The frequency response of a complete horn loudspeaker, in the range where the throat impedance of the horn is a resistance as given by Eq. (9.1), is determined by solution of the circuit of Fig. 9.3. A horn-loaded drive unit behaves very differently from a direct radiator. The diaphragm of a direct-radiator loudspeaker is mass controlled because a flat on-axis response is given at frequencies where the acceleration of the diaphragm is constant. Because the velocity decreases with frequency, so does the radiated power for ω>c/a, but this is compensated for by an increasingly narrow directivity pattern, which is how the flat on-axis response is maintained. By contrast, a horn has a fairly constant directivity pattern over its operating frequency range. Hence, for a flat frequency response, the radiated power must also be constant, which can only be achieved if the velocity is constant. Hence the diaphragm of horn-loaded drive unit is resistance controlled. For purposes of analysis, we shall divide the frequency range into three parts, A, B, and C, as shown in Fig. 9.5.
Midfrequency range
In the midfrequency range, designated as B in Fig. 9.5, the response is equal to the reference efficiency given by Eq. (9.8). Here, the response is “flat” with frequency, and, for the usual high-frequency units used in auditoriums with 300-Hz cutoff frequencies, the flat region extends from a little above 500 to a little below 3000Hz. In this region the velocity of the diaphragm is constant with frequency, rather than decreasing in inverse proportion to frequency as was the case for a direct-radiator loudspeaker.
Resonance frequency
It is apparent from Fig. 9.3 that because ωCM1 is small, zero reactance will occur at the frequency where
f0=12πMMD(CMSCMB/(CMS+CMB))√.
(9.12)
In practice, this resonance usually is located in the middle of region B of Fig. 9.5 and is heavily damped by the conductance GMT, so that the velocity of the diaphragm is resistance controlled.
Low frequencies
At frequencies well below the resonance frequency, the response will drop off 6dB for each octave decrease in frequency if the throat impedance is a resistance as given by Eq. (9.1). This case is shown as region A in Fig. 9.5.
Let us simplify Fig. 9.3 so that it is valid only for the low-frequency region, well below the resonance of the diaphragm. Then the inductance LE, the mass MMD, the compliance CM1, and the conductances GMS and GMB may all be dropped from the circuit, giving us Fig. 9.6.
Assuming the throat admittance of the horn is a pure conductance as given by Eq. (9.3), the frequency at which the frequency response is 3dB down is given in terms of the Thiele–Small parameters by
ωL=(1+VASVB)ωSQESSDcSDc+(1+SD/ST)ωSQESVAS.
(9.13)
where VB is the volume of the back cavity. In practice, however, the throat impedance ZMT of the horn near the lowest frequency at which one wishes to radiate sound is not a pure resistance. Hence, region A needs more careful study. Solving for the mechanical admittance at the diaphragm of the drive unit yields
YMc=u˜cf˜c=jωCM2(ST/SD)2YMTjωCM2+(ST/SD)2YMT
(9.14)
where
CM2=CMSCMBCMS+CMB
(9.15)
and YMT is the mechanical admittance at the throat of the horn with area ST. The mechanical impedance at the diaphragm of the drive unit is the reciprocal of YMc,
ZMc=f˜cu˜c=(SDST)2ZMT−j1ωCM2
(9.16)
where ZMT=1/YMT is the mechanical impedance at the throat of the horn with area ST.
As we shall show in the next part, the mechanical impedance at the throat of ordinary types of horn at the lower end of the useful frequency range is equal to a mechanical resistance in series with a negative compliance. That is to say,
ZMT≡RMT+j1ωCMT.
(9.17)
The bold RMT indicates that this resistance varies with frequency. Usually, its variation is between zero at very low frequencies and ρ0cST (as given by Eq. 9.1) at some frequency in region A of Fig. 9.5. Hence, the admittance YMT=l/ZMT is a resistance in series with a negative mass reactance. In the frequency range where this is true, therefore, the reactive part of the impedance ZMc can be canceled out by letting (see Eqs. 9.16 and 9.17)
S2DS2T1CMT=1CM2=(1CMB+1CMS).
(9.18)
Then,
ZMc=RMT(SDST)2≡1GMc
(9.19)
where GMc is the acoustic conductance of the throat of the horn at low frequencies transformed to the diaphragm.
The efficiency for frequencies where the approximate circuit of Fig. 9.6 holds, and where the conditions of Eq. (9.18) are met, is
Eff=100B2l2GMcRE+B2l2GMc
(9.20)
assuming Rg>>RE. The conductance GMc usually varies from “infinity” at very low frequencies down to ST/(S2Dρ0c) at some frequency in region A of Fig. 9.5.
High frequencies
At very high frequencies, the response is limited principally by the combined mass of the diaphragm and the voice coil MMD. If the compliance CM1 of the front cavity were zero, the response would drop off at the rate of 6dB per octave (see region C of Fig. 9.5). It is possible to choose CM1 to resonate with MMD at a frequency that extends the response upward beyond where it would extend if it were limited by MMD alone. We can understand this situation by deriving a circuit valid for the higher frequencies as shown in Fig. 9.7
. It is seen that a damped antiresonance occurs at a selected high frequency ωU, which is given in terms of the Thiele–Small parameters of the drive unit by
where VF is the volume of the front cavity. Above this resonance frequency, the response drops off 12dB for each octave increase in frequency (see region C of Fig. 9.5).
Because the principal diaphragm resonance (Eq. 9.12) is highly damped by the throat resistance of the horn, it is possible to extend the region of flat response of a drive unit over a range of four octaves by proper choice of CM1 at higher frequencies and by meeting the conditions of Eq. (9.18) at lower frequencies.