2-3. Inequalities among Logical and Arithmetic Expressions

Inequalities among binary logical expressions whose values are interpreted as unsigned integers are nearly trivial to derive. Here are two examples:


These can be derived from a list of all binary logical operations, shown in Table 2-1.

Let f(x, y) and g(x, y) represent two columns in Table 2-1. If for each row in which f(x, y) is 1, g(x, y) also is 1, then for all (x, y), Clearly, this extends to word-parallel logical operations. One can easily read off such relations (most of which are trivial) as and so on. Furthermore, if two columns have a row in which one entry is 0 and the other is 1, and another row in which the entries are 1 and 0, respectively, then no inequality relation exists between the corresponding logical expressions. So the question of whether or not is completely and easily solved for all binary logical functions f and g.

Table 2-1. The 16 Binary Logical Operations
x y 0 x & y x & ¬y x ¬x & y y xy x | y ¬(x | y) xy ¬y x | ¬y ¬x ¬x | y ¬(x & y) 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1

Use caution when manipulating these relations. For example, for ordinary arithmetic, if x + ya and zx, then z + ya. But this inference is not valid if “+” is replaced with or.

Inequalities involving mixed logical and arithmetic expressions are more interesting. Below is a small selection.

The proofs of these are quite simple, except possibly for the relation By |xy| we mean the absolute value of xy, which may be computed within the domain of unsigned numbers as max(x, y) − min(x, y). This relation may be proven by induction on the length of x and y (the proof is a little easier if you extend them on the left rather than on the right).

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset