Chapter 5
IN THIS CHAPTER
Getting the hiring manager involved
Developing a position success profile
Being thoughtful about the job title
Determining core competencies for success
If you’ve determined that the needs in your workforce plan are best addressed by hiring additional full-time employees, it’s time to find this talent! This chapter outlines the foundations of a successful hiring process — engaging the right people in the process and ensuring that you (and everyone involved) are clear on what success looks like.
Nearly everything else you do with respect to HR policies and practices becomes easier if you’re making good hiring decisions. If you don’t have to spend the bulk of your time each day helping leaders resolve people issues, you can concentrate on the big picture: where you or your senior management want the organization to go in the years ahead.
That’s the benefit of good hiring decisions. A bad hiring decision produces just the opposite result. You spend more time as a firefighter and less time as a leader and strategic planner.
Ensuring the right talent is a team sport, so when the organization needs to source talent for an open position, the first step is to involve the hiring manager, the individual who will lead this new team member. The quality of a recruiter’s relationship with the hiring manager makes a world of difference.
When a recruiter and hiring manager aren’t aligned, the process will take longer than it should. The recruiter will bring in candidates whom the hiring manager doesn’t think are a fit; candidates may suffer from a poor, unorganized interview experience; and chances are decent that the search will end back at square one. So the first step is a well-run intake meeting with the hiring manager. This meeting sets the stage for collaboration and clear communication between the recruiter and the hiring manager throughout the process.
An important outcome of the intake meeting is the development of a success profile for the position you’re recruiting for. Traditionally and often still referred to as a job description, the updated terminology of the success profile reflects what it does: defines success in the position.
The position success profile is where your hiring criteria are first formally set forth, so it should be airtight. Why? Because the position success profile eventually drives the communication of the position, the candidate selection process, and a new employee’s first performance check-in or review.
Think of the position success profile as your blueprint. Do a good job of constructing it, and all the subsequent pieces of the hiring process will more easily fall into place.
The following sections dive deeper into creating the position success profile and ensuring the correct elements. Because it’s the foundation of many of your Talent and HR processes, it must be done thoughtfully.
There are a number of reasons to create a position success profile, and when done well, it serves as the foundation for all talent processes. For example, success profiles do the following:
Throughout this book, I focus on how position success profiles are essential tools for the purposes of effective recruiting, hiring, and performance management. At the same time, to ensure that your position success profiles are written in a way that carries out your reasons for having them, you may want to consult a lawyer before finalizing and using them.
Just like the blueprint of a home ensures the correct layout for the builder (and eventually the homeowner), the position success profile ensure clarity on the outcomes of the position. It sets the organization and the employee up for success, so it’s important that it includes the right information. The following elements are most often included in a well-written position success profile:
Apart from everything else, a well-written position success profile reflects your organization’s hiring practices and terms and conditions of employment — which are areas subject to federal and state laws prohibiting your organization from unlawful discrimination. As such, any references to race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical or mental disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, or other status protected by state or local law can expose your company to a possible discrimination suit.
In rare cases, an employer can rely on certain protected statuses in hiring (or in other employment practices) when doing so is a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ). One frequently cited example is recruiting only women for a position as a live-in counselor in a female residence hall. Rarely does a discriminatory hiring criterion qualify as a BFOQ, however, and BFOQs are very difficult for an employer to prove. So, before you include such criteria in a success profile, consult an experienced and knowledgeable lawyer.
You may be thinking, “This is a piece of cake. I already have on hand the job descriptions we’ve always used for the positions I want to fill.” But consider this: The outcomes and responsibilities that constitute most jobs today are a far cry from what they were as recently as a few years ago. You may have a job description that outlines job duties, but to ensure that it adequately describes success in the role, it must include outcomes — what’s expected in the role. What’s happened in most organizations is that tasks and responsibilities that were formerly regarded as jobs unto themselves are now consolidated with other functions. The overall result is that many existing success profiles are pretty much obsolete, or they are written as job descriptions with more of a focus on tasks and duties rather than outcomes.
Jobs today are generally broader in scope than those of the past. Position success profiles, therefore, now need to consider the expanded skill sets that employees need to handle greater responsibilities. Focus on success in the position now and in the near future (18 to 24 months out), based on your company’s current needs and longer-term objectives.
Aside from establishing the priority of job duties from a business needs perspective, this distinction can be legally significant. The Americans with Disabilities Act (and many analogous state laws) protects disabled employees who are able to perform “essential” (which has a special legal definition) job duties, with or without a reasonable accommodation. Courts and agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) investigating a charge of disability discrimination consider which duties the employer treated as primary or essential in determining whether they’re “essential” within the meaning of the statute. Although the employer’s characterization of a duty as “essential” isn’t conclusive, it’s evidence of which duties are most important.
Educational requirements like degrees and licenses are formal acknowledgments that a candidate has completed a specific field of study or passed a particular test. Credentials like these, or qualifications like certain work experiences or fluency in particular languages, are absolute necessities in some jobs. The person who delivers pizza for you, for example, must have a driver’s license; the appropriate medical boards must license the surgeon you hire. Be thoughtful about the credentials for your position to ensure that they accurately reflect the needs of the position.
Make sure that the credentials are necessary. Sure, every manager wants someone with an MBA and maybe a PhD and probably some sort of industry certification, too. But unless these are actually required for the job, they shouldn’t make it into the success profile or be used as hiring criteria because they can limit the potential talent that you attract.
The job you describe must truly be realistic. Some job descriptions work beautifully until the person you hire actually tries to perform the job. One factor to consider is the compatibility of a job’s various duties. Some people who are creative may be less adept at tasks that require attention to detail.
By the same token, some people who are at their best when they’re working by themselves on complex, analytical tasks may be content to work independently and not as part of a tight-knit team. The takeaway here is to make sure that when you’re lumping several tasks into the same job description, you’re not creating a job very few, if any, people could fill.
Outcomes are the results. They’re the most valuable and important part of the position you’re focused on filling and the most important aspect of the position success profile. The activities the position engages in and the outputs produced should be geared toward these results. These results should be measurable (preferably with numbers), directly lead to objectives being met, and be of real value. Following are some examples of types of outcomes that should be noted in the position success profile:
You don’t need to be William Shakespeare to write a solid position success profile, but you definitely need to appreciate the nuances of the language. For example, use clear and concise language and, when possible, words with a single meaning. And you want to make sure that the words you choose actually spell out what the job entails. “Good communication skills,” for example, is too general; more specific would be: “Ability to communicate technical information to nontechnical audiences.”
Before you start the recruiting process and look at options for how and where you can find the ideal candidate for the job you’re designing (see Chapter 6), you should establish a salary range for the position. In Chapter 11, I discuss the details of salary and what constitutes an effective compensation structure. Your ideal candidate may come at a hefty price, so know the market compensation for people with the skills you seek.
Job titles are meant to be meaningful, relevant, and clarifying. If you want to attract and retain the best talent, be thoughtful about naming the job carefully and appropriately whenever possible.
An inaccurate or overblown job title can create false expectations and lead to resentment, disappointment, or worse. Now that the majority of positions in most companies involve multitasking, some job titles are probably outdated. If your office manager left, for example, does “office manager” accurately describe the job they were doing, and is that the title you should still use for your opening? Or is “operations manager” now more accurate for the position as it has evolved?
Consider the following guidelines when determining the right job title:
Job titles are helpful beyond the hiring process, so it’s important to be thoughtful and get it right. They can help others within your organization understand a particular employee’s role, and a change in title can indicate when an employee has taken on more responsibility. Outside contacts, such as vendors and clients, use job titles to determine who they need to talk to when they have specific questions or needs.
Every job has a set of technical requirements, but a success profile isn’t complete without those broad-but-telling aspects of a candidate known as core competencies, which are the soft skills, interpersonal abilities, or simply qualities and attributes that support success in the position.
These include an aptitude for communicating with people at all levels, abilities, and backgrounds; the capacity to work well in teams (as both a leader and a team member and both in person and virtually); and other factors, such as a strong sense of ethics and a talent for efficient and creative problem-solving. Candidates who are weak in these areas — even while having solid hard skills and work experience — may prove unable to grow as your organization goes through changes that are part of today’s work environment.
For example, if you’re recruiting an outbound sales rep for your home security business, one way to market your service is to solicit potential customers by phone. The basic job of an outbound sales leader is, of course, to generate leads by calling people on the phone. Some sales leaders, however, are clearly much better at this than others. They have a knack for engaging the interest of the people they call. They don’t allow repeated rejections to wear them down.
Interview your own top performers. Assuming you have a group of people who perform the same job — and assuming one or two of those people are clearly the “stars” of the group — sitting down with your key people or their immediate supervisors to determine what makes them so successful at what they do is certainly worth your time.
Try to answer the following questions: