Chapter 8
IN THIS CHAPTER
Looking at the basics and potential pitfalls of interviewing
Preparing for an interview
Beginning the interview
Knowing the right questions to ask — and avoid
Asking hard-hitting questions (and interpreting the answers)
Ending the interview gracefully
Interviewing is an important step in the employee selection process. If done effectively, the interview enables the employer to determine whether an applicant’s skills, experience, and personality meet the job’s requirements. By the time a candidate is brought in for an interview, the organization should be relatively confident about the candidate’s ability to succeed in the position, and the interview can increase the level of confidence.
The interview’s function is to confirm two important things, both for the organization and for the candidate:
To answer these questions as accurately as possible, your interview process should be structured and consistent, and yet interviews are arguably the most subjective part of any selection system. As humans with natural bias and perspective based on our own experiences, we have to fight the tendency to judge people according to whether we simply like them or not, as opposed to making sure that the candidates we’re interviewing are being graded on job-relevant characteristics. For this reason, interviews should come later in the hiring process, after objective components of the process have been completed.
Interviews are only as effective as how and when they’re conducted. When they’re held at the right time in the process and are conducted consistently, interviews can provide you with the confidence to move forward in your selection decision. In this chapter, I take an in-depth look at interviewing, with a focus on the things you need to know and do to get the most out of the interviewing process.
Interviewing for a job is stressful, no matter what side of the table you’re on. But when you’re a new hiring manager faced with the challenge of trying to hire the perfect employee or a seasoned recruiter working hard to deliver a great candidate, the stress is amplified, so it’s helpful to be super clear on the goals of the interview.
A well-done interview enables you to perform the following three tasks, which are essential to making a sound hiring decision:
The best interviews are interactive conversations with a purpose. They’re focused and structured while allowing for an opportunity to get to know each other.
Understanding common interviewer mistakes can help you improve your technique and make well-informed hiring decisions. Not only does a well-run interview provide you with great insight into the candidate’s experience and ways of working, but good interview techniques can also help you make a positive impression on candidates. A job candidate is likely to feel more motivated and enthusiastic about accepting a role at your company after a positive interview experience.
This section takes a look at some of the all-too-common practices that get in the way of a successful interview and ultimately hinder the candidate experience.
Preparation is key for conducting a successful job interview. By being prepared, you can feel confident when greeting candidates and leading them through the interview process. To help you prepare for an upcoming interview, review the position success profile and the candidate’s application materials. Be clear on the ideal candidate for the position and the list of questions to best assess the candidate’s ability to achieve the outcomes of the position. If it’s an in-person interview, you can also prepare by organizing the interview space and ensuring you have the materials you need before the candidate arrives so that you aren’t taking valuable interview time to prepare the space.
Failing to give the interviewing process the time and effort it deserves is, by far, the main reason interviews fail to reveal useful information about a person. You can probably understand why managers frequently neglect to take the necessary steps to prepare for interviews, conduct them diligently, and evaluate the results in a thoughtful manner: They’re busy. Everybody’s busy. Time is at a premium. But your job is to make every interview you conduct count. Encourage line managers who make their own hiring decisions to do the same.
The more prepared the interviewer is, the more likely they’ll manage the time well and maximize the process. Most leaders are moving at a very fast pace, and it takes discipline to allow focused time before and during the job interview. Managing your time effectively before an interview allows you to prepare thoroughly and arrive on time to meet the job candidate. Being on time for the interview shows professionalism and your consideration for the candidate’s time.
During an interview, structuring the time well allows you to ask the questions needed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the candidate’s abilities. Finishing the interview within a reasonable period demonstrates your time management abilities and your respect for the candidate’s schedule. Overall, managing the time well creates a positive experience for the candidate and reflects positively on the organization.
Skillful interviewers think through the process and tend to follow the same method every time — albeit with variations that they tailor to individual situations. Unsuccessful interviewers tend to wing it, creating a different routine for each interview and entering unprepared. The hidden danger of a lack of planning: You deprive yourself of the one thing you need the most as you’re comparing candidates — an objective standard on which to base your conclusions. Without structure, you have no way of knowing whether the impressions you gather from the interview would be different if your approach and other aspects of the interview were consistent for each candidate. If you wing it, you’re also not creating a great experience for the candidate, which negatively reflects on the business as a whole.
An effective interview provides both the interviewer and the candidate opportunities to find out about each other so they can each make good employment decisions. The interviewer’s time speaking should be focused on answering a candidate’s questions and helping them assess whether this is the right opportunity for them.
Interviewers typically lead these conversations by prompting interview subjects to address various aspects of their candidacy. Allowing the candidate to speak about their experiences, credentials, values, and career goals is essential to recognizing the value they can bring to your company. Asking questions and providing ample time for the candidate to express their answers shows your interest in them while discovering important details about their qualifications. Probing through active listening (for example, letting the candidate’s comments spark related questions) is a critical interviewing skill because it allows you to gain valuable information you’d miss if you did most of the talking. You can — and should — react to, comment on, and build on the answers that candidates give in job interviews.
This situation describes the halo effect, a type of cognitive bias in which your overall impression of a person influences how you feel and think about their character. Essentially, your overall impression of a person (“She is nice!”) impacts your evaluations of that person’s specific traits (“She is also smart!”). For example, some interviewers may feel an instant positive connection to a candidate and assume that this interaction will translate into a dedicated, hardworking, innovative hire.
Undoubtedly, candidates will ask questions about you, your position in the organization, and the business’s operations. When answering these questions, be professional by using positive or constructive statements. While it’s important to provide an honest overview of the challenges within the role and organization, emphasize how you and the business plan to meet and lead through the challenges. This shows a solution-focused and positive outlook on how you and the business navigate challenges. It also demonstrates transparency, which many candidates value when making decisions about their careers.
Your ability to get the most out of the interviews you conduct invariably depends on how well prepared you are. Here’s a checklist of things you should do prior to any interviewing:
Set up a general structure for the interview. Create a basic schedule for the interview so that, as the meeting progresses, you reserve enough time to cover all the key areas you want to address, while also providing the candidate plenty of time to get the answers to the questions they have. Having a rough schedule to adhere to will help you begin and end the session on time, allowing you to be more efficient and showing that you respect the candidate’s time.
A phone or video interview/pre-screen is a great use of time to provide the candidate an opportunity to ask and answer general questions and also determine whether both you and the candidate feel there is enough mutual interest to move on to the next step. (See Chapter 7 for more on pre-screens.)
Your priority in meeting candidates face-to-face (in person or virtually) for the first time is to put them at ease. It’s important to create an environment where the candidate feels safe and comfortable to share and connect. Disregard any advice anyone has given you about doing things to create stress just to see how the individual responds. Those techniques are rarely productive, and they put both you and your company in a bad light. Instead, view the first minutes of the meeting as an opportunity to build rapport with the candidate. The more comfortable they are, the more engaging the interview will be, and the more you’ll find out about them.
If you’re in person and seated at your desk as the candidate walks in, a common courtesy is to stand and meet the individual halfway, shake hands, and let them know that you’re happy to meet them (basic stuff but easy to forget). You don’t need to cut to the chase right away with penetrating questions. Skilled job interviewers usually begin with small talk — a general comment about the weather, transportation difficulties, and so on — but they keep it to a minimum.
The foundation of a successful panel interview is thoughtful planning. This includes selecting which team members will participate in the interview, preparing your team, and deciding which questions each interviewer will ask the candidate. At their best, panel interviews allow interviewers to combine their strengths, perspectives, and experiences, leading to effective and comprehensive questions, but it’s important that all of the panelists are aligned. Following are some considerations to maximize the panel interview:
Be thoughtful in selecting the right panelists. When selecting who will interview candidates, keep in mind who the primary stakeholders for the position are, who the candidate may interact with regularly once in the position, and who may be able to offer the candidate a sense of inclusion within the organization. Representation matters, and for this reason, it’s important to make sure your interview panel include people from underrepresented groups. Underrepresented groups include a variety of diverse identities, such as race and ethnicity, religious affiliation, women, veterans, people with disabilities, and members of the LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, asexual, and more) community.
Interview panels often consist of four to six people and may include
After the small talk is out of the way, your next step is to give the candidate a very basic overview of what you’re expecting to get from the interview and how long you estimate it to last. Be careful not to give too much information, though. Saying too much about the skills and characteristics you’re looking for turns a savvy interviewee into a “parrot” who can repeat the same key words they just heard.
The Q&A is the main part of the interview. How you phrase questions, when you ask them, how you follow up — each of these aspects of interviewing can go a long way toward affecting the quality and value of the answers you get. The following sections describe the key practices that differentiate people who’ve mastered the art of questioning from those who haven’t.
Even before you start to ask questions, you want to have a reasonably specific idea of what information or insights you’re expecting to gain from the interview based on your research and the hiring criteria you develop in your position success profile. You may uncover two or three items on the candidate’s résumé that warrant clarification. Or you may have a specific question, based on the notes you take during earlier candidate evaluation, about one particular aspect of the candidate’s personality. Whatever the need, decide ahead of time what you want to know more about and build your interview strategy around that goal.
Every question you ask during a job interview must have a specific purpose. That purpose may be to elicit specific information, produce some insight into the candidate’s personality or past performance, or simply put the candidate at ease. The general rule is this: If the question has no strategic significance, think twice before asking it. Again, tie questions to the criteria defined in the job description.
Listening attentively is difficult under the best of circumstances, but it’s often an even tougher challenge during a job interview. That’s because it’s tempting to draw conclusions before the candidate has completed the answer. Yet another habit is to begin rehearsing in your mind the next question you intend to ask while the candidate is still answering the earlier question. Fight these tendencies. Consider writing down your questions before the interview begins and then direct the full measure of your concentration to the candidate and what that person is saying.
Whenever a candidate offers an answer that doesn’t address the specific information you’re seeking, nothing’s wrong with asking additional questions to draw out more specific answers. For example, if a candidate talks about the money they saved their department, ask how much they saved and what, specifically, they did to accomplish that. Too many interviewers let candidates off the hook in the interest of being nice. That practice, however, can prove counterproductive — the interviewee may give you valuable background on specific abilities if your questions are more penetrating.
The fact that a candidate doesn’t respond immediately to a question you ask doesn’t mean that you need to rush in with another question to fill the silence. Give the candidate time to come up with a thoughtful answer. If the silence persists for more than, say, ten seconds, ask the candidate whether they want you to clarify the question. Otherwise, don’t rush things. Use the silence to observe the candidate and to take stock of where you are in the interview. Remember that the interview is a time for you to listen, and some candidates may need time to process your question before providing a thoughtful answer.
A study from the University of Toledo found that judgments made in the first ten seconds of an interview can predict the outcome of the interview. The problem with these types of snap judgments? They’re usually useless. Making a snap judgment in the first ten seconds creates a situation where the interview is spent trying to confirm what we think of someone — this is called confirmation bias, and it completely leaves out time for accurate assessment. In essence, by making a snap judgment, you render the interview unusable. Reserving judgment isn’t easy but try to keep your attention on the answers you’re getting instead of making interpretations or judgments. You’ll have plenty of time after the interview to evaluate what you see and hear.
Memories can do tricky things, leading people to ignore what actually happens during an interview and to rely instead on general impressions. Taking notes helps you avoid this common pitfall. Just make sure that you do so unobtrusively so the candidate doesn’t feel like they have to pause for you to keep pace. Keep all notes factual and within ethical and nondiscriminatory boundaries. Also, give yourself a few moments after the interview to review your notes and clarify them or put them into some kind of order.
You can usually divide questions into five categories, based on the kinds of answers you’re trying to elicit.
Definition: Questions that call for a simple, informational answer — often a yes or no.
Examples: “How many years did you work for the circus?” “Did you enjoy it?” “What cities did you tour?”
When to use them: Closed-ended questions work best if you’re trying to elicit specific information or set the stage for more complex questions.
Pitfalls to avoid: Asking too many of them in rapid-fire succession and failing to tie them back to the job criteria can make candidates feel as though they’re being interrogated.
Definition: Questions that require thought and oblige the candidate to reveal attitudes or opinions. One type of open-ended question is the behavioral interview question. With a behavioral question, candidates are asked to relate past on-the-job experiences to situations they are likely to encounter in the position being discussed.
Examples: “Can you describe how you handle tight deadlines on the job?” “Can you give me an illustration of how you improved productivity at your last job?”
When to use them: Most of the time but interspersed with closed-ended questions.
Pitfalls to avoid: Not being specific enough as you phrase the question and not interceding if the candidate’s answer starts to veer off track.
Definition: Questions that invite the candidate to resolve an imaginary situation or react to a given situation.
Examples: “If you were the purchasing manager, how would you go about selecting a new automated purchase order system for the company?” “If you were to take over this department, what’s the first thing you’d do to improve productivity?”
When to use them: Use them when you can frame them in the context of actual job situations.
Pitfall to avoid: Putting too much stock in the candidate’s hypothetical answer. You’re usually better off asking questions that force a candidate to use an actual experience as the basis for an answer.
Definition: Questions asked in such a way that the answer you’re looking for is obvious.
Examples: “You know a lot about team building, don’t you?” “You wouldn’t dream of falsifying your expense accounts, would you?”
When to use them: Rarely, if ever. You’re not likely to get an honest answer — just the answer you want to hear. And you run the risk of appearing unprofessional.
Definition: Questions that, on the surface, may seem bizarre but may actually be revealing in the answers they elicit.
Examples: “What literary character do you most closely identify with?” “If you could be reincarnated as a car, which one would you choose?”
When to use them: Some businesses have used these kinds of questions to determine whether a candidate is a fit for the company culture or to see whether the interviewee can think outside the box, but most firms should approach them with a good deal of caution. A candidate’s response to an off-the-wall challenge may highlight their creativity and offer insight into their thought process. The key is not to overuse, but recognize that for some candidates and cultures, these types of questions are incredibly helpful in assessing the candidate’s open mindedness and creativity. This can also be helpful to express quirkiness and personality during the interview process.
The questions you or others in your organization ask during a job interview can result in legal problems for the company if you fail to follow certain guidelines. Even the most innocent of questions can result in a discrimination suit at some point.
Antidiscrimination and consumer protection legislation restricts the type and scope of pre-employment questions that you can ask. Moreover, court decisions and administrative rulings have refined what you can and can’t ask, and, to make matters even more confusing, standards can vary from state to state — and even from city to city.
Here are some current pitfalls:
The following sections provide a rundown of which questions are permitted before hiring and which are not. Check with your attorney for any local restrictions or new rulings and keep in mind that all questions must directly relate to a bona fide job requirement.
Even questions that seem okay to ask under the following guidelines may be discriminatory if they’re asked in circumstances that suggest a discriminatory intent — for example, asking only female employees who reveal that they have children whether they have any reason they couldn’t work overtime or on the weekend.
Questions okay to ask: None.
Risky ground: Questions related to the candidate’s national origin, ancestry, or native language or that of family members. That also applies to the applicant’s and the applicant’s parents’ places of birth.
Discriminatory: “What sort of an accent is that?” “Where were you born?” “Where were your parents born?”
Questions okay to ask: “If hired, will you be able to prove that you have the right to remain and work in the United States?”
Risky ground: Questions that may oblige a candidate to indicate national origin.
Discriminatory: “Are you a U.S. citizen?”
Questions okay to ask: “Where do you live?” “How long have you lived here?”
Risky ground: Questions about housing aimed at revealing financial status. (These may be considered discriminatory against minorities.)
Discriminatory: “Are you renting, or do you own your home?”
Questions okay to ask: “If hired, can you provide proof that you are at least 18 years of age?” (Asking this question is okay to ensure that the candidate is old enough to work in a specific job that has a minimum age requirement.)
Risky ground: Questions regarding age when age is not a bona fide job requirement.
Discriminatory: “How old are you?” “In what year were you born?” “When did you graduate from high school?”
Questions okay to ask: “Can you relocate?” (only if it’s relevant to the job).
Risky ground: All questions regarding marital or family status.
Discriminatory: “Are you pregnant?” “When are you due?” (even if the candidate is obviously pregnant).
Questions okay to ask: “Can you work overtime on days other than Monday through Friday?”
Risky ground: Any question whose answers may indicate religious beliefs or affiliation.
Discriminatory: “What religious holidays do you observe?”
Questions okay to ask: “Can you perform the expected job functions with or without reasonable accommodation?”
Risky ground: Questions that aren’t directly related to a bona fide job requirement and, in addition, aren’t being asked of all candidates.
Discriminatory: “Do you have a hearing impairment?” “Have you ever filed a workers’ compensation claim?”
Questions okay to ask: “Have you ever used another name or nickname?”
Risky ground: Questions about whether the applicant has ever changed their name or about the candidate’s maiden name.
Discriminatory: “What kind of name is that?”
Questions okay to ask: “What language do you speak, read, and/or write?” (permissible if relevant to the job).
Risky ground: Questions that reveal the applicant’s national origin or ancestry.
Discriminatory: “What language do you speak at home?” “Is English your first language?”
What makes an interview question “good”? A good question does two things:
You can ask hundreds of such questions, but here are some to get you started, along with ideas on what to look for in the answers:
“What was the most difficult decision you ever had to make on the job?” Notice the intentionally vague aspect of this question. It’s not hypothetical; it’s real. What you’re looking for is the person’s decision-making style and how it fits into your company culture. Someone who admits that firing a subordinate was difficult demonstrates compassion. Those who successfully decided to approach a coworker over a conflict may turn out to be great team players. Individuals who admit to a mistake exhibit honesty and open-mindedness.
Also, note how people went about making the decision. Seeking the advice of others, for example, may mean that they’re team centered. This question is an especially important one if you’re interviewing a candidate for a middle- or senior-level management position.
“I see that you’ve been unemployed for the past few months. Why did you leave your last job, and what have you been doing since then?” This question is important, but don’t let it seem accusatory. Especially in challenging economic times, it’s not unusual for highly competent people to find themselves unemployed through no fault of their own and unable to prevent gaps in their employment history. Pursuing the issue in a neutral, diplomatic way is important. Try to get specific, factual answers that you can verify later.
At the same time — and as noted in Chapter 7 — the reasons for employment gaps may pertain to legally protected information that you, the employer, may not consider in making hiring or any other employment-related decision. For example, an applicant who was unemployed due to cancer very likely has a protected disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act and similar state laws. Probing into the reasons underlying employment gaps can unearth information that you, the employer, may not want to be injected into the application/hiring process. You must be careful when approaching this issue.
With only a few minutes to go, you can bring the session to a graceful close by following these steps:
Offer the candidate a broad-brushstroke summary of the interview.
Sum up what the candidate has said about their fit for the position, reasons for wanting the job, and so on. This summary demonstrates that you were a sincere listener and that you care about the candidate as a person. That leaves a good impression. It also gives the candidate an opportunity to clarify any misunderstandings.
Let the candidate know what comes next.
Advise the candidate how and when you’re going to contact them and whether any further steps need to be taken — for example, there may be additional assessments you want to include in the process. Being clear on next steps not only is a common courtesy but also creates a good impression and is an important part of a great candidate experience.
Also, let the candidate know you’ll be in touch regardless of the hiring decision. Not all companies say, “Thanks, but no thanks” to rejected applicants, but it’s a sign of respect and consideration.
End the interview on a formal but sincere note.
Thank the candidate for their time and repeat your commitment to follow up. If the interview is in person, either stand or shake hands again. This action formally ends the session and provides a signal for the candidate to leave. Walk the applicant out of the office to the elevator lobby or front door.
And one last suggestion: As soon as possible after the candidate’s departure, take a moment to collect your thoughts and write down your impressions and a summary of your notes. You don’t need to make any definitive decisions at this point, but recording your impressions while they’re still fresh in your mind will help you immeasurably if the final choice boils down to several candidates, all of whose qualifications are comparable. Along these lines, collect all feedback from other interviewers who met with the candidate the same day that they met with the interviewee. This allows you to gather feedback while it’s still fresh and when it’s most relevant.
Completing the evaluation form will set you up for clarity as you’re making hiring decisions.