of hearing loss that approves the student to process auditory information required for auditory-verbal communication, with the assist of hearing aids or assistive listening devices (ALD) when required. However, the amount of hearing loss is not a precise predictor of how one function auditorially. Hard of hearing denotes to impairment in hearing that does not completely avoid applied communication by speech. Hence, the person who is hard of hearing usually communicates by using speech. The audiologist assessment does not dependably envisage the student’s capability to hear with understanding. |
10.4 Inclusion of Hearing-Impaired Students in Inclusive Classrooms
The inclusion of children with disabilities in common classrooms has established the attention of extensive exploration in education. It has both academic and social well-being for all students, such as providing opportunity for communication and social relations. Inclusive education (IE) is the method of recurring to the diversity of children by enhancing participation in classrooms and reducing separation from education [16]. This change has been mentioned to variously as incorporation, straight, and, more in current times, inclusion. Inclusion denotes students with disabilities becoming a portion of the regular education classroom, getting an eloquent curriculum with essential provision, and being trained with effective approaches [17]. The notion of IE has been pinched from the human rights perception which matters that disability foundations differences in human features which may be in the procedure of sensory or physical ability, but these changes do not limit human abilities [18]. IE can be operative only if it is planned to be able to afford several stages and methods of support with both learners and educators. The source temperament is an important aspect of hearing-impaired students’ inclusion in general education [19]. Starting with the awareness that many CwHIs are silently excluded from school due to a lack of support, it is critical to ensure that sufficient assets are made available [20]. In an IE system, human means are needed, and they include all people who assist hearing-impaired students in learning. Successful inclusion requires the definition of roles and obligations, teamwork, the forming of teams, and preparation [21]. A detailed prospectus is needed. Although hearing-impaired students follow the same program as their hearing peers, they are required to take additional subjects in order to participate in extracurricular activities. Hearing-impaired students who wear hearing aids and others who have a significant hearing loss and need reserve assistance from a special educator must have their content needs addressed in inclusive classroom settings.
10.4.1 Assistive Technology
Students with disabilities can benefit from using technology to improve and increase their independence in educational and employment tasks, as well as participate in classroom debates and complete some difficult educational tasks. ATs are often recommended to colleges, parents, and educators as tools to help students with hearing impairments by offering compensatory value, resolving learning issues, and certifying individual independence. Many research projects have looked at the effectiveness of these assistive devices, mostly in terms of remediation and assistance. Students should be exposed to technical resources that can help them resolve their academic difficulties, particularly in central and unexpected schools [22]. Furthermore, if students can use a calculator but have difficulty saying numbers correctly, then they can use more specialized resources such as a speaking calculator, which can be used anytime or wherever they need it and helps students say numbers correctly [23]. Persons with disabilities have been using AT for many years, and its use in instructional, vocational, and playful activities is rapidly increasing. Following the appropriate broadcast of individual needs and technology stipulations for persons with disabilities, experts are clearing up special needs people with a variety of assistive devices and facilities [24]. Several factors are considered when selecting assistive devices, such as the impact of technology on the body and the frame’s possessions on technologies [3]. The use, power, and special effects of AT on the learning of special needs students were investigated. The aim of this research is to show how useful AT can be in helping CwHIs in inclusive classrooms.
10.4.2 Assistive Technology for Hearing Impairments
ATs include a broad variety of assistive, adaptive, and rehabilitative devices for people who are deaf or hard of hearing. In the past 20 years, deafness and hearing disability assistive devices have advanced significantly. The three types of ATs are hardware-based, software-based, and prosthetic inserts. AT [25] may be a critical problem in allowing people with disabilities to engage in daily life and be a part of society. This technology has two functions: it is a tool for recognizing freedom as well as a noticeable indicator of disability [26]. When AT is treated as a tool or a method of accomplishing a desired goal, it is more likely to be incorporated into the user’s life. In the other hand, technology that is viewed as a simple signal of an impairment will highlight the dishonor associated with the disability. People with a negative attitude toward technology, on the other hand, may avoid or discourage using it; they may avoid expressive acts and try to isolate themselves socially and physically [27]. In a number of environments, deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals use a variety of assistive devices to increase their user-friendliness. Most devices that have enhanced sound or alternate methods of knowledge access often provide vision and/or vibration. These technologies fall into three different categories: hearing technology, notification systems, and communication provisions. Within each key grouping, there may be subgroups based on various reasons or expected audiences when using the technology. The end aim of both of these devices is to increase information accessibility for people who use hearing aids. The illustrations that follow are meant to restore the reader’s understanding of these tools’ meaning, as well as when and how they could be created. Deaf and hard-of-hearing people can use ATs in particular circumstances, depending on their needs. By using intervals, these ATs can be used in parallel. Many of the approaches developed for deaf or hard of hearing people could be appropriate for people who do not have hearing loss; however, this knowledge is out of date at this time. The evidence provided is remarkable in that it is broad enough to provide the student with a common understanding of AT advanced among people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Since technology and websites for students with hearing impairments in inclusive classroom settings are constantly evolving, no computer, manufacturer, or resource can be considered dominant.
10.4.3 Hearing Technology
Hearing technology will play an important role in the education of deaf and hard-of-hearing children in inclusive classrooms. Just a few studies have looked at how these kids use technology. Hearing technology is almost indistinguishable from any other system that increases the amount of sound available to a listener. This study examines concerns surrounding children’s use of and attitudes toward hearing aids, cochlear implants, teacher-worn microphones, and student-worn microphones, among other technologies. Individual amplifiers that are normally placed on the head or on the body, such as hearing aids and cochlear implants, as well as assistive listening devices that are not naturally worn on the head or on the body, such as classroom sound field amplification systems, are protected by hearing technology for deaf and hard-of-hearing citizens [28]. Despite the fact that students and educators agree that using hearing technology is self-motivated for successful inclusion [29, 30], the tools are used infrequently and ineffectively due to the stigma associated with ATs. Hearing equipment offered to deaf and hard-of-hearing students in inclusive schools has the ability to enhance teaching and learning practices in inclusive classrooms for students with hearing impairments. In inclusive classroom settings, no computer, manufacturer, or resource can have a significant influence.
10.4.4 Assistive Listening Devices
These instruments, of course, are used to increase the signal-to-noise ratio in any given situation. ALDs provide a direct connection to the sound source, reducing the special effects of contextual sound, range, and room audibility in addition to increased power. There are both individual ALDs and collective or big group ALDs. A transmitter sends a person’s speech or another sound source to a headset, which distributes the sound equally in a building, such as in theaters and churches, or directly to a single person. The four key ways to transmit sound are frequency modulation (FM), infrared (light), induction loop (electromagnetic), and a straight link. Direct audio input (DAI) is a feature of some hearing aids that allows the consumer to attach directly to an FM device or an Induction Loop receiver. In many cases, a computer, television, MP3 player, or radio can be connected directly to the device. ALDs denote to several types of amplification tools intended to enhance the communication of persons with hard of hearing to improve the user-friendliness to speech indication when individual hearing devices are not appropriate. There are several types of ALDs to overawe a threesome of speech-to-sound percentage (SNR) difficulties, sound, space, and echo. ALDs contrast in their inner electronic procedures extending from simple hard-wire microphone-amplifier essentials to more fashionable broadcasting systems.
10.4.5 Personal Amplification
These devices are intended to increase a person’s sound access in all situations. They are chosen because they are based on a person’s interests, the diagnosis and confirmation of hearing loss, and the individual’s specific characteristics. An audiologist is required to acquire and tailor this group of equipment. Although many foundations do not consider personal amplification to be AT, assistive attending devices and other auditory-based devices (MP3, TV, and computer) can be connected across these systems and explained concisely. In addition, some reserve sources say that personal intensification can be achieved by the use of AT. Students who use hearing aids or cochlear implants and are deaf or hard of hearing will be eligible to participate in AT. A teacher’s voice can be transmitted directly from a wireless microphone worn by the teacher over FM radio waves to a small receiver worn by a student with hearing loss. Amplified phones have a wide range of adapted mobile phones and notification systems that can help people with varying degrees of hearing loss. Face-to-face communication systems can offer support when little, one-on-one discussions are required. Text and other adaptive telephones (TTY) can offer access for persons who cannot use amplified phones. Added choices now available contain PDAs, Blackberries, Sidekicks, and videophones. These devices amplify speech heard over the phone. They are beneficial for people who do not wear hearing aids. This technology is used fewer frequently now that texting is available over cell phones. In response to sound, notification devices show a sign. To warn the person with hearing loss that a sound has occurred, some use strobe lights, steady lights, or colorful systems.
10.4.6 Communication Supports
In inclusive classroom environments, students with hearing impairments often use a variety of ATs to improve contact with their peers. The child and family need a communication method that allows for normal, articulate, and ample exchanges. Hearing aids can help people who were born with a hearing loss or those whose hearing has deteriorated but who still have some residual hearing. Hearing aids cannot restore hearing, but they do assist in making the sounds you need to hear more audible. Certain people may benefit from cochlear implants, a surgically implanted hearing device. These are usually only recommended for people who have a severe hearing loss and are unable to use hearing aids. Smart headphones can be used for a variety of purposes, including staying in touch, searching for facts, and finding your way around. People and groups that were previously unreachable can now connect, form relationships, and connect a group thanks to social media. Videoconferencing is highly helpful because it alleviates minor possible stressors by encouraging parents to participate in their children’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) resolutions in inclusive classroom environments for hearing-impaired students.
10.5 Total Communication System for Hearing Impairments
Total communication is a method in which voice, fingerspelling, and signs are all practiced [31]. In deaf educational settings, TC is the most widely used contact tool [32]. For receptive communication, newborns and small children will rely on supported residual hearing as well as visual cues from signs and lip reading. The child is strengthened to communicate sensitively using both signs and words. He went on to say that the goal is to include a variety of opportunities for children with hearing loss to learn to communicate and use speech as a social communication tool. The majority of general education teachers profit from total cooperation when it comes to resolving communication and instruction issues. The total communication system is a method for reinforcing and improving the skills required for SHI to work in a general classroom setting. Since they do not have talents, common education teachers tend to be apathetic about the use of absolute contact. Such teachers can be unconcerned about the philosophies and teaching strategies that rely on absolute contact, and as a result, they become counterproductive [33]. Furthermore, if teachers lack the necessary skills and knowledge, then a lively environment that encourages students to learn and develop their skills will not be created [34]. In educational presentations, these students may be a step behind their hearing peers [35]. In general education classrooms, teachers can also do things that are detrimental to genuine SHI teaching and learning [36]. For example, they want total communication and assistive hearing, such as hearing aids and cochlear transplants, to be continued, so that they can maximize their communication abilities [37]. Total communication is a method of educating children with hearing loss that includes all forms of communication, such as proper signs, natural movements, fingerspelling, body language, listening, lip-reading, and voice. Hearing aids or cochlear implants are worn by children on total communication channels normally.
Table 10.2 Assistive technology devices that are recommended for students with hearing impairments.
| Devices | Explanations |
| Amplified Telephone |
It builds up to ring load to vigilant those who are deaf or hard of hearing. Non-aid operators shall require getting at minimum a cell phone with amplification proficiencies. |
| Headphones and Headset | Headphones are a daily device for a maximum of us. Further thing to recall is that the best hearing aids have sets for “music” which proceeds into account headphones. |
|
Personal Listeners |
New device available for non-aid operators is the personal amplifier, also recognized as the personal listeners. These devices are designed as a little bigger than Mp3 players and which provides a better amplifying sound system for a hearing aid use. |
| Hearing Aids |
A hearing aid is a battery-powered electronic device aimed to improve your hearing. A BTE hearing aid is the best frequently used variety of aid with children. |
| Cochlear Implants Processors | Cochlear implants are surgically implanted electric devices that restore hearing to people who are profoundly deaf or hard of hearing in both ears. |
| Blee |
Blee is a wearable band for deaf and hard of hearing persons.
In daily life, deaf persons false step on several occasions, occasionally even emergency notifications for the reason that they cannot respond to sound. |
| Personal FM System | An FM module is a type of hearing aid that improves the speech-to-noise ratio by using a distant microphone that can be rented near the sound source. |
| Automatic Speech Recognition |
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is the procedure of stemming the transcript of a sound, given the speech waveform.
Speech understanding goes one phase more and gathers the sense of the sound to transport the speaker’s command. |
| Voice Carry-Over |
Voice Carry-Over (VCO) treaties persons with a hearing loss endure to use their voice on the telephone.
VCO, a technology established by Ultratec, lets persons to speak straight to the person they are calling, then read that person’s reply on their CapTel, TTY, or IPhone show. |
| T-Mobile Sidekick | This text-based communication standard, along with on-device email and a full QWERTY keyboard, made it general with the deaf community, providing a telecommunication tool for use both intimate and outdoor the home. |
| Real-Time Captioning | Distant real-time captions are designed at a distant area and then sent to the spot where the program is taking place. |
| Screen Readers |
A screen reader is a software application that empowers persons with deaf and hard of hearing to use a computer. The software provides manuscript documents and even the names of programs on headlines on the screen. |
| Caption Call |
This phone interprets the voice to manuscript.
This works on the internet [38]. |
In inclusive classroom environments, the aim is to support language learning in whatever way is most active for each child (Table 10.2).
10.6 Conclusion
The CwHI are capable of making the best of teaching and learning results together with their normal-hearing equals in an inclusive educational setting if presumed a proper learning atmosphere with satisfactory provisions of concerned expert staff, devices, tools, and resources that will improve the execution of the inclusion platform for CwHI. Learning is a procedure that occurs in obvious and ideal conditions, according to studies, to the point where circumstances in which students are engaged deliberately or then have great special effects on them. It also discusses educator attitudes toward the inclusion of hearing-impaired students, stating that doing so is always dangerous and fraught with conflicts and discrepancies. Finally, teacher skills, learner needs, and the availability of ATs for enhancing complete contact between hearing-impaired and their normal-hearing peers in inclusive classroom settings have played a role in enabling the inclusion of hearing-impaired students.
References
1. UNESCO. ICTs in education for people with special needs. Institute for Information Technologies in Education Specialized Training course, Moscow, 2006.
2. Akçamete, G., Kış, A., Gürgür, H., Özel gereksinimli öğrenciler için kaynaştırma modeli geliştirme projesi, Ankara Üniversitesi bilimsel araştırma projesi kesin raporu, 2009.
3. Hersh, M.A. and Johnson, M.A., Anatomy and physiology of hearing, hearing impairment and treatment, in: Assistive technology for the hearing impaired, deaf and deaf blind, M.A. Hersh and M.A. Johnson (Eds.), pp. 1–39, Springer, London, 2003.
4. Dede, C., Learning with Technology. 1998 ASCD Yearbook, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 N. Pitt St., Alexandria, VA 22314–1453 (Stock No. 198000; $15.95, member; $18.59, non-member), 1998.
5. Bouck, E.C., Shurr, J.C., Tom, K., Jasper, A.D., Bassette, L., Miller, B., Flanagan, S.M., Fix it with TAPE: Repurposing technology to be assistive technology for students with high-incidence disabilities. Prev. Sch. Fail.: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 56, 2, 121–128, 2012 Jan 1.
6. Borg, J., Larsson, S., Östergren, P.O., The right to assistive technology: For whom, for what, and by whom? Disabil. Soc., 26, 2, 151–167, 2011 Mar 1.
7. Harris, F., Sprigle, S., Sonenblum, S.E., Maurer, C.L., The participation and activity measurement system: an example application among people who use wheeled mobility devices. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol., 5, 1, 48–57, 2010 Jan 1.
8. Gilliam, M.L. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Obstet. Gynecol., 118, 3, 706–707, 2011.
9. English, M.A. and Mastrean, M.B., Congestive heart failure: Public and private burden. Crit. Care Nurs. Q., 18, 1, 1–6, 1995.
10. Stotz, K.E., Itoi, M., Konrad, M., Alber-Morgan, S.R., Effects of self-graphing on written expression of fourth grade students with high-incidence disabilities. J. Behav. Educ., 17, 2, 172–186, 2008.
11. Balciuniene, J., Dahl, N., Jalonen, P., Verhoeven, K., Van Camp, G., Borg, E., Jazin, E.E. Alpha-tectorin involvement in hearing disabilities: One gene–two phenotypes. Hum Genet., 105, 3, 211–216, 1999.
12. Stach, B.A. and Ramachandran, V., Hearing aids: Strategies of amplification. Cumming otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 5th ed., pp. 2265–2275, Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2010.
13. Paul, P.V. and Whitelaw, G.M., Hearing and deafness: An introduction for health and education professionals, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2010.
14. Zhu, J., Yamane, H., Paul, W.E., Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations. Ann. Rev. Immunol., 28, 445–489, 2009.
15. Adoyo, P.O. and Maina, E.N., Practices and Challenges in Deaf Education in Kenya. Deaf Education Beyond the Western World: Context, Challenges, and Prospects, pp. 73–86, 2019.
16. UNESCO. World conference on special needs education: Access and equality. Salamanca, Spain. Paris, Author, 1994.
17. Attewell, J. and Savill-Smith, C., Mobile learning and social inclusion: Focusing on learners and learning. In Learning with Mobile Devices: Research and Development, pp. 3–11, 2004.
18. Cober, E.R., Rioux, S., Rajcan, I., Donaldson, P.A., Simmonds, D.H., Partial resistance to white mold in a transgenic soybean line. Crop Sci., 43, 1, 92–95, 2003.
19. Chimedza, R. and Peters, S., Disabled people’s quest for social justice in Zimbabwe, in: Disability, human rights, and education: Cross-cultural perspectives, pp. 7–23, 1999.
20. Chakuchichi, D.D., Chimedza, R.M., Chiinze, M.M., Kaputa, T.M., Including the excluded issues in disability and inclusion. Zimbabwe Open University, Harare, 2003.
21. Ainscow, M., Education for all: Making it happen. Keynote address, in: International Special Education Congress, Birmingham, 1995.
22. Mull, C.A. and Sitlington, P.L., The role of technology in the transition to postsecondary education of students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. J. Spec. Educ., 37, 1, 26–32, 2003 May.
23. Lankutis, T., Special Needs Technologies: An Administrator’s Guide. Technol. Learn., 25, 2, 30, 2004 Sep 1.
24. Cook, A.M. and Hussey, S., Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 2002.
25. Schneidert, M., Hurst, R., Miller, J., Üstün, B., The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil. Rehabil., 25, 11–12, 588–595, 2003 Jan 1.
26. Jutai, J.W., Fuhrer, M.J., Demers, L., Scherer, M.J., DeRuyter, F., Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 84, 4, 294–302, 2005.
27. Lu, Y., Luo, X., Polgar, M., Cao, Y., Social network analysis of a criminal hacker community. J. Comput. Inform. Syst., 51, 2, 31–41, 2010.
28. Dillon, H., Hearing aid technology and the future, in: Presentation at the Acoustical Society of American conference, Honolulu, HI, 2006.
29. Eriks-Brophy, A., Durieux-Smith, A., Olds, J., Fitzpatrick, E., Facilitators and barriers to the inclusion of orally educated children and youth with hearing loss in schools: Promoting partnerships to support inclusion. Volta Rev., 106, 1, 53, 2006 Apr 1.
30. Luckner, J.L. and Muir, S., Successful students who are deaf in general education settings. Am. Ann. Deaf, 435–446, 2001.
31. Olawole, G., Total quality management in Nigerian SME companies: a case study of Rolling Technologies communication limited, 2010.
32. GRI. Sustainability reporting guidelines. GRI, Boston, MA, 2002.
33. Raji, A., Seely, E.W., Bekins, S.A., Williams, G.H., Simonson, D.C., Rosiglitazone improves insulin sensitivity and lowers blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Diabetes Care, 26, 1, 172–178, 2003 Jan 1.
34. Adaka, A. and Ugwuanyi, L.T., Using total communication technique in teaching students with hearing impairment in inclusive classrooms in Enugu State-Nigeria: Teachers’ perspectives and difficulties. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 11, 5, 100–107, 2017.
35. Esplugas, S., Bila, D.M., Krause, L.G.T., Dezotti, M., Ozonation and advanced oxidation technologies to remove endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in water effluents. J. Hazard. Mater., 149, 3, 631–642, 2007.
36. Kolo, J., Information and communication technology transformation in the Middle East: issues and initiatives from the sustainability prism, in: Technological Transformation and Competitiveness in the Middle East, Inderscience, Enterprises Ltd, London, UK, 2007.
37. Marschark, M., Lang, H.G., Albertini, J.A. Reading, writing, and literacy. In Educating Deaf Students. Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
38. Thomas, F.B., The significance of assistive technology in inclusive education: Creating scope for persons with disabilities. Int. J. Adv. Res. Ideas Innov. Technol., 5, 1, 721–727, 2019.
Email: [email protected]