Appendix 4
Proof of Inequalities by Galaï and Masulis (1976)

In using the Mill ratio1, we assert that

[A4.1]image

With the previous inequality, we can deduce that, for inequality [A2.7]:

[A4.2]image

By transforming inequality [A2.8], we see that:

[A4.3]image

when:

image

Therefore, expression [A2.8] is always superior to 0 for image or image

By transforming inequality [A3.7], we find that:

[A4.4]image

This relationship will be positive if:

image

Because of this, [A3.7] will always be positive for companies when image(the value of company assets is at least equal to the discounted nominal value of its debt) or likewise, when d1 ≥ 0.

By defining image we know that h(d) is always positive. We can demonstrate that h’(d) > 0 regardless of the value of d. This means that h(d) is a monotonic function of d and strictly a growth function. If d1 > d2, then h(d1) − h(d2) > 0.

Given that image we can deduce that for inequality [A3.8]:

[A4.5]image
  1. 1 Gordon, R.D. (1941). Values of Mill’s ratio of area to bounding ordinate and of the normal probability integral for large values of the arguments. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12, 364–366.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset