Our research gives us tremendous hope for the future, because collectively organizations have the resources and power to change the world by creating and maintaining trust.
Our friend David Kirby of Ford offers this poignant analogy for how essential trust is to the fabric of our society: If you go to a meeting in a conference room, the first thing you do is find an empty chair and sit down at the table. Imagine one day you pull up the nearest chair and plop down. Before you know what happened, you find yourself with an ungraceful landing on the floor, the broken chair upturned beside you. The next day, will you sit down immediately, or will you instead check your chair first?
If you have to check your chair every time you sit, or confirm your bank is holding your money safe, or sniff‐test your food every time you eat … If you have to wonder if a product will work as advertised, or question whether your employers will keep their promises … If you have to do all these things, you won't have time to do much more.
Trust is foundational to human progress. Tens of thousands of years ago, humans lived in small nomadic groups that traveled together, hunted together, and gathered periodically with other groups. Out of this grew tribal culture, and eventually individuals took on specialized roles. Some hunted. Some gathered food. Others made tools and created useful objects. Some raised children, and others tended animals. You didn't steal food from somebody in your tribe because you needed the tools she was making.
As societies evolved, spoken languages developed and were later written down. Much of the earliest writing recorded transactions in a barter economy as a way of preserving records and “enforcing” trust.211 These ten sheep skins in exchange for those five sharpened blades. There is a practical reason that happened. Humans can maintain about 150 social relationships at a time. After that we need analogues like writing to record and remember information important to relationships.212
In this way, implicit trust from within the tribe could be extended to those outside the tribe. Trust was less about whose tribe or family you were from. Instead, trust was replaced by written contracts and laws. Those who were trustworthy relied on a framework of rules (called the “rule of law”) to trust people they didn't know. The untrustworthy were forced into some degree of good behavior by threat of punishment.
This is how you codify trust among millions—by creating ways that the trustworthy can continue their lives and work, protected from the untrustworthy by social institutions. Trust in abstractions like “money” grew out of a need to carry on transactions beyond barter.
Now, however, we believe that the world is facing a trust deficit that has a direct impact on national economic performance. In Chapter 2 we shared that economists Paul Zak and Stephen Knack found that a 15 percent rise in a nation's belief that “most people can be trusted” adds a full percentage point to economic growth every year.213 If you apply the economists’ math to the global economy at the time of this writing, you find that a 15 percent rise in belief that most people can be trusted would add $847 billion (!) to annual GDP.214
Even though trust has eroded, companies and nonprofits are starting from a position of relative strength in society. We believe that gives organizations the opportunity—and responsibility—to revitalize trust. There are three reasons in particular that we want to highlight:
Organizations are far more nimble than other institutions when it comes to solving problems. Innovative companies succeed by finding new ways to create experiences and satisfy customers. Modern charitable organizations like the Gates and Skoll Foundations are engines of innovation in nonprofit work. The great innovative movements of recent decades, like agile management and design thinking, find their practical testing in organizations willing to try new things. These organizations are looking for a competitive edge, or more complete fulfillment of their missions.
Organizations, and especially businesses, are capable of changing course when needed. Only a few years ago, auto executives might have said, “Don't talk to me about electric vehicles. They'll never replace the gas vehicle.” In 2022, all the major car companies are redesigning their fleets with dozens of new, fully electric models. A few are committing billions to being fully electric within a decade.215 Some of the world's most powerful business leaders are pushing hard on their organizations and others to take broad action on climate change, arguing that it poses a threat to profits as well as lives.216
Businesses are now the most trusted type of institution. Edelman, a global communications firm, completed their twenty‐first study on public trust, surveying more than 33,000 people in over twenty‐eight countries. According to their research, businesses earn the highest level of trust (61 percent), closely followed by NGOs (59 percent). Both types of organizations are more trusted than the government (52 percent) and media companies (50 percent), which are perceived as highly divisive.217
Not only are businesses more trusted, but they are also increasingly expected to be drivers of positive change. We believe they should shape policy debates about the economy, inequality, and climate change, and improve healthcare and education. And, as we discussed in Chapter 11, workers are looking specifically to their own employers. While just over half of U.S. respondents said they trust businesses, almost three‐quarters view their own employers as a mainstay of trust.218
Increasingly we look to business and NGO leaders to rebuild trust. And if they don't, who else is going to do it?
Ultimately, business leaders must realize that if their humans don't thrive, their organization won't survive. When humans thrive, traditional metrics thrive as well: long‐term profitability, resilience in the face of relentless change, fulfilling a purpose, and enduring shareholder value.219 This premise has fueled the rise of ESG and stakeholder capitalism to mainstream prominence, discussed in Chapter 11.
Economists will tell you that trust is necessary for ongoing economic relationships. People want to do business with organizations that are not solely interested in maximizing profit with every transaction. Even a purely rational analysis, the kind that dominated economic thinking for hundreds of years, suggests that creating trust matters to organizations who want to last for a significant time because it creates repeat customers.220
Behavioral economics remind us that people are not fully rational in their economic decisions. Because people have a limited ability to hold all details of a relationship in mind at once, they revert to making choices based on a “gut feeling.” The lesson is: You won't build trust with purely rational arguments. In the famous words of Maya Angelou, what matters most is how people feel about their experiences of the Four Factors of Trust.
We want to leave you with a final word on five principles you can use to turn trust into a discipline that elevates the human experience for your workers, customers, and partners.
It is our ambition to build trust and help leaders positively impact the humans in their ecosystem. And we can do this while continuing to drive profitable growth, which can be a powerful fuel for good. After all, profit is how capital creates both more jobs and better jobs.221 In nonprofit companies, revenue is the fuel that turns ideas and values into real‐world results. After the revenues and profits are earned and put to use, though, the larger questions remain: “Am I improving the world? Am I fulfilling a greater mission? Do I work for more than wealth, power, or fame?”
We are passionate about building trust to elevate the human experience because it creates the types of organizations we want to belong to, and the type of world in which we want to live.