20

Collagen-based tubular constructs for tissue engineering applications

C.E. Ghezzi, B. Marelli and S.N. Nazhat,    McGill University, Canada

Abstract:

Vascular and respiratory systems have high priority in clinical research due to their cardinal role in human physiology. Significant clinical demand has raised the need to produce tissue engineered constructs, to repair or substitute functional parts, and to develop suitable models to study and cure severe pathologies of vascular and respiratory systems. This chapter provides an overview of the current approaches for vascular and airway tissue replacement, regeneration, and modelling. Furthermore, protein-based materials, such as type I collagen, are presented as the construction materials for tissue engineered models and substitutes. Subsequently, the cells, primarily involved in tubular tissues, are described as the construction workers in tissue engineering approaches in concert with the application of dynamic culture conditions, implemented as the construction tools for engineered tissues.

Key words

tubular tissue model; collagen; dynamic stimulation

20.1 Introduction

Tissue engineering approaches are primarily applied in clinical settings for planar tissues because of their relative low complexity and simple geometry [1]. The mechanical and functional requirements of tubular tissues are more stringent compared with tissues with planar geometries, such as epidermal and dermal layer substitutes, which are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved products used mainly for wound management [2]. Tubular tissues are the main components of several biological systems, in particular circulatory, respiratory, urinary, and gastrointestinal in the form of blood vessels, airway tracts, bladder, and gastrointestinal tract, respectively. Tubular tissues not only present an increased complexity in the geometry and tissue architecture, they are also populated by mixed cell types, and exposed to cyclic mechanical stimuli, which modulate cellular responses and ultimately the functionality of the tissues. Understanding of and the ability to reproduce physiologically equivalent biological environments are critical to generate mechanically and biologically functional neo-tissues. In vivo studies can provide the entire complexity of the biological milieu, but system variables cannot be independently controlled. Therefore, distinct effects of the biological environment can hardly be segregated in in vivo models. In contrast, in vitro studies allow the systematic isolation of each control variable, but they render a strong simplification of the experimental settings, where the biochemical and mechanical signals present in the native environment are strongly limited [3].

To extend the utility of engineered tissues for regenerative medicine and to circumvent limitations associated with traditional two-dimensional (2D) culture systems [4], the development of biocompatible and mechanically relevant tubular tissue constructs would provide an insight into complex biological phenomena and pathologies, together with improved solutions for the repair of respiratory tracts. In particular, the regeneration of tubular tissues involves sequential steps beginning with the reproducible production of a biodegradable scaffold based on well-characterized materials and moving towards scaffold seeding with a population of committed cells, which is readily available and easily expandable [5]. Furthermore, the potential clinical success of a tissue engineered tubular constructs is dictated by a combination of cost- and time-effectiveness along with long-term functionality.

Vascular and respiratory systems have high priority in clinical research due to their cardinal role in human physiology. Significant clinical demand has raised the need to produce tissue engineered constructs, to repair or substitute functional parts, and to develop suitable models to study and cure severe pathologies of vascular and respiratory systems. This chapter provides an overview of the current approaches for vascular and airway tissue replacement, regeneration, and modelling. Furthermore, protein-based materials, such as type I collagen, are presented as the construction materials for tissue engineered models and substitutes. Subsequently, the cells, primarily involved in tubular tissues, are described as the construction workers in tissue engineering approaches in concert with the application of dynamic culture conditions, implemented as the construction tools for engineered tissues.

20.2 Current approaches to vascular tissue replacement and regeneration

Atherosclerosis is the primary cause of several cardiovascular diseases and is responsible for the majority of mortality in developed countries [6]. The most common surgical procedure to treat damaged small vessels is coronary heart bypass graft surgery with the patient’s own veins and arteries. However, autologous vessels are not adequate for replacements, due to concomitant vascular complications [7]. This has raised the need to propose a small-diameter blood vessel substitute. The use of synthetic materials, such as Dacron® and Teflon®, led to early failure of the graft due to occlusion and thrombus formation [8, 9]. Consequently, several routes have been exploited to develop autologous small-calibre vascular grafts. The earliest attempt was the endothelialization of synthetic grafts, but the optimization of endothelial cell attachment and long-term maintenance on synthetic surfaces were never successfully achieved [10]. Furthermore, research has shifted its focus towards collagen–gel-based blood vessel models, where the biological-derived scaffold may be able to enhance cell-mediated active remodelling and functional mechanical response.

In 1986, Weinberg and Bell developed the first collagen hydrogel tubular construct, an initiator of diverse approaches carried out with limited success, mainly due to low mechanical properties [11]. L’Heureux et al. proposed collagen gel culture techniques over a central mandrel, to enhance material resistance through cell contraction and remodelling of the matrix [12]. Hirai et al. attempted to increase the initial collagen concentration up to 2.5 mg/ml, achieving modest improvements [13]. Tranquillo et al. focused on magnetic preallignment during collagen fibrillogenesis, to guide the formation of oriented collagen fibrils, potentially reflected in improved mechanical properties [14]. However magnetic prealignment was not sufficiently effective compared to cell-mediated matrix contraction over a central mandrel. Girton et al. proposed innovative culture methods to stiffen and strengthen collagen gels constructs, by glycation of the matrix [15]. However, despite all attempts reported in literature tubular collagen constructs present inadequate mechanical properties for vascular replacement applications. A totally innovative method was proposed by L’Heureux et al., based on the concept of cell self-assembly model to create a completely biological vascular graft [16], with excellent mechanical properties but in a time frame incompatible with clinical applications. Furthermore, synthetic biodegradable scaffolds have been proposed for vascular tissue engineering. Niklason et al. developed a polyglycolic acid (PGA) mesh seeded with vascular cells and cultured under pulsatile conditions, exhibiting high mechanical resistance and suitable matrix structural properties [17]. As for the completely biological approach, the long time in culture required to develop the construct raises manufacturing costs and reduces clinical pertinence.

20.3 Current approaches to airway tissue replacement, regeneration, and modelling

The natural role of the airway tracts is to allow airflow passage; therefore, their primary function is to maintain patency. Air is distributed through all branches, via the trachea, bronchi, and bronchioles, which bifurcate for ~ 20 generations before terminating at sites of gas exchange in the lung parenchyma [18]. Unlike blood vessels, which comprise the adventitia and media layers to maintain patency, the airways rely upon multiple C-shaped cartilaginous rings, which are uniformly distributed along the length of large airways to prevent collapse due to high transmural pressure. Further towards the periphery, cartilage is more randomly organized and decreases in the wall content, until membranous bronchioles are only supported by the elastic recoil of the lung.

Diverse medical conditions affect the airway tracts, including asthma, inflammatory stenosis, neoplasms, post-incubation, and trauma injuries. Despite the clinical needs, a functional airway tissue substitute or a three-dimensional (3D) airway tissue model has not been shown to be effective to date in airway reconstruction procedures and in vitro tissue models for inflammatory diseases [19]. In particular, the requirements for a prosthetic airway replacement are constantly correlated with the improvement of surgical techniques. The standard operation for severe stenosis is resection followed by end-to-end anastomosis, which is only recommended for defects less than 6 cm long [20]. In such patients, alternative approaches are required to reconstruct the airway. The spectrum of tract replacements ranges from standard surgical approaches, such as autologous tissue flaps and artificial prosthesis to new promising methodologies, such as decellularized allografts, and tissue engineered constructs.

20.3.1 Autologous tissues

Autogenous tissues are mainly used as patches or in tubular forms, harvested from a wide range of body sites. Tracheal small defects can be successfully treated with graft repairs from fascia lata [21], auricular and costal cartilage [22], bronchial patch [23], pericardium [24], and aortic grafts [25]. Autologous grafts have also been used in combination with artificial material support, such as tantalum wires [26], polypropylene meshes (Marlex™) [27], and silicone, or polyethylene and polyurethane stents [28, 29]. However, due to the high frequency of tumour recurrence, this approach has been mainly abandoned for lateral tracheal incision [21]. Although tissue grafts can successfully repair small tracheal defects, large defects require vascularization to maintain tissue viability and reduce the risk of necrosis. Another approach is to harvest tissue flap from the patient, preserving or reanastomosing the blood supply. Therefore, this method provides independent vascularization and favourable wound healing conditions in comparison to graft materials. Due to the significant segment length, cartilage grafts, polymer rings, or meshes are required to increase the rigidity and stability of the flap tissue [30]. Approaches for vascularized autologous tracheal repair include skin flaps [31], pedicled periosteum [32], intercostal muscle patch [33], and broncus [34]. Although vascularized autologous flaps have generally been successful, the complexity and the multi-staged approach constrain the surgical technique, thus limiting the common use of this procedure [30].

20.3.2 Artificial airway constructs

Synthetic materials have been extensively used to generate artificial constructs as a means of temporary tracheal support and tracheal prosthesis for tissue replacement. The common drawbacks of artificial materials are their lack of integration with the host tissues. Therefore, problems of migration, dislodgement, infection, and obstruction together with lack of epithelialization generally arise [21]. To date, there are mainly two types of airway stents commercially available as tracheal replacements: silicone tubes and expandable metallic stents. Silicone tubes are flexible and are proposed as long-term placements and atraumatic insertions. In particular, the Tracheaobronzane® Dumon™ Silicone Stent, which has shown excellent clinical results, is composed of external studs to prevent dislodgment, and extremities that are designed to maximize airflow, thus reducing formation of granulation tissue [35, 36]. Another product currently available is the Dynamic™ (Y) stent, characterized by a Y-geometry (tracheal and bronchial limbs), C-shaped stainless steel struts to mimic the cartilaginous rings, and optimized internal surface to limit obstructions [37]. Although silicone-based stents are easy to customize and remove, they exhibit strong limitations arising from difficulty in placement, tendency to dislodge, and frequently occurring obstructions due to lack of epithelialization and low inner to outer diameter ratio [38].

Therefore, metallic stents have been introduced to ameliorate correct delivery and placement with less invasive surgical procedures, in order to reduce obstructions, and improve their stability [38]. Ultraflex™ Esophageal NG Stent System is a self-expandable tubular mesh currently in use, and is made of flexible single-strand Nitinol wire covered with polyurethane, to reduce tissue ingrowth [39]. In order to further prevent tumour and tissue growth within the wire mesh stents, Polyflex® Esophageal Stent have been developed based on a silicone-covered polyester wire mesh with an internal silicone coating [40]. Uncovered metallic stents can potentially improve epithelialization and integration with the surrounding tissue, but are difficult to remove. In comparison, coated stents are able to decrease tumour and granulation tissue ingrowth and to improve removability [30].

The full replacement of tracheal tracts was experimentally performed in large animal models with a wide range of materials in tubular form, such as stainless steel [41], Vitallium [42], polyethylene [4345], silicone [4649] polytetrafluoroethylene [50, 51], and their combinations [5255]. Solid prostheses were also used in clinical settings, with silicone tubes being the most exploited. The Neville artificial trachea was composed of a silicone tube with two suturable fabric cuffs at the extremities to prevent granulation tissue and enhance a stable fixation [56]. However, silicone prostheses still displayed severe stenosis and infection at the interface of the prosthesis and tracheal epithelium [21]. Upon the failure of solid prosthesis due to obstructive granulation tissue, porous materials were designed to stimulate tissue ingrowth and eventually migration of adjacent tracheal epithelium. Due to insufficient structural support, experimental mesh prostheses have been frequently reinforced with wire, plastic rings, or coils. Moreover, they have been externally wrapped with other tissues (e.g. pericardium, fascia lata or dura mater) or biopolymers (e.g. fibrin or reconstituted collagen) to prevent air leakage. The most exploited materials for mesh production have been polypropylene [27, 57, 58], polyethylene terephthalate [51, 59], polyurethane [60],and polytetrafluoroethylene [61] in multiple combinations mainly based on collagen grafting [62] and polypropylene reinforcement [63]. Some of the porous meshes for tracheal replacement were also produced for clinical applications; in particular Marlex™ based prosthesis [27, 64]. Despite the porous structure, epithelium did not cover the entire luminal surface of the constructs. Therefore, the continued proliferation of scar tissue could not be controlled, frequently leading to obstruction and stenosis. In addition, the lack of coverage in large sectors of the meshes frequently results in bacterial colonization, and the subsequent infection of the prostheses [21].

20.3.3 Allotransplanted airway constructs

Biological scaffolds derived from allogenic and xenogenic tissues are commonly used in a variety of reconstructive surgeries and also adapted for tissue and organ replacement in regenerative medicine strategies. During the past decade, tissue decellularization techniques have been optimized to reduce deleterious in vivo effects of residual cellular material in order to circumvent immunosuppression post-treatment. Furthermore, new methodologies have attempted to minimize deterioration of extracellular matrix (ECM) native composition, structure, and mechanical performance imparted by the decellularization processes. The hypothesis of this tissue replacement approach is that ECM-derived scaffolds produced by decellularization can maintain or promote site-appropriate cell phenotypes during the process of cell repopulation, via exposure of the ligands and bioactive molecules necessary to lead cell populations to organize in functional structures [65]. The matrix should provide an inductive 3D biological template to stimulate the regeneration of a functional tissue through in vivo cell recruitment or exogenous provision. Decellularization techniques are generally a combination of physical, ionic, chemical, and enzymatic methodologies, which are more efficiently imparted by perfusion systems, in particular for vascularized tissues or organs [66].

In 2008, Macchiarini et al. repopulated a decellularised human donor windpipe in a dedicated bioreactor with autologous epithelial cells (ECs) and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived chondrocytes (Fig. 20.1). The bioreactor was designed to seed and culture both ECs and MSCs, spatially segregated in the luminal and external surfaces of the construct, respectively. After 4 days of dynamic culture, the graft was used to replace a compromised left main bronchus of a 30-year-old woman. The patient was immediately provided with a normal functioning airway without immunosuppressive drugs [67]. Despite the clinical success of this windpipe transplantation, several questions have been raised. The long-term effects of decellularization treatments on the morphological changes of the donor tracheal tissues have not been investigated. It is not indicated whether the tissue would eventually be replaced by newly formed cartilaginous tissues or it would progressively degrade and loses its original supporting role [68]. Moreover, the lack of an intrinsic blood supply can result in the unpredictable healing of the tissue [69]. The optimization of graft preservation might ultimately broaden the clinical application of tissue engineered products, in relation to the time required to prepare the antigen-free tissue, culture the committed cell population, and the complete maturation of the tissue [70]. Further in vitro studies have evaluated the potential intrinsic changes and degradation of decellularized human tissue scaffolds. During one-year storage in physiological solution, human decellularized tracheas displayed loss of ECM architecture and changes in mechanical properties. Such degradation phenomena can be further accelerated in vivo, impacting the clinical relevance of long-term tissue transplantation [71]. Remlinger et al. observed biochemical and mechanical degradation of porcine tracheal ECM after implantation in a dog model. In order to limit the scaffold deterioration, pre-seeding of the matrix with chondrocytes may compensate the significant degradation of ECM [72].

image
20.1 Human donor windpipe for tracheal replacement. Decellularized trachea preseeded with autologous ECs and MSCs used to replace a diseased left main bronchus. Adapted from [67].

Reconstruction of long-segment tracheal defects was also performed via tracheal allotransplantation without any decellularization treatments, in order to maintain the blood supply [4]. Delaere et al. reported a successful tracheal allotransplantation after indirect revascularization of the graft in heterotopic position. A segment of donor trachea was placed in the recipient’s forearm for revascularization, circumferentially wrapped with patient’s own tissues for 4 months. Immunosuppressive therapy was administered until transplantation took place. The donor tracheal cartilage was surrounded by the host’s blood vessels and lined with an epithelial layer originating from the patient. The tracheal allograft was then placed in the proper anatomical position with an intact blood supply.

20.3.4 Tissue-engineered airway constructs

Over the last two decades, numerous efforts have been concentrated to develop functional tissue engineered tracheal replacement, exploiting several scaffolding materials, different cell sources, and diversified culture conditions.

Scaffold-free approaches aim to develop tissue-like constructs to promote and lead to tissue development. Tani et al. used rabbit auricular chondrocytes to produce an ECM sheet, which was then wrapped around a silicone tube and cultivated for 6 weeks under dynamic condition (Fig. 20.2) [73]. The silicone support was removed after the dynamic conditioning and the chondrocyte sheet demonstrated sufficient structural integrity to maintain the shape, but the mechanical strength was found to be equivalent only to 30% of that in the native trachea.

image
20.2 Scaffold-free TE approach. Macroscopic appearance of the chondrocyte sheet and cylindrical construct. (a) Chondrocyte sheet produced after 7 days in static culture. (b) Silicone tube to support the chondrocyte sheet. (c) Cylindrical construct after 6 weeks of dynamic culturing. (d) Construct compressed with forceps. (e) Serial rings cut from the cylindrical construct. Adapted from [73].

In comparison, Gilpin et al. produced a similar chondrocyte sheet under static culture followed by dynamic culturing for 8 weeks [74]. The scaffold-free sheets were used as anterior cartilage grafting in a rabbit animal model. Although the construct exhibited no signs of inflammation, the implants showed evidence of mechanical failure. The main advantage of a purely cell-based approach is the reduction in inflammation at the implantation site. However, structural and mechanical integrities are generally compromised and the extensive time in culture are not cost- and time-effective for clinical applications [19].

Vacanti et al. in 1994 proposed a biodegradable sheet of nonwoven PGA mesh seeded with calf chondrocytes, as circumferential replacement of rat trachea [75]. No implanted animals survived, probably due to the excessive rigidity of the construct and lack of vascularization. Further studies attempted to line the cartilaginous construct with respiratory epithelium, and revealed the complexity to guarantee a continuous epithelium without infection [76]. In order to improve the mechanical functionality of the scaffold, Kojima et al. developed a modular construct composed by ovine chondrocyte-seeded nonwoven PGA mesh, placed in the grooves of a helical Silastic® template and then covered with an ovine fibroblast-seeded mesh (Fig. 20.3) [77].

image
20.3 Modular silicone-based tracheal tissue engineered construct. (a) Silastic helical template. (b) Chondrocyte-seeded matrix was placed in the grooves (arrow) of the template and covered with a fibroblastseeded mesh. Adapted from [77].

The implants were inserted in the neck of the sheep to allow maturation for 8 weeks and subsequently implanted to repair a circumferential defect. However, animal survival was limited to 7 days due to significant stenosis, probably as a consequence of inflammatory reaction induced by PGA, leading to high cellular content and low proteoglycan presence compared to normal tracheas. The same group further developed the implants by wrapping the PGA matrices around a silicone tube and seeded with ovine nasal chondrocytes, where harvesting requires a less invasive procedure and thus more suitable for clinical applications [78]. After subcutaneous implantation, no inflammatory reactions were reported, resulting in a matrix composition similar to native trachea but with significantly lower mechanical properties. Furthermore, Kojima et al. assessed the feasibility of co-culture of ECs and chondrocytes from the same tissue source and revealed, after 4 weeks, that only 60% of the internal surface was covered with epithelium. Recently, Jungebluth et al. performed a tracheobronchial transplantation with a stem-cell-seeded bioartifical nanocomposite made of polyhedral oligomericsilsesquioxane covalently bonded to poly-[carbonate-urea]-urethane [79]. The construct was first seeded under dynamic culturing for 36 hours and then implanted. At early time points, biopsy samples showed the presence of necrotic tissue associated with fungal contamination, while 1 month after surgery biopsies revealed large inflammation areas with initial signs of epithelialization. The ability to line tissue construct with a continuous epithelium under in vitro conditions is one of the main challenges for airway tissue engineering. This limitation is mainly due to the synthetic (non-biological) origin of biodegradable polymers that discourage EC growth and organization. In contrast, collagen modified constructs have been shown to promote ciliated epithelium lining under both in vitro and in vivo conditions [80, 81]. Natural trachea, on the other hand, has the capability to restore the epithelial mucosa when a small portion of tracheal tissue is removed [82].

Several natural polymer-based materials have been applied as tracheal tissue engineering: specifically hyaluronan and silk fibroin (SF)-derived materials. Henderson et al. developed hyaluronan-based scaffolds, which have been shown to support chondrocyte growth under dynamic culture conditions [83]. However, in vivo animal implantation demonstrated a nonspecific foreign body response [84]. In addition, silk fibroin has been used as a coating in rabbit trachea defect reconstruction. The results demonstrated good biocompatibility of the material, promoting fibroblast invasion and capillary vessel formation [85]. In order to take advantage of the biocompatibility of natural polymers, several groups have proposed different methods to conjugate natural and synthetic polymers. Komura et al. developed a three-layered construct consisting of a collagen sheet, a PGA mesh and a poly L-lactide/ε-caprolactone copolymer mesh, seeded with rabbit chondrocytes [86]. Three months after implantation in the cervical trachea, the structural integrity of the scaffold was maintained and epithelial regeneration occurred in the lumen. Similar work has been developed by Omori et al. based on a polyethylene Marlex™ mesh tube covered with collagen sponge [87]. The airway reconstruction of a small defect was performed on an elderly patient, inducing good epithelialization and patency for two years. Furthermore, Lin et al. proposed a composite construct composed of a poly(ε-caprolactone) tubular frame embedded with type II collagen sponge [88]. Subcutaneous implantation of the scaffold revealed a significant increase in the mechanical properties after 8 weeks, exceeding those of native tracheal tissue, and a matrix composition similar to a cartilaginous tissue.

The same group developed a bioreactor system to grow the tissue engineered trachea seeded with chondrocytes after a maturation period under static culture. An increase in cell proliferation, glycosaminoglycan and collagen content was observed under dynamic culture. After 2 months’ implantation into rabbit tracheal defects, poor epithelialization occurred [89]. However, this work revealed the central role of a bioreactor system to stimulate the maturation and to augment the functional and mechanical quality of tissue engineered constructs. Similarly, Kojima et al. developed a construct made of stromal cells seeded in PGA mesh inserted into helical grooves of a silicone tube, where the external surface was coated with transforming growth factor β2 to stimulate chondrogenic differentiation [90]. After 6 weeks of subcutaneous implantation, cartilage formation was observed, although the mechanical properties were not evaluated. In general, the rationale for the combination of different materials is to compensate for the limitations of the single constituent. However, the inherent complexity in producing composite, multilayered, and hybrid materials has so far limited the translation of these scaffolds into clinical settings [19].

20.3.5 Airway tissue models

Together with tissue engineered constructs for airway replacement, research has also driven the focus towards tissue models. The main objective of tissue models is to mimic the microstructure, geometry, and functionalities of the native tissue in vitro. In addition, 3D tissue models provide new possibilities for the study of complex physiological and pathophysiological processes in vitro [91]. Along this route, tissue engineered constructs might reduce the need for organ or tissue transplantations by supporting the development of therapies to prevent or cure diseases at the origin [92]. In comparison, in vivo animal models can offer the entire complexity of the biological milieu, but are lacking in the independent control of the system variables and with inherent differences between animal and human responses. Therefore, distinct effects of the biological environment can hardly be segregated in experimental in vivo conditions. In contrast, under in vitro conditions each control variable can be systematically isolated, but with a strong simplification of the experimental settings, where the biochemical and mechanical signals present in the real biological system are strongly limited.

Under this perspective, Agarwal et al. developed an in vitro wound-healing model comprising type I collagen gel in a planar geometry for the co-culturing of human fibroblasts, and bronchial ECs [93]. The study investigated the expression of ECM proteins during would-healing tissue contraction in response to the presence of epithelium and different wound types, characteristic of asthma. Choe et al. also proposed a protocol based on highly hydrated type I collagen gel to setup, maintain, and characterize a tissue engineered human bronchial mucosa model obtained over 2 weeks and to be used for basic physiology and pathophysiology studies (Fig. 20.4) [94]. Because of extensive cell-mediated contraction, the bronchial mucosa model was also implemented to study airway remodelling and cell–substrate interactions in planar geometry. Moreover, an in vitro airway tissue model is commercially available with the same geometry. EpiAirway™ originates from normal (i.e. non-immortalized) human-derived tracheal/bronchial ECs, cultured to generate a 3D, pseudo-stratified model [95].

image
20.4 Flowchart of the preparation of a human bronchial mucosa model. The tissue engineered model is prepared from human foetal lung fibroblasts (IMR-90), bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE) and type I collagen gel in planar geometry cultured for 14 days to be ready for experiments. Reproduced from [94].

This 3D tissue model has been used primarily to study respiratory infections, and drug delivery. In contrast to these previous approaches, Miller et al. developed a tissue engineered model of the bronchioles, incorporating the native cylindrical geometry of the tissue and the presence of both fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) within a highly hydrated type I collagen gel [96]. Due to the original tissue geometry, the experimental model was mechanically stimulated under physiological conditions in order to approximate the behaviour of the native tissue (e.g. airway remodelling). Generally, airway tissue models do not resemble the native environment in terms of both tissue-like architecture and the ability to provide physiological mechanical cues to the resident cells. In particular, previous studies did not aim to reproduce independently and in combination the sequential occurrence of the in vivo mechanical stimuli (i.e. shear stress and circumferential strain). Recently, a method to produce tubular dense collagen-based constructs was proposed to potentially meet the demands of the above challenges. In less than one hour, tubular dense collagen-based constructs (TDCCs) with native tissue equivalent fibrillar protein densities and mechanical properties were produced by the circumferential wrapping of plastically compressed dense collagen gel-based sheets around a cylindrical support [97] (Fig. 20.5).

image
20.5 Macroscopic appearance of TDCCs. Close up images of as-prepared 3.4 mm diameter TDCC from (a) rat-tail tendon derived, and (b) bovine dermis derived collagen. Both constructs maintained patency, demonstrating structural stability under their own weight. (c) Macroscopic image of TDCCs with various diameters (i.e. 3.0, 2.4, 2.0, 1.5 mm). [97]

This method has potential clinical applications by dramatically reducing the time allocated for scaffold production, eliminating the dependence on donor availability and cell-based matrix synthesis as well as potentially reducing the risk of detrimental in vivo effects that are associated with residual biological materials. Furthermore, a TDCC was used to investigate air smooth muscle cell (ASMC) responses under physiological pulsatile flow. The role of shear stress alone, and in combination with circumferential strain on the proliferation, alignment, and phenotype of ASMCs seeded in 3D, was underscored together with the effects of ASMC-mediated remodelling on matrix morphological and mechanical properties. By providing ASMCs with a physiologically equivalent 3D environment, and through in vitro mechanical stimulation, ASMCs exhibited their native orientation, maintained their contractile phenotype and enhanced the mechanical properties of the TDCC through matrix remodelling.

20.4 Type I collagen: the construction material

The word ‘collagen’ is a French neologism to identify the constituent of connective tissue that produces glue [98]. In fact, collagen is the most abundant protein present in the human body, identified as superfamily of structural proteins with a wide spectrum of properties, ranging from biomechanical functions to cellular gene expression modulation [99, 100].

20.4.1 Type I collagen structure

Collagens share the characteristic three α-helical chain structure, composed of repeated sequence of the triplet Gly-X-Y, where X and Y are frequently proline and hydroxyproline, respectively [101]. The three α-helical chains are then organized and stabilized in a triple helical quaternary structure, which is the trademark of the collagen superfamily [102]. The lack of side chain in glycine allows the compaction of the collagen triple helix [103]. On the other hand, the side chains of X and Y residues are exposed providing the capacity for lateral interactions with ECM macromolecules, and resulting in the formation of various supramolecular level of organizations [104]. Only collagen types I, II, III, V, and XI can be organized in highly ordered supramolecular aggregates (i.e. fibrils) [105] (Fig. 20.6).

image
20.6 Hierarchical structure of collagen protein materials. Each collagen molecule is composed of three α-chains that form ≈ 300 nm long triple helical collagen molecule. Triple helices aggregate both in lateral and longitudinal directions to form fibrils. In tendons and ligaments, multiple fibrils are organized into fibres to provide stiffness and tensile load resistance. Reproduced from [106].

The hierarchical organization at several discrete levels of the collagen protein results in the distinct mechanical and structural properties of the fibres [107]. The existence of a monomeric building unit for the collagen fibre was proposed by Gross in 1956 and defined as tropocollagen [108]. Collagen fibrils have a distinctive suprastructure, identified with a periodicity of 67 nm (D-period), which is represented by the quarter-staggered arrangement of individual collagen monomers in fibrillar-array [104]. In particular, type I collagen is the major organic component in tendons, ligaments, bone, skin, cornea, and vessels [109], and in the form of fibres it is characterized by substructural organization as fibrils and fibrillar bundles, which have been previously correlated with the ultimate strength of biological tissues [106].

20.4.2 Type I collagen as a biomaterial

Type I collagen has been extensively used as a biomaterial, due to the excellent biological properties and processability in different forms [110]. Type I collagen is well established in the clinical use of various tissue replacements and devices, such as wound dressing, tissue augmentation, ophthalmic barriers, bioprosthetic heart valves, arteriovenus shunts, suture threads, haemostatic membranes, dura mater substitutes, nerve conduits, and drug delivery [111]. The use of type I collagen, in particular in tissue engineering provides numerous advantages [98, 107, 110, 112], such as its:

• cost-effectiveness and ease of isolation in large quantity from different sources (e.g. rat-tail tendon, bovine dermis, human skin, and ligamenthum nuchae);

• processability in various forms;

• excellent biological properties;

• potential for functionalization and hybridization with other materials to tailor biological and mechanical properties;

• approval for clinical use from health agencies (FDA and European medical agencies).

Type I collagen-based biomaterials are mainly produced from decellularization of collagen-rich tissues and reconstitution of solubilized collagen [113]. Decellularization processes generally require purification and removal of cellular components to reduce an immunogenic potential. Subsequent chemical fixation can be used to strengthen and increase the stability of the collagen matrix [114]. Modern extraction methods are based on three main principles of solubilization: either in acidic [115, 116], neutral salt [117], or proteolytic solutions [118]. The latter strongly reduces the self-assembling capacity of tropocollagen molecules into fibril aggregation, due to the cleavage of terminal telopeptide regions induced by the proteolytic treatment [119]. To reduce this effect, endogenous proteases can be inhibited during the acidic solubilization [120]. In general, acidic extraction with an additional pepsin solubilization step is the most effective technique. However, some telopeptides are cleaved or partially denatured [118, 121, 122]. Multiple protocols are widely used to solubilize collagen, and various collagen solutions are readily available at a large variety of concentrations from many different sources. Procollagen solutions are used to produce reconstituted collagen gels by restoring the pH, temperature, and ionic concentration to physiological levels. Procollagen polymerization in physiological conditions results in a protein concentration of less than 0.85 wt%, which generates highly hydrated collagen gels with low values of collagen fibrillar density (CFD) and a limited range of mechanical properties (i.e. strength of 4–6 kPa and elastic modulus of 20–30 kPa) [123, 124]. Collagen gels under tension generate nonlinear stress–strain behaviour similar to those of native tissues [124, 125]. At low strains, uniaxial tensile curves present a nonlinear phase, called the ‘toe’ region, which is followed by a linear phase, where the elastic modulus is calculated, and terminating with an exponential failure region [126]. In the unloaded configuration, the collagen gel network presents an isotropic structure. Under low stress, a rearrangement phase occurs where collagen fibrils orientate and align towards the direction of the stress. Once the majority of collagen fibrils are recruited in the direction of the stress, an alignment phase follows, where higher stresses are necessary to axially deform the fibrils [127].

The method of collagen gel preparation easily allows the direct injection of cells prior to gelling, thus enhancing seeding efficiency and the homogeneous distribution of cells within the scaffold [128]. Cellularized collagen hydrogels were initially described in 1962 [129], and have since been identified as an excellent 3D substrate for the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of numerous cell types [107]. The use of 3D substrate to study cellular responses, in comparison to 2D cultures, is theoretically founded on the systems-based scientific approach proposed by Weiss in 1959 [130]. Through this, the emphasis is placed on the cells in relationship with their external physical environment, and not limited to the cells as single entities. Moreover, since the texture and mechanical properties of 3D collagen matrices resemble the fibrous connective tissue environment, they have become well-established model systems to study cell behaviour in an in vitro tissue-like milieu [131]. Initially, fibroblasts were studied encased within 3D hydrogels under both restrained and free conditions to underscore the mechanism of cell-mediated gel contraction [132]. Afterwards, Bell et al. adopted fibroblast-seeded 3D hydrogels as tissue-like structures to model wound contraction under in vitro conditions [133]. The same collagen matrices seeded with fibroblasts were then proposed as skin-equivalents in 1981 [134], and these have become the concept at the base of the first allogeneic cell-based product (Apligraf®, Fig. 20.7), approved by the US FDA as skin graft and in 1998 was commercialized by Organogenesis [135]. Cellular collagen hydrogels have proven to be effective for the treatment of skin ulcers, burns and oral mucosal defects [136, 137]. Acellular collagen hydrogels are also currently in clinical use for dura mater replacement [138].

image
20.7 Cell-based collagen gel product. Apligraf® is a bi-layered cell-based product FDA approved as skin substitute for the healing of both diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers. It consists of a dermal layer, comprising bovine type I collagen gel and human dermal fibroblasts, and of an epidermal layer formed by human keratinocyte cells [135, 139].

Although collagen exhibits excellent biological properties [140], the wider application of its hydrogels in tissue engineering is limited due to low mechanical strength [141] (Fig. 20.8a), and structural instability arising from cell-mediated contraction attributable to the mechanical tension imposed by the constituent cells [142] (Fig. 20.8b). Several approaches have been taken to overcome the mechanical and structural drawbacks of collagen-based hydrogels, including cell-induced gel densification resulting from collagen remodelling and subsequent increase in CFD, a process that can be unpredictable and time consuming [133, 143]. Collagen remodelling comprises a complex set of events where, in analogy to native ECM, is continuously digested by synchronous proteolytic degradation (activated by matrix metallo proteinases (MMPs)) and reassembled by the cells (through endogenous collagen production), eventually resulting in morphological and structural changes [144].

image
20.8 Highly hydrated collagen (HHC) gel mechanical instability and cell-mediated contraction. (a) Macroscopic view of collagen hydrogels at concentrations of 0.66 and 3 mg/ml (left and right panels, respectively), which exhibit limited mechanical properties and structural integrity. Scale bar = 5 mm; (b) HHC hydrogel contraction by dermal fibroblasts at protein concentration of 3 mg/ml. Adapted from [145].

A variety of cross-linking methods, using either chemical [146148], photochemical [149151], or enzymatic [152, 153] have also been investigated. However each method imparts some degree of cytotoxicity, and can be technically limited by a high cost–benefit ratio for large-scale implementation [154].

Brown et al. developed a processing technique based on plastic compression of collagen hydrogels in order to generate scaffolds with increased CFD and subsequent improvement in the mechanical properties (i.e. strength and elastic modulus) [155, 156] (Fig. 20.9).

image
20.9 Plastic compression (PC) technique. (a) Schematic view of as made HHC gel. (b) Schematic view of dense collagen gel sheet at the end of the PC process. (c) Simplified diagram of the PC technique: after casting HHC gels are placed on a porous support made of (bottom to top) absorbent paper blot layers, a stainless steel mesh, and a polymer mesh. Unconfined compressive stress (1 kPa) is applied for 5 min. to expel the excess water from the collagen gel, resulting in a thickness reduction of 20-fold. Adapted from [156].

Briefly, collagen hydrogels are subjected to a compressive stress of 1 kPa (1A) for 5 minutes, resulting in the expulsion of more than 95% of the water content and a 40-fold increase in CFD from 0.3 to 12%. The application of plastic compression on collagen hydrogels produces dense collagen (DC) constructs (Fig. 20.9b) with controlled protein content and mesoscale properties, significantly enhancing the mechanical and structural performances of collagenous hydrogels (i.e. strength of 0.6 MPa and elastic modulus of 1.5 MPa) [155]. DC scaffolds have been shown to improve cell metabolic activity [157] and stimulate osteoblastic differentiation [158]. DC gels also demonstrated their potential as osteoid model for bone tissue engineering [159, 160], also in combination with other biopolymers (e.g. chitosan) [161], silk fibroin derived anionic polypeptides [162], and bioactive glasses (i.e. Bioglass® 45S5) [163, 164].

20.5 Cells: the construction workers

Culture systems in 3D can provide a simplified variant of the native tissue architecture, where cells are embedded and surrounded within a hydrated matrix (e.g. collagen, fibrin, fibroin, and chitosan gels) [165, 166]. Most of the cells, in particular those subjected to mechanical stimuli (e.g. SMCs, chondrocytes), demand a 3D environment in order to organize into a physiological tissue-like structure under in vitro conditions [91]. Cell adhesion molecules, distributed over the entire cell surface interact with the surrounding matrix, significantly expanding the spatial organization of integrin receptors in comparison to 2D substrates, which do not resemble the cell arrangement in native tissues (Fig. 20.10). Moreover, the additional dimension provided by 3D substrate modulates integrin ligation, cell contraction, and associated intracellular signalling [167]. Therefore, the dimensionality of the culture environment strongly affects the extent of external mechanical stimuli transferral to the resident cells.

image
20.10 The importance of a 3D environment for tissue engineered constructs. The composition and architecture determine the mechanical properties of the ECM, and modulate how mechanical forces are transferred to the resident cells. Reproduced from [91].

20.5.1 SMCs

SMCs are a functionally key component of a large variety of organs and tissues, part of the cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary, and reproductive apparatuses [168]. Generally, SMCs share a common structure and the active role in the regulation of the tissue or organ functions, while the inducing stimuli differ substantially depending on the origin of the tissue (e.g. vascular and respiratory tone). In fact, SMCs display a phenotypic plasticity to accommodate diverse functions in multiple tissues. They exhibit a multifunctional capacity for contraction, migration, proliferation, synthesis of ECM, and secretion of growth factors [169]. These features allow SMCs to regulate the lumen diameter of hollow organs, through a reversible transient contraction or a chronic reduction/enlargement of the lumen, due to structural remodelling (e.g. vascular aneurism, airway narrowing). Specifically for the airway wall, airway smooth muscle tone acts in concert with the cartilaginous rings and cooperate to strengthen the airways structure, preventing collapse during respiration [18]. ASMCs are frequently involved in pathological mechanisms related to airway diseases [170]; in particular they participate in the inflammatory process and remodelling involved in asthma, due to the ability to modulate their in vivo phenotype in response to variations in the external conditions [171].

In contrast to skeletal muscle cells, SMCs can simultaneously proliferate and express a set of contractile-lineage specific proteins [172]. In response to specific stimuli, SMCs can modulate their phenotype by suppressing the expression of certain contractile protein genes, converting from a differentiated contractile phenotype to a dedifferentiated synthetic phenotype [169]. The phenotypic modulation has been implicated in mechanisms underlying a number of pathological conditions, including atherosclerosis and restenosis post-angioplasty, and airway remodelling in asthma [173, 174].

A similar shift in SMC phenotype is also observed post-extraction from their native site. The subsequent expansion, and culture using traditional culture techniques results in a significant loss of cell functionality [175]. In particular, phenotypic plasticity is typically displayed in proliferative media (i.e. 5–10% serum content), which alters their differentiation state towards a synthetic phenotype. Moreover, low cell density has been associated with a down-regulation of the contractile protein gene expression due to reduced cell–cell contact. Specifically, the influence of serum and the reduction in cell–cell interactions have been demonstrated to be independent and cumulative [176179].

The substrate plays a predominant role in the SMC phenotype regulation, through ECM components that modulate cell integrin-mediated signalling [180]. SMCs removed from their native site and cultured under conventional static conditions (i.e. tissue culture plastic) did not exhibit alignment along a preferential direction [181], together with a shift of phenotype in favour of a proliferative state [182]. In particular, 2D substrate made of highly hydrated type I collagen gel enhances the synthetic state of SMCs [183, 184]. The 3D culture of SMCs within highly hydrated type I collagen gel has also demonstrated the further reduction of the expression of contractile proteins in comparison with monolayers [180, 185].

20.5.2 MSCs

At the stage of human development, progenitor cells are present in a large variety of tissues, while in adults they are mostly prevalent in the bone marrow [186]. MSCs can be easily isolated from the bone marrow, cultured, and expanded under in vitro conditions. Moreover, they can generate a spectrum of specialized mesenchymal tissues, such as bone, cartilage, muscle, marrow stroma, tendon, ligament, fat, and a variety of other connective tissues (Fig. 20.11) [187]. In addition, MSCs produce a variety of bioactive factors, which can serve to structure regenerative microenvironments in case of tissue injury [186]. MSCs possess unique features that make them attractive tools for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. For example, stem cells can replicate in culture while retaining the ability to differentiate into specific lineages, which is in contrast to primary culture where the availability and phenotypic plasticity of cells are limiting factors [188]. In addition, adult stem cells, including MSCs, display decreased immunogenic potential, which may facilitate allogenic transplantation in building damaged or neo-mesenchymal tissues [189]. Under this perspective, the ad-hoc development of 3D culture substrates might allow greater control over MSC fate and ultimately tissue architecture and function [190]. The continuous remodelling of ECM, which comprises degradation and synthesis, alters the elasticity and biochemical cues of the matrix that affect cell activity and differentiation [191]. Recent data has demonstrated that the culture substrate is not to be considered as an inert, solid-state environment. On the contrary, MSC differentiation state and responses reflect culture conditions through multiple physical mechanisms, such as the geometry at the micro- and nanoscale, elasticity, and external mechanical stimuli transferred from the substrate to the cells [192]. In particular, soft matrices (elastic modulus ~ 1 kPa) have been shown to stimulate MSCs towards a neuronal-like phenotype. Increasing in substrate stiffness determined a shift to a myogenic cell fate, whereas the stiffest matrices (Elastic modulus ~ 30–100 kPa) lead to osteoblastic differentiation, due to the similarities with collagenous bone [193, 194]. MSC chondrogenic lineage stimulation has been successfully achieved in vitro by supplementing culture medium with bioactive factors, including dexamethasone and transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1) [195]. Specifically, TGF-β1 has been shown to induce chondrogenesis in MSC preparation as early as day 7, even without the presence of dexamethasone [196].

image
20.11 The mesengenic process. The lineage transitions from the progenitor MSCs to highly differentiated phenotypes. Reproduced from [187].

20.6 Culture conditions: the construction tools

Bioreactors, together with scaffolds and biochemical cues represent the core of all tissue engineering strategies. Bioreactors have been developed to enable controlled regimes for the delivery of multiple growth factors and mechanical stimuli to direct cell growth and differentiation [3]. Specifically, a bioreactor is a tissue culture tool to provide a mechanically active environment where physical, chemical and mechanical stimuli can be independently monitored and controlled. This multi-variable culture system has been proposed as a translational step from the traditional static culture environment to the in vivo animal model, in order to study construct maturation and integration with the capability to control physiological equivalent stimuli. However, the choice of the bioreactor regime is strongly related to the ability of the 3D substrate to respond to and transfer the applied stresses to the resident cells.

20.6.1 Dynamic stimulation of SMCs

SMCs in their native sites are constantly exposed to cyclic mechanical stresses as a result of airflow during tidal breathing or blood flow in the cardiac cycle. Such mechanical forces have been demonstrated to play a fundamental role in regulating SMC alignment, phenotype and contractile function [18, 180]. Cyclic mechanical stimuli are commonly applied to cultures of ASMCs adherent to 2D substrates, which is generally a silicone distensible membrane stretched at a controlled rate [197200]. The need for more physiologically relevant substrates has led to 3D culture systems, in order to resemble the cell organization in their native environment. In particular, SMC orientation can be modulated by the type of mechanical stimuli applied. The stimulation of SMC within tubular structure generally relies on bioreactor systems able to generate cyclic circumferential strains and flow-induced shear stresses [201].

Cells directly exposed to physiological shear stress displayed an orientation parallel to the flux direction, which is an organization consistent with cell arrangement in vivo (e.g. ephitelium) [202, 203]. In addition, SMC orientation is dependent on the magnitude of cyclic stretch applied. SMCs exhibited an alignment parallel to the stress direction at low values of strain (2%) [203, 204], while at higher strains (> 5–10%) they arranged perpendicular to the stress in order to limit cellular damage due to the excessive strain [205208]. Moreover, SMC orientation parallel to the direction of the stretch (i.e. circumferentially) has been reported only for cells seeded within compliant 3D tubular substrates (e.g. type I collagen hybridized with biodegradable elastomers) exposed to low values of strain [203, 204, 209, 210], as reported in Plate XII (between pages 354 and 355). In comparison SMCs, cultured and stimulated with pulsatile flow or cyclic stretching on 2D substrates (e.g. silicone), exhibited an arrangement perpendicular to the strain and independent of the extent of strain [206208, 211213]. Table 20.1 summarizes the main parameters previously reported to stimulate SMCs extracted from various sites.

Table 20.1

Summary of SMC dynamic mechanical stimulation parameters and responses, in vitro

Authors Material Scaffold geometry Cell distribution Type of stimulation Duration of stimulation Cell alignment Cell differentiation state
Kim et al. [214] Poly(glycolide-co-ε-caprolactone) Tubular 2D Cyclic strain (5%) 4 weeks Parallel to the strain Upregulation of αSMA and MHC
Jeong et al. [215] Poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) Tubular 3D Pulsatile strain (5%) and shear stress (ND) 8 weeks Parallel to the strain Upregulation of αSMA
Jeong et al. [204] Marine collagen and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Tubular 3D Pulsatile strain (5%) and shear stress (ND) 3 weeks Parallel to the strain Upregulation of αSMA and MHC
Zhao et al. [212] Silicone Tubular 2D Pulsatile strain (7%) and shear stress (3 dyne/cm2) 24 hours Parallel to the flux NR
Kanda et al. [209] Type I collagen coated polyurethane Tubular 3D Pulsatile strain (7%) and shear stress (3 dyne/cm2) 10 days Parallel to the flux (inner layer) and to the strain (outer layer) NR
Liu et al. [207] Silicone Planar 2D Cyclic stretching (10%) 24 hours Perpendicular to the strain NR
Cha et al. [206] Type I collagen coated polyurethane Planar 3D Cyclic stretching (10%) 24 hours Perpendicular to the strain Upregulation of αSMA
Lee et al. [210] Poly(glycerol sebacate) Tubular 3D Cyclic stretching (NR) and shear stress (15 dyne/cm2) 3 weeks Perpendicular to the strain Upregulation of αSMA, calponin
Fairbank et al. [213] Type I collagen coated silicone Planar 2D Cyclic stretching (5%) 5 days Perpendicular to the strain Upregulation of MLCK
Morioka et al. [208] Type I collagen coated silicone Planar 2D Cyclic stretching (20%) 2 hours Perpendicular to the strain NR
Ghezzi et al. [203] Type I collagen gel Tubular 3D Pulsatile strain (5%) and shear stress (3.2 dyn/cm2) 7 days Parallel to the flux (inner wall) and to the strain (outer wall) Upregulation of Acta2, MLCK, Cald-1, SM22, αSMA and MHC

Image

Not defined (ND), not reported (NR), smooth muscle actin (SMA), myosin heavy chain (MHC), myosin light chain kinase (MLCK).

20.6.2 Dynamic stimulation of MSCs

MSCs have been widely used in combination with bioreactor-based systems in order to stimulate in vitro growth and expansion, while preventing dedifferentiation [216218]. Dynamic culture systems in 3D have been proposed as effective alternative to traditional 2D culture models, in order to gain better control of the culture conditions as well as to mimic the dynamic 3D architecture of the native environment. A large variety of bioreactors have been adopted for the culture, growth, and maturation of MSCs within 3D constructs, including fixed-beds [219], stirred suspension [220], rotating wall vessels [221], and the most exploited category, perfusion chambers [222]. Perfusion culture was developed in order to mimic the physiological supply of nutrients within the tissue. It is generally based on the steady flow of media over or though a cell-seeded construct [223]. Perfusion systems, in comparison to stirred or suspended mechanisms, determine a more uniform distribution of cells at the seeding stage. In addition, MSC expansion and differentiation in perfused 3D scaffolds have been shown to be the most effective [220], improving specifically structure, function, and biological properties of engineered cartilage and bone constructs [224, 225]. In the case of airway tracts, a dedicated bioreactor in a double-chamber rotating configuration for the culture of MSCs in a decellularized trachea was previously developed for the development of tissue engineered hollow organs (Fig. 20.12) [67, 226]. The bioreactor was designed in order to facilitate cell-seeding procedures, to enhance oxygenation of the culture medium and mass transport, and to stimulate the resident cells with hydrodynamic stimuli, which have been shown to promote cell metabolic activity and the differentiation process towards chondrogenic lineage.

image
20.12 Bioreactor design for MSC culture within engineered tubular structures. Three-dimensional view of the bioreactor assembly (a) and exploded view of its components (b) to support 3D maturation of the construct and to provide appropriate hydrodynamic stimuli and adequate mass transfer. Adapted from [226].

Furthermore, numerous studies have shown that mechanical stimulation plays an important role in MSC differentiation towards chondrogenic, osteogenic, and contractile lineages [211, 227229]. In particular, MSC contractile phenotype can be stimulated through cyclic mechanical strain, as summarized in Table 20.2. The application of mechanical stimuli also induces a preferential MSC alignment on 2D or within the 3D substrate. MSCs have been generally shown to align only in the direction perpendicular to the strain applied (parallel to the flow, in case of tubular geometry) [211, 230233], in contrast with in vivo evidences of SMCs subjected to similar stimuli, which align parallel to the strain (i.e. circumferential direction) or in an helical pattern [227]. In addition, the extent of cyclic strain would influence the alignment of MSC in order to prevent cell body damages for strain greater than 5% [230233].

Table 20.2

Summary of MSC dynamic mechanical stimulation parameters and responses

Authors Material Scaffold geometry Cell distribution Type of stimulation Duration of stimulation Cell alignment Cell differentiation state
Hamilton et al. [230] Type I collagen coated silicone membrane Planar 2D Cyclic strain (10%) 7 days Perpendicular to the strain Up-regulation of αSMA and Calp1
Huang et al. [231] Silicone membrane Planar 2D Cyclic strain (10%) and shear stress (10 dyn/cm2) 24 hours Perpendicular to the strain
Parallel to the flow
Up-regulation of contractile markers, greater under strain
Park et al. [232] Type I collagen and elastin coated silicone membrane Planar 2D Pulsatile strain (10%) 24 hours Perpendicular to the strain Up-regulation of αSMA and SM22α
O’Cearbhaill et al. [211] Silicone Tubular 2D Pulsatile strain (5%) and shear stress (10 dyn/cm2) 24 hours Parallel to the flux Up-regulation of αSMA and calponin
O’Cearbhaill et al. [234] Fibrin gel supported by silicone sleeve Tubular 2D and 3D Cyclic strain (5%) 24 hours NR Up-regulation of αSMA and SM22α
Nieponice et al. [233] Fibrin gel Planar 3D Cyclic strain (7%) 7 days Perpendicular to the strain Up-regulation of αSMA and calponin
Kurpinski et al. [227] Silicone Planar 2D Cyclic strain (5%) 2–4 days Perpendicular to the strain Up-regulation of Calp-1 and down-regulation of chondrogenic markers
Sarraf et al. [235] Type I collagen gel Planar 3D Cyclic strain (ND) 24 hours NR Upr-egulation of αSMA
Khan et al. [236] Type I collagen Tubular 3D Shear stress (3–4 dyne/cm2) 21 days NR Up-regulation of αSMA, desm

Image

Not defined (ND), not reported (NR), smooth muscle actin (SMA).

20.7 Conclusions and future trends

Tissue models aim to provide a close replica of the native tissues, in order to mimic their microstructure, geometry, and functionalities in vitro. Therefore, the tubular dense collagen constructs described in this chapter may be beneficial as in vitro airway tissue models for preclinical studies to mimic pathological mechanisms (e.g. inflammatory and degenerative diseases) in a relevant biomechanical environment, as alternatives to simple tissue culture techniques or complex animal models, as well as providing new insights into the physiology of the native tissue. In particular, such tissue models could be implemented to validate selected drug efficacy and efficiency for asthma and cystic fibrosis treatments on mucociliary and muscle cells in physiological 3D environments, in comparison to simplistic traditional 2D treated culture substrates.

Future investigations could also implement MSC-seeded tubular constructs in combination with epithelium coverage of the lumen to investigate the interplay of the airway epithelium, smooth muscle, cartilagelike insertions, and biomechanical forces. The dynamic culture system could also be increased in complexity by providing a cyclic stimulation of humid air-flow instead of culture media, in order to reproduce more closely the physiological stimuli through the native flow.

Furthermore, with respect to the physiologically relevant mechanical properties of the tubular dense collagen-based constructs, in addition to the potential airway tract replacement, these could also be considered in other tissue engineering scenarios including the regeneration of blood vessels, urinary, and gastrointestinal tracts.

20.8 References

1. Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2009;8:457–470.

2. Metcalfe AD, Ferguson MWJ. Tissue engineering of replacement skin: the crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration. J Royal Soc Interface. 2007;4:413–417.

3. Freed LE, Guilak F, Guo XE, et al. Advanced tools for tissue engineering: scaffolds, bioreactors, and signaling. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:3285–3305.

4. Delaere P, Vranckx J, Verleden G, De Leyn P, Van Raemdonck D. Tracheal allotransplantation after withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy. New Engl J Med. 2010;362:138–145.

5. Basu J, Ludlow JW. Platform technologies for tubular organ regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:526–533.

6. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801–809.

7. Conte MS. The ideal small arterial substitute: a search for the Holy Grail? FASEB J. 1998;12:43–45.

8. Pevec WC, Darling RC, Litalien GJ, Abbott WM. Femoropopliteal reconstruction with knitted, nonvelour dacron versus expanded polytetrafluorethylene. J Vasc Surg. 1992;16:60–65.

9. Sayers RD, Raptis S, Berce M, Miller JH. Long-term results of femorotibial bypass with vein or polytetrafluoroethylene. Br J Surgery. 1998;85:934–938.

10. Herring M, Smith J, Dalsing M, et al. Endothelial seeding of polutetrafluoroethylene femoral popliteal bypass – the failure of low-density seeding to improve patency. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:650–655.

11. Weinberg CB, Bell E. A blood-vessel model constructed from collagen and cultured vascular cells. Science. 1986;231:397–400.

12. L’Heureux N, Germain L, Labbe R, Auger FA. In vitro construction of a human blood-vessel from cultured vascular cells – a morphologic study. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:499–509.

13. Hirai J, Kanda K, Oka T, Matsuda T. Highly oriented, tubular hybrid vascular tissue for a low pressure circulatory system. Asaio J. 1994;40:M383–388.

14. Tranquillo RT, Girton TS, Bromberek BA, Triebes TG, Mooradian DL. Magnetically orientated tissue-equivalent tubes: application to a circumferentially orientated media-equivalent. Biomaterials. 1996;17:349–357.

15. Girton TS, Oegema TR, Tranquillo RT. Exploiting glycation to stiffen and strengthen tissue equivalents for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;46:87–92.

16. L’Heureux N, Paquet S, Labbe R, Germain L, Auger FA. A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel. FASEB J. 1998;12:47–56.

17. Niklason LE, Gao J, Abbott WM, et al. Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science. 1999;284:489–493.

18. Kamm RD. Airway wall mechanics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 1999;1:47–72.

19. Ott L, Weatherly R, Detamore M. Overview of tracheal tissue engineering: clinical need drives the laboratory approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39:2091–2113.

20. Doss AE, Dunn SS, Kucera KA, Clemson LA, Zwischenberger JB. Tracheal replacements: part 2. ASAIO J. 2007;53:631–639.

21. Grillo HC. Development of tracheal surgery: a historical review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:610–619.

22. Heatley DG, Clary RA, Lusk RP, Garner FT. Auricular cartilage versus costal cartilage as a grafting material in experimental laryngotracheal reconstruction. The Laryngoscope. 1995;105:983–987.

23. Rollin AD, Tagliaferro RM, Schaffarzick WR. Experimental studies on the repair of wounds and defects of the trachea and bronchi. Dise Chest. 1950;17:426–441.

24. Idriss F, DeLeon S, Ilbawi M, Gerson C, Tucker G, Holinger L. Tracheoplasty with pericardial patch for extensive tracheal stenosis in infants and children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;88:527–536.

25. Azorin JF, Bertin F, Martinod E, Laskar M. Tracheal replacement with an aortic autograft. Europ J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2006;29:261–263.

26. Rob CG, Bateman GH. Reconstruction of the trachea and cervical oesophagus; preliminary report. Br J Surg. 1949;37:202–205.

27. Pearson FG, Henderson RD, Gross AE, Ginsberg RJ, Stone RM. The reconstruction of circumferential tracheal defects with a porous prosthesis. An experimental and clinical study using heavy Marlex mesh J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1968;55:605–616.

28. Eckersberger F, Moritz E, Wolner E. Circumferential tracheal replacement with costal cartilage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;94:175–180.

29. Barker WS, Litton WB. Bladder osteogenesis aids tracheal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol. 1973;98:422–425.

30. Kucera KA, Doss AE, Dunn SS, Clemson LA, Zwischenberger JB. Tracheal replacements: part 1. ASAIO J. 2007;53:497–505.

31. Farr HW, Jean-Gilles B, Die A. Cervical island skin flap repair of oral and pharyngeal defects in the composite operation for cancer. American J Surg. 1969;118:759–763.

32. Fonkalsrud E, Plested W. Tracheobronchial reconstruction with autologous periosteum. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1966;52:666–674.

33. Shinohara H, Yuzuriha S, Matsuo K, Kushima H, Kondoh S. Tracheal reconstruction with a prefabricated deltopectoral flap combined with costal cartilage graft and palatal mucosal graft. Ann Plastic Surg. 2004;53:278–281.

34. Watson J, Donald PJ, Gourley IM. Composite vascularized free-rib and pleural transfer for laryngotracheal reconstruction. Otolaryngology – Head Neck Surg. 1983;91:384–395.

35. Dumon JF, Cavaliere S, Diaz-Jimenez JP, et al. Seven-year experience with the dumon prosthesis. J Bronchol. 1996;3:6–10.

36. In: http://www.bosmed.com/pulmonology/novatech-dumontm-tracheal-and-bronchial-stents.html; April 27, 2012.

37. In: http://www.bostonscientific.com/Device.bsci?page=HCP_Overview&navRelId=1000.1003&method=DevDetailHCP&id=10069892&pageDisclaimer=Disclaimer.ProductPage; April 27, 2012.

38. Saito Y, Imamura H. Airway stenting. Surg Today. 2005;35:265–270.

39. In: http://www.bostonscientific.com/Device.bsci?page=HCP_Overview&navRelId=1000.1003&method=DevDetailHCP&id=10005791&pageDisclaimer=Disclaimer.ProductPage; April 27, 2012.

40. In: http://www.bostonscientific.com/Device.bsci?page=HCP_Overview&navRelId=1000.1003&method=DevDetailHCP&id=10005241&pageDisclaimer=Disclaimer.ProductPage; April 27, 2012.

41. Beattie Jr EJ, Blades B, Keshishian JM. Tracheal reconstruction. J Thorac Surg. 1956;32:707–725 discussion, 25–27.

42. Michelson E, Solomon R, Maun L, Ramirez J. Experiments in tracheal reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1961;41:748–759.

43. Shaw RR, Aslami A, Webb WR. Circumferential replacement of the trachea in experimental animals. Ann Thorac Surg. 1968;5:30–35.

44. Burnett Jr CA, Stanley AL, Stringer CJ. Tracheal replacement with polyethylene tubes and report of case. J Maine Med Assoc. 1962;53:112–114.

45. Beall Jr AC, Harrington OB, Greenberg SD, Morris Jr GC, Usher FC. Tracheal replacement with heavy Marlex mesh Circumferential replacement of the cervical trachea. Arch Surg. 1962;84:390–396 (Chicago, Ill: 1960).

46. Spinazzola AJ, Graziano JL, Neville WE. Experimental reconstruction of the tracheal carina. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;58:1–13.

47. Borrie J, Redshaw NR, Dobbinson TL. Silastic tracheal bifurcation prosthesis with subterminal dacron suture cuffs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;65:956–962.

48. Demos NJ, Mitnick H, McCally D. Tracheal regeneration in long term survivors with silicone prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1973;16:293–300.

49. Betlejewski S, Burduk D, Mackiewicz H, Owczarek A, Winiarski P. Experimental tracheal reconstruction in the rabbit. Med Sci Monitor. 1998;4:607–610.

50. Kramish D, Morfit HM. The use of a teflon prosthesis to bridge complete sleeve defects in the human trachea. Am J Surg. 1963;106:704–708.

51. Cull DL, Lally KP, Mair EA, Daidone M, Parsons DS. Tracheal reconstruction with polytetrafluoroethylene graft in dogs. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:899–901.

52. Villegas-Cabello O, Vazquez-Juarez JL, Gutierrez-Perez FM, Davila-Cordova RF, Diaz-Montemayor C. Staged replacement of the canine trachea with ringed polyethylene terephthalate grafts. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;42:302–305.

53. Osada H, Takeuchi S, Kojima K, Yamate N. The first step of experimental study on hybrid trachea: Use of cultured fibroblasts with artificial matrix. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;35:165–168.

54. Choi H-S, Suh H, Lee J-H, et al. A polyethylene glycol grafted bi-layered polyurethane scaffold: preliminary study of a new candidate prosthesis for repair of a partial tracheal defect. Europ Arch OtoRhino-Laryngol. 2008;265:809–816.

55. Leake D, Habal M, Pizzoferrato A, Vespucci A. Prosthetic replacement of large defects of the cervical trachea in dogs. Biomaterials. 1985;6:17–22.

56. Neville WE, Bolanowski PJP, Kotia GG. Clinical experience with the silicone tracheal prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99:604–613.

57. Hayashi A. An experimental study of successful tracheal replacement using pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle flap and soft Marlex mesh. J Jap Assoc Thorac Surg. 1991;39:144–153.

58. Teramachi M, Okumura N, Nakamura T, et al. Intrathoracic tracheal reconstruction with a collagen-conjugated prosthesis: evaluation of the efficacy of omental wrapping. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:701–711.

59. Shaha A, DiMaio T, Money S, Krespi Y, Jaffe BM. Prosthetic reconstruction of the trachea. Am J Surg. 1988;156:306–309.

60. Nelson RJ, Goldberg L, White RA. Neovascularity of a tracheal prosthesis/tissue complex. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:800–808.

61. Bailey BJ, Kosoy J. Observations in the development of tracheal prostheses and tracheal transplantation. Laryngoscope. 1970;80:1553–1565.

62. Sekine T, Nakamura T, Liu Y, Ueda H, Matsumoto K, Shimizu Y. Collagen coated Y-shaped prosthesis for carinal replacement promotes regeneration of the tracheal epithelium. ASAIO J. 2000;46:421–425.

63. Okumura N, Nakamura T, Natsume T, Tomihata K, Ikada Y, Shimizu Y. Experimental study on a new tracheal prosthesis made from collagen-conjugated mesh. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108:337–345.

64. Moghissi K. Tracheal reconstruction with a prosthesis of Marlex mesh and pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;69:499–506.

65. Badylak SF, Weiss DJ, Caplan A, MacChiarini P. Engineered whole organs and complex tissues. Lancet. 2012;379:943–952.

66. Ott HC, Matthiesen TS, Goh SK, et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat Med. 2008;14:213–221.

67. Macchiarini P, Jungebluth P, Go T, et al. Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet. 2008;372:2023–2030.

68. Wu W, Liu Y, Zhao Y. Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet. 2009;373:717.

69. Delaere PR, Hermans R. Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet. 2009;373:717–718.

70. Zhang P, Luo X, Wang H. Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet. 2009;373:718.

71. Baiguera S, Del Gaudio C, Jaus MO, et al. Long-term changes to in vitro preserved bioengineered human trachea and their implications for decellularized tissues. Biomaterials. 2012;33:3662–3672.

72. Remlinger NT, Czajka CA, Juhas ME, et al. Hydrated xenogeneic decellularized tracheal matrix as a scaffold for tracheal reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3520–3526.

73. Tani G, Usui N, Kamiyama M, Oue T, Fukuzawa M. In vitro construction of scaffold-free cylindrical cartilage using cell sheet-based tissue engineering. Pediatric Surg Int. 2010;26:179–185.

74. Gilpin DA, Weidenbecher MS, Dennis JE. Scaffold-free tissue-engineered cartilage implants for laryngotracheal reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:612–617.

75. Vacanti CA, Paige KT, Kim WS, Sakata J, Upton J, Vacanti JP. Experimental tracheal replacement using tissue-engineered cartilage. J Pediatric Surg. 1994;29:201–205.

76. Sakata J, Vacanti CA, Schloo B, Healy GB, Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tracheal composites tissue engineered from chondrocytes, tracheal epithelial-cells, and synthetic degradable scaffolding. Transplant Proc. 1994;26:3309–3310.

77. Kojima K, Bonassar LJ, Roy AK, Vacanti CA, Cortiella J. Autologous tissue-engineered trachea with sheep nasal chondrocytes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:1177–1184.

78. Kojima K, Bonassar LJ, Ignotz RA, Syed K, Cortiella J, Vacanti CA. Comparison of tracheal and nasal chondrocytes for tissue engineering of the trachea. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1884–1888.

79. Jungebluth P, Alici E, Baiguera S, et al. Tracheobronchial transplantation with a stem-cell-seeded bioartificial nanocomposite: a proof-of-concept study. Lancet. 2011;378:1997–2004.

80. Yoshiyuki K. Experimental study of artificial trachea made from collagen. J Showa Med Assoc. 2001;61:458–467.

81. Davenport EA, Nettesheim P. Regulation of mucociliary differentiation of rat tracheal epithelial cells by type I collagen gel substratum. Am J Respiratory Cell and Molec Biol. 1996;14:19–26.

82. Dunham B, Flint P, Singhal S, Visage CL, Leong K. Tracheal tissue engineering. In: Bronzino JD, ed. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook. Taylor & Francis Group 2006.

83. Henderson JH, Welter JF, Mansour JM, Niyibizi C, Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Cartilage tissue engineering for laryngotracheal reconstruction: comparison of chondrocytes from three anatomic locations in the rabbit. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:843–853.

84. Weidenbecher M, Henderson JH, Tucker HM, Baskin JZ, Awadallah A, Dennis JE. Hyaluronan-Based scaffolds to tissue-engineer cartilage implants for laryngotracheal reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1745–1749.

85. Ni Y, Zhao X, Zhou L, et al. Radiologic and histologic characterization of silk fibroin as scaffold coating for rabbit tracheal defect repair. Otolaryngology – Head Neck Surg. 2008;139:256–261.

86. Komura M, Komura H, Kanamori Y, et al. An animal model study for tissue-engineered trachea fabricated from a biodegradable scaffold using chondrocytes to augment repair of tracheal stenosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:2141–2146.

87. Omori K, Nakamura T, Kanemaru S, et al. Regenerative medicine of the trachea: the first human case. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114:429–433.

88. Lin CH, Su JM, Hsu SH. Evaluation of type II collagen scaffolds reinforced by poly(epsilon-caprolactone) as tissue-engineered trachea. Tissue Eng Part C – Methods. 2008;14:69–77.

89. Lin CH, Hsu SH, Huang CE, Cheng WT, Su JM. A scaffold-bioreactor system for a tissue-engineered trachea. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4117–4126.

90. Kojima K, Ignotz RA, Kushibiki T, Tinsley KW, Tabata Y, Vacanti CA. Tissue-engineered trachea from sheep marrow stromal cells with transforming growth factor β2 released from biodegradable microspheres in a nude rat recipient. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:147–153.

91. Griffith LG, Swartz MA. Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:211–224.

92. Griffith LG, Naughton G. Tissue engineering – current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science. 2002;295:1009–1014.

93. Agarwal AR, Mih J, George SC. Expression of matrix proteins in an in vitro model of airway remodeling in asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2003;24:35–42.

94. Choe MM, Tomei AA, Swartz MA. Physiological 3D tissue model of the airway wall and mucosa. Nat Protocols. 2006;1:357–362.

95. In: http://www.mattek.com/pages/products/epiairway/applications/; May 22, 2012.

96. Miller C, George S, Niklason L. Developing a tissue-engineered model of the human bronchiole. J Tissue Eng Regenerative Med. 2010;4:619–627.

97. Ghezzi CE, Marelli B, Muja N, Nazhat SN. Immediate production of a tubular dense collagen construct with bioinspired mechanical properties. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:1813–1825.

98. van der Rest M, Garrone R. Collagen family of proteins. FASEB J. 1991;5:2814–2823.

99. Burgeson RE, Nimni ME. Collagen types – molecular-structure and tissue distribution. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1992;250–272.

100. Li S-T. Biologic biomaterials: tissue-derived biomaterials (collagen). In: Bronzino JD, ed. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook. Taylor & Francis Group 2006.

101. Ricard-Blum S, Ruggiero F, van der Rest M. The collagen superfamily. In: Brinckmann J, Notbohm H, Müller PK, eds. Collagen. Springer 2005;35–84.

102. Wess T. Collagen fibrillar structure and hierarchies. In: Fratzl P, ed. Collagen: Structure and Mechanics. Springer LCC 2008.

103. Yannas IV. Natural materials. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, eds. Biomaterials Science. Elsevier Academic Press 2004.

104. Gelse K, Pöschl E, Aigner T. Collagens – structure, function, and biosynthesis. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2003;55:1531–1546.

105. Kadler KE, Holmes DF, Trotter JA, Chapman JA. Collagen fibril formation. Biochem J. 1996;316:1–11.

106. Gautieri A, Vesentini S, Redaelli A, Buehler MJ. Hierarchical structure and nanomechanics of collagen microfibrils from the atomistic scale up. Nano Lett. 2011;11:757–766.

107. Lee CH, Singla A, Lee Y. Biomedical applications of collagen. Int J Pharmac. 2001;221:1–22.

108. Gross J. The behavior of collagen units as a model in morphogenesis. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956;2:261–274.

109. Kadler K. Extracellular matrix 1: fibril-forming collagens. Protein Profile. 1994;1:519–638.

110. Miyata T, Taira T, Noishiki Y. Collagen engineering for biomaterial use. Clin Mater. 1992;9:139–148.

111. Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1–13.

112. Cen L, Liu W, Cui L, Zhang W, Cao Y. Collagen tissue engineering: development of novel biomaterials and applications. Pediatric Res. 2008;63:492–496.

113. Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Berthod F. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials. 2010;3:1863–1887.

114. Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3675–3683.

115. Steven FS, Jackson DS. Purification and amino acid composition of monomeric and polymeric collagens. Biochem J. 1967;104:534–536.

116. Rajan N, Habermehl J, Coté MF, Doillon CJ, Mantovani D. Preparation of ready-to-use, storable and reconstituted type I collagen from rat tail tendon for tissue engineering applications. Nature Protocols. 2007;1:2753–2758.

117. Gross J, Highberger JH, Schmitt FO. Extraction of collagen from connective tissue by neutral salt solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1955;41:1–7.

118. Miller EJ, Kent Rhodes R. Preparation and characterization of the different types of collagen. In: Leon W, Cunningham DWF, eds. Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press 1982;33–64.

119. RubinAL Pfahl D, Speakman PT, Davidson PF, Schmitt FO. Tropocollagen: significance of protease-induced alterations. Science. 1963;139:37–39.

120. Miller EJ. Structural studies on cartilage collagen employing limited cleavage and solubilization with pepsin. Biochemistry. 1972;11:4903–4909.

121. Zhang Z, Li G, Shi B. Physicochemical properties of collagen, gelatin and collagen hydrolysate derived from bovine limed split wastes. J Soc Leather Technol Chem. 2006;90:23–28.

122. Chandrakasan G, Torchia DA, Piez KA. Preparation of intact monomeric collagen from rat tail tendon and skin and the structure of the nonhelical ends in solution. J Biol Chem. 1976;251:6062–6067.

123. Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4337–4351.

124. Roeder BA, Kokini K, Sturgis JE, Robinson JP, Voytik-Harbin SL. Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure. J Biomech Eng. 2002;124:214–222.

125. Tower TT, Neidert MR, Tranquillo RT. Fiber alignment imaging during mechanical testing of soft tissues. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30:1221–1233.

126. Sander EA, Barocas VH. Biomimetic collagen tissues: collagenous tissue engineering and other applications. In: Fratzl P, ed. Collagen – Structure and Mechanics. Springer 2008;477.

127. Chandran PL, Barocas VH. Deterministic material-based averaging theory model of collagen gel micromechanics. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129:137–147.

128. Thevenot P, Nair A, Dey J, Yang J, Tang LP. Method to analyze three-dimensional cell distribution and infiltration in degradable scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C – Methods. 2008;14:319–331.

129. Grillo HC, Gross J. Thermal reconstitution of collagen from solution and the response to its heterologous implantation. J Surg Res. 1962;2:69–82.

130. Weiss P. Cellular dynamics Rev Modern Phys. 1959;31:11–20.

131. Grinnell F, Petroll WM. Cell motility and mechanics in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010;335–361.

132. Elsdale T, Bard J. Collagen substrata for studies on cell behavior. J Cell Biol. 1972;54:626–637.

133. Bell E, Ivarsson B, Merrill C. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:1274–1278.

134. Bell E, Ehrlich HP, Buttle DJ, Nakatshji T. Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent tissue of full thickness. Science. 1981;211:1052–1054.

135. In: http://www.organogenesis.com/products/bioactive_woundhealing/apligraf.html; May 20, 2012.

136. Falanga V, Sabolinski MA. bilayered living skin construct (APLIGRAF®) accelerates complete closure of hard-to-heal venous ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7:201–207.

137. Nevins ML. Tissue-engineered bilayered cell therapy for the treatment of oral mucosal defects: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2010;30:31–39.

138. Zerris VA, James KS, Roberts JB, Bell E, Heilman CB. Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;83B:580–588.

139. In: http://www.apligraf.com/professional/what_is_apligraf/index.html; May 20, 2012.

140. Postlethwaite AE, Seyer JM, Kang AH. Chemotactic attraction of human fibroblasts to type-I, type-2, and type-3 collagens and collagen-derived peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75:871–875.

141. Stella JA, D’Amore A, Wagner WR, Sacks MS. On the biomechanical function of scaffolds for engineering load-bearing soft tissues. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2365–2381.

142. Guidry C, Grinnell F. Heparin modulates the organization of hydrated collagen gels and inhibits gel contraction by fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1987;104:1097–1103.

143. Feng Z, Yamato M, Akutsu T, Nakamura T, Okano T, Umezu M. Investigation on the mechanical properties of contracted collagen gels as a scaffold for tissue engineering. Artif Organs. 2003;27:84–91.

144. Sengupta S, Park S-H, Seok GE, et al. Quantifying osteogenic cell degradation of silk biomaterials. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:3592–3599.

145. Helary C, Bataille I, Abed A, et al. Concentrated collagen hydrogels as dermal substitutes. Biomaterials. 2010;31:481–490.

146. Damink L, Dijkstra PJ, Vanluyn MJA, Vanwachem PB, Nieuwenhuis P, Feijen J. Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using hexamethylene diisocyanate. J Mater Sci – Mater Med. 1995;6:429–434.

147. Damink L, Dijkstra PJ, Vanluyn MJA, Vanwachem PB, Nieuwenhuis P, Feijen J. Glutaraldehyde as a cross-linking agent for collagen-based biomaterials. J Mater Sci – Mater Med. 1995;6:460–472.

148. Vanluyn MJA, Vanwachem PB, Damink LO, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J, Nieuwenhuis P. Relations between in vitro cytotoxicity and cross-linked dermal sheep collagens. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:1091–1110.

149. Chan BP, Chan OCM, So KF. Effects of photochemical crosslinking on the microstructure of collagen and a feasibility study on controlled protein release. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1627–1636.

150. Chan BP, So KF. Photochemical crosslinking improves the physicochemical properties of collagen scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A. 2005;75A:689–701.

151. Ibusuki S, Halbesma GJ, Randolph MA, Redmond RW, Kochevar IE, Gill TJ. Photochemically cross-linked collagen gels as three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:1995–2001.

152. Chau DYS, Collighan RJ, Verderio EAM, Addy VL, Griffin M. The cellular response to transglutaminase-cross-linked collagen. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6518–6529.

153. Orban JM, Wilson LB, Kofroth JA, El-Kurdi MS, Maul TM, Vorp DA. Crosslinking of collagen gels by transglutaminase. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A. 2004;68A:756–762.

154. Charulatha V, Rajaram A. Influence of different crosslinking treatments on the physical properties of collagen membranes. Biomaterials. 2003;24:759–767.

155. Abou Neel EA, Cheema U, Knowles JC, Brown RA, Nazhat SN. Use of multiple unconfined compression for control of collagen gel scaffold density and mechanical properties. Soft Matter. 2006;2:986–992.

156. Brown RA, Wiseman M, Chuo CB, Cheema U, Nazhat SN. Ultrarapid engineering of biomimetic materials and tissues: fabrication of nano-and microstructures by plastic compression. Adv Funct Mater. 2005;15:1762–1770.

157. Bitar M, Brown RA, Salih V, Kidane AG, Knowles JC, Nazhat SN. Effect of cell density on osteoblastic differentiation and matrix degradation of biomimetic dense collagen scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:129–135.

158. Buxton PG, Bitar M, Gellynck K, et al. Dense collagen matrix accelerates osteogenic differentiation and rescues the apoptotic response to MMP inhibition. Bone. 2008;43:377–385.

159. Marelli B, Ghezzi CE, Barralet JE, Nazhat SN. Collagen gel fibrillar density dictates the extent of mineralization in vitro. Soft Matter. 2011;7:9898–9907.

160. Pedraza CE, Marelli B, Chicatun F, McKee MD, Nazhat SN. An in vitro assessment of a cell-containing collagenous extracellular matrix-like scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:781–793.

161. Chicatun F, Pedraza CE, Ghezzi CE, et al. Osteoid-mimicking dense collagen/chitosan hybrid gels. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:2946–2956.

162. Marelli B, Ghezzi CE, Alessandrino A, Barralet JE, Freddi G, Nazhat SN. Silk fibroin derived polypeptide-induced biomineralization of collagen. Biomaterials. 2012;33:102–108.

163. Marelli B, Ghezzi CE, Mohn D, et al. Accelerated mineralization of dense collagen-nano bioactive glass hybrid gels increases scaffold stiffness and regulates osteoblastic function. Biomaterials. 2011;32:8915–8926.

164. Marelli B, Ghezzi CE, Barralet JE, Boccaccini AR, Nazhat SN. Three-dimensional mineralization of dense nanofibrillar collagen-bioglass hybrid scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:1470–1479.

165. Cummings CL, Gawlitta D, Nerem RM, Stegemann JP. Properties of engineered vascular constructs made from collagen, fibrin, and collagen‚ fibrin mixtures. Biomaterials. 2004;25:3699–3706.

166. Yamane S, Iwasaki N, Majima T, et al. Feasibility of chitosan-based hyaluronic acid hybrid biomaterial for a novel scaffold in cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:611–619.

167. Roskelley CD, Desprez PY, Bissell MJ. Extracellular matrix-dependent tissue-specific gene expression in mammary epithelial cells requires both physical and biochemical signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12378–12382.

168. Rodríguez LV, Alfonso Z, Zhang R, Leung J, Wu B, Ignarro LJ. Clonogenic multipotent stem cells in human adipose tissue differentiate into functional smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:12167–12172.

169. Halayko AJ, Solway J. Invited review: molecular mechanisms of phenotypic plasticity in smooth muscle cells. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90:358–368.

170. Solway J, Fredberg JJ. Perhaps airway smooth muscle dysfunction contributes to asthmatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness after all. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1997;17:144–146.

171. Siddiqui S, Martin JG. Structural aspects of airway remodeling in asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008;8:540–547.

172. Solway J, Seltzer J, Samaha FF, et al. Structure and expression of a smooth muscle cell-specific gene, SM22alpha. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:13460–13469.

173. James AL, Paré PD, Hogg JC. The mechanics of airway narrowing in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1989;139:242–246.

174. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis – an update. New Engl J Med. 1986;314:488–500.

175. Halayko AJ, Salari H, Ma X, Stephens NL. Markers of airway smooth muscle cell phenotype. Am J Physiol – Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 1996;270:L1040–L1051.

176. Bowers CW, Dahm LM. Maintenance of contractility in dissociated smooth muscle: low-density cultures in a defined medium. Am J Physiol – Cell Physiol. 1993;264:C229–C236.

177. Ma X, Wang Y, Stephens NL. Serum deprivation induces a unique hypercontractile phenotype of cultured smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol – Cell Physiol. 1998;274:C1206–C1214.

178. Kato S, Shanley JR, Fox JC. Serum stimulation, cell-cell interactions, and extracellular matrix independently influence smooth muscle cell phenotype in vitro. Am J Pathol. 1996;149:687–697.

179. Wong JZ, Woodcock-Mitchell J, Mitchell J, et al. Smooth muscle actin and myosin expression in cultured airway smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol – Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 1998;274:L786–L792.

180. Stegemann JP, Hong H, Nerem RM. Mechanical, biochemical, and extracellular matrix effects on vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98:2321–2327.

181. Dartsch PC, Hammerle H. Orientation response of arterial smooth muscle cells to mechanical stimulation. European J Cell Biol. 1986;41:339–346.

182. Thyberg J. Differentiated properties and proliferation of arterial smooth muscle cells in culture. Int Rev Cytol. 1996;169:183–265.

183. Dekkers BGJ, Schaafsma D, Nelemans SA, Zaagsma J, Meurs H. Extracellular matrix proteins differentially regulate airway smooth muscle phenotype and function. Am J Physiol – Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;292:L1405–L1413.

184. Yamamoto M, Yamamoto K, Noumura T. Type I collagen promotes modulation of cultured rabbit arterial smooth muscle cells from a contractile to a synthetic phenotype. Exp Cell Res. 1993;204:121–129.

185. Li S, Lao J, Chen BPC, et al. Genomic analysis of smooth muscle cells in 3-dimensional collagen matrix. FASEB J. 2003;17:97–99.

186. Caplan AI. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213:341–347.

187. Caplan AI, Bruder SP. Mesenchymal stem cells: building blocks for molecular medicine in the 21st century. Trends Mol Med. 2001;7:259–264.

188. Koh CJ, Atala A. Tissue engineering, stem cells, and cloning: opportunities for regenerative medicine. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1113–1125.

189. Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood. 2007;110:3499–3506.

190. Sands RW, Mooney DJ. Polymers to direct cell fate by controlling the microenvironment. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18:448–453.

191. Koshikawa N, Schenk S, Moeckel G, et al. Proteolytic processing of laminin-5 by MT1-MMP in tissues and its effects on epithelial cell morphology. FASEB J. 2004;18:364–366.

192. Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, Gimble JM, Liedtke W, Chen CS. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:17–26.

193. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126:677–689.

194. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005;310:1139–1143.

195. Mackay AM, Beck SC, Murphy JM, Barry FP, Chichester CO, Pittenger MF. Chondrogenic differentiation of cultured human mesenchymal stem cells from marrow. Tissue Eng. 1998;4:415–428.

196. Johnstone B, Hering TM, Caplan AI, Goldberg VM, Yoo JU. In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res. 1998;238:265–272.

197. Smith PG, Garcia R, Kogerman L. Strain reorganizes focal adhesions and cytoskeleton in cultured airway smooth muscle cells. Exp Cell Res. 1997;232:127–136.

198. Connolly SC, Smith PG, Fairbank NJ, et al. Chronic oscillatory strain induces MLCK associated rapid recovery from acute stretch in airway smooth muscle cells. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:955–963.

199. Smith PG, Janiga KE, Bruce MC. Strain increases airway smooth-muscle cell-proliferation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1994;10:85–90.

200. Chaudhuri S, Smith PG. Cyclic strain-induced HSP27 phoshorylation modulates actin filaments in airway smooth muscle cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008;39:270–278.

201. Niklason LE, Yeh AT, Calle EA, Bai Y, Valentín A, Humphrey JD. Enabling tools for engineering collagenous tissues integrating bioreactors, intravital imaging, and biomechanical modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:3335–3339.

202. Franke RP, Grafe M, Schnittler H, Seiffge D, Mittermayer C, Drenckhahn D. Induction of human vascular endothelial stress fibres by fluid shear stress. Nature. 1984;307:648–649.

203. Ghezzi CE, Risse P-A, Marelli B, et al. An airway smooth muscle cell niche under physiological pulsatile flow culture using a tubular dense collagen construct. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1954–1966.

204. Jeong SI, Kim SY, Cho SK, et al. Tissue-engineered vascular grafts composed of marine collagen and PLGA fibers using pulsatile perfusion bioreactors. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1115–1122.

205. Ritchie AC, Wijaya S, Ong WF, Zhong SP, Chian KS. Dependence of alignment direction on magnitude of strain in esophageal smooth muscle cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102:1703–1711.

206. Cha JM, Park TN, Noh TH, Suh T. Time-dependent modulation of alignment and differentiation of smooth muscle cells seeded on a porous substrate undergoing cyclic mechanical strain. Artif Organs. 2006;30:250–258.

207. Liu B, Qu M-J, Qin K-R, et al. Role of cyclic strain frequency in regulating the alignment of vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Biophys J. 2008;94:1497–1507.

208. Morioka M, Parameswaran H, Naruse K, et al. Microtubule dynamics regulate cyclic stretch-induced cell alignment in human airway smooth muscle cells. PloS One. 2011;6:e26384.

209. Kanda K, Matsuda T, Oka T. In vitro reconstruction of hybrid vascular tissue. Hierarchic and oriented cell layers ASAIO J. 1993;39:M561–M565.

210. Lee K-W, Stolz DB, Wang Y. Substantial expression of mature elastin in arterial constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:2705–2710.

211. O’Cearbhaill ED, Punchard MA, Murphy M, Barry FP, McHugh PE, Barron V. Response of mesenchymal stem cells to the biomechanical environment of the endothelium on a flexible tubular silicone substrate. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1610–1619.

212. Zhao S, Suciu A, Ziegler T, et al. Synergistic effects of fluid shear stress and cyclic circumferential stretch on vascular endothelial cell morphology and cytoskeleton. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1781–1786.

213. Fairbank NJ, Connolly SC, MacKinnon JD, Wehry K, Deng L, Maksym GN. Airway smooth muscle cell tone amplifies contractile function in the presence of chronic cyclic strain. Am J Physiol – Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;295:L479–L488.

214. Kim Byung S, Sung In J, Cho Seung W, Nikolovski J, et al. Tissue engineering of smooth muscle under a mechanically dynamic condition. Anglais. 2003;13:5.

215. Jeong SI, Kwon JH, Lim JI, et al. Mechano-active tissue engineering of vascular smooth muscle using pulsatile perfusion bioreactors and elastic PLCL scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1405–1411.

216. Chen X, Xu H, Wan C, McCaigue M, Li G. Bioreactor expansion of human adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2052–2059.

217. Khayat G, Rosenzweig DH, Quinn TM. Low frequency mechanical stimulation inhibits adipogenic differentiation of C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells. Differentiation. 2012;83:179–184.

218. Majd H, Wipff P-J, Buscemi L, et al. A novel method of dynamic culture surface expansion improves mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and phenotype. Stem Cells. 2009;27:200–209.

219. Weber C, Freimark D, Poertner R, et al. Expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells in a fixed-bed bioreactor system based on non-porous glass carrier – part A: inoculation, cultivation, and cell harvest procedures. Int J Artif Organs. 2010;33:512–525.

220. King JA, Miller WM. Bioreactor development for stem cell expansion and controlled differentiation. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007;11:394–398.

221. Oragui E, Nannaparaju M, Khan WS. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering for musculoskeletal applications. Open Orthopaed J. 2011;5(Suppl 2):267–270.

222. Zhao F, Ma T. Perfusion bioreactor system for human mesenchymal stem cell tissue engineering: dynamic cell seeding and construct development. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;91:482–493.

223. Ellis M, Jarman-Smith M, Chaudhuri JB. Bioreactor systems for tissue engineering: a four dimensional challenge. In: Chaudhuri J, Al-Rubeai M, eds. Bioreactors for Tissue Engineering. Springer 2005.

224. Saini S, Wick TM. Concentric cylinder bioreactor for production of tissue engineered cartilage: effect of seeding density and hydrodynamic loading on construct development. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19:510–521.

225. Bancroft GN, Sikavitsast VI, van den Dolder J, et al. Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteloblasts in a dose-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12600–12605.

226. Asnaghi MA, Jungebluth P, Raimondi MT, et al. A double-chamber rotating bioreactor for the development of tissue-engineered hollow organs: from concept to clinical trial. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5260–5269.

227. Kurpinski K, Chu J, Hashi C, Li S. Anisotropic mechanosensing by mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:16095–16100.

228. Sharp LA, Lee YW, Goldstein AS. Effect of low-frequency pulsatile flow on expression of osteoblastic genes by bone marrow stromal cells. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009;37:445–453.

229. Thorpe SD, Buckley CT, Vinardell T, O’Brien FJ, Campbell VA, Kelly DJ. The response of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to dynamic compression following TGF-BETA 3 induced chondrogenic differentiation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38:2896–2909.

230. Hamilton DW, Maul TM, Vorp DA. Characterization of the response of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells to cyclic strain: implications for vascular tissue-engineering applications. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:361–369.

231. Huang Y, Zheng L, Gong X, et al. Effect of cyclic strain on cardiomyogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. PloS one. 2012;7:e34960.

232. Park JS, Chu JSF, Cheng C, Chen F, Chen D, Li S. Differential effects of equiaxial and uniaxial strain on mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;88:359–368.

233. Nieponice A, Maul TM, Cumer JM, Soletti L, Vorp DA. Mechanical stimulation induces morphological and phenotypic changes in bone marrowderived progenitor cells within a three-dimensional fibrin matrix. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;81A:523–530.

234. O’Cearbhaill ED, Murphy M, Barry F, McHugh PE, Barron V. Behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells in fibrin-based vascular tissue engineering constructs. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38:649–657.

235. Sarraf CE, Otto WR, Eastwood M. In vitro mesenchymal stem cell differentiation after mechanical stimulation. Cell Prolif. 2011;44:99–108.

236. Khan OF, Chamberlain MD, Sefton MV. Toward an in vitro vasculature: differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells within an endothelial cell-seeded modular construct in a microfluidic flow chamber. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:744–756.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset