The fifth component of the change management playbook is adjustments. Things change.
Once you've implemented systems to track; assess; adjust daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, and annually; and thought through your ongoing communication, don't confuse communicating with operating cadences. Do avoid the public company sprint to do things just ahead of quarterly earnings calls, instead, staying ahead of the curve at all times.
Ideally you will have put in place a balanced scorecard to look at destination, objectives, strategic links, initiatives, and measures by the following segments:
Recall, you'll likely want to follow up
Focus on strategic, organizational, and operational issues and opportunities with appropriate governance and culture as your foundation.
The strategic process is about the creation and allocation of the right resources to the right places in the right way over time. It comes from the Greek strategos and is the art of the general, arranging forces before battle. Think in terms of broad choices for how to achieve objectives.
Annual strategic reassessment and plan (looking out 3–5 years)
Through organizational and operational processes
The organizational process is about people—acquiring, developing, encouraging, planning, and transitioning them. You can't get from strategy to execution without people. The strongest organizations have tactical capacity—“a team's ability to work under difficult, challenging conditions and to translate strategies into tactical actions decisively, rapidly, and effectively.”1
The core strategic organizational processes are laid out in Table 26.1.
Table 26.1 Strategic Organizational Planning Processes
Planning: | Future Capabilities | How to bridge gaps from current reality to future needs |
Succession | How to backfill leaders over time | |
Contingency | How to fill surprise vacancies | |
Implementation: | Programs, projects and tasks to acquire, develop, encourage and transition people | |
Develop innate talent with learned knowledge, practices skills, relevant experience. |
The operational process is about making things happen—executional tactics. This comes from the Greek taktikos, the art of deploying forces during battle. This includes tasks that roll up into projects that in turn roll up into programs to design, build, sell, deliver, or support products or services.
Annual operating plan with monthly and quarterly reviews and updates (rolling quarterly?)
Programs and projects planned as appropriate
Tasks: Performed and managed in real time and daily
Projects: Interdependent tasks rolled up into projects tracked and managed weekly
Programs: Interdependent projects rolled up into programs tracked and managed monthly
The governance process is about ensuring compliance with laws, regulations, and policies. This process is generally owned by the board.
Culture is made up of behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values, and the environment. Consider rolling quarterly planning. Each quarter:
Prior quarter: Capture key learnings, implications for future.
If, for example, you were doing this exercise in Q2 2015, the 18-month read would include all of 2016—three to six quarters out. So you could set initial targets for the following year in Q2 and have your plans ready in Q4. Thus, the rolling quarterly planning process makes annual planning redundant.
With that as context, be disciplined about adjusting along the way in four key areas:2
Take a three-step approach to adjusting and advancing your leadership.
Step 1: Assess your effectiveness as a leader, defining areas you need to adjust to be more effective.
Step 2: Prepare a leadership development plan.
Step 3: Identify support partners to help you refine your plan and stay on track.
As appropriate, dial up your focus on developing your people as individuals, and your team as a whole, ensuring that they are positioned for longer-term success.
Set in motion a process to align the longer-term organizational development plans with the longer-term (3-plus years) strategic plan. Consider these four components:
Schedule these four processes to be done on an annual basis.
By now, you should be well on your way to tracking milestones to keep the team focused on the most important deliverables, as a team. You should be doing this monthly, unless milestones are falling off target, in which case you should increase the frequency until the milestones are back on track.
Periodically pause to evaluate your tracking process. Is it working as planned? Are we tracking the right milestones? Are our meetings efficient and focusing on the most important issues? Analyze, and adjust as necessary.
You'll also want to ensure that you have the proper balance between long-term thinking and short-term execution. Consider blending in longer-term issues (talent reviews, strategic planning and reviews, future capability, succession and contingency planning, operational reviews) on a quarterly meeting schedule to ensure that each is addressed at last once annually.
The idea is to have a meeting every month with time added once each quarter to deal with longer-term issues. It is a cycle with each piece feeding into the next. Use the calendar shown in Table 26.1 as a starting point, and then adjust it to meet your organizational needs without dropping any key pieces.
Leverage Tool 26.1 for business reviews.
Table 26.1 Prototypical Quarterly Meeting Flow
Monthly: | Milestone update and adjustments |
---|---|
Middle month each quarter: | Business review and adjustments plus a deep dive on a special topic |
Special Topics: | |
Q1: | Talent reviews |
Q2: | Strategic review and planning |
Q3: | Future capability, succession, and contingency planning |
Q4: | Operational review and planning |
Periodically pause to consider whether you can evolve the organization even more assertively to your target culture with a three-part approach.
First, make sure you and your leadership team are aligned on the specific values and behaviors you are attempting to embed into the culture.
Second, work with your leadership team to evaluate where you are as an organization against the dimensions of a culture: behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values, and the environment (BRAVE). Identify where you believe you need to focus as a team to move closer to the desired state.
Third, now that you and your leadership team are aligned on BRAVE and clear about where you need to evolve across those components, begin to make changes in business processes that reflect where you are heading. Reinforce the changes by ensuring your core people processes work for you to embed the desired culture over time.
Provide feedback not only on measurable results but also on demonstrated behaviors in line with the target culture. Do this in the moment of the behavior as frequently as possible.
Publicly recognize those who've not only delivered concrete results but also demonstrated desired behaviors.
An active internal communications program is the lifeblood of a cultural evolution. First, get your messages clear on what you wish to reinforce about the culture you are driving. If people need to work more closely as a team to solve customer problems, institute a lunch and learn or similar program to share information and get on the same page. Or encourage leadership team members to invite peers to their staff meeting to share news from their departments. If you are trying to evolve the team and the culture to a more aggressive posture in the market, celebrate examples where team members were assertive, took a risk, and won the business.
The ideas will flow; just be sure you do map your messages to your audiences, and have a continuous and multimedia approach to communicating culture.
John Wooden, the legendary coach of University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) basketball, whose teams won an astounding 10 U.S. National Collegiate Athletic Association championships, said: “Things turn out the best for the people who make the best of the ways things turn out.”
As a leader, it is up to you to make the best of how things turn out. No matter how well you have planned your merger, no matter how disciplined you are in your follow-up, some things will be different from what you expected. Often your ability to keep moving forward while reacting to the unexpected or the unplanned will be the determining factor in whether your transition is deemed a success or failure.
One of the main advantages to starting early and deploying the building blocks of tactical capacity quickly is that you and your team will be ready that much sooner to adjust to changing circumstances and surprises. Remember, the ability to respond flexibly and fluidly is a hallmark of a team with tactical capacity. The preceding annual, quarterly, and monthly meeting schedule will enable your team to recognize and react to the changes that might impact your team over time.
Not all surprises are equal. Your first job is to sort them out to guide your own and your team's response. If it is a minor, temporary blip, keep your team focused on its existing priorities. If it is minor, but enduring, factor it into your ongoing people, plans, and practices evolution.
Major surprises are a different game. If they're temporary, you'll want to move into crisis or incident management. If they're enduring, you'll need to react and make some fundamental changes to deal with the new reality. When you're evaluating change, use Table 26.2 to help guide you to an appropriate measured response.
Table 26.2 Change Map
Type | Temporary Impact | Enduring Impact |
---|---|---|
Minor Change | Downplay: Control and stay focused on priorities | Evolve: Factor into ongoing team evolution |
Major change | Manage: Deploy incident management response plan | Restart: Requires a fundamental redeployment |
Consequential changes that are enduring (i.e., irreversible) require a fundamental restart. These can be material changes in things such as customer needs, collaborators' direction, competitors' strategies, or the economic, political, or social environment in which you operate. They can be internal changes, such as reorganizations, future acquisitions, or spin-offs; getting a new boss; or your boss getting a new boss.
Whatever the change, if it's major and enduring, hit a restart button. Go right back to the beginning; do a full situation analysis; identify the key stakeholders; relook at your message; restart your communication plan; and get your people, plans, and practices realigned around the new purpose. Remember, the fittest adapt best.
Major but temporary surprises start out either good or bad. They don't necessarily stay that way. Just as a crisis handled well can turn into a good thing, a major event handled poorly can easily turn into a serious crisis. The difference comes down to how well you prepared in advance, implemented the response, and learned and improved for the next time.
In a crisis or disaster, teams need a way to get done in hours what normally takes weeks or months. This requires an iterative instead of sequential approach. That disciplined iteration is detailed as follows.
Leadership is about inspiring, enabling, and empowering others. Enhance that with the idea that “It is better to be vaguely right than precisely wrong.” Then add Charles Darwin's point that “it is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”3 Add them all up and you get leading through a crisis being about inspiring, enabling, and empowering others to get things vaguely right quickly, and then adapt along the way—with clarity around direction, leadership, and roles.4
This plays out in three steps of a disciplined iteration that should be aligned with the overall purpose:
Along the way, keep the ultimate purpose in mind. It needs to inform and frame everything you do over the short, mid-, and long term as you lead through a crisis instead of merely out of a crisis. Crises change your organization. Be sure the choices you make during crises change you in ways that move you toward your purpose and aspirational culture and not away from your core vision and values.
Let's delve deeper into each of these key steps.
Preparing in advance is about building general capabilities and capacity—not specific situational knowledge. For the most part, there is a finite set of the most likely and most devastating types of crises and disasters that are worth preparing for. Think them through. Run the drills. Capture the general lessons so people can apply them flexibly to the specific situations they encounter.5 Have resources ready to be deployed when those disasters strike.
Threats may be one or more of the following, often in combination:
Now, back to three things you should do to prepare.
Plan who's going to do what when in a crisis. In general, you'll want first responders to deal with immediate physical threats to people and property. They should
There are two parts to your communication protocols. Part I protocols deal with physical issues. Part II protocols deal with reputational issues.
Part I protocols spell out who gets informed when (with lots of redundant back-ups built in). These should have a bias to inform more people faster.
Part II protocols are about formal, external communication. At a minimum, the one, single, primary spokesperson (and back-up) message and communication points should be crystal clear. It's a good guideline to follow three over-arching ideas from the Forbes Agency Council's 13 Golden Rules of PR Crisis Management.
Protocols are useless if people haven't been trained to apply them. Make sure your first responders are trained in first aid and triage. Make sure your communicators are trained in communicating in a crisis so people know whom to contact when and when to trigger crisis management protocols.
One of the learnings from the Boeing 737 Max crashes is that their crisis management protocols should have been triggered years before they were. It seems that some knew there was a potential problem and chose not to deal with it.
People need direction, training and resources. Make sure there's a site leader at each of your sites with access to cash. Make sure your first responders have working first-aid kits.
Our fight-or-flight instincts evolved to equip us for moments like this. If the team has the capabilities and capacity in place, turn it loose to respond to the events. This is where all the hard work of preparation pays off.
A big part of this is knowing when and how to react without under- or overreacting.
While first responders should react in line with their training, keep in mind that random, instinctual, uncoordinated actions by multiple groups exacerbate chaos. Stopping everything until excruciatingly detailed situation assessments have been fed into excruciatingly detailed plans that get approved by excruciatingly excessive layers of management leads to things happening excruciatingly too late.
The preferred methodology is to pause before you accelerate to get thinking and plans vaguely right quickly. Then, get going to bridge the gaps with a combination of discipline (structure, doctrine, process) and agility (creativity, improvisation, adaptability).6
Situational questions (keeping in mind the physical, political, emotional context)
Armed with answers to those questions, think through and choose the situational objectives and intent. What are the desired outcomes of leading through the crisis? What is the desired end state? This is a critical component of direction and a big deal.
The Red Cross provides relief to victims of disasters. In doing that, the prioritization of shelter, food, water, medicine, and emotional support varies by the type of disaster. If someone's home is destroyed by a fire in the winter, shelter takes precedence. On the other hand, if a reservoir gets contaminated, the critical priority is getting people clean water.
These examples illustrate the importance of thinking through the priorities for each individual situation and each stage of a developing crisis. The choices for isolating, containing, controlling, and stabilizing the immediate situation likely will be different than the priorities for the mid-term response, which is more about getting resources in the right place and then delivering the required support over time. Those in turn will be different from the priorities involved in repairing the damage from the crisis or disaster and preventing its reoccurrence.
Get the answer to the question, “Where do we focus our efforts first?” and the priority choices start to become clear. Then, get them communicated to all, perhaps starting with a set of meetings to:
A crisis is better managed by using an iterative approach than by using the more sequential approach. This is why we recommend early meetings to jump-start strategic, operational, and organizational processes all at the same time, getting things vaguely right quickly and then adapting to new information along the way.
Support team members in implementing plans while gathering more information concurrently.
Complete situation assessment and mid-term prioritization and plans.
Conduct milestone update sessions daily or more frequently as appropriate.
Overcommunicate at every step of the way to all the main constituencies. Your message and main communication points will evolve as the situation and your information about the situation evolve. This makes the need that much greater for frequent communication updates within the organization, with partner organizations, and the public. Funneling as much as possible through one spokesperson will reduce misinformation. Do not underestimate the importance of this.
Along the way and through every step, your communication should be emotional, rational, and inspirational:
Remember the airplane that crash-landed in the Hudson River? First officer Jeff Skiles was the “pilot in charge” of the airplane when it took off, ran into a flock of birds, and lost both its engines. At that point, Captain Chesley Sullenberger chose to take over. With his command “my aircraft,” followed by Skiles' “your aircraft,” control (and leadership) was passed to “Sully,” who safely landed the plane. Only one pilot can be in charge at a time. Two people trying to steer the same plane at the same time simply does not work.
The same is true for crisis and disaster management. Only one person can be the “pilot in charge” of any effort or component at a time. A critical part of implementation is clarifying and reclarifying who is doing what, and who is making what decisions at what point—especially as changing conditions dictate changes in roles and decision-making authority within and across organizations. Make sure the handoffs are as clean as the one on Sully and Skiles’s flight.
At the end of the crisis, conduct an after-action review looking at:
The most up-to-date, full, editable versions of all tools are downloadable at primegenesis.com/tools.