References

  1. Abbuhl, R., Gass, S., and Mackey, A. (2013). Experimental research designs. In Research Methods in Linguistics, Podesva, R.J. and Sharma, D. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 116–134.
  2. Aguasvivas, J.A., Carreiras, M., Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., and Duñabeitia, J.A. (2018). SPALEX: A Spanish lexical decision database from a massive online data collection. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2156.
  3. Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon, 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  4. Algom, D., Chajut, E., and Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 323–338.
  5. Athanasopoulos, P., Damjanovic, L., Krajciova, A., and Sasaki, M. (2011). Representation of colour concepts in bilingual cognition: The case of Japanese blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 9–17.
  6. Augustinova, M., Almeida, E., Clarys, D., Ferrand, L., Izaute, M., Jalenques, I., Juneau, C., Normand, A., and Silvert, L. (2016). Que mesure l’interférence Stroop ? Quand et comment ? Arguments méthodologiques et théoriques en faveur d’un changement de pratiques dans sa mesure. L’Année psychologique, 116(1), 45–66.
  7. Avanzi, M. (2019). “Yaourt” ou “yoghourt” ? Français de nos régions [Online]. Available at: https://francaisdenosregions.com/2019/02/01/yahourt-ou-yoghourt/ [Accessed 5 April 2019].
  8. Avanzi, M., Barbet, C., Glikman, J., and Peuvergne, J. (2016). Présentation d’une enquête pour l’étude des régionalismes du français. SHS Web of Conferences, 27, 03001.
  9. Bååth, R. (2010). ChildFreq: An online tool to explore word frequencies in child language. LUCS Minor, 16, 1–6
  10. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., and Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  11. Baayen, R.H., Feldman, L.B., and Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 290–313.
  12. Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., and Bates, D.M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
  13. Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Hutchison, K.A., Cortese, M.J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J.H., Nelson, D.L., Simpson, G.B., and Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459.
  14. Bard, E.G., Robertson, D., and Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32–68.
  15. Baron-Cohen, S. and Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175.
  16. Barr, D.J., Gann, T.M., and Pierce, R.S. (2011). Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 201–207.
  17. Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H.J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
  18. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
  19. Beaver, J. and Carter, M. (2019). Developmental Reading Assessment, 3rd edition. Pearson Assessments, Minneapolis.
  20. Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14(2–3), 150–177.
  21. Berman, R.A. and Slobin, D.I. (1994). Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.
  22. Bernicot, J., Laval, V., and Chaminaud, S. (2007). Nonliteral language forms in children: In what order are they acquired in pragmatics and metapragmatics? Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2115–2132.
  23. Bernstein Ratner, N. (2000). Elicited imitation and other methods for the analysis of trade-offs between speech and language skills in children. In Methods for Studying Language Production, Menn, L. and Bernstein Ratner, N. (eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 291–312.
  24. Besner, D., Stolz, J.A., and Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 221–225.
  25. Blanc, N., Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., and Brouillet, D. (2008). Updating situation models during reading of news reports: Evidence from empirical data and simulations. Discourse Processes, 45(2), 103–121.
  26. Bloom, P. (2002). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words? MIT Press, Cambridge.
  27. Bloom, L., Hood, L., and Lightbown, P. (1974). Imitation in language development: If, when, and why. Cognitive Psychology, 6(3), 380–420.
  28. Bonin, P. (2013). Psychologie du langage: la fabrique des mots, 2nd edition. De Boeck Supérieur, Brussels.
  29. Borghi, A., Caramelli, N., and Setti, A. (2016). How abstract is risk for workers? Expertise, context and introspection in abstract concepts. Reti, saperi, linguaggi, Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences, 95–118.
  30. Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L.A., and Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, 61–79.
  31. Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O. and McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118, 123–129.
  32. Branigan, H.P. and Pickering, M.J. (2017). An experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, E282.
  33. Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Liversedge, S.P., Stewart, A.J., and Urbach, T.P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 489–506.
  34. Bransford, J.D. and Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726.
  35. Bransford, J.D., Barclay, J.R., and Franks, J.J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3(2), 193–209.
  36. Brysbaert, M. (2007). “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Some simple SPSS solutions to a complex problem. Report, version 2, Royal Holloway, University of London.
  37. Brysbaert, M. (2013). Lextale_FR a fast, free, and efficient test to measure language proficiency in French. Psychologica Belgica, 53(1), 23–37.
  38. Brysbaert, M. and New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990.
  39. Brysbaert, M. and Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–20.
  40. Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A.M., Bölte, J., and Böhl, A. (2011). The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, 58(5), 412–424.
  41. Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., and Keuleers, E. (2016). The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 441–458.
  42. Cai, Q. and Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS ONE, 5(6), e10729
  43. Carlson-Radvansky, L.A. and Radvansky, G.A. (1996). The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection. Psychological Science, 7(1), 56–60.
  44. Carreiras, M., Carriedo, N., Alonso, M.A., and Fernández, A. (1997). The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25, 438–446.
  45. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., and Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16(8), 585–589.
  46. Carroll, J.B., Davies, P., and Richman, B. (1971). The American Heritage Word Frequency Book. Houghton Mifflin, New York.
  47. Chan, A., Meints, K., Lieven, E., and Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children’s comprehension of English SVO word order revisited: Testing the same children in act-out and intermodal preferential looking tasks. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 30–45.
  48. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger, New York.
  49. Clark, H.H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.
  50. Clifton, C., Staub, A., and Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In Eye Movements. A Window on Mind and Brain, van Gompel, R.P.G., Fischer, M.H., Murray, W.S., and Hill, R.L. (eds). Elsevier, Oxford, 341–371.
  51. Coady, J.A. and Evans, J.L. (2008). Uses and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43(1), 1–40.
  52. Colonna, S., Schimke, S., and Hemforth, B. (2012). Information structure effects on anaphora resolution in German and French: A crosslinguistic study of pronoun resolution. Linguistics, 50(5), 991–1013.
  53. Colston, H.L. and Gibbs, R.W. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 57–80.
  54. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33(4), 497–505.
  55. Connell, L. (2007). Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition, 102(3), 476–485.
  56. Connell, L. and Lynott, D. (2009). Is a bear white in the woods? Parallel representation of implied object color during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 573–577.
  57. Coventry, K.R., Prat-Sala, M., and Richards, L. (2001). The interplay between geometry and function in the comprehension of over, under, above, and below. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(3), 376–398.
  58. Crepaldi, D., Amenta, S., Pawel, M., Keuleers, E., and Brysbaert, M. (2015). SUBTLEX-IT. Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Italian. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Italian Association For Experimental Psychology. September 10–12, Rovereto, Italy.
  59. Cuetos, F., Glez-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., and Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicológica, 32(2), 133–144.
  60. Culicover, P.W. and Jackendoff, R. (2010). Quantitative methods alone are not enough: Response to Gibson and Fedorenko. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(6), 234–235.
  61. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29.
  62. Dąbrowska, E. (2010). Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review, 27(1), 1–23.
  63. Davis, M.H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(4), 85.
  64. DeKeyser, R. and Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean. In Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, Kroll, J.F. and de Groot, A.M.B. (eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 88–108.
  65. Dell’Acqua, R. and Grainger, J. (1999). Unconscious semantic priming from pictures. Cognition, 73(1), B1–B15.
  66. Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference. Macmillan International, Basingstoke.
  67. Dienes, Z. and McLatchie, N. (2018). Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 207–218.
  68. Dimitropoulou, M., Duñabeitia, J.A., Avilés, A., Corral, J., and Carreiras, M. (2010). Subtitle-based word frequencies as the best estimate of reading behavior: The case of Greek. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 218.
  69. Drieghe, D. and Brysbaert, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(5), 951–961.
  70. Dunn, L.M. and Dunn, D.M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th edition. Pearson Assessments, Minneapolis.
  71. Durrleman, S., Hippolyte, L., Zufferey, S., Iglesias, K., and Hadjikhani, N. (2015). Complex syntax in autism spectrum disorders: A study of relative clauses. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(2), 260–267.
  72. Eilola, T.M., Havelka, J., and Sharma, D. (2007). Emotional activation in the first and second language. Cognition & Emotion, 21(5), 1064–1076.
  73. Eisenbeiss, S. (2010). Production methods in language acquisition research. In Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research, Blom, E. and Unsworth, S. (eds). John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 11–34.
  74. Engelen, J.A., Bouwmeester, S., de Bruin, A.B.H., and Zwaan, R.A. (2014). Eye movements reveal differences in children’s referential processing during narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 118, 57–77.
  75. Erickson, T.D. and Mattson, M.E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 540–551.
  76. Evers-Vermeul, J. and Sanders, T. (2011). Discovering domains – On the acquisition of causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1645–1662.
  77. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., and Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
  78. Ferrand, L. (2001). Cognition et lecture: processus de base de la reconnaissance des mots écrits chez l’adulte. De Boeck, Brussels.
  79. Ferrand, L. and Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked non-word priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 45(3), 353–372.
  80. Ferrand, L. and Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(2), 119–122.
  81. Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., and Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 488–496.
  82. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203.
  83. Ferreira, F. and Yang, Z. (2019). The problem of comprehension in psycholinguistics. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 485–495.
  84. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K.G.D., and Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15.
  85. Field, A. and Hole, G. (2003). How to Design and Report Experiments. Sage, London.
  86. Field, A., Miles, J., and Field, Z. (2012). Discovering Statistics Using R. Sage, London.
  87. Foster, E.D. and Deardorff, A. (2017). Open Science Framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 105(2), 203–206.
  88. Gass, S.M. (2015). Experimental research. In Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Paltridge, B. and Phakiti, A. (eds). Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, London, 180–209.
  89. Gass, S.M. and Mackey, A. (2007). Data Elicitation for Second and Foreign Language Research. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
  90. Gelman, A. and Loken, E. (2014). Ethics and statistics: The AAA tranche of subprime science. Chance, 27(1), 51–56.
  91. Gibson, E. and Fedorenko, E. (2010). Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(6), 233–234.
  92. Gibson, E. and Fedorenko, E. (2013). The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1–2), 88–124.
  93. Gillioz, C., Gygax, P., and Tapiero, I. (2012). Individual differences and emotion inferences during reading comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 66, 239–250.
  94. Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Becker, R.B., and Cutting, J.E. (2007a). An introduction to experimental methods for language researchers. In Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S., and Spivey, M.J. (eds). John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, 53–86.
  95. Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S., and Spivey, M.J. (eds) (2007b). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam.
  96. Gordon, P.C. and Hendrick, R. (1997). Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference. Cognition, 62(3), 325–370.
  97. Gordon, P.C., Hendrick, R., and Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1411–1423.
  98. Gordon, P.C., Hendrick, R., Johnson, M., and Lee, Y. (2006). Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(6), 1304–1321.
  99. Halekoh, U. and Højsgaard, S. (2014). A Kenward–Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models – The R package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(9), 1–30.
  100. Havik, E., Roberts, L., Van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., and Haverkort, M. (2009). Processing subject–object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 59(1), 73–112.
  101. van Heuven, W.J.B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., and Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190.
  102. Hoeben Mannaert, L.N., Dijkstra, K., and Zwaan, R.A. (2017). Is color an integral part of a rich mental simulation? Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 974–982.
  103. Huettig, F., Rommers, J., and Meyer, A.S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–171.
  104. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.
  105. Jegerski, J. (2014). Self-paced reading. In Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics, Jegerski, J. and VanPatten, B. (eds). Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames, 20–49.
  106. Judd, C.M., Westfall, J., and Kenny, D.A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69.
  107. Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
  108. Kaiser, E. (2013). Experimental paradigms in psycholinguistics. In Research Methods in Linguistics, Podesva, R.J. and Sharma, D. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 135–168.
  109. Karmiloff, K. and Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). Comment les enfants entrent dans le langage ? Retz, Paris.
  110. Kehler, A. and Rohde, H. (2013). A probabilistic reconciliation of coherence-driven and centering-driven theories of pronoun interpretation. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(1–2), 1–37.
  111. Kelter, S., Kaup, B., and Claus, B. (2004). Representing a described sequence of events: A dynamic view of narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 451–464.
  112. Kenward, M.G. and Roger, J.H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53(3), 983–997.
  113. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., and New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650.
  114. Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., and Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304.
  115. Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., and Christiansen, M.H. (2018). Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 154–169.
  116. Kim, Y. and McDonough, K. (2008). Learners’ production of passives during syntactic priming activities. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 149–154.
  117. Kim, J., Gabriel, U., and Gygax, P. (2019). Testing the effectiveness of the Internet-based instrument PsyToolkit: A comparison between web-based (PsyToolkit) and lab-based (E-Prime 3.0) measurements of response choice and response time in a complex psycholinguistic task. PLoS ONE, 14(9), e0221802.
  118. Kissine, M., Cano-Chervel, J., Carlier, S., Brabanter, P.D., Ducenne, L., Pairon, M.-C., Deconinck, N., Delvenne, V., and Leybaert, J. (2015). Children with autism understand indirect speech acts: Evidence from a semi-structured act-out task. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0142191.
  119. Konishi, T. (1993). The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 519–534.
  120. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., and Christensen, R.H.B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
  121. Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710.
  122. Lassonde, K.A. and O’Brien, E.J. (2009). Contextual specificity in the activation of predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 46, 426–438.
  123. Lemhöfer, K. and Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343.
  124. Lenth, R.V. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33.
  125. Levinson, S.C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In Language and Space, Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., and Garrett, M.F. (eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, 109–169.
  126. Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., and Licata, L. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 764–766.
  127. Litosseliti, L. (ed.) (2018). Research Methods in Linguistics, 2nd edition. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, London.
  128. Logan, G.D. and Sadler, D.D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In Language and Space, Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., and Garrett, M.F. (eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, 493–529.
  129. Luke, S.G. (2016). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1494–1502.
  130. MacKay, D.G. and Ahmetzanov, M.V. (2005). Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm: An experimental analogue of flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 16(1), 25–32.
  131. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.
  132. Madden, C.J. and Zwaan, R.A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 31, 663–672.
  133. Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., Wodniecka, Z., and Brysbaert, M. (2015). SUBTLEX-PL: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 471–483.
  134. Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., and Bates, D. (2017). Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315.
  135. Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, Where Are You? Dial Book for Young Readers, New York.
  136. McClelland, G.H., (2014). Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, Reis, H.T. and Judd, C.M. (eds), 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 608–626.
  137. McConkie, G.W. and Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17(6), 578–586.
  138. McDaniel, D., Cairns, H.S., and McKee, C. (1998). Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  139. McKenna, F.P. and Sharma, D. (1995). Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1595–1607.
  140. Meier, B.P. and Robinson, M.D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247.
  141. Menn, L. and Bernstein Ratner, N. (eds) (2000). Methods for Studying Language Production. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.
  142. New, B. (2006). Lexique 3 : une nouvelle base de données lexicales. In Actes de la Conférence Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, TALN 2006. Louvain, Belgium.
  143. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., and Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 661–677.
  144. Ortega, L. (2014). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
  145. Peirce, J., Gray, J.R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., and Lindeløv, J.K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203.
  146. Perea, M., Vergara-Martínez, M., and Gomez, P. (2015). Resolving the locus of cAsE aLtErNaTiOn effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked priming. Cognition, 142, 39–43.
  147. Phakiti, A. (2015). Quantitative research and analysis. In Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Paltridge, B. and A. Phakiti (eds). Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, London, 180–209.
  148. Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York.
  149. Potter, M.C. and Levy, E.I. (1969). Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 10–15.
  150. Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I.A., Politzer, G., and Bastide, A. (2007). A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition, 14(4), 347–375.
  151. Price, P.C., Jhangiani, R., and Chiang, I.-C.A. (2013). Research Methods in Psychology, 2nd edition. BCcampus, Vancouver.
  152. Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2016). E-Prime: Documentation article [Online]. Available at: https://www.pstnet.com.
  153. Rasinger, S.M. (2010). Quantitative methods: Concepts, frameworks and issues. In Research Methods in Linguistics, Litosseliti, L. (ed.). Continuum, New York, 49–67.
  154. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
  155. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.
  156. Rayner, K. and Bertera, J.H. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206(4417), 468–469.
  157. R Development Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna [Online]. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.
  158. Reimers, S. and Stewart, N. (2007). Adobe Flash as a medium for online experimentation: A test of reaction time measurement capabilities. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 365–370.
  159. Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256.
  160. Rossi, J.-P. (2008). Psychologie de la compréhension du langage. De Boeck, Brussels.
  161. Rowland, C. (2013). Understanding Child Language Acquisition. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
  162. Royle, P. and Reising, L. (2019). Elicited and spontaneous determiner phrase production in French-speaking children with developmental language disorder. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 43(3), 167–187.
  163. Sanford, A.J. and Graesser, A.C. (2006). Shallow processing and underspecification. Discourse Processes, 42, 99–108.
  164. Satterthwaite, F.E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110–114.
  165. Schilling, N. (2013). Surveys and interviews. In Research Methods in Linguistics, Podesva, R.J. and Sharma, D. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 96–115.
  166. Schmalhofer, F. and Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.
  167. Schubert, T.W., Murteira, C., Collins, E.C., and Lopes, D. (2013). ScriptingRT: A software library for collecting response latencies in online studies of cognition. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e67769.
  168. Schumann, J. and Zufferey, S. (2020). Connectives and straw men. Experimental approach on French and English. In Proceedings of the 12th OSSA Conference: Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity, OSSA Conference Archives, University of Windsor, Canada.
  169. Schumann, J., Zufferey, S., and Oswald, S. (2019). What makes a straw man acceptable? Three experiments assessing linguistic factors. Journal of Pragmatics, 141, 1–15.
  170. Schütze, C.T. (2016). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Language Science Press, Berlin.
  171. Schütze, C.T. and Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment data. In Research Methods in Linguistics, Podesva, R.J. and Sharma, D. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 27–50.
  172. Schwab, S. and Avanzi, M. (2015). Regional variation and articulation rate in French. Journal of Phonetics, 48, 96–105.
  173. Simmons, J.P., Nelson, L.D., and Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
  174. Singmann, H. (2019). Mixed model reanalysis of RT data [Online]. Available at: https://cran.r-roject.org/web/packages/afex/vignettes/afex_mixed_example.html [Accessed 24 June 2019].
  175. Singmann, H. and Kellen, D. (2020). An introduction to mixed models for experimental psychology. In New Methods in Cognitive Psychology, Spieler, D. and Schumacher, E. (eds). Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames, 4–32.
  176. Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., and Aust, F. (2017). Afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 0.17-8 [Online]. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/package=afex.
  177. Skordos, D. and Papafragou, A. (2012). Lexical alternatives improve 5-year-olds’ ability to compute scalar implicatures. In BUCLD 36 Online Proceedings Supplement [Online]. Available at: http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2012/07/Skordos-36.pdf.
  178. Smith, N. (2004). Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  179. Smith, N.J. and Levy, R. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319.
  180. Soares, A.P., Machado, J., Costa, A., Iriarte, Á., Simões, A., de Almeida, J.J., Comesaña, M., and Perea, M. (2015). On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 680–696.
  181. Spivey, M.J. and Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10(3), 281–284.
  182. Staub, A. and Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Gaskell, M.G. (ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 327–342.
  183. Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104.
  184. Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31.
  185. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662.
  186. von Stutterheim, C. and Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41(5), 851–882.
  187. Sze, W.P., Rickard Liow, S.J., and Yap, M.J. (2014). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 263–273.
  188. Vasishth, S. and Nicenboim, B. (2016). Statistical methods for linguistic research: Foundational Ideas – Part I. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(8), 349–369.
  189. de Vega, M., Diaz, J.M., and Leon, I. (1997). To know or not to know: Comprehending protagonists’ beliefs and their emotional consequences. Discourse Processes, 23, 169–92.
  190. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D.P., Paganelli, F., and Dworzynski, K. (2005). Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 501–520.
  191. Wagner, E. (2015). Survey research. In Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Paltridge, B. and Phakiti, A. (eds). Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, London, 166–197.
  192. Weskott, T. and Fanselow, G. (2011). On the informativity of different measures of linguistic acceptability. Language, 87(2), 249–273.
  193. Williams, J.M.G., Mathews, A., and MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 3–24.
  194. Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications [Online]. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.5499 [Accessed 22 September 2018].
  195. Winter, B. (2019). Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
  196. Ziegler, J.C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A.M., Rey, A., and Grainger, J. (2000). Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: Evidence from incremental priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53(3), 671–692.
  197. Zufferey, S. (2020). Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. ISTE Ltd, London and John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  198. Zufferey, S. and Gygax, P. (2020). “Roger broke his tooth. However, he went to the dentist”: Why some readers struggle to evaluate wrong (and right) uses of connectives. Discourse Processes, 57, 184-200.
  199. Zufferey, S., Mak, W.M., and Sanders, T.J.M. (2015a). A cross-linguistic perspective on the acquisition of causal connectives and relations. International Review of Pragmatics, 7(1), 22–39.
  200. Zufferey, S., Mak, W., Degand, L., and Sanders, T. (2015b). Advanced learners’ comprehension of discourse connectives: The role of L1 transfer across on-line and off-line tasks. Second Language Research, 31(3), 389–411.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset