A feasibility study is a survey of people whose agreement and support you would need in order to succeed at a particular project, usually a large capital or endowment campaign of at least $1 million. A feasibility study invites prospective donors, board members, community leaders, and program officers at foundations and corporations who might be approached to contribute to such a project to state anonymously what they think about a potential campaign and what level of support they or their organization might provide. Generally, the survey is done in two or three parts: an online survey sent to all the prospects who will be asked for major gifts; a phone survey to a smaller number of donors who will probably be asked for lead gifts; and optional in‐person interviews or a focus group with a handful of key leaders, some of whom may not be donors per se, but who have gravitas in the community and whose opinion will be sought by prospects.
For prospects to feel that they can be completely honest and candid, their answers have to be anonymous. For that reason, most organizations hire a consultant to carry out a feasibility study. Maximum anonymity is ensured when people are asked by a consultant whom they don't know to fill out a form sent from an email with the consultant's name or the name of the firm conducting the survey. Online surveys aggregate the data right away; by now, people are comfortable with them from Survey Monkey, Google Forms, Survey Sparrow, and the like. Although some people might be completely candid without the shield of anonymity, human nature is such that, to spare someone's feelings or to avoid a confrontation, many people will not be as direct if they are aware that what they say is going to get back to someone they know.
The survey consists of structured questions presented in a multiple‐choice format. A few open‐ended questions can also be included, which ask such things as whether prospects have confidence in the leadership of the organization and what they think about the organization's program directions. Open‐ended questions can also ask prospects’ opinions on anything the organization may have done or said that was at all controversial. Once the results of the survey are in, the consultant looks for any pattern of response and for issues needing clarification. The results of the online survey form the basis of the questions in the phone survey with prospective lead donors. On the phone, the surveyor can probe a little more, record anecdotes and examples, and even query respondents about whether they agree or disagree with some of the opinions or findings that came from the written survey. In‐person interviews, which can be helpful if there is a need to clarify the case or probe further about any anomalies found in the phone or written surveys, are not needed if you have enough information to go on without them (and obviously are less anonymous).
A feasibility study is complicated and time‐consuming both to construct and to conduct, which makes it expensive. That's why it is only done in the case of high‐risk or high‐cost projects. The least expensive study conducted by a professional will likely cost $5,000; many studies may cost as much as $75,000.
There is no need to do a feasibility study in the following situations:
You will need to do a study under the following circumstances:
A feasibility study gives you an added measure of assurance and will help you identify and counter potentially big problems. When you are raising large amounts of money, a feasibility study will allow you to discover the capacity of your donors in a way that would otherwise be difficult, given our society's strong taboo about discussing how much money a person has.
In the end, you are looking for assurance that you will be able to raise the first 60–70% of your goal from 5–10 people. If you can do that, you will most likely be able to raise the rest of the money to reach your goal. That guideline is the most reliable indicator of whether your campaign will succeed.
Feasibility studies often predict that a campaign will bring in a lower amount than it actually raises in the end. Some consultants prefer to err on the side of underestimating the amount that can be raised, but the main reason campaigns exceed their goals is that the excitement generated by a campaign affects prospects. It is one thing for prospects to tell a consultant what they might, theoretically, contribute to a campaign should it be launched, but quite another for them to be asked in person to give to a campaign by someone they admire. In speaking with a consultant or filling out a survey, prospects are sober and serious and not wanting to mislead. They name an amount they could give that is perhaps a stretch but that they feel confident they could pay. Later, during the real campaign, when a friend or colleague comes with a staff person to ask for the gift, prospects are likely to become excited by the enthusiasm of the askers and end up giving more than they told the interviewer during the phone survey. Perhaps on the phone a prospect said they would be unlikely to give, but faced with the reality of the campaign, they may not want to be left out. Their objections, which seemed so big during the phone call, can fade in the light of the campaign. This does not mean you should add on a few hundred thousand to whatever the study suggests you can raise, but it does mean that you can be confident that a well‐done study will present an amount that is at least what you can actually bring in.