References

  1. ACADÉMIE NATIONALE DE MÉDECINE, Parité en santé: la recherche scientifique et la médecine ne peuvent plus ignorer les différences biologiques entre les sexes, Report, June 2016.
  2. AKRICH M., “Comment sortir de la dichotomie technique/société”, in LATOUR B., LEMONNIER P. (eds), De la préhistoire aux missiles balistiques. L’intelligence sociale des techniques, pp. 105–131, La Découverte, Paris, 1994.
  3. AKRICH M., CALLON M., LATOUR B., Sociologie de la traduction. Textes fondateurs, Presses des Mines, Paris, 2006.
  4. ALASWANI A.M., “Change management strategies for successful ERP implementation”, Business Process Management Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 266–275, 2001.
  5. ALBEROLA E., CROUTTE P., HOIBIAN S., “La “double peine” pour des publics fragilisés face au tout-numérique”, Annales des Mines-Réalités industrielles, no. 3, pp. 32–36, 2016.
  6. ALTER N., L’innovation ordinaire, PUF, Paris, 2000.
  7. AMMENWERTH E., ILLER C., MAHLER C., “IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study”, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2006.
  8. ARTHUR W.B., “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events”, The Economic Journal, vol. 99, no. 394, pp. 116–131, 1989.
  9. AUBRET J., GILBERT P., PIGEYRE F., Management des compétences. Réalisation, concepts, analyses, Dunod, Paris, 2005.
  10. BARDIN L., “Du téléphone fixe au portable. Un quart de siècle de relations interpersonnelles médiatisées en France”, Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, vol. 112, pp. 97–122, 2002.
  11. BAREL Y., FRÉMEAUX S., “Les conditions de succès d’une approche descendante du changement managérial. Le cas d’un hypermarché”, Management & Avenir, vol. 2, no. 22, pp. 30–51, 2009.
  12. BARLEY S.R., “Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 78–108, 1986.
  13. BARVILLE-DEROMAS N., BOBILLIER-CHAUMON M.E., CIPPELLETTI E. et al., “Quand les technologies s’incarnent dans l’activité: le cas des réseaux sociaux numériques d’entreprise”, Psychologie du travail et des organisations, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 325–339, 2018.
  14. BAUDET J., Histoire des techniques. De l’outil au système, Vuibert, Paris, 2016.
  15. BAWDEN D., ROBINSON L., “The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies”, Journal of Information Science, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 180–191, 2009.
  16. BELK R.W., “Extended self in a digital world”, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 477–500, 2013.
  17. BELOVA O., KING I., SLIWA M., “Introduction: Polyphony and organization studies: Mikhail bakhtin and beyond”, Organization Studies, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 493–500, 2008.
  18. BERNOUX P., Sociologie du changement. Dans les entreprises et les organisations, Le Seuil, Paris, 2004.
  19. BIA FIGUEIREDO M., MORLEY C., “Une lecture structurationniste des pratiques de management de projet SI”, Systèmes d’information et management, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 34–87, 2015.
  20. BIJKER H., HUGHES T.P., PINCH T., The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987.
  21. BOBILLIER CHAUMON M.E., Conditions d’usage et facteurs d’acceptation des technologies dans l’activité: Questions et perspectives pour la psychologie du travail, HDR Thesis, University of Grenoble, 2013.
  22. BOBILLIER CHAUMON M.E., “Acceptation située des TIC dans et par l’activité: Premiers étayages pour une clinique de l’usage”, Psychologie du travail et des organisations, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 4–21, 2016.
  23. BONNEUIL C., JOLY P.B., Sciences, techniques et société, La Découverte, Paris, 2013.
  24. BOSE D., SEGUI-GOMEZ M., CRANDALL J.R., “Vulnerability of female drivers involved in motor vehicle crashes: An analysis of US population at risk”, American Journal of Public Health, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 2368–2373, 2011.
  25. BOSTROM N., “The transhumanist FAQ: version 2.1”, World Transhumanist Association, 2003. Available at: https://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-faq/ [accessed 9 March 2019].
  26. BOURNIGAL J.M., HOULLIER F., LECOUVEY P. et al., Agriculture Innovation 2025: 30 projets pour une agriculture compétitive et respectueuse de l’environnement, Report, Inra, 2015.
  27. BRANGIER E., VALLERY G., “Aspects psychologiques et organisationnels du développement des nouvelles technologies de la communication et de l’information”, in BRANGIER E., LANCRY A., LOUCHE C. (eds), Les dimensions humaines du travail: théories et pratiques de la psychologie du travail et des organisations, pp. 213–250, Presses universitaires de Nancy, Nancy, 2004.
  28. BRANGIER E., DUFRESNE A., HAMMES-ADELÉ S., “Approche symbiotique de la relation humain-technologie: Perspectives pour l’ergonomie informatique”, Le travail humain, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 333–353, 2009.
  29. BRETON P., Histoire de l’informatique, La Découverte, Paris, 1987.
  30. BRILLHART P.E., “Technostress in the workplace: Managing stress in the electronic workplace”, Journal of American Academy of Business, vol. 5, no. 1/2, pp. 302–307, 2004.
  31. BROD C., Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution, Addison Wesley, Boston, 1984.
  32. BROUSSE C., “La vie quotidienne en France depuis 1974. Les enseignements de l’enquête Emploi du temps”, Économie et Statistique, no. 478/479/480, pp. 79–117, 2015.
  33. CADIX A., POINTET J.-M., Le management à l’épreuve des changements technologiques: impacts sur la société et les organisations, Éditions d’Organisation, Paris, 2002.
  34. CALLON M., LASCOUMES P., BARTHE Y., Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique, Le Seuil, Paris, 2001.
  35. CALLON M., “Quel espace public pour la démocratie technique ?”, in CEFAÏ D, PASQUIER D. (eds), Les sens du public. Publics politiques, publics médiatiques, pp. 197–221, Le Seuil, Paris, 2003.
  36. CARDON D., À quoi rêvent les algorithmes. Nos vies à l’heure des big data, Le Seuil, Paris, 2015.
  37. CARON F., La dynamique de l’innovation: Changement technique et changement social, XVIe-XXe siècle, Gallimard, Paris, 2010.
  38. CELLER B.G., LOVELL N.H., BASILAKIS J., “Using information technology to improve the management of chronic disease”, The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 179, pp. 242–246, 2003.
  39. CÉPÈDE M., PICARD F., TUGAULT M.J. et al., “Section II: les conséquences de la motorisation”, Économie rurale, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–43, 1951.
  40. CHAINTREUIL J.-N., RH & Digital. Regards Collectifs de RH sur la Transformation Digitale, Diateino, Paris, 2015.
  41. CHANDLER A.D., “Organizational capabilities and the economic history of the industrial enterprise”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 79–100, 1992.
  42. CHAREYRON P., “Hoplites numériques. Le combat d’infanterie à l’âge de l’information”, IFRI, Focus stratégique, vol. 30, 2011.
  43. CHARLIER T., EYNAUD P., VULIN B., La transformation numérique: Quels enjeux pour le développement des entreprises de l’ESS ?, IAE de Paris/France Active, Paris, 2019.
  44. CHIAPELLO E., GILBERT P., Management Tools: A Social Sciences Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.
  45. ÇOKLAR A.N., ŞAHIN Y.L., “Technostress levels of social network users based on ICTs in Turkey”, European Journal of Social Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 2011.
  46. COLLARD F., “Les énergies renouvelables”, Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, vol. 7, nos 2252–2253, pp. 5–72, 2015.
  47. COOREN F., “Ventriloquie, performativité et communication: ou comment fait-on parler les choses”, Réseaux, vol. 163, no. 33, pp. 33–54, 2010.
  48. CORRELL S., “Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations”, Americal Sociological Review, vol. 69, pp. 93–113, 2004.
  49. CREDOC, Baromètre du Numérique, Étude annuelle, ARCEP/CGE/Agence du numérique, 2016.
  50. CRESWELL R., Prométhée ou Pandore ? Propos de technologie culturelle, Kimé, Paris, 1996.
  51. CROSBY A.W., The Measure of Reality: Quantification in Western Europe, 1250–1600, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
  52. CROZIER M., The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1964.
  53. CROZIER M., FRIEDBERG E., Actors and Systems: the Politics of Collective Action, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.
  54. CURIE J., HAJJAR V., MARQUIÉ H. et al., “Proposition méthodologique pour la description du système des activités”, Le travail humain, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 103–118, 1990.
  55. DAGOGNET F., Eloge de l’objet: pour une philosophie de la marchandise, Vrin, Paris, 1989.
  56. DAUMAS M., “Le mythe de la révolution technique”, Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 291–302, 1963.
  57. DAVIS F.D., “User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 38, pp. 475–487, 1993.
  58. DAVIS F.D., BAGOZZI R.P., WARSHAW P.R., “User acceptance of information technology: A comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989.
  59. DEBRESSON C., Understanding Technical Change, Black Rose Books, Montreal, 1987.
  60. DEFÉLIX C., PICQ T., “De l’entreprise étendue à la “gestion des compétences étendue”: enjeux et pratiques en pôles de compétitivité”, @GRH, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 41–66, 2013.
  61. DEMOLI Y., “Carbone et tôle froissée. L’espace social des modèles de voitures”, Revue française de sociologie, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 223–260, 2015.
  62. DESCARTES R., Discours de la méthode, Jan Maire, Leyde, 1637.
  63. DIMAGGIO P.J., POWELL W.W., “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 147–160, 1983.
  64. DOWEK G., GUIRAUD D., KIRCHNER C. et al., Rapport sur la création d’un comité d’éthique en sciences et technologies du numérique, Technical Report, INRIA, 2009.
  65. DUDEZERT A., La transformation digitale des entreprises, La Découverte, Paris, 2018.
  66. DURU-BELLAT M., “École de garçons et école de filles…”, VEI Enjeux, vol. 138, pp. 65–72, 2004.
  67. EDGERTON D., “From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology”, History and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 111–136, 1999.
  68. EL WAFI W., BRANGIER E., ZADDEM F., “Usage des technologies numériques et modèles de la perméabilité des frontières entre la vie personnelle et la vie professionnelle”, Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 74–87, 2016.
  69. ELLUL J., The Technological Society, Knopf, New York, 1964.
  70. ELLUL J., The Technological System, Continuum, New York, 1980.
  71. ELLUL J., The Technological Bluff, W. B. Eerdmans., Grand Rapids, 1990.
  72. ENGESTRÖM Y., Learning by expanding, Orienta-Konsultit Oy, Helsinki, 1987.
  73. ENGESTRÖM Y., “Activity theory and individual and social transformation”, in ENGESTRÖM Y., MIETTIN R., PUNAMAKI R.L. (eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory, pp. 19–38, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
  74. EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR GENDER EQUALITY, Gender equality index 2015: Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2012 (country profiles), 2015.
  75. EURYDICE/COMMISSION EUROPÉENNE/EACEA, Developing Key Competences at School in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy – 2011/12, Eurydice report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2012.
  76. FÉDÉRATION DES INDUSTRIES DE LA MÉCANIQUE, Guide pratique de l’usine du futur. Enjeux et panorama de solutions, 2015.
  77. FLEURY N., GUILLAS-CAVAN K., LERAIS F. et al., “Dialogue social sur la stratégie de l’entreprise: éléments de bilan et perspectives”, La Revue de l’Ires, vol. 1/2, no. 94/95, pp. 115–154, 2018.
  78. FLICHY P., “Internet et le débat démocratique”, Réseaux, no. 4, pp. 159–185, 2008.
  79. FOUCAULT M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Vintage Books, New Yok, 1977.
  80. FOURASTIÉ J., Le grand espoir du XXe siècle: progrès technique, progrès économique, progrès social, PUF, Paris, 1949.
  81. FREDERICK C., “The new housekeeping: How it helps the woman who does her own work”, Ladies Home Journal, pp. 70–71, 1912.
  82. FRIEDMANN G., The Anatomy of Work: Labor, Leisure and the Implications of Automation, MacMillan, New York, 1964.
  83. GALLOT S., VERLAET L., “La transparence: l’utopie du numérique ? ”, Communication & Organisation, no. 1, pp. 203–217, 2016.
  84. GARDEY D., “Sténodactylographe: de la naissance d’une profession à sa féminisation, 1883–1930”, Les Cahiers du MAGE, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 1995.
  85. GARDEY D., Écrire, calculer, classer. Comment une révolution de papier a transformé les sociétés contemporaines (1800–1940), La Découverte, Paris, 2008.
  86. GARVIN D.A., “Comment Google a converti ses ingénieurs au management”, Harvard Business Review, August-September 2014.
  87. GERBERT P., LORENZ M., RÜSMANN M. et al., Industry 4.0. The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries, Report, Boston Consulting Group, 2015.
  88. GILBERT P., BOBADILLA N., GASTALDI L. et al., Innovation, Research and Development Management, ISTE Ltd, London, and John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2018.
  89. GIDDENS A., The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.
  90. GIEC-IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Report, 2014.
  91. GILBERT P., LECLAIR P., “Les systèmes de gestion intégrés: une modernité en trompe-l’œil ?”, Sciences de la société, vol. 61, pp. 17–30, 2004.
  92. GILBERT P., RAULET-CROSET N., TEGLBORG A.C., “L’entreprise libérée: analyse de la diffusion d’un modèle managérial”, Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, vol. XXIII, no. 56, pp. 205–224, 2017.
  93. GILLE B., The Renaissance Engineers, Lund, Humphries and Company, London, 1966.
  94. GILLE B., The History of Techniques, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1986.
  95. GIMPEL J., The Medieval Machine: The Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages, Penguin Books, New York, 1976.
  96. GLENDINNING C., “Notes toward a neo-Luddite manifesto”, Utne Reader, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 50–53, 1990.
  97. GOFFI J.Y., La philosophie de la technique, PUF, Paris, 1988.
  98. GOMEZ P.Y., “Le sens du travail à l’ère numérique”, Revue Projet, vol. 6, pp. 36–42, 2017.
  99. GORDON S., FORD R., “On the definition and classification of cybercrime”, Journal in Computer Virology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2006.
  100. GRANJON F., “Fracture numérique”, Communications, vol. 1, no. 88, pp. 67–74, 2011.
  101. GRANVILLE K., “Facebook and Cambridge Analytica: What you need to know as fallout widens”, The New York Times, 18 March 2018. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/facebook-cambridge-analytica-explained.html [accessed 2 April 2019].
  102. GREENAN N., HAMON-CHOLET S., MOATTY F. et al., TIC et conditions de travail. Les enseignements de l’enquête COI, Research Report, Centre d’études de l’emploi, Noisy-le-Grand, 2012.
  103. GURVITCH G., “Société, technique et civilisation”, Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, vol. 45, pp. 5–16, 1968.
  104. GUSTON D.H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2010.
  105. HABERMAS J., Toward a Rational Society, Beacon Press, Boston, 1970.
  106. HALES D., Renewables 2018, Global Status Report, Renewable Energy Policy Network 2018, Report. Available at: http://www.ren21.net/status-ofrenewables/global-status-report/ [accessed 20 April 2019].
  107. HARARI Y.N., 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, Spiegel & Grau, New York, 2018.
  108. HAUDRICOURT A.G., La technologie, science humaine. Recherches d’histoire et d’ethnologie des techniques, pp. 37–46, Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Paris, 1987.
  109. HAUPTMANN S., STEGER T., ““A brave new (digital) world”? Effects of In-house social media on HRM”, German Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 26–46, 2013.
  110. HEGE A., DUFOUR C., “Les pratiques des acteurs d’entreprise face à la longue maladie et au handicap en Allemagne”, La Revue de l’IRES, vol. 4, no. 67, pp. 59–93, 2010.
  111. HEIDEGGER M., Technology and Values: Essential Readings, 1954.
  112. HERF J., Reactionary modernism: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
  113. HOFSTADTER D., Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, Basic Books, New York, 1979.
  114. HOTTOIS G., Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique, Aubier-Flammarion, Paris, 1984.
  115. HOTTOIS G., “Humanisme et évolutionnisme dans la philosophie de la technique”, Revue internationale de Philosophie, vol. 41, no. 161, pp. 278–295, 1987.
  116. HSIAO K.L., “Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress: The role of personality traits”, Online Information Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 272–295, 2017.
  117. HSIAO K.L., SHU Y., HUANG T.C., “Exploring the effect of compulsive social app usage on technostress and academic performance: Perspectives from personality trait”, Telematics and Informatics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 679–690, 2017.
  118. HUGUES T., “The evolution of large technological systems”, in BIJKER W., HUGHES T., PINCH T. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, pp. 51–82, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1989.
  119. IGLESIAS O., BONET E., “Persuasive brand management – How managers can influence brand meaning when they are losing control over it”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 251–264, 2012.
  120. INNIS H., Empire and Communications, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1950.
  121. INSEE, Espérance de vie – Mortalité, INSEE Références, 2016.
  122. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF ROBOTICS, Robots and the workplace of the future, Working Document, Frankfurt, 2018.
  123. JACOB R., DUCHARME J., Changement technologique et gestion des ressources humaines: fondements et pratiques, Gaëtan Morin, Montreal, 1995.
  124. JARRIGE F., Technocritiques: du refus des machines à la contestation des technosciences, La Découverte, Paris, 2016.
  125. JAVEAU C., “Éthique et technique: le vieux débat reste ouvert”, Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, no. 88, pp. 173–187, 1990.
  126. JENA R.K., MAHANTI P.K., “An empirical study of Technostress among Indian Academicians”, International Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2014.
  127. JONAS H., Le principe responsabilité, Flammarion, Paris, 2008.
  128. KEMP P., L’irremplacable, une éthique de la technologie, Cerf, Paris, 1997.
  129. KLEIN J.-L., LAVILLE J.-L., MOULAERT F., “L’innovation sociale: repères introductifs”, in L’innovation sociale, pp. 7–44, ERES, Paris, 2014.
  130. KLUZER S., PRIEGO L.P., DigComp into action: Get inspired, make it happen. A user guide to the European Digital Competence Framework, European Union, Luxembourg, 2018.
  131. KRISHNAN S., “Personality and espoused cultural differences in technostress creators”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 66, pp. 154–167, 2017.
  132. KUHN A., MOULIN Y., “Un exemple d’obstacle au désapprentissage. Le cas de la culture paternaliste à Bata Hellocourt”, Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, vol. XIX, no. 47, pp. 241–257, 2013.
  133. KUUTTI K., “Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research”, in NARDI B. (ed.), Context and Consciousness – Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 17–44, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  134. LAGACÉ M., CHARMARKEH H., LAPLANTE J. et al., “How ageism contributes to the Second-level digital divide: The case of Canadian seniors”, Journal of Technologies and Human Usability, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2015.
  135. LAPERCHE B., LEFEBVRE G., LANGLET D., “Innovation strategies of industrial groups in the global crisis: Rationalization and new paths”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1319–1331, 2011.
  136. LATOUR B., Aramis, or The love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  137. LAURENT B., BAKER M., BEAUDOUIN V. et al., Innovation et Participation. Approches Critiques, Presses des Mines, Paris, 2018.
  138. LAVILLE J.-L., “Innovation sociale, économie sociale et solidaire, entrepreneuriat social. Une mise en perspective historique”, in KLEIN J.-L., LAVILLE J.-L., MOULAERT F. (eds), L’innovation sociale, pp. 45–80, ERES, Paris, 2014.
  139. LAWLER E.E., LEVENSON A., BOUDREAU J.W., “HR metrics and analytics: Use and impact”, Human Resource Planning, pp. 27–35, 2010.
  140. LAWRENCE P.R., LORSCH J.W., “Differentiation and integration in complex organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–47, 1967.
  141. LEMONNIER P., “Technique (système)”, Dictionnaire de l’ethnologie et de l’anthropologie, pp. 697–698, 1991.
  142. LEONTIEV A.N., Activity, Consciousness and Personality, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1978.
  143. LEROI-GOURHAN A., Evolution et Techniques – L’homme et la matière, Albin Michel, Paris, 1943.
  144. LEROI-GOURHAN A., Milieu et techniques, Albin Michel, Paris, 1945.
  145. LÉVY P., L’intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace, La Découverte, Paris, 1994.
  146. LÉVY P., Cyberculture, Odile Jacob, Paris, 1997.
  147. LIAO S.M., SANDBERG A., ROACHE R., “Human engineering and climate change”, Ethics, Policy & Environment, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 206–221, 2012.
  148. LICKLIDER J.C., “Man-computer partnership”, Ekistics, pp. 165–169, 1960.
  149. MAGGI-GERMAIN N., “Les accords “libératoires” sur l’emploi des travailleurs handicapés”, La Revue de l’IRES, vol. 4, no. 67, pp. 99–121, 2010.
  150. MAIER C., LAUMER S., ECKHARDT A., “Information technology as daily stressor: Pinning down the causes of burnout”, Journal of Business Economics, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 349–387, 2015.
  151. MARCHIORI D.M., MAINARDES E.W., RODRIGUES R.G., “Do individual characteristics influence the types of technostress reported by workers?”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 1–13, 2018.
  152. MARTIN M., “La rationalisation du travail ménager en France dans l’entre-deux guerres”, Culture Technique, pp. 157–165, 1980.
  153. MARX K., ENGELS F., The Communist Manifesto, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1999.
  154. MAUSS M., Techniques, Technology, and Civilisation, Berghahn Books, New York, 2006.
  155. MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER V., CUKIER K., Big Data. A Revolution that will Transform how we Live, Work, and Think, Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Canada, 2013.
  156. MCLUHAN M., The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects, Random House, London, 1967.
  157. METZGER J.-L., “TIC et travail: de l’étude des usages à la critique de l’impératif de changement”, in GRANDJON F. (ed.), Communiquer à l’ère numérique, Regards croisés sur la sociologie des usages, pp. 91–125, Presses des Mines, Paris, 2011.
  158. MIDLER C., JULIEN B., LUNG Y., Innover à l’envers, Dunod, Paris, 2017.
  159. MINSKY M., The Society of Mind, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1985.
  160. MINTZBERG H., The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1978.
  161. MONTMOLLIN M. (de), L’intelligence de la tâche, Peter Lang, Bern, 1984.
  162. MONTMOLLIN M. (ed), Vocabulaire de l’ergonomie, Octarès, Toulouse, 1995.
  163. MUMFORD L., The myth of the Machine, Harcourt, New York, 1966.
  164. OECD, Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014, OECD Publishing, 2014.
  165. OECD, The Future of productivity, OECD Publishing, 2015.
  166. OGBURN W.F., Recent social trends in the United States, Report of the President’s Research Committee on Social Trends, pp. 132–152, 1933.
  167. OGBURN W.F., “How technology changes society”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 1947.
  168. O’NEIL C., Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, Crown, New York, 2016.
  169. OOSTERLYNCK S., MOULAERT F., “L’innovation sociale en Flandre: Apports et limites”, in KLEIN J.-L., LAVILLE J.-L., MOULAERT F. (eds), L’innovation sociale, pp. 175–192, ERES, Paris, 2014.
  170. ORLIKOWSKI W.J., “The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations”, Organization Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 398–427, 1992.
  171. PARAPONARIS C., CINA M., CAMPILLO V., “Les ingénieurs de conception industrielle dans la révolution numérique”, Les études de l’emploi cadre, APEC, nos 2018–38, 2018.
  172. PAVE F., L’illusion informaticienne, L’Harmattan, Paris, 1989.
  173. PERRET V., “Quand le changement devient soluble ou l’idéologie managériale du changement organisationnel”, in LECA B. (ed.), Les études critiques en management: une perspective française, pp. 209–231, Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec, 2009.
  174. PETTIGREW A.M., “Context and action in the transformation of the firm”, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 649–670, 1987.
  175. PHILLIPS J.R., “Enhancing the effectiveness of organizational change management”, Human Resource Management, vol. 22, nos 1–2, pp. 183–199, 1983.
  176. PHILLIPS L., “Armed resistance”, Nature, vol. 488, pp. 576–579, 2012.
  177. PICHAULT F., Le conflit informatique: gérer les ressources humaines dans le changement technologique, De Boeck, Brussels, 1990.
  178. PILLON J.-M., “Le pointage et le placement ? Quand Pôle emploi échoue à régler ses contradictions au moyen de logiciels”, Gouvernement et action publique, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 81–103, 2015.
  179. QUINTON S., “The community brand paradigm: A response to brand management’s dilemma in the digital era”, Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 29, no. 7/8, pp. 912–932, 2013.
  180. RABARDEL P., People and Technology: a Cognitive Approach to Contemporary Instruments, University Paris 8, (retrieved April, 29, 2018 from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01020705, 2002).
  181. RAGOWSKY A., SOMERS T.M., “Enterprise Resource Planning”, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2002.
  182. RAGU-NATHAN T.S., TARAFDAR M., RAGU-NATHAN B.S. et al., “The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and validation”, Information Systems Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 417–433, 2008.
  183. RICŒUR P., “L’éthique, la morale et la règle”, Autres temps, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 52–59, 1989.
  184. RIFKIN J., The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World, Macmillan, New York, 2011.
  185. RINALDI A., “The ten commandments for computer ethics from the computer ethics institute”, The Net: User Guidelines and Netiquette, 1996. Available at: http://www.fau.edu/rinaldi/net/ten.html.
  186. RIOUX J.-P., La révolution industrielle: 1780–1880, Le Seuil, Paris, 1971.
  187. ROGERS E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, 1983.
  188. ROUSSEAU D.M., “Is there such a thing as “evidence-based management””, Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 256–269, 2006.
  189. ŞAHIN Y.L., ÇOKLAR A.N., “Social networking users’ views on technology and the determination of technostress levels”, Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1437–1442, 2009.
  190. SALE K., Rebels Against the Future: The Luddites and Their War on the Industrial Revolution: Lessons for the Computer Age, Addison Wesley, Reading, 1995.
  191. SAUVY A., La machine et le chômage: le progrès technique et l’emploi, Dunod/Bordas, Paris, 1980.
  192. SCHUMPETER J.A., The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1926.
  193. SCHWAB K., The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Crown Business, New York, 2017.
  194. SEGRESTIN D., “Les nouveaux horizons de la régulation en organisation: le cas des progiciels de gestion intégrés”, in DE TERSSAC G. (ed.), La théorie de la régulation sociale de Jean-Daniel Reynaud, pp. 61–76, La Découverte, Paris, 2003.
  195. SEGRESTIN D., DARRÉON J.L., TROMPETTE P. (eds), Le mythe de l’organisation intégrée. Les progiciels de gestion, Presses universitaires du Mirail, Toulouse, 2004.
  196. SÉRIS J.P., La technique, PUF, Paris, 2013.
  197. SEWELL G., “The discipline of teams: the control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 397–428, 1998.
  198. SFEZ L., Technique et idéologie. Un enjeu de pouvoir, Le Seuil, Paris, 2002.
  199. SHAPIRO J.R., WILLIAMS A.M., “The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields”, Sex Roles, vol. 66, pp. 175–183, 2012.
  200. SILVERSTONE R., HIRSCH E. (eds), Consuming Technologies. Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, Routledge, London, 1994.
  201. SIMON H., The New Science of Management Decision, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1960.
  202. SIMONDON G., On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, 1980.
  203. SPENCER S.J., STEELE C.M., QUINN D.M., “Stereotype threat and women’s math performance”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 35, pp. 4–28, 1999.
  204. STAR S.L., GRIESEMER J.R., “Institutional ecology, “Translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, pp. 387–420, 1989.
  205. STOKKINK D., PERARD P., L’économie sociale et solidaire en Europe, Note d’analyse, Think Tank “Pour la solidarité”, 2016.
  206. TARAFDAR M., TU Q., RAGU-NATHAN B. et al., “Crossing to the dark side”, Communication of the ACM, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 113–120, 2011.
  207. TAYLOR F.W., The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper, New York, 1911.
  208. TEGLBORG A.-C., GILBERT P., RAULET-CROSET N., “The management device in the blind spot to resistance to change”, Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, vol. 4, no. 98, pp. 18–29, 2015.
  209. THOMPSON E.P., The Making of the English Working Class, Open Road Media, New York, 2016.
  210. THOUMIE P., Recherche technologique et diffusion de l’innovation au service du handicap, Report for the French Youth, Education and Research Ministry, 2004.
  211. TOPÇU S., “Dossier engagement public des chercheurs. Nucléaire: de l’engagement “savant” aux contre-expertises associatives”, Natures, Sciences, Sociétés, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 249–256, 2006.
  212. TOURAINE A., L’évolution du travail ouvrier aux usines Renault, Éditions du CNRS, Paris, 1955.
  213. TRIST E.L., “On sociotechnical systems”, in PASMORE W.A., SHERWOOD J.J. (eds), Sociotechnical Systems: A Sourcebook, pp. 43–57, University Associates, San Diego, 1978.
  214. TSAI W., “Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 996–1004, 2001.
  215. TSANG E.W.K., ZAHRA S.A., “Organizational unlearning”, Human Relations, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 1435–1462, 2008.
  216. TURKLE S., Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, Basic Books, New York, 2011.
  217. VAN DE VEN A.H., POOLE M.S., “Explaining development and change in organizations”, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 3, 1995.
  218. VAUJANY F.-X. (de), De la conception à l’usage. Vers un management de l’appropriation des outils de gestion, EMS, Paris, 2005.
  219. VAYRE E., “Les incidences du télétravail sur le travailleur dans les domaines professionnel, familial et social”, Le travail humain, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 1–39, 2019.
  220. VENKATESH V., MORRIS M.G., DAVIS G.B. et al., “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003.
  221. VINCK D., Sociologie des sciences, Armand Colin, Paris, 1995.
  222. VOUILLOT F., “L’orientation, le butoir de la mixité”, Revue française de pédagogie, no. 171, pp. 59–67, 2010.
  223. VYGOTSKI L., Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2012.
  224. WANG K., SHU Q., TU Q., “Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 3002–3013, 2008.
  225. WEBER M., Economy and Society, University of California Press, 1978.
  226. WEF, The Future of Jobs. Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Report, 2016.
  227. WEICK K.E., QUINN R.E., “Organization change and development”, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 50, pp. 361–386, 1999.
  228. WEIL S., La condition ouvrière, Gallimard, Paris, 1951.
  229. WHITE L., Medieval Technology and Social Change, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1969.
  230. WINNEFELD JR P.A.S., KIRCHHOFF C., UPTON D.M., “Facteur humain et cybersécurité: les leçons du Pentagone”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 100–110, February-March 2016.
  231. ZUBOFF S., “Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization”, Journal of Information Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 75–89, 2015.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset