11

Domestic considerations

Women typically continue to carry the double burden of childcare and unpaid domestic work, even a triple burden of care for dependents, including parents, older people people with disabilities. (Broadbridge and Hearn, 2008)

How can you compare being a mother holding your own beautiful healthy child to having a successful career? There’s no comparison. But that’s all I had: I didn’t have the babies; I didn’t have my family; I only had my job. So I felt I had to put heart and soul into it. (Eliza)

You’ve got to know what you’re getting into when you have a child so don’t just say ‘oh I want a baby’ and think everything’s just going to be the same. You’ve got to really work out what that’s going to do to your career and whether you’ve got a supportive partner, male or female, to help you. (Jessica)

Introduction

A pervasive theme throughout the study was the domestic responsibilities – partners, children and parents, others – which the women had. This chapter focuses on the domestic considerations that have to be taken into account by women who wish to be successful, as evinced by the comments of the participants in our study and as reinforced by other cognate research (see, for example, Burke, 2002; Gordon and Whelan-Barry, 2006; Kamenou, 2008; Ezzedeen and Ritchey, 2009). We begin by looking at women as carers and the improvements in support for women in recent years. The chapter then looks at why some of the women were tempted to get off the career ladder as a result of domestic responsibilities and requirements and the feelings of guilt that some of them had because of ‘not being there’. We then focus on the support provided by partners and the particular issues arising from being in a two-career family.

Women as carers

Many of the participants in the study referred to the fact that there was still a widespread assumption that it was the woman who did the caring – of children or aged parents – when required. Ruth comments from the perspective of someone who has neither parents nor children to look after:

There are interesting assumptions made about caring as a woman; that you do have children or that you will now have ageing parents and I don’t have those either as my parents both died when I was young. I’m … now getting another set of assumptions, but I do feel that within the sector still. Talking to colleagues who work here, the assumption is made that it will be you as a woman who will have to deal with those issues. I think the whole issue of woman as carer, be it as mother or be it as dutiful daughter at different ends of the career are still things that are issues.

This assumption was often coupled with a lack of understanding of the pressures on carers, of whatever gender, as Jessica summarises:

I don’t think people recognise the pressure on the female for the childcare. I think that’s at all levels actually. But if you had to be back for six o’clock every night, you know what it’s like, it’s in your mind, and I think that people who haven’t had children, or men often, didn’t understand that. Some of the men did because they had to share the childcare, but that is a huge stress.

Jessica herself had a daughter, but said that she ‘carried on working throughout, had a nanny and everything’. Gill described the position in the UK higher education sector, with most of the female vice chancellors having children, though the age at which their mother became a chief executive or a senior manager was important in enabling a balance between home and work:

But in my experience … most of the women in that group have got a partner and many of them have got children. Some, believe it or not, still have children at school, which I find incredible. I honestly don’t think that I could’ve done this job when I had children at school. In fact, I took it on when my youngest went to university, which suited me perfectly. I mean, you could cope with a 16-year-old perhaps, one fairly sensible 16-year-old … I don’t know how you do it even with a supportive husband. I spend all my time in the week working. My kids say to me, ‘oh nice of you to phone this week!’

Fiona talked about how being a carer – in particular of her parents – had helped her at work and also in terms of her general development:

I think I’ve changed, I think, if you start with my care role which is tough, very tough and has been for a number of years before [my parents] came to live with me. I have – this sounds really pious – but I have learned so much, I have gained so much from it. I think I do my job better, I think I’m more accessible, I think I understand people’s commitments better. Perhaps if I’d had kids earlier on, but I’ve always tried to be supportive of people with kids but I don’t know quite what it’s like to balance. I now know what that balance is like. I feel in touch with a kind of reality that I’ve always been quite rooted in, but I’m really, really rooted in. I think perhaps I’m more centred, more contented, and happier in a sense, even though it’s a tough and sometimes very sad and sometimes funny kind of life.

Kate also spoke about how being a carer – also of elderly relatives – as well as a partner had affected her career path:

If I look at my sister … who has equally been a carer and all the rest of it, I think it does make a huge difference. One of the reasons why I made the decision not to go for the Director’s job was that actually [my daughter is] 16. I’ve got two more years and I want to be able to make sure I put the time that she needs into her. That’s a positive choice: it’s not feeling trapped by it; it’s actually a positive choice. My uncle and my mother are 82 and 78 and they’re OK but they’re frail and you do think, it is the old cliché isn’t it, you don’t want ‘all the time you spent at the office’ on your gravestone. So it’s always a factor for me. I would never say I’d just do something without thinking about where this fits in the context of other stuff that’s important to me … which might explain my somewhat erratic career path!

Improved conditions

As noted elsewhere in this book, there have been a number of changes in recent years, whether it is in terms of more family-friendly employment policies and approaches or a greater sharing between women and men in terms of caring roles. Carrie comments with regard to practice in the United States:

I work with a male dean who’s … a wonderful example of someone who, you know we understand life’s issues but we do draw a line sometimes. So if we’ve had a secretary who has her, what do you call it annual leave that you can take off – we do it by hours not by days – so if three times in one week she’s using two hours of annual leave to come in at ten o’ clock in the morning instead of eight you know we’ll have to talk to her about that. But if somebody has real serious issues we work with them. And I think we would do that whether it was a male or a female …

Kate contrasted her experience with that of a good friend, and of present-day support for women working and caring, noting the different way in which she had nurtured her children and the result, as she perceived it:

We spend a lot of time in France … but … the system in France has always been very different and there’s always been really good childcare. [My friend]’s got three children. She was a teacher, so she went back to work as soon as the children were born virtually because the childcare was so fantastic. And she’s actually retired early because she gets pension credits for having three children so she could retire at 50. But I never get a sense that she felt uncomfortable about being successful in France. So I think there’s something about the generational thing and there’s something about when the children were small. The culture, certainly in a rural environment, was that you didn’t work or if you did you didn’t really put your kids into care. Whereas when I had [my daughter] because I was 40 by then … and I thought, ‘well if I stop off now, I will not get back on’. So I put her into a nursery at three months old … I did all the stuff about breast feeding her in the lunch hour and everything, all that sort of stuff, but actually I would say she’s probably more balanced than the other two. So that’s interesting. I remember thinking when she was about six, ‘why didn’t I do that when the boys were small?’ Then, what was interesting for me when she went to school [was] all the environment had changed – there was a breakfast club, there was an after-school club. There was all this stuff that made it much easier to bring up small children and actually have an interesting job in rural environments. It was a huge change … which just, when the boys were small, wasn’t there.

Tempted to stay at home

A number of the women admitted to considering giving up work to adopt a more domestic lifestyle, as for example Bella:

I’m not very far away sometimes from thinking I could just ditch the whole lot and just spend time with the children and be a domestic creature … It wouldn’t take very much actually … I’m the main breadwinner … So I think that has to be a factor in it. It probably wouldn’t take very much, I don’t know, I could still do it. I think if one of the children did go off the rails – I mean at the moment they’re doing fine just about – I think that would make me stop … I have worked incredibly hard rather consistently for a very long time; it just does get very tiring. I might just suddenly feel I’m exhausted by it all … I’m really enjoying … my current role. I think it’s a great job but in five years’ time I have absolutely no idea where I’m going to end up next.

However, she felt that staying at home with the children would create its own problems and issues:

I did actually take parental leave once for three months from [my former employment] … I never took much time off for maternity leave for either of my two children and I thought this is absurd I’ve got to do it. And that was quite an interesting taster as to the reality of it because I was not very good with it. I had loads of work to do I wasn’t able to cut myself off very successfully and it’s made me think a bit more carefully about this thing of really do I genuinely want to ditch all this and give it up, but having said that … I do think, I mean it’s always on my mind that I could now do it and actually [my partner has] just got a reasonably well paid job so it is a bit more a possibility now. What it would take I don’t know.

Andrea gave a rather more philosophical perspective on ‘the traditional female role’, especially in relation to ‘the new generation of women’:

I think the risk … is that they sit back and they go ‘oh I won’t bother really’ and … ‘let someone else do it’. And that’s fine, you can move back into the traditional female role, but I think we could easily forget how much of a loss of who we are as a person that then results in, and there are a lot of other cultures which are prevalent in the world at the moment for whom the female is not an equivalent to the male in any way, shape or form. They are some kind of an ‘other’ where ‘other’ is childlike and to be controlled.

Being there – or not

There were various references in the interviews to guilt feelings about not being home with the children or at least more available for them. Diane said:

I think, looking back – my daughter and I chat about this – that there are things that you think, well, I could have spent more time with my daughter, I could’ve been at home more, I could’ve been a better mother. She’s an only child. I think probably one of the decisions not to have any more children was, in those days, childcare. The arrangements for working and being a mother weren’t as beneficial. You had very strict periods of maternity leave. There was no nursery provision as such, so I think having more children was certainly a trade off. Not that I’m very motherly anyway, I can’t say I’m very domestic, so it’s not as though I would’ve stayed home baking bread.

Bella comments about feelings of guilt and being – or not being – there:

Why do I feel so guilty about [not being at home with the children]? I think it’s because there’s all these headlines … I’m always meeting, well [name] is a good example, she’s never worked and I get on extremely well with her but there’s always a slight edge in our conversations that I think she feels slightly defensive, not that I’m remotely critical of her, but I think she feels she did do the right thing for her children and this big unwritten question is ‘and maybe you haven’t’ or maybe that’s how I perceive it. I don’t know, but often it’s coming from the outside, that feeling of guilt; mothers particularly generate it.

So too did Gill:

If there’s any feeling, it’s of loss, in the sense that when they were younger and demanding, it was always ‘where can I park them so I can get on with my work?’ rather than revelling in spending time with them, which most mothers would, which I think was a pity … We’ve got this enormous house too that we were doing up with no money and so there was the house and all those other commitments. I was school governor and all those kinds of things, and the children and the job; it’s a common story. But no, I don’t feel guilty because they’ve turned out really well.

Bella agreed with this view, feeling that it was good for her boys to have a happy mother, ‘and also I do think children are quite resilient, I think one tends to project all sorts of anxieties onto them which maybe aren’t there’. However, for Eliza, it was important to enjoy quality time with her son, even if it meant working difficult hours to fit everything in:

I get to walk him to school in the morning and we laugh and we chat and hold hands. I pick him up every evening, which I never got the chance to do … When I pick him up early, we all have time. Sometimes we go for walks; we go for a drive; we go to the shops. I never did that when he was younger. So the quality time that I spend with him is that I’m a mum for him, to share him, to share his sorrows and to share his joy … But … it does mean I have to work extremely hard to juggle. Basically it means that to give him that time, until he goes to bed, it means that five days a week I work from 8 o’clock to 11 o’clock every night. But I don’t resent it because it’s for me, it’s for my family

Carrie – as a single parent – had to consider the economics as well as the logistics of being at work and caring for a child:

You know you’ve got to provide for your child and since in my case I wasn’t getting child support payments that whatever I could do to bring more money into my home I needed to do … Having my daughter and being … the wage earner, administration was the way I needed to do it. I could work all summer and make additional money. Some of my decisions to be in administration did centre on my daughter … I could just work all day and go home and be home to have a dinner meal with my daughter. So family did impact on me … there was a correlation between wanting to stay in administration and having a child at home for me.

Supportive partners

There was widespread recognition within the group of women that supportive partners had been very important to them. Bella told us:

Well, he’s not supportive in doing the housework I have to say … which is really where I’d like some support. But in terms of saying ‘go for things’, yes, and I think that’s made a huge difference. I think if I’d been partnered up with someone who wasn’t particularly driven themselves and was happy just to lie around and have an easy life, I would probably have slipped in that direction too … I think that is quite a powerful factor whether you like it or not.

This strong support from a partner – whether or not it included doing domestic chores – had been invaluable to Eliza during a difficult career progression that she described as a ‘twisted path’:

There have been many, many troughs – more than peaks I would say – in my career. But … my partner … has a huge belief in me and is my best friend and my best critic. Without that support I am still unsure whether I would’ve been driven enough to do it on my own.

Jessica felt much the same:

I’ve got a very, very supportive husband. I don’t think I could’ve done it without him. He had a big job himself … but we shared so when I went to business school for a mini MBA he looked after our daughter for two or three weeks. Not many men would do that. We had the nanny come in during the day but he was home each evening and put her to bed and all that sort of stuff. I think you have to juggle things. Did I have a good work-life balance? No. Did I have a good life-work balance? I reckon so.

As did Gill:

Are we going to mention the supportive husband in this narrative? … We couldn’t afford for me to have a career break. My husband’s a [profession] … We decided we wanted to move down to this part of the world and whoever got the job first would go. So he’s arguably sacrificed quite a bit of his career for me, although perhaps it didn’t feel like that at the time. We’ve also made a decision a long time ago that we wouldn’t live apart so we wouldn’t have a two career … which has also constrained both of our careers a bit. I was at [institution] for a very long time because of that. But, instead of being anxious about my success, he celebrates it and revels in it so if he didn’t and if he wasn’t prepared to increasingly support me in the practical sense I wouldn’t be where I am … I wouldn’t say it was a two-person job but I think if you had an unsupportive husband who said ‘why aren’t you here warming my slippers by the fire?’ then you couldn’t do it.

So too did Diane:

My husband … he’s a star. I mean up until me moving here … he worked full-time, but he retired when I came here … He’s been around the system long enough to know that this is a two-person job, which is why I think women don’t do it or there are very few women doing some of these jobs, because behind it, there is an assumption – it’s not so explicit now, it used to be very explicit – that there is a wife running round managing everything else, so that the husband can just focus on the career … And he was cute enough to know that, and even though we have no dependents or whatever that he saw his job as being my support. And he actually quite enjoys it. I mean he wasn’t so wedded to his work. He was quite happy to give it up and he can pursue other interests. He does a lot of voluntary work now and he quite likes that, but he is hugely supportive.

Ruth particularly valued her current and previous partners’ feedback and input on career progression:

The two men who have been my long-term partners in the course of my career have both worked in similar fields and so you bounce ideas off people, you learn to support people … In both relationships, career has initially come first. In my current relationship, I’ve learnt that career isn’t the be all and end all – in a good way – it’s really important to me. I would say my first longterm partner was someone who was very, very supportive and also had a fantastic sense of what higher education could do to change people. So in the sense of bouncing ideas off, in the sense of similar life views, that’s been important.

Andrea talked especially about her partner’s willingness – as with Gill’s – to be very flexible and to take on a number of the more domestic roles. This led to a discussion of the work-home dynamic, its issues, challenges and complexities:

I would say that I’ve been particularly fortunate in that my partner is very flexible and a number of people, [when] the crunch comes, you know: ‘shall we move to place X or place Y?’ We won’t move to place Y because you know the partner won’t do so and actually has a set of expectations – ‘yes you can have this career, but these are the expectations I have of you as a mother, as a home maker’ … and I haven’t experienced this and this is where I think I’ve been particularly lucky. I mean I don’t do machinery with buttons, I don’t iron, I don’t cook, I don’t do the car, I don’t do the gardening, I don’t do the washing machine, I don’t do the tumble drier etc. – I’m being silly but – [my partner] does a huge amount of all of those things so I am free to spend two hours writing a report on the Sunday morning. For a lot of people they do all of that domestic work as well as, and it’s that, maintaining both quantities of work that’s important and therefore the extent to which that is shared properly as against partially because sometimes things are shared down the ‘well I’ll do the car and you do the cooking’ or, you know, lots of men are interested in cooking but there’s a whole different set of skills looking after the children.

Andrea summed up the key elements of this work-home dynamic as follows:

Who controls the money is very significant … the economic dependence then reflecting in the psychological dependence and the capacity to then make your own choices … you can’t choose because actually you don’t have any control over that. And the consequence of that later if that emotional integration unpicks itself.

Gill spoke about the advantages of being single, but still with the need to have a life beyond work:

You can see the advantage of being single, obviously, but equally, if you’re single you’ve got to go out there and make yourself a life; you’ve got to find friends and spend time with them. You can’t just work so you’ve still got to find the time for all the other parts of life.

Ruth saw the key issue in terms of career development and domestic considerations as being the ‘freedom to move round the country’, summing up the tension between work and life with a partner as follows:

You either are very lucky with the partner you have or you have to decide at some point that your career is taking precedence over that. I have had both supportive partners and at other times the relationship has come to an end, and although ostensibly it’s not to do with that, I would be lying if I said it hadn’t had some bearing on the situation.

Two-career families

‘According to the Office for National Statistics, 5.9 million in the UK are in a household where all adults over 16 are working’ (Wilcock, 2010). Not surprisingly, then, a number of the women interviewed spoke about two-career families, either their own, or those of people that they knew. Lillian talked about some of the difficulties:

I do think two-career families put huge pressures on. There are opportunities to support each other though; childcare provisions are much better, there is a much more accepting environment at work. But I think in some ways it takes away choices as well; the ‘I am going to do something entirely different’. I was talking to somebody this morning that’s just come back from America and he was telling me that because he supported his wife for a year they’ve agreed that she will support him for a year. She’s pretty high earning, so he can look around. But I think they’re quite lucky. I think the opportunities my sister had when she was off school, off work looking after children, which turned into the most wonderful change of career, are less likely, which is a pity.

Fiona found that both her own success and social and cultural pressures proved to be problematic in terms of her relationships and then her marriage:

I talk with [people] and hear how they talk about their relationships. I was talking to someone … recently who said, ‘I’m not going to marry until I’m 30’. I was married at 23, going on 13 you know, far too young, far, far, far too young and inexperienced … And I’m just much more centred and I have got friends, not many, female friends who are centred in a relationship like that, but that’s never really happened for me. My relationships have always been about striving. I suppose, never really thought about it, but I suppose because partners could see what was happening. I was desperately trying to prove that I’m still domestic; and I am, I’m very domestic, I’m very ordinary, don’t worry I’m not a threat to you. So, because of the kinds of guys I always picked they both wanted somebody on their arm who looked good and eventually always went for a younger version or a more glamorous version or whatever, as happens in all of that. They didn’t want to be threatened by where I was going. I did, certainly in my marriage, try really, really hard to stop myself from going on. I wanted the marriage to last and I did try to hold myself back. But actually, I couldn’t. I didn’t sort of get the jobs but I did write the papers; I did get involved in research groups. I couldn’t help it, that’s who I am. And eventually that was one of the tensions … My husband … didn’t like his career, which was … in the same business. Couldn’t see what it was all about. So I think it’s where we started in a sense, although my ego’s not in my job my soul is, my life is, because I care about it, it’s all intertwined. And the ability to balance what I do here with what’s important in my personal life is not a conflict now but was a conflict earlier. It’s partly about growing up and partly about different circumstances.

Gill summed up the question of the supportive versus the competitive partner as follows:

I think this is absolutely critical … that you either have a partner that’s supportive completely and not threatened by you, or you have a partner, a man, who can’t cope with your success and feels his own ego is suffering. And that would be absolutely fatal … I think particularly in validating ‘you’ and giving you opportunities to do things to show what you can do.

Olivia had married young and then remarried in later life, but did not have any children from either marriage:

My husband’s got a child, but he’s now married, he’s in his late 20s. I’ve never had any children and have never really had the inclination … I think it’s probably the same with anybody who’s been married more than once, is that you learn a lot from your first marriage. In hindsight I was quite young when I got married first time round and I think that as you get older, and I was just short of 40 when I got married the second time, you kind of know what you want much more than I did when I was 25. I think I’m much more able to have a conversation about things that you want and I think that’s a maturity and confidence thing … I was on my own for probably three years, and during that time I did what I wanted to do when I wanted to do it and I knew what I wanted to do. So, from a social perspective … I think you are your own person more if you’ve lived on your own when you’re older. Then if you go into a relationship, you’re clearer about what you want from the relationship, what you bring to the party. I think on those things it then makes it a more work-life balance when he’s around than when he’s not around.

Conclusion

This chapter has looked at the various domestic considerations that the women involved in our study needed to take into account as they developed their careers. It began with a look at women as carers and the experiences of the women in caring roles. Most had a partner and children or parents – or both – to look after. Having such roles had obviously had an effect on careers and working patterns. We looked at the improvements that the women felt had been made since they embarked on their careers in supporting working women who also had domestic responsibilities. It is interesting to note that even when the women in our study recognised the adjustments that they had made in order to foreground their careers, they rarely constructed them in negative terms, but were more likely to recognise the expectation of the centrality of domestic responsibilities for most women. Those who had negotiated role-reversals with their partners showed recognition of this as being unusual, if not exceptional.

We observed comments made by some of the women that there had been times when they had been tempted to stay at home and look after children, though the pull of work and the need to be stimulated was almost always too strong. There were many references to feelings of guilt at not ‘being there’ for children, though none of the women felt that their absences from home had been particularly detrimental to their offspring. A good number stressed the importance of having supportive partners, though the support took different forms and did not always include sharing the domestic load fully. Support included help with career development and progression, not least in the form of feedback and advice. Economic dependence or independence figured prominently in some of the women’s comments in relation to partners. In this context, we ended the chapter by looking at two-career families and the particular stresses and strains of both partners working in often demanding roles. Tensions clearly led to problems with relationships in some cases.

References

Broadbridge, A., Hearn, J. Gender and management: new directions in research and continuing patterns in practice. British Journal of Management. 2008; 19:38–49.

Burke, R. Career development of managerial women. In: Burke R.J., Nelson D.L., eds. Advancing Women’s Careers. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.

Ezzedeen, S., Ritchey, K. Career advancement and family balance strategies of executive women. Gender in Management. 2009; 24(6):388–411.

Gordon, J.R., Whelan-Barry, K.S. It takes two to tango: an empirical study of perceived spousal/partner support for working women. Women in Management Review. 2004; 19(5):260–273.

Kamenou, N. Reconsidering work-life balance debates: challenging limited understandings of the "life" component in the context of ethnic minority women’s experiences. British Journal of Management. 2008; 19:99–109.

Wilcock, J. Juggling childcare with work is not just a "women’s issue". Professional Manager. 2010; 19(4):14.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset