Chapter
4

Using the Product or Service
Lever to Transform to a More
Real-Time Organization

TaskRabbit realized that many people are always pressed for time. Its success is evidence that many people do not want to spend their scarce time to complete necessary chores. By building a network that lets users hire independently contracted “taskers” to perform chores, TaskRabbit helps people maintain their busy lifestyles. Since being acquired by furniture retailing giant IKEA in 2017, the company has been expanding rapidly. There’s an obvious synergy between the two businesses: consumers can buy furniture at IKEA, then hire someone from TaskRabbit to assemble it. With TaskRabbit’s integration into the IKEA.com site, customers can check the availability of taskers based on location and product choice and start the process of booking a tasker while shopping online. Customers can buy IKEA furniture and have it assembled as soon as the next day.

According to Stacy Brown-Philpot, CEO of TaskRabbit, the easy availability of help to assemble IKEA products has boosted online sales. She notes that “we’ve seen more customers now will buy things online through the IKEA website—and buy more things—because the TaskRabbit service is available.” Indeed, one recent IKEA customer set a TaskRabbit record, hiring helpers for 117 hours of furniture assembly.29

The convenience of scheduling this furniture assembly service while completing a purchase makes the scheduling faster for most customers. For many customers, hiring someone to assemble the furniture has proven to be an attractive substitution for do-it-yourself assembly. Customers choosing this option spend none of their scarce time on assembly, making the effective real time for that option zero. Assuming the assembly is done properly, that is a real-time customer experience that demonstrates respect for the value of customer time and makes IKEA products more attractive to purchase. Although the actual real time for assembly is not instantaneous, it can occur as soon as the next day. IKEA has clearly used the service lever to become a more real-time organization. Although currently unable to offer same-day assembly, innovating to offer that is obviously a path to becoming even more real time.

Pulling the “Faster” Real-Time Product or Service Lever

The product or service is the overt reason the customer interacts with the organization—products and services fill needs. However, in a competitive market, customers have choices; there are almost always alternative ways to fill a need, and in those situations the customer employs selection criteria to decide between different alternatives. Increasingly, the primary selection criteria for a product or service include customers’ time expectations. Research indicates that convenience makes it possible to decrease time and effort in acquiring and using a service. It also indicates that convenience is at the forefront when customers evaluate their service experiences.30 Customers will gravitate to the product or service option that reduces the amount of time they spend on a nonpleasurable activity. Modifying a product or service to allow customers to complete a nonpleasurable activity faster is an important transformation lever to consider. It is important, though, to understand the bounds of the task. For example, if customers are making airline reservations, they expect that the reservations will be completed quickly; however, they will not consider the task of making reservations finished unless and until the reservations have been made completely and correctly.

In this example, no single airline was the beneficiary of an immediate competitive advantage. The whole industry benefitted from cooperation among competitors and other key stakeholders. Faster customer service was made possible by the transformation of processes. Those transformations were enabled by technology changes. Faster service came along with the changes that were driven by lower costs. All airlines gained a service and cost foundation from which individual airlines could provide future improvements to customer real-time experiences.

So, what is the lesson from this example for leaders aspiring to transform their organizations to real-time organizations? The lesson will become clearer after considering the following example from Fandango.

Innovation with tickets at Fandango was not as complex as innovation with boarding passes within the airline industry. Unlike the airlines, which had to collaborate with competitors and other stakeholders, Fandango did not need to collaborate with competitors. Furthermore, competitive benefits for individual airlines were not the reason for boarding pass innovation.

As the question posed earlier basically asked, how, then, is the history of innovation with boarding passes instructive for leaders of real-time organizations? Consider this lesson: To provide customers with better real-time experiences, think innovatively across the entire ecosystem. Think innovatively about those you need to work with to become a more real-time organization. Think innovatively about the results you intend to obtain. Think innovatively about what needs to be transformed to achieve those results. Think innovatively about what levers will enable the transformation. Take advantage of other transformations. Build on good business practices, such as lowering costs. And think innovatively beyond the immediate transformation to what your next innovations could be.

The expectation is that as complexity and interdependence increase, companies will increasingly work with external stakeholders to more completely satisfy customer desires. The implication is that activities of a company’s broader community can be supportive of the drive to become a real-time company, or they can undermine those same efforts. From a customer’s perspective, there may be no obvious line of delineation between a company and its partners. A real-time company that works with slower or more poorly performing partners will fail to meet customers’ expectations. Increasingly, companies will discover that to achieve the next level of performance along the real-time performance continuum, they must work with their partners to improve their real-time performance.

The transformations by Fandango and the airline industry involved process changes that were enabled by technology. Technology can make dramatic improvements possible, such as the dramatic cost reductions experienced by the airline industry. One of the most dramatic changes in customer real-time experience occurred with Netflix.

Pulling the “Better Quality” Real-Time Product or Service Lever

The primary value of a product or service from the customer’s perspective of time may be to provide the customer with a more satisfying (e.g., enjoyable or productive) use of time. If that is so, then changing the product or service to provide the customer with a more satisfying use of time is an important transformation lever to consider. However, the quest for time quality does not give the real-time company a license to violate customer time duration expectations. Based on prior experience, customers have developed a set of time norms that shape their views about how much time an activity should take. For example, when consumers go to the movies, they certainly expect the time that it takes to get their tickets and popcorn to be short. In addition, if they expect a two-hour feature-length film, they are not going to be satisfied with a fifteen-minute short film even if the quality of the short film exceeded every expectation.

The history of the movie theater experience makes for an informative case study that demonstrates how theater owners have continuously sought new and innovative ways to improve the entertainment experience for their customers. In effect, by improving the quality of the time for the theater audiences, they increased the time value for their customers.

Innovation in a competitive industry is a nonstop process; companies must innovate to survive. This is especially important in hypercompetitive industries where there are significant direct and indirect competitors. In the entertainment industry, a consumer has many options so companies, like theater owners, must compete not only against other theater owners but also against home entertainment services, live events, nightclubs, and even the board game industry. When services are dissimilar, customers will weigh the cost and time investment for their options, paying clear attention to perceived differences in the expected value of their time spent, including both quality and duration.

The goal of most innovation or transformation efforts is to improve quality, reduce costs, or create new or better opportunities. Most companies will measure the success of such innovations based on their ability to improve an internally defined metric. Theater owners’ move toward the adoption of digital technology was motivated by a desire to reduce costs. Happily, this same transformation also made it easier for them to manage the content they showed and be more responsive to changing customer desires. From a real-time perspective, any innovation should improve the customer’s real-time experience and drive other business values for the company (such as lowering cost). However, improving the customer’s real-time experience is not always the driver of innovation, particularly for organizations that have not joined the real-time revolution. For example, if the entertainment industry had moved away from overnight film shipping before there was a digital alternative, that would have lowered shipping costs, but the shipping process would have taken longer, and that would have negatively impacted the industry’s ability to support theater owners and, ultimately, the moviegoing customer.

When properly applied, innovations that improve the customer’s real-time experience have a compounding effect. In the case of the digitization of the entertainment industry, application of digital technology to the production process has improved production efficiencies. That time saving can be used to get movies to market quicker, or the extra time can be reinvested to improve the film quality (via more special effects, more editing, etc.). This same technology, when applied to the distribution process, provides additional process improvements that benefit the customer. However, when one well-meaning process innovation (e.g., reducing the cost of overnight shipping without a digital alternative) causes another process to slow, the intended benefit can be completely negated.

Concluding Thoughts on Innovating with the Product or Service

It is essential for a company to understand how its product or service impacts customers’ time experiences. Customers critically evaluate their experiences when using a specific product or service. It is important to recognize that they also look beyond those usage experiences to consider a more holistic view of time; they will consider every step associated with a product or service as being part of their time investment with that company. Efforts to transform the way customers use a product or service are important, but the company must also look beyond that horizon to consider the other steps that customers take to discover, acquire, and support the company’s products and services. For example, if a company alters the design of a product (such as an automobile headlight) so that it is quick and easy for customers to replace while maintaining the usable life of the product, this redesign demonstrates that the organization understands and values the time customers invest not only in using the product but also in replacing it.

When a company begins a program to transform itself into a more real-time company, it has to expect that its competitors are undergoing their own real-time transformations. As competitors move toward becoming more real time, the organization’s survival will become dependent on its ability to continuously improve its real-time performance. For the company to be sufficiently agile in such an environment, it must continue to monitor and respond effectively to competitor-driven changes to customers’ time expectations.

As illustrated with the examples in this chapter, a company may opt to modify or enhance its product or service to make the product faster or the service more engaging. Such an enhancement may be the optimal course of action for demonstrating that the company values customer time more effectively than competitors do. However, using the product or service lever to counter competitive threats is not the only lever available to a real-time organization. For example, improving its ordering, delivery, or support processes could be considered. In such a competitive situation, the goal for the responding company is to use the levers at its disposal to transform customer expectations in its favor.

Key Takeaways

Image  When searching for a product or service that is to be used to perform a nonpleasurable activity, such as vacuuming, customers will buy something that they expect will conserve their scarce resource of time. They will want to reduce the amount of time they spend on the activity. Transforming a product or service to allow customers to spend less time on such an activity or complete it faster is an important transformation lever to consider. It is also important that the activity be done completely and correctly.

Image  When searching for a product or service to provide a satisfying use of time, customers will buy a product or service that they expect will be enjoyable, productive, or otherwise satisfying. Changing such a product or service to provide the customer with a more satisfying use of time is an important transformation lever to consider. It is also important to take related customer time duration expectations into account.

Image  Some transformations are fairly straightforward. Some are not. As a leader aspiring to transform your organization to a real-time organization, think innovatively. Think innovatively about those you need to work with, the results you intend to obtain, what needs to be transformed, and the levers that will enable the transformation. Take advantage of other transformations. Build on good business practices. And, like a good chess player, think ahead. Think innovatively beyond the immediate transformation to what your next innovations could be.

Image  Innovation in a competitive industry is a nonstop process. Companies must innovate to survive. Innovations or transformations other than real-time transformations generally seek to improve good business practice, such as increasing quality, reducing costs, or creating new or better opportunities. As a leader, consider pursuing real-time transformations that will improve both customer real-time experiences and good business practice. Leaders in real-time denial run the risk of threatening survival if they pursue transformations that would improve business practice while at the same time worsen customer real-time experiences. This unhappy threat is particularly likely when competitors provide better customer real-time experiences.

Image  Efforts to transform the way customers use a product or service are important. However, leaders must also look beyond use and consider the other steps in the life of a product or service. Those include steps where customers discover, acquire, and maintain the company’s products and services. Furthermore, using the product or service lever to counter competitive threats is not the only lever available to a real-time organization. The following chapters discuss a number of levers. In responding to a competitive situation, one or more levers may be used to transform customer experiences so customers view their experiences more favorably.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset