Index

Page numbers followed by f and t refer to figures and tables, respectively.

  • ABC training software, 427–430
  • Abraham, Jay, 63
  • Abrahamson, S., 26
  • Accountability, in success pyramid, 382, 383, 383f
  • Acknowledgment, 439. See also Recognition
  • Additions to product family, 22, 22f
  • Add-ons, 21, 22f
  • Advanced development projects, 92
  • Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), 311–313
  • Aesthetic value, 437–438, 450–451, 458
  • Agile, 36–48
    • in ABC training software development, 428
    • at Deloitte, 37–45, 39f
    • at IBM, 379–381
    • at Integrated Computer Solutions, Inc., 393–400, 394f, 395f, 398f, 399f
    • objective and principles of, 36–37
    • Scaled Agile Framework, 389
    • at Star Alliance, 46–48, 403f, 404
    • steps in, 283f, 284f
    • tools/methodologies for, 403f, 404
    • at UNICEF USA, 389–391
    • at Wärtsilä Energy Solutions, 426–427
  • Agile Master Plan:
  • Agile project management, 153, 154, 160
  • Agility, 379
  • Airbus, 33–34
    • and Boeing 787, 493
    • core innovation capability case study, 230–240, 232t
    • open innovation at, 33–35
    • safety issues for, 490–491, 494
  • Airbus Space and Defence, 418–421, 419f, 420f
  • Airbus Technocampus EMC2, 34
  • Air India, 493
  • Alexander, Jack, 246
  • Allen, Paul G., 66
  • Alliance strategy, 65
  • All Nippon Airways (ANA), 30, 491–494
  • Alt-Simmons, Rachel, 360
  • Altura Ventures, 378
  • Al-Waleed, Prince, 469
  • Amazon.com, 306
  • Ambiguity, 120, 121, 121t, 279, 334
  • AMD (Advanced Micro Devices), 311–313
  • American Airlines, 491
  • American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC), 28
  • Ampore Faucet Company (case study), 503–506
  • ANA (All Nippon Airways), 30
  • Analysis-paralysis, 336
  • Anderson, Ken, 445, 446, 448
  • Apple, 375–377
  • Application engineering strategy, 90
  • Applied research projects, 92
  • Approximate (top-down) estimates, 175
  • APQC (American Productivity and Quality Center), 28
  • Arcadis, 179–187, 186f
  • Ariely, Dan, 288
  • Arup, Ove, 499, 502, 503
  • Ashworth, Harry Ingham, 502
  • Askin, Robert, 501
  • Assumptions, 167–169, 169f
    • in business case, 165
    • changes in, 166, 168
    • in customer value management, 260
    • documenting, 168–169, 169f
    • explicit and implicit, 167–168
    • over life-cycle of project, 302, 303f
    • too many, 334
    • tracking and challenging, 324, 325, 325t
    • tracking and validating, 336
  • Atencio, Xavier, 448, 453, 455
  • Autonomy, 15
  • Baham, J., 448
  • Bait and hook business model, 306
  • Baker, Buddy, 455
  • Balanced R&D/marketing companies, 101
  • Balanced scorecard, 146–147
  • “Big hairy audacious goals” (BHAGs), 170
  • “Blue sky” brainstorming, 434, 435
  • Board of directors, 11, 59
  • Boeing:
    • 737 MAX 8 jetliners, 533–534
    • 777, co-creation of, 30, 297
    • 787 Dreamliner, 297, 354, 489–496
  • Boland, Jim, 379, 381
  • Bontis, N., 254
  • Bootlegged projects, 91–92, 127–128
  • Booz, Allen, and Hamilton, 106, 107
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) portfolio model, 68–69, 69f, 71–73, 95, 95f
  • Boundary boxes:
    • target, for metrics, 268, 269f
    • triple constraints with, 357–358, 358f
    • value measurement vs., 256, 256f
  • Bower, Joseph, 316
  • Bowman, Douglas, 120
  • Brainstorming, 105, 138–141, 334, 433–435
  • Brand value strategy, 65
  • Bricks and clicks business model, 306
  • Brier, David, 95
  • Brown, Brene, 4
  • Buchen, Irving, 384
  • Budgeting, 67, 175–176
  • Buffett, Warren, 251
  • Business case, 117, 118, 121
    • assumptions in, 302
    • development of, 164–167
    • failure of, 368
    • for Iridium, 513–514
    • success and early termination criteria in, 358
    • in traditional vs. innovation environments, 330
  • Business-drive program Roadmap (BDPR), 418–421, 419f, 420f
  • Business intelligence (BI), 134, 300–301
  • Business models, 295–313
    • of Apple, 376
    • Boeing 787 Dreamliner (case study), 489–496
    • and business intelligence, 300–301
    • change in, 297
    • characteristics of, 299
    • co-creation built into, 32–33
    • critical issues/challenges with, 313
    • for Disney projects, 457. See also Global business model innovation (Disney case studies)
    • for Disney Tokyo, 459, 463
    • disruption of, 317–319
    • enhancements for, 303–305, 305f
    • failure of, 310
    • identifying threats to, 308–309, 309t
    • Iridium business model failure (case study), 508–534, 526t
    • and lawsuits, 310–313
    • project manager as designer of, 297–298
    • skills for innovators of, 301–303, 303f
    • and strategic alliances, 308
    • and strategic partnerships, 300
    • and success of innovation projects, 368
    • types of, 305–307
    • for UNICEF Kid Power development, 390
    • use of term, 296
    • and value, 298–299
  • Business need, 4–7, 165
  • Business ownership, changes in, 166
  • Business process innovation, 368
  • Business side of success:
    • innovation success, 363–364, 364f
    • traditional success, 354–355
  • Business value, 10, 219, 249, 295, 355, 364–365, 364f
  • Cahill, Joseph, 496, 498
  • Calabretta, G., 161
  • Candidate Experience Platform (CEX), 38–45
  • Capacity planning, 66–67
  • Caputo, Michele A., 190
  • Carlton, Richard P., 385
  • Carnelós, Carlos, 381
  • Carr, Martin, 500
  • Case studies, 431–534. See also Innovation in action
    • Airbus core innovation capability, 230–240, 232t
    • Ampore Faucet Company views on innovation, 503–506
    • Boeing 787 Dreamliner business model, 489–496
    • Disney culture and global innovation opportunities, 456–475, 462t, 465t–466t, 471t, 472t
    • Disney innovation creation, 441–456, 443f
    • Disney innovation project management skills, 431–441
    • Disney partnerships in global business model, 476–489, 481t, 482t, 488t
    • IdeaSpace, 231–240
    • Iridium business model failure, 508–534, 526t
    • Leckey-Firefly, 225–226
    • Magneti Marelli, 222–223
    • multiple innovation sponsors, 506–507
    • National Health Service of the UK, 227–228
    • Redwood Credit Union, 223–224
    • Sydney Opera House, 496–503
    • Total France, 228–229
  • Cash cows (in BCG model), 69, 69f, 71
  • Cash flow, as roadblock to innovation, 335
  • Catmull, Edwin, 1
  • Cauley, L., 523
  • CCB (change control board), 177–178
  • CEX (Candidate Experience Platform), 38–45
  • Chaney, Chris, 508
  • Change control board (CCB), 177–178
  • Change cycle, 345–348, 347f, 348f
  • Cheng, J. Y., 59
  • Chesbrough, H. W., 34, 241, 422
  • Choi, Quan, 387
  • Christensen, C., 23, 315, 316, 318
  • Claircom, 524, 527
  • Clark, K. B., 23
  • Classification systems:
    • for innovation, 8, 58–59
    • for projects, 8–9, 91–92
  • Closed innovation, 23–25, 376
  • Coats, Claude, 431, 439, 447
  • Co-creation, 27–33, 28f
    • at Airbus, 33–35
    • change control board with, 177–178
    • innovation project management in, 4–5
    • value attributed with, 274, 274t
  • Co-creation strategy, 65
  • Co-creation team, 151
  • Collaboration, 132, 221, 332, 379, 390
  • Collective belief, 516–517
  • Collective business model, 306
  • Collins, Jim, 303–304
  • Co-located teams, 152–153
  • COMAU, 400–408, 401f–407f
  • Commercial intelligence, 66
  • Communication:
    • at Arcadis, 179–187, 186f
    • as leadership skill, 132
    • traditional vs. innovative management of, 178
    • X + Y + Z = D (Shabatat Theory) of, 180–182
  • Competencies. See also Core competencies
    • Eli Lilly competency model, 77–88
    • enhancing/destroying, 366–367, 367t
    • innovation, 16
  • Daikin, 53–54
  • Data discovery, 134
  • Davis, Alice Estes, 445
  • Davis, David, 516–517
  • Davis, Marc, 445, 447
  • Defensive innovation, 57, 95–96, 95f
  • Definitive estimates, 176
  • Deliverables, 248–251, 353, 354
  • Dell Computer, 306, 312–313
  • Deloitte Central Europe, 37–45
  • Department of Defense (DOD), 323, 355
  • Desch, Matt, 533–534
  • Design freeze milestones, 172–173
  • Design star, 343, 344f
  • Design thinking, 135–138, 136f, 379–381
  • Development:
    • research and development ratio, 93–94
    • research vs., 92–93
  • Diener, K., 304
  • Direct sales model, 306
  • Discontinuities, 309, 309t
  • Discontinuous innovation, 57
  • Disney:
    • constraints at, 365
    • culture and global innovation opportunities (case study), 456–475, 462t, 465t–466t, 471t, 472t
    • Imagineering division, 139, 140, 431–441
    • innovation creation: Haunted Mansion (case study), 441–456, 443f
    • innovation project management skills (case study), 431–441
    • integrated services at, 463–464
    • partnerships in global business model innovation (case study), 476–489, 481t, 482t, 488t
  • Disney, Walt, 432, 433, 435, 445–448
  • Disney Book Group, 433, 438
  • Disruption, 318, 319
  • Disruptive innovation, 23, 58, 315–326
    • in action, 324–326, 325t, 326t
    • and business model disruption, 317–319
    • categories of, 319–321
    • critical issues/challenges with, 326
    • dark side of, 321
    • defined, 316
    • early understanding of, 316–317
    • and integrated product/project teams, 321–324, 324t
    • steps in, 321
    • use of term, 320
  • Disruptive technologies, 316, 320
  • Distribution business model various fee in, free out, 306
  • Diversity, 350
  • DOD (Department of Defense), 323, 355
  • Dogs (in BCG model), 69, 69f, 71
  • Dovale, Tony, 27, 321
  • Drew, Richard, 128
  • Dru, J., 320–321
  • Drucker, Peter, 2, 4, 321
  • Dubai Customs, 202–207, 203f–206f
  • Durstewitz, Markus, 231–233, 235, 240
  • Dvir, D., 59
  • Earned Value Measurement System (EVMS), 355–356
  • Easy value metrics, 253–255, 253t, 254t
  • EBay, 306
  • Eco-innovation, 57
  • Economic evaluation of projects, 108–111, 110f, 111f
  • Egan, Bruce, 529
  • EI (emotional intelligence), 134–135
  • Eisner, Michael, 459, 462, 467, 470, 479
  • Eli Lilly competency model, 77–88
    • for leadership, 78, 84–88
    • for process skills, 77–78, 81–84
    • for scientific/technical expertise, 77–81
  • Emotional intelligence (EI), 134–135
  • Enders, Tom, 230
  • Engagement, improving, 221
  • Engineering changes, 93
  • Enhancements, 21
  • Enterprise environmental factors, 168, 169, 456–459
  • Enterprise project management, 304, 353
  • Entrepreneurial teams, 322
  • Entrepreneurship strategies, 97
  • Environment, 332
    • characteristics of, 120–123, 279
    • enterprise, 163, 164
    • enterprise environmental factors, 168, 169, 456–459
    • for innovation, 23, 115, 120–123
    • of traditional project management, 296
  • Environmental scanning, 75
  • Estimates, 175–176
  • Estimating manual, 176
  • Ethiopian Air, 493, 533
  • Evaluation recommendations, 165
  • EVMS (Earned Value Measurement System), 355–356
  • Evolutionary innovation, 315
  • Execution:
    • COMAU leaner processes for, 401–403, 403f
    • failures of, 368–369
  • Exit strategies, 165
  • Explicit assumptions, 167–168
  • Extrinsic rewards, 287–288
  • Facebook, 377–378
  • Facilitation (term), 343
  • Failure:
    • of business model innovation, 310
    • categories of, 359, 359f
    • causes of, 368–371
    • of co-creation initiatives, 33
    • criteria for, 371, 372
    • cultural, 123
    • defining, 359
    • degrees of, 358–359, 359f
    • at Euro Disney, 467
    • of Iridium business model, 508–534, 526t
    • in life-cycle phases, 262
    • of public-sector projects, 50–51
    • to search for ideas, 331
    • of success, 329–330
    • of traditional metrics/KPIs, 266
    • in using value metrics, 273
  • Farmer, E. H., 500
  • Farrelly, Elizabeth, 501
  • FedEx, 305
  • FFE, see Fuzzy front end
  • Figueroa, José R., 190
  • Finance and accounting, SWOT analysis of, 76
  • Financial innovation, 57
  • Financial uncertainty, 335
  • Finnish Aid nontechnical innovation, 55–56
  • First to market strategy, 89, 99
  • Flower, J., 511
  • Followership innovation, 58
  • Follow the leader strategy, 89–90, 99
  • Forecasting, 171
  • Form study prototypes, 142
  • Foundation, in success pyramid, 382, 383f
  • Franchise business model, 306
  • Frees, Paul, 452
  • Fremium business model, 307
  • Fry, Arthur, 128
  • Full-scale development projects, 92
  • Functional prototypes, 142
  • Funding for innovation, 4–5, 335, 349–350, 385
  • Fuzzy back end, 117
  • Fuzzy front end (FFE), 117–118, 137, 161
  • Goodbye to Deerland, 426
  • Google, 384
  • Goossens, Eugene, 498
  • Governance, 115–116
    • BDPR for, 418–421, 419f, 420f
    • and external stakeholders, 332
    • failures of, 369–370
    • of innovation projects, 144–145, 277–278
    • metrics for, 277–278
    • by portfolio PMO, 65
    • transformational, 145
    • as value metric, 243
  • Government/government agencies:
    • control of/influence on R&D, 103–104
    • costs overruns on projects for, 256
    • IdeaScale developed by, 222
    • innovation by, 48–51
    • project management used in, 357
    • success defined by, 360
  • Govindarajan, Vijay, 299
  • Gracey, Yale, 447, 451
  • Graffius, Scott M., 36
  • Grams, P., 515
  • Grant, Roy, 524, 526
  • Grass roots projects, 91
  • Greer, David J., 26
  • Growth life-cycle portfolio, 70, 72f
  • Groysberg, B., 59
  • Gurtner, S., 322
  • Half Double methodology, 339–342, 340f, 341f, 348
  • Hall, Peter, 500
  • Hamel-Smith, Ocian, 74
  • Hard value metrics, 253–255, 253t, 254t
  • Harvesting team, 151
  • Haunted Mansion (case study), 441–456, 443f
  • Hench, J., 431, 438, 439, 448
  • Hersman, Deborah, 493
  • Hewlett Packard, 384
  • Hidden innovation, 57
  • High-end disruptive innovations, 320
  • Hillis, Durrell, 510, 511
  • Hitachi, Ltd., 52–54
  • Hoare, H. R. “Sam,” 501
  • Home Depot, 305
  • Hopp, C., 317, 319
  • HP Labs, 280
  • Huerta, Michael, 491
  • Hughes, Davis, 502
  • Hultink, E. J., 362
  • Hultman, Ken, 246
  • Human behavior, project selection and, 94
  • Humanitarian innovation, 51–54., See also Social innovation
  • Human resource management, 76–77, 332–333
  • Hybrid jobs, 381
  • Hynes, Martin D., III, 77
  • HYPE Innovation, 230–241, 232f
  • IBM, 301, 378–381
  • Ideas:
    • for closed innovation, 24
    • from crowdsourcing, 26
    • failing to search for, 331
    • for open innovation, 25
    • portfolio of, 397
    • selection of, 118
  • Idea development, 118
  • Idea generation, 127–128
  • Idea genesis, 118
  • IdeaScale, 222–224
  • IdeaSpace, 231–240
  • Iger, Robert A., 487
  • Imaretska, E., 143–144
  • Inazuka, Tooru, 53
  • Inbound innovation, 58
  • Inclusion, 350
  • Incorporated joint ventures, 478
  • Incremental innovation, 20–22, 22f, 116
    • at Apple, 376
    • effects of, 318
    • fuzzy front end of, 117
  • Information and knowledge management, 159–218
    • at Arcadis, 179–187, 186f
    • assumptions, 167–169, 169f
    • budgeting, 175–176
    • communication, 178–187
    • critical issues/challenges in, 217–218
    • at Dubai Customs, 202–207, 203f–206f
    • in fuzzy front end phase, 118
    • growth in information, 163f
    • information warehouses, 160–163
    • in innovation cultures, 126
    • innovation planning overview, 163–167
    • intellectual capital components, 164f
    • knowledge management components, 161f
    • life-cycle phases, 171–174, 174f
    • at Merck, 207–210, 208f
    • at NTT Data, 187–190
    • at Philips Business Group MA&TC Services, 190–202, 193f, 195f–197f, 200f
    • at Repsol, 210–214
    • scheduling, 176
    • scope change control, 176–178
    • staffing innovation projects, 213, 215–217, 216f
    • validating objectives, 169–171
    • work breakdown structure, 175
  • Information warehouses, 160–163
  • InnoVate Platform, 413–414, 413f
  • Innovation(s), 19–60. See also specific topics
    • Agile, 36–48
    • board of directors' role in, 59
    • business process, 368
    • categories of, 73–74, 74f, 315–316
    • classification systems for, 8, 58–59
    • closed, 23–25, 376
    • co-creation, 27–33, 28f
    • and creativity, 334
    • crisis-driven, 58
    • critical interactions for, 12f
    • critical issues/challenges in, 60–61
    • crowdsourcing, 26–27
    • defensive, 57, 95–96, 95f
    • defining success of, 354
    • definitions for, 2–4, 19
    • differing views on (case study), 503–506
    • discontinuous, 57
    • disruptive, 58. See also Disruptive innovation
    • eco-, 57
    • evolutionary, 315
    • examples of, see Innovation in action
    • financial, 57
    • finding project sponsor for, 60
    • followership, 58
    • government, 48–51
    • hidden/invisible/stealth, 57
    • human behavior side to, 8
    • humanitarian or social, 51–54
    • incremental, 116, 117, 318
    • incremental vs. radical, 20–23, 22f
    • industry-specific, 7
    • institutional, 57
    • literature on, 7–8
    • negative, 139
    • nontechnical, 54–56
    • offensive, 57, 95–96, 95f
    • open, 24–35. See also Open innovation
    • open sustainability, 57
    • process, 3, 57, 317, 368
    • product, 57
    • product development, 21–23, 22f
    • pulled (or inbound), 58
    • purposes of, 3, 74
    • pushed (or outbound), 58
    • R&D differentiated from, 4
    • reasons for, 10, 66
    • revolutionary, 316
    • service, 57
    • social, 57
    • strategic, 3
    • in strategic planning, 66–67
    • sustaining, 315–316
    • typical cash flow with, 13f
    • value (or value-driven), 35–36
    • value-added, 56–57
  • Innovation competencies, 16
  • Innovation cultures, 123–127
    • at Apple, 377
    • and corporate leadership, 126–127
    • critical success factors for, 150–151
    • at Disney (case study), 456–475, 462t, 465t–466t, 471t, 472t
    • in project management innovation scaling, 15
    • and reward systems, 129–130
    • at Samsung, 392
    • at 3M, 384–385
  • Innovation funding, 4–5, 335
  • Innovation governance, 144–145, 277–278
  • Innovation in action. See also Case studies
    • ABC training, 427–430
    • Airbus co-creation partnerships, 33–35
    • Airbus Space and Defence, 418–421, 419f, 420f
    • Apple, 375–377
    • Arcadis, 179–187, 186f
    • COMAU, 400–408, 401f–407f
    • Deloitte Central Europe, 37–45, 39f
    • Dubai Customs, 202–207, 203f–206f
    • Eli Lilly, 77–88
    • Facebook, 377–378
    • Finnish Aid, 55–56
    • GEA, 410–418, 411f–414f
    • Hitachi, Ltd., 52–54
    • HYPE Innovation, 230–241, 232f
    • IBM, 378–381
    • IdeaScale, 222–224
    • InnovationLabs, 277–288
    • Integrated Computer Solutions, Inc., 393–400, 394f, 395f, 398f, 399f
    • Medtronic, 130–133
    • Merck, 207–210, 208f
    • Motorola, 385–386
    • Naviair, 336–348, 340f–342f, 344f–348f
    • NTT Data, 187–190
    • Philips Business Group MA&TC Services, 190–202, 193f, 195f–197f, 200f
    • Qmarkets, 225–230
    • Repsol, 210–214, 212f, 214f
    • Samsung, 392–393
    • Star Alliance, 46–48
    • Texas Instruments, 382–385, 383f
    • 3M, 384–385
    • thyssenkrupp, 421–424, 422f, 423f
    • Tokio Marine and Nichido Systems, 408–410
    • UNICEF USA, 388–391
    • University of Cincinnati student organization, 349–351
    • Wärtsilä Energy Solutions, 424–427, 425f
    • Zurich North America, 386–388
  • Innovation knowledge, 242
  • Innovation labs:
    • choosing metrics for, 277–288
    • in project management innovation scaling, 15–16
  • InnovationLabs LLC, 277–288
  • Innovation leadership:
    • for innovative cultures, 126–127
    • at Medtronic, 130–133
    • by project managers, 6
    • with radical innovation, 22–23
    • skills for, 133–135, 134f
  • Innovation management:
    • at GEA, 411–418, 411f–414f
    • project management vs., 5
  • Innovation management software, 219–242
    • critical issues/challenges in, 241–242
    • from HYPE Innovation, 230–241, 232f
    • IdeaScale, 222–224
    • and open innovation, 241
    • origin and benefits of, 220–222
    • from Qmarkets, 225–230
    • workflow for, 220f
  • Innovation metrics, 278–288. See also Value metrics
    • aligning rewards and, 287–288
    • dark side of, 288–290
    • external, 280
    • in governance, 277–278
    • for human resources, 287
    • for innovation development, 285–286
    • for insight, 285
    • internal, 281
    • for market development, 286
    • people, 281
    • for portfolios, 283–284
    • qualitative and quantitative, 281–287
    • for research, 284–285
    • and ROI-based models, 278–280
    • for selling, 286
    • for strategic thinking, 282, 283
    • transversal metrics, 286–287
  • Innovation network, 242
  • Innovation pillars (COMAU), 401–408, 402f–407f
  • Innovation planning, 163–167
  • Innovation portfolio management, 148–151, 149f, 397–400, 398f–399f
  • Innovation portfolio project management office (IPPMO), 148–151, 149f, 290
  • Innovation project management (IPM), 1–17–7
    • benchmarking in, 9–10
    • business need for, 4–7
    • critical issues/challenges in, 17
    • and definitions for innovation, 2–4
    • at Disney (case study), 431–441
    • Eli Lilly competency models, 77–88
    • innovation pillars in, 401–408, 402f–407f
    • innovation targeting in, 12–13
    • literature on innovation, 7–8
    • literature on project management, 8–9
    • scaling project management innovation, 14–16
    • in small companies, 14
    • traditional project management vs., 2, 121, 121t
    • value as missing link in, 10–11
  • Innovation project managers (IPMs), 219
    • change in role of, 248
    • in co-creation projects, 32
    • critical skills for, 133–135, 134f
    • marketing's involvement with, 88–90
    • in project selection phase, 220
    • strategic planning role of, 64
  • Innovation project teams, 22–23, 370
  • Innovation targeting, 12–13, 12f, 13f, 386
  • Innovation team(s), 151–153, 152f, 322, 331
  • The Innovator's Dilemma (Christensen), 316
  • The Innovator's Solution (Christensen and Raynor), 316
  • Institutional innovation, 57
  • Intangible assets, 289
  • Intangible value metrics, 253–255, 253t, 254t, 273–274
  • Integrated Computer Solutions, Inc., 393–400, 394f, 395f, 398f, 399f
  • Integrated product/project teams (IPTs), 321–324, 324t
  • Intel, 305, 311–313
  • Intellectual capital, 162, 163, 164f
  • Intellectual property rights, 25, 103, 333–334, 376
  • Intelligent innovation management software, 242
  • Internal disruption, 321
  • Intrinsic rewards, 287–288
  • Investment in innovations:
    • balancing, 73–74, 74f
    • costs included in, 111
    • at fuzzy front end, 117
    • new product development, 107, 107f
  • Investment life-cycle approach, 361, 361f
  • Invisible innovation, 57
  • IPM, see Innovation project management
  • IPMs, see Innovation project managers
  • IPPMO, see Innovation portfolio project management office
  • IPTs (integrated product/project teams), 321–324, 324t
  • Iridium business model failure (case study), 508–534, 526t
    • ascent of project, 523–525
    • Bankruptcy Court hearing, 532
    • and collective belief, 516–517
    • debt financing for, 519–520
    • descent of project, 525–529
    • “hidden” business case, 514
    • infancy years for project, 517–519
    • IPO for, 522
    • and Iridium “flu,” 529
    • Iridium system, 512
    • launching venture, 511–512
    • marketing campaigns, 523
    • M-Star project, 520–521
    • naming of project, 450
    • obtaining executive support, 450
    • project initiation, 513–514
    • project management at Motorola and Iridium, 521–522
    • rescue of Iridium, 531–532
    • risk management, 514–516
    • satellite deorbiting plan, 530–531
    • satellite launches, 522
    • satellite network of, 512–513
    • shareholder lawsuits, 532
    • Staiano as CEO, 521
    • white knight for, 529
  • Iron triangle, 354
  • Irvine, Dick, 449
  • Isaacson, Walter, 376
  • Jacobs, Marc, 19
  • Japan Airlines (JAL), 491–493
  • Jobs, Steve, 375–377
  • Johnson, Steven, 26, 48, 360
  • Joint venture, 478
  • Jones, Peter, 499, 500
  • Juliani, A.J., 111
  • LaHood, Ray, 491
  • Lamont, J., 289
  • Lawsuits, business models and, 310–313
  • LCCA (life-cycle cost analysis), 489–490
  • Leadership. See also Innovation leadership
    • changes in, 166
    • competencies for, 78, 84–88
    • and innovation cultures, 126–127
    • in project management innovation scaling, 15
    • transformational, 145
    • and value, 246–248
  • Leadership style, 248
  • Lean manufacturing strategy, 65
  • Learning curves, 176
  • Leckey-Firefly (case study), 225–226
  • Legal requirements, in business case, 165
  • Lenfle, S., 297
  • Leopold, Raymond, 509, 510
  • Lewin, Kurt, 179, 182
  • LFV, 338
  • Licensing agreements, 333, 476–477
  • Licensing rights, 333–334
  • Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA), 489–490
  • Life-cycle phases, 171–174, 174f
    • in Disney Haunted Mansion project, 442, 443f
    • failure in, 262
    • investment life-cycle approach, 361, 361f
    • product life cycles, 91, 98–99
    • for R&D projects, 128–129
    • tracking assumptions over, 302, 303f
  • Life-cycle portfolio models, 70–71, 71f–73f
  • Line of sight, 119, 135, 136, 330–331, 334
  • Lion Air, 533
  • Littlemore, D. S., 500
  • Lloyd, Carmen, 531
  • Loch, C., 8
  • Lockheed, 519
  • Logistics, in success pyramid, 383, 383f
  • LOT Polish Airlines, 493
  • Low-end disruption, 318–320
  • Luchs, M. G., 140
  • Lumada, 52–54
  • Lüttgens, D., 304
  • McCaw, Craig, 529, 530
  • McDonald's, 305
  • McDonnell Douglas Corp., 519
  • McKeown, Max, 64, 115
  • McKnight, William, 126
  • McLean, W., 124, 173
  • McNerney, James, 491
  • Magneti Marelli (case study), 222–223
  • Management:
    • multiple projects sponsored by, 506–507
    • success defined by, 360
  • Mann, Robert, 496
  • Manufacturing:
    • coupling between marketing, R&D, and, 98–99, 98f, 99f
    • in project selection, 94
    • SWOT analysis of, 75–76
  • Market attractiveness, 70f, 71f
  • Market growth analysis, 71
  • Marketing, 12
    • coupling between R&D, manufacturing, and, 98–99, 98f, 99f
    • in defining success of innovation projects, 360–363, 361f
    • innovation project manager involvement with, 88–90
    • of Iridium, 523
    • in R&D priority setting, 100–101
    • strategic innovation planning role of, 67–68
    • SWOT analysis of, 75
    • “wish list” of, 66–67
  • Marketing-dominated companies, 101
  • Market share analysis/strategies, 70–73, 71f
  • Marquis, D., 20
  • Marshall, Graham, 386
  • Martino, J., 108, 109
  • Maurer, Rick, 345, 346
  • Maurya, Ash, 123
  • Mead, Richelle, 12
  • Measurement. See also Metrics
    • in balanced scorecard approach, 146–147
    • Earned Value Measurement System, 355–356
    • at GEA, 415–417
    • of key performance indicators, 252, 252t, 254
    • of success, 361–363
    • timing of success measurement, 355
    • timing of value measurement, 255
    • of value, 252–256, 252t–254t, 253f, 256f
  • Medtronic, 130–133
  • Melik, R., 162, 172
  • Merck, 207–210, 208f
  • Merrow, D., 122
  • “Me too” strategy, 90
  • Metrics, 160
    • in aligning projects and strategic business objectives, 275–277, 275f–277f
    • audiences for, 264t
    • bases on success/failure criteria, 372
    • categories of and metrics selection, 264
    • dark side of, 288–290
    • development of, 353–354
    • early development of, 356
    • for innovation governance, 277–278
    • at InnovationLabs, 277–288
    • for innovation project management, 254. See also Innovation metrics
    • of operational and strategic business success, 354
    • for risk management, 406, 407f
    • selecting, 264–266
    • of success, 362
    • for tracking assumptions, 302, 303f
    • traditional, failure of, 266
    • as value metrics, 243. See also Value metrics
  • Metrics management program, 290–292
  • Meyer, Stacy, 190
  • Microsoft, 422
  • Midttun, Lisa, 190
  • Miles, R. E., 125
  • Milestones, 171–174
    • customer approval, 173–174
    • design freeze, 172–173
    • scope freeze, 172
  • Mindset:
    • for innovation, 23
    • of project managers, 338–339, 354
    • at 3M, 384
  • Mitchell, John, 511, 517, 518
  • Mock-ups, 436–437
  • Mondale, Leo, 511
  • Mootee, I., 135, 136
  • Morris, Langdon, 393
  • Motorola, 385–386. See also Iridium business model failure (case study)
  • Muller, A., 289
  • Multidisciplinary teams, 378
  • Multiple sponsors (case study), 506–507
  • Nagji, Bansi, 209
  • Nagy, D., 317
  • National Health Service (NHS) (case study), 227–228
  • Navarra, Anthony, 518, 529
  • Naviair, 336–348, 340f–342f, 344f–348f
  • Negative innovation, 139
  • Netflix, 306, 318–319
  • Networking, 132
  • New-market disruption, 318
  • New product and process development (NPPD), 118
  • New product development (NPD), 116
    • activities in, 106–107, 106f, 107f, 116
    • and change in business model, 368
    • competency-enhancing or -destroying, 366, 367t
    • freezes in, 172–173
    • fuzzy front end of, 117–118
    • innovation categories, 21–23, 22f
    • integrated product/project teams for, 323
    • project management framework for, 403–404, 404f
    • stages/phases of, 117
    • stockholder/stakeholder pressures on, 5
  • Next generation products, 22, 22f
  • Ng, H. S., 254
  • NHS (National Health Service) (case study), 227–228
  • Nondisclosure agreements, 103
  • Nontechnical innovation, 54–56
  • Nontraditional life-cycle phases, 174, 174f
  • Norton, D. P., 146–147
  • Norton, Richie, 4, 27
  • Nowacki, Edward J., 517–518
  • NPD, see New product development
  • NPPD (new product and process development), 118
  • NTT Data, 187–190
  • NUAC, 338
  • Objectives. See also Strategic goals/objectives
    • of radical vs. incremental innovation, 21
    • validating, 169–171
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 58
  • Offensive innovation, 57, 95–96, 95f
  • Oliver, Dave, 531
  • One size fits all approach, 8, 330
  • Open innovation, 24–35
    • at Airbus, 33–35
    • at Apple, 376
    • co-creation as, 27–33
    • crowdsourcing, 26–27
    • at Facebook, 377, 378
    • and innovation management software, 241
    • and risk level, 139
    • at thyssenkrupp, 422
  • Open Knowledge, 222–223
  • Open sustainability innovation, 57
  • Opportunity analysis, 118
  • Opportunity identification, 118
  • Opportunity options, 165
  • Opportunity-seeking, 66
  • Order-of-magnitude estimates, 175
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 58
  • Organization, 12
  • Organizational/corporate culture, 123–126, 150, 171. See also Innovation cultures
    • at Ampore Faucet, 504–506
    • and knowledge management, 162
    • at Samsung, 392
    • at 3M, 384–385
  • Organizational process assets, 169
  • Oriental Land Company, 479, 481
  • Osterwalder, A., 299, 300
  • Outbound innovation, 58
  • Outcomes, 353, 354
  • Outputs (deliverables), 248–251
  • Outsourcing, 101–102, 490
  • Ove Arup and Partners, 499, 502, 503
  • Ownership:
    • business, 166
    • of intellectual property, 376
    • of projects, 94
  • Paper prototypes, 142
  • Park, B.-J., 34
  • Parker, Mark, 319
  • Partnerships:
    • in Airbus co-creation, 33–35
    • in Disney global business model innovation, 476–489, 481t, 482t, 488t
    • types of, 300
  • Patents, 333
  • Pauling, Linus, 105
  • Pay what you can (PWYC) business model, 307
  • Pay what you want (PWYW) business model, 307
  • PDMA (Product Development and Management Association), 2
  • Pedersen, C. L., 135
  • Perceived value, 257, 362
  • Performance, definitions of, 356
  • Peterson, Kenneth, 509
  • Philips Business Group MA&TC Services, 190–202, 193f, 195f–197f, 200f
  • Phillips, J., 255
  • Pich, M. T., 58
  • Pigneur, Y., 299, 300
  • Planning failures, 368–369
  • Platforms, 30
  • Platform strategy, 65
  • PMs, see Project managers
  • PM 1.0, 154t–156t
  • PM 2.0, 153–156, 154t–156t
  • PM 3.0, 156, 156t
  • PM3 methodology, 188–190
  • PMBOK ® Guide (PMI), 5, 134, 199, 297
    • on competing constraints, 442
    • and Disney theme park innovation, 431–432
    • domain areas of, 361
    • enterprise environmental factors in, 456
    • for enterprise project management, 304
    • traditional tools in, 302
  • PMI, see Project Management Institute
  • PMO, see Project management office
  • PMO (portfolio [strategic] project management office), 64–65, 97
  • Politics, 332
  • Political failures, 370
  • Porter, Michael, 266
  • Portfolio of products/services:
    • aligning project planning/execution with management of, 119
    • analysis of, 68–74
    • balancing, 396–397
  • Portfolio (strategic) project management office (PMO), 64–65, 97
  • Potato model, 343, 344f
  • Predictably Irrational (Ariely), 288
  • Prima donnas, 112, 332, 337
  • Primary value, 11
  • Priority setting, 99–101, 109, 110f–111f
  • Problem children, 71
  • Process benchmarking, 9–10
  • Process innovation, 3, 57, 317, 354, 368. See also Defensive innovation
  • Process skills competencies, 77–78, 81–84
  • Product design, 117
  • Product Development and Management Association (PDMA), 2
  • Product implementation, 117
  • Product innovation, 57. See also Offensive innovation
  • Production support projects, 92
  • Product life cycles, 70–71, 71f–73f, 91, 98–99. See also Life-cycle phases
  • Product portfolio analysis, 68–74, 69f–74f
  • Product/quality improvements, 21
  • Profit life-cycle portfolio, 71, 72f
  • Projects:
  • Project closure, 160, 255
  • Project culture, 123–124
  • Project financing, 460–461, 520
  • Project management, 11
  • Project Management Institute (PMI), 2, 5, 192, 193, 301, 441. See also PMBOK® Guide
  • Project management office (PMO):
    • innovation portfolio, 148–151, 149f, 290
    • portfolio (strategic), 64–65, 97
    • roles of, 66–67
    • traditional, 149
  • Project managers (PMs), 5–6. See also Innovation project managers (IPMs)
    • changing role of, 353
    • COMAU PM Academy for, 406–408
    • as designer of business models, 297–298
    • in disruptive innovation projects, 325
    • hybrid jobs of, 381
    • innovation management skills of, 8
    • mindset of, 338–339, 354
    • PMI certification of, 301
    • timing of assignment of, 167
    • in traditional project management, 64, 304
  • Project selection, 107–108. See also Strategic planning
    • critical factors in, 67
    • innovation project managers in, 220
    • portfolio of products/services analysis in, 68–74
  • Project teams, 125
  • Project termination, 112–113
  • Project value, 249, 292. See also Value
  • Project workloads, 332–333
  • Proof-of-principle prototypes, 141
  • Proof of technology (PoT), 387
  • Prototypes, 137, 141–143
  • Public sector innovation, 48–51
  • Pulled (or inbound) innovation, 58
  • Pushed (or outbound) innovation, 58
  • PWYC (pay what you can) business model, 307
  • PWYW (pay what you want) business model, 307
  • Qatar Airways, 493
  • Qmarkets, 225–230
  • Quality:
  • Question marks (in BCG model), 68, 69, 69f, 71
  • Radical innovation, 20–23, 22f, 129–130, 376
  • Ramos, Andy, 224
  • Randhawa, Jag, 2
  • Ratnakar, Sukant, 317
  • Ravenscroft, Thurl, 455
  • Raynor, M., 316, 318
  • R&D, see Research and development
  • R&D dominated companies, 101
  • Readjustment of projects, 111–112, 372
  • Ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), 51
  • Recognition, 221, 385, 439
  • Recruiting, 385
  • Redwood Credit Union (case study), 223–224
  • Reinhardt, R., 322
  • Repsol, 210–214, 212f, 214f
  • Research:
    • development vs., 92–93
    • funding cuts for, 67
    • licenses needed for, 333
    • by Motorola, 385–386
  • Research and development (R&D):
    • contract (outsourced), 101–102
    • coupling between marketing, manufacturing, and, 98–99, 98f, 99f
    • economic evaluation of projects, 108–111, 110f, 111f
    • government influence in, 103–104
    • idea sources for strategic planning, 105–107, 106f, 107f
    • innovation differentiated from, 4
    • life-cycle phases for projects, 128–129
    • modeling planning function for, 96–99, 96f–99f
    • priority setting in, 99–101
    • project readjustments, 111–112
    • projects classification, 91–92
    • project selection issues, 107–108
    • project termination, 112–113
  • Research and development ratio, 93–94
  • Resilience, 379
  • Resources:
    • in business case, 165
    • changes in availability of, 166
    • project workloads, 332–333
    • for R&D vs. development projects, 92
  • Resource management, 213, 215–217, 216f
  • Resource restrictions, 27
  • Results, in success pyramid, 383, 383f
  • Return on investment (ROI), 278–280
  • Revolutionary innovation, 316
  • Rewards, 287–288, 385, 397–400, 398f–399f
  • Reward systems, 129–130
  • Richardson, John, 526, 527
  • Rigby, D. K., 37
  • Risks:
    • assessing, 122
    • with assumptions, 334
    • balancing, 396–397
    • in business case, 165
    • with co-creation, 33
    • with crowdsourcing, 26
    • and human factors, 122
    • in new aircraft design, 494–495
    • with open innovation, 24–25
    • with radical innovation, 20, 21
    • risk/reward evaluation, 397–400, 398f, 399f
    • types of, 112
    • with types of projects, 33
    • weighting, 397–400, 398f, 399f
  • Risk intensity, 93, 93f
  • Risk management, 119–123, 120f, 121t
    • Boeing 787 Dreamliner (case study), 489–496
    • at COMAU, 404–407, 405f–407f
    • for Iridium, 514–516
    • in PMBOK® Guide, 297
  • Risk/reward evaluation, 397–400, 398f, 399f
  • Ritter, T., 135
  • Roadblocks to innovation, 329–351
    • analysis-paralysis, 336
    • cash flow and financial uncertainty, 335
    • control, 335–336, 336f
    • critical issues/challenges with, 351
    • failing to search for ideas, 331
    • “failure of success,” 329–330
    • innovation funding, 335
    • insufficient line of sight, 330–331
    • intellectual property rights, 333–334
    • lack of collaboration, 332
    • Naviair's handling of, 336–348, 340f–342f, 344f–348f
    • not understanding creativity–innovation relationship, 334
    • one size fits all, 330
    • overcoming, at University of Cincinnati, 349–351
    • politics, 332
    • prima donnas, 332
    • project workloads, 332–333
    • sense of urgency, 331
    • too many assumptions, 334
  • Robben, H. S. J., 362
  • Rock David, 343, 345, 345f
  • ROI (return on investment), 278–280
  • Rule of inversion, 356
  • RUTF (ready-to-use therapeutic food), 51
  • Sabbatical leaves, 104
  • Safety constraint, 433, 442, 450, 458, 490
  • Sailer, Richard F., 432
  • Sales, in project selection, 94
  • Samit, Jay, 295, 316, 358
  • Samsung, 392–393
  • Sanctioned direction, in success pyramid, 382, 383f
  • Saren, M. A., 58
  • Satisfied customers, 317
  • Scaled Agile Framework, 389
  • Scaling project management innovation, 14–16
  • SCARF model, 345, 346f
  • Schedule acceleration, 331
  • Scheduling, 93, 176
  • Schumpeter, J., 34
  • Scientific/technical expertise, 77–81
  • Scope:
  • Scope change control, 176–178
  • Scope freeze milestones, 172
  • Scrum, 160, 389
  • Secondary value, 11
  • Secrecy agreements, 103
  • Sense of urgency, 331
  • Service innovation, 57
  • Sewell, Bruce, 312
  • Shabatat Theory, 180–182
  • Shareholder value, 10
  • Sharman, Robin, 116
  • Shenhar, A. J., 59
  • Shosteck, Herschel, 508, 528
  • Sicotte, H., 150
  • Sinek, Simon, 342
  • Sippy, Haresh, 103
  • Sivers, Derek, 127
  • Sklar, Martin, 431, 439, 446
  • Sloane, Paul, 13, 65
  • Small companies, 14
  • SMART objectives, 170
  • Smith, Galen K., 379, 380
  • Snow, C. C., 125
  • Social innovation, 51–54, 57
  • Social learning, 200–202
  • Social media, 390
  • Soft value metrics, 253–255, 253t, 254t
  • Software innovation. See also Innovation management software
    • HYPE Innovation, 230–241, 232f
    • IdeaScale, 222–224
    • Qmarkets, 225–230
  • SOLiD Framework, 190, 196, 199–200, 200f
  • Sorenson, Charles E., 329–330
  • Souder, W., 109, 110f–111f, 112
  • Sourcing business model, 306–307
  • Southwest Airlines, 306
  • SOW (statement of work), 442–444
  • Space X, 533
  • Specifications, 92, 177
  • Speed, Jeffrey, 470
  • Speed to market, 221
  • Spekman, R. E., 308
  • Spencer, John, 111
  • Spinoff innovations, 128–129
  • Sponsors, 60, 151, 335, 506–507
  • Spotts, Kandace, 387
  • Srivastava, M. K., 34
  • Staffing innovation projects, 213, 215–217, 216f, 332
  • Stage gates, 387–388
  • Staiano, Edward, 521, 524, 526
  • Stakeholders:
    • differing definitions of success by, 360
    • failures caused by, 369–370
    • politics of, 332
    • pressures on innovation team by, 331
    • and product development, 5
    • for UNICEF Kid Power, 389–391
    • and value metrics, 257–258
  • Stakeholder management, 390, 408–410
  • Star Alliance, 46–48
  • Starbucks, 306
  • Stars (in BCG model), 68, 69f, 71
  • Statement of work (SOW), 442–444
  • Stealth innovation, 57
  • Stealth projects, 127–128
  • Stockholders, 5, 360
  • Storyboards, 436
  • Storytelling, 140–141, 433–434, 439
  • Strategic alliances, 308
  • Strategic assumptions, 168
  • Strategic benchmarking, 9
  • Strategic goals/objectives:
    • aligning ideas for innovation with, 396
    • alignment of projects and, 275–277, 275f–277f, 355
    • business, 165, 275–277, 275f–277f, 355
    • in business case, 165
    • changes in, 400
    • decision making based on, 124–125
    • defining, 96, 97
    • in fuzzy front end phase, 117
    • projects targeted to, 66
    • of radical vs. incremental innovation, 21
    • for UNICEF Kid Power, 391
  • Strategic innovation, 3
  • Strategic partnerships, 300
  • Strategic planning, 63–114
    • aligning project planning/execution with, 119
    • confidentiality agreements, 103
    • contract (outsourced) R&D in, 101–102
    • critical issues/challenges in, 113–114
    • economic evaluation of projects, 108–111, 110f, 111f
    • Eli Lilly competency models, 77–88
    • government influence in R&D process, 103–104
    • idea sources for, 105
    • innovation project manager's role in, 64
    • innovation role in, 66–67
    • innovation technology sources, 104
    • marketing role in strategic innovation planning, 67–68
    • marketing's involvement with innovation project managers, 88–90
    • modeling R&D planning function in, 96–99, 96f–99f
    • nondisclosure agreements, 103
    • and offensive vs. defensive innovation, 95–96, 95f
    • portfolio PMO's role in, 64–65, 97
    • priority setting in, 99–101
    • product life cycles in, 91
    • product portfolio analysis in, 68–74, 69f–74f
    • project readjustments, 111–112
    • project selection issues, 107–108
    • project termination, 112–113
    • R&D projects classification in, 91–92
    • research and development ratio in, 93–94
    • and research vs. development, 92–93
    • secrecy agreements, 103
    • strategy types in, 65
    • SWOT analysis for core competencies identification in, 74–77
    • traditional, 6, 7, 7f
  • Strategy maps, 147–148
  • Success:
    • and business models, 368
    • business side of, 354–355, 363–364, 364f
    • business value creation as true measure of, 244, 355
    • categories of, 359f
    • and core competencies, 366–368, 367t
    • criteria for, 244, 371–372, 387
    • critical issues/challenges with, 383
    • defined at beginning of a project, 359–360
    • defined in strategic terms, 354
    • degrees of, 356, 358–359, 359f
    • differing definitions of, 251, 354–361, 367
    • dimensions of, 355
    • of disruptive innovation, 324, 326, 326t
    • early definitions of, 355–357, 356f, 357f
    • “failure of,” 329–330
    • of innovation projects, 353–368, 371–373
    • of integrated product/project teams, 323–324, 324t
    • long- and short-term, 362–363
    • marketing's role in defining, 360–363, 361f
    • measures defining, 361, 362
    • prioritizing factors of, 365–366, 366t
    • redefining, in recent years, 357–358, 358f
    • timing of measurement of, 355
    • of traditional projects, 160, 354–355
    • value component of, 249
  • Success pyramid, 382–383, 383f
  • Suggestion box/system, 220–221
  • Supply chain, 308
  • Surowieckipp, J., 525
  • Sustaining innovation, 315–316
  • Sustainment period, 365
  • Sustainment team, 151, 152
  • Sweeney, J., 143–144
  • SWOT analysis, 74–77
  • Sydney Opera House, 354, 496–503
  • Symonds, Ralph, 502
  • Systems, totally complex, 22, 22f
  • Takahashi, Masatomo, 481
  • Technical expertise, 77–81, 98
  • Technical failure, 370
  • Technocampus EMC2, 34
  • Technology, 12
    • advanced stages of, 332
    • as change driver, 386
    • classifying levels and subsystems of, 367–368
    • competency-enhancing or -destroying, 366, 367t
    • development of, 118
    • disruptive, 316, 320
    • in iron triangle, 354
    • levels of, 25, 104
    • proof of, 387
    • radical breakthroughs in, 22, 22f
    • in Walt Disney Imagineering, 435–436
  • Technology usage strategy, 65
  • Teledesic Project, 529
  • Termination of projects, 112–113, 358, 368
  • Texas Instruments, 382–385, 383f
  • Thales Alenia Space, 533
  • Thinking time, 16
  • Thoma, Don, 533–534
  • Thomas, Bob, 449
  • Thyssenkrupp, 419f, 421–424, 422f, 423f
  • Tidd, J., 14
  • Time:
    • as Disney constraint, 445–449, 447f, 458
    • in Earned Value Measurement System, 355–356
    • in iron triangle, 354
    • in triple constraints, 356, 356f, 357f
    • in value metrics, 268
  • Time-to-market strategy, 65
  • Timing:
    • in business case, 165
    • of project manager assignment, 167
    • of success measurement, 355
    • of value measurement, 255
  • Todd, Lionel, 500
  • Tokio Marine and Nichido Systems, 408–410
  • Tools/processes for innovation, 115–157. See also Information and knowledge management; Innovation management software
    • balanced scorecard, 146–147
    • brainstorming, 138–141
    • for business model innovation, 301–303
    • creativity and innovation fears, 143–144
    • critical issues/challenges with, 156–167
    • design thinking, 135–138, 136f
    • fuzzy front end of product development, 117–118
    • idea generation, 106f, 107f, 127–128
    • innovation culture, 123–127
    • innovation governance, 144–145
    • innovation leadership at Medtronic, 130–133
    • innovation portfolio management, 148–151, 149f
    • innovation project manager skills, 133–135, 134f
    • innovation sponsorship, 151
    • innovation team, 151–153, 152f
    • line of sight, 119
    • new product development, 116
    • PM 2.0, 153–156, 154t–156t
    • PM 3.0, 156, 156t
    • prototypes, 141–143
    • reward systems, 129–130
    • risk management, 119–123, 120f, 121t
    • spinoff innovations, 128–129
    • strategy maps, 147–148
    • transformational governance, 145
  • Toombs, Leota, 453
  • Total France (case study), 228–229
  • Totally complex systems/platforms, 22, 22f
  • Toyota, 305
  • Toys “R” Us, 305
  • Traditional metrics, 264, 264t, 265
  • Transformational governance, 145
  • Transmeta Corporation, 311
  • Triple constraints, 356–358, 357f, 358f, 442. See also individual constraints
  • Trust, 343, 345, 345f, 379
  • Trust Equation, 345
  • TRW, 517
  • Tuff, Geoff, 209
  • Uncertainty, 120, 122, 279, 334, 335
  • UNICEF Kid Power, 51, 388–391
  • UNICEF USA, 388–391
  • United Airlines, 491, 493
  • University of Cincinnati student organization, 349–351
  • Urgency, sense of, 331
  • User experience prototypes, 142
  • Utzon, Jørn, 496, 498–503
  • Validation:
    • of assumptions, 169, 169t
    • at Motorola, 386
    • of objectives, 169–171
  • Value, 10–11, 243–292
    • aesthetic, 437–438
    • attributes of, 244, 257, 274t
    • business, see Business value
    • and business models, 298–299
    • changing concept of, 246–247, 247f, 247t
    • co-created, 27, 28
    • combining benefits and, 248–249
    • converting benefits to, 253f
    • created by innovation, 138
    • creating value metrics, 267–273
    • critical issues/challenges in, 292–293
    • customer/stakeholder impact on metrics of, 257–258
    • customer value management programs, 258–261, 259t
    • dark side of innovation metrics, 288–290
    • definitions of, 244
    • dimensions of, 304, 305
    • effective measurement of, 252–256, 252t–254t, 256f
    • in establishing culture, 125–126
    • evolution of value identification, 245–247, 246t
    • forms of, 10–11, 11f
    • harvesting, 364–365, 364f
    • importance of, 29, 29f
    • innovation value metrics examples, 273–275, 274t
    • and leadership, 246–248
    • metrics at InnovationLabs, 277–288
    • metrics for innovation governance, 277–278
    • metrics in aligning projects and strategic business objectives, 275–277, 275f–277f
    • and metrics management program, 290–292
    • and metrics selection, 264–266
    • need for value metrics, 249–252, 266–267
    • perceived, 257, 362
    • project, 249
    • and project management, 261–263, 263f
  • Value-added innovation, 56–57
  • Value-added reseller (VAR) model, 307
  • Value-added work, 260
  • Value chain, 266
  • Value (or value-driven) innovation, 35–36, 392
  • Value-in-use, 27–28, 35, 243, 292, 362, 363f
  • Value management methodology (VMM), 256
  • Value metrics, 252t, 264, 264t. See also Innovation metrics
  • Value networks, 298
  • Value Performance Framework (VPF), 246, 246t
  • Value proposition, 424–425
  • Van Der Pilj, P., 297, 301
  • VAR (value-added reseller) model, 307
  • Venture teams, 322
  • Verzuh, Eric, 170
  • Virtual teams, 152–153
  • Visual prototypes, 142
  • VMM (value management methodology), 256
  • Voice of the customer (VOC), 144, 318
  • Voltaire, 12
  • Von Oech, Roger, 368
  • VPF (Value Performance Framework), 246, 246t
  • Walker, Carl, 449
  • Wal-Mart, 305
  • Walt Disney Company, 139, 431, 460, 464, 465. See also Disney
  • Walt Disney Imagineering (WDI), 139, 140, 431–441
  • Wärtsilä Energy Solutions, 424–427, 425f
  • WBS (work breakdown structure), 175
  • WDI, see Walt Disney Imagineering
  • Welch, Jack, 119
  • Wheelwright, S. C., 23
  • Williams, Jim, 510
  • Windolph, John, 523
  • Wirick, David, 49–51
  • Work breakdown structure (WBS), 175
  • Working, new ways of, 16
  • Working prototypes, 142
  • Workloads, project, 332–333
  • Zalk, Bob, 455
  • Zeitoun, Al, 14n, 15
  • Zerbib, P., 515
  • Zhu, Pearl, 59, 68
  • Zuckerberg, Mark, 378
  • Zurich North America (ZNA), 386–388
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset