Chapter 6
IN THIS CHAPTER
Following the flow of a criminal case from indictment to final appeal
Litigating the civil matter from the demand letter to collection of a final judgment
Paralegals assist their supervising attorneys with cases from start to finish. This chapter gives you the nuts and bolts of how to help your supervising attorney bring your firm’s criminal and civil cases through the maze of litigation.
Criminal law paralegals may work in the public sector for either the prosecution or the public defender, or they may provide services for a private defense law firm that defends those who can afford to pay for their own lawyers. No matter which side of the fence you’re on, your career in criminal litigation will be extremely busy. You have to concentrate on staying on top of the constant flow of cases and making your supervising attorney look good. We focus on procedure in this chapter, but you can find out more about the nature of criminal law in Chapter 5.
Paralegals who work in a federal, state, or local prosecuting attorney’s office make sure that their supervising attorneys file the proper criminal charges against criminal defendants. The attorney begins the process by reviewing police reports of suspected criminal activity. He may even assist law enforcement in the process of obtaining a search warrant.
Police officers may arrest a suspect based on probable cause, which is a reasonable belief — based on all the facts available to the officer given her special training and experience — that a crime has been committed. For charges like drunk driving, misdemeanor assault or theft, and malicious mischief charges, police officers often arrest individuals suspected of committing crimes and turn the case that they have filed in court over to the prosecutor. For felony cases, law enforcement often investigates criminal activity and then refers the matter to the prosecutor without first making an arrest.
So, although law enforcement authorities may develop a case against an individual for prosecution, the prosecutor alone decides which criminal charges to file, especially with major criminal matters such as felonies. The prosecuting attorney, with the assistance of the paralegal, reviews the police reports, and decides upon two things:
When prosecutors are reasonably satisfied that they can get a conviction in court, they file a charging document against the defendant. The prosecutor charges the defendant either by indictment or complaint.
Charging documents come in two varieties:
Many types of felony cases on the federal level and in those states with grand juries are initiated by an indictment. An indictment document charges a defendant with a felony. The indictment just states that there’s probable cause to charge the defendant based on the evidence. It doesn’t imply that the prosecution has met the burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
A prosecutor presents evidence to a group of citizens, called a grand jury, which then returns a decision based on its review of the prosecutor’s case. Grand juries exist on the federal level and in most state judicial systems. If the grand jury thinks there’s enough evidence to charge the defendant, it returns an indictment (or true bill); if there isn’t enough evidence for an indictment, the grand jury returns no bill.
The grand jury’s indictment alleges that the defendant has committed each element of the crime charged. An indictment is enough to bring a defendant to trial.
A famous quip declares that, at least in those states without a grand jury, you need only two things to file criminal charges against a defendant: a prosecutor and a pen! That’s pretty close to the truth. In many states, a prosecutor can file criminal charges against a defendant by putting his signature on a charging document called a complaint. Sometimes, the complaint is also called an information (that is, it informs defendants about the criminal charges against them).
Like an indictment, the complaint or information must, on its face, state each of the elements of the crimes charged. If it doesn’t, the defendant can bring a motion to dismiss for failure to allege all elements of the crimes in the charging document. If the defendant successfully gets the court to dismiss the complaint or information, the prosecutor may choose to refile the charges to accurately reflect the defendant’s conduct.
In some cases, the prosecution must present the facts to a judge in a hearing to determine whether there’s probable cause to put the defendant on trial. This stage of the proceedings is called a preliminary hearing. The preliminary hearing is like a mini-trial. The defendant doesn’t put on a case, and the judge decides whether the state can go forward with the evidence that the prosecution has presented.
As a paralegal, you play an instrumental role in getting a criminal case ready for trial. In fact, if prosecuting attorneys had to do all the pre-trial preparation themselves, they’d have little time to manage their large caseloads. The same is true for offices specializing in criminal defense. Paralegals relieve attorneys from handling time-consuming pre-trial matters and allow them to focus on actually prosecuting or defending their cases.
Early on you’ll visualize what the trial notebook will look like for a particular case. Everything you do before trial potentially ends up in the notebook to assist the attorney at trial. (You can find more about trial notebooks in Chapter 14.) Your duties for both the prosecution and defense may include collecting police reports and other data, collecting and organizing evidence, interviewing witnesses and preparing them for trial, preparing discovery documents, assisting with pre-trial motions and briefs, and maintaining a schedule of deadlines.
As a paralegal, you gather police reports. Normally, law enforcement sends reports to the prosecutor’s office, but it’s not unusual for reports and other items not to make it to the prosecutor’s files. The paralegal should contact the police detective, sit down with him, and compare the reports in the detective’s files with the reports in the prosecutor’s files. That’s the only way to know whether the prosecutor’s case file is complete. Often, detectives may perform follow-up investigation, and the paralegal needs to ensure that the prosecutor’s case file is always up to date when new information comes in.
In addition, you should request other reports that may not ordinarily show up in the detective’s investigative case file. The nature of these reports depends on the type of case. If you’re dealing with a drunk driving case, you’ll need to make sure you get the report showing that the breath testing machine was properly calibrated. If you’re dealing with a homicide, you as the paralegal should order the autopsy report from the medical examiner. If someone called in the crime on 911, ask the emergency call center to reproduce a copy of the recording for later use in trial.
Be on the lookout for other reports as well. Examples might include crime lab reports for forensic evidence such as DNA, fingerprints, ballistics, fiber analysis, handwriting analysis, and so on.
In addition, begin creating a log for all photographs, photomontages, property, and evidence. After the documents and evidence are gathered, you can organize and compile it into a meaningful trial notebook.
One of your pre-trial duties when you work for the prosecution is to contact crime victims and witnesses (those who are favorable to the prosecution and those who aren’t). Try to arrange a meet-and-greet with the victim as soon as possible after the defendant has been charged.
A crime victim has undergone a traumatic experience, especially in cases concerning a major assault, robbery, rape, or kidnapping, and the effects of the crime may go well beyond any monetary loss to the victim. In homicide cases, you need to arrange to meet with the family of the decedent. You need to be extremely sensitive to their emotional needs. Not surprisingly, they may be quite angry, upset, or distraught. They want information about how the case will proceed through the system, and many times they just need someone to listen to them. Often, the victim needs professional counseling, and you can help line up that kind of assistance.
Correspondingly, if you work for the defense, you need to meet with your client as soon as you can. If the defendant is in custody, you may have to plan several trips to the jail. In many ways, meeting with the criminal defendant is as critical to the defense as is meeting with the victim for the prosecutor. In your initial meetings, remind the defendant of the attorney’s advice not to discuss the case with anyone. The “friends” your client makes in the next cell could be the people who will sell her up the river in return for some perceived preferential treatment from the authorities in their own cases.
In addition to meeting with the crime victim or client, you also need to meet with witnesses early, regardless of which side you’re on. The police reports give a summary of what witnesses might potentially testify to in court. However, written summaries often don’t do justice to the witness’s true story. When police officers interview witnesses at the scene of a crime, their time is limited. Officers can’t possibly get all the important details of the incident when conducting an investigation in the hubbub and immediate aftermath of a criminal act. In their quest to solve the crime as quickly and efficiently as possible, law enforcement officials might gloss over information that’s critical to winning the case in court. Sometimes, you may need to conduct follow-up witness interviews to uncover facts that were missed the first time around.
You also have an advantage over law enforcement when meeting with witnesses. You’re probably not as intimidating as an officer in uniform with a badge and a gun. You can take your time to meet with victim’s witnesses to obtain a fuller, more detailed statement. Through careful interviewing techniques, one witness interview may lead to additional witnesses whose names weren’t uncovered when the police officer first took the report. (We talk more about interviewing skills in Chapter 12.) After you conduct initial interviews and provide a summary to your attorney, the lawyer can determine whether she needs to interview witnesses further.
Paralegals are often instrumental in seeking out and organizing evidence in criminal cases. (We discuss some of the ways you may go about obtaining evidence in Chapter 11.) As a paralegal for the prosecution, you’ll probably help the victim determine what the restitution will be if the defendant gets convicted. Medical records may be critical to proving the case against the defendant, so you may ask the victim to sign a release of medical records. This allows the prosecutor to do follow-up contact with any medical personnel to decide whom to subpoena to testify in court. It also assists the prosecutor in determining the amount of restitution the defendant will owe in the event of a conviction. You determine whether the victim suffered any other financial loss as well. Typical losses include property damage, lost wages, and identity theft losses. Because crime victims deal with the trauma brought on by the criminal act, they especially need your support and guidance to help them gather receipts and other evidence of loss.
The paralegal in the prosecutor’s office should also contact law enforcement to get a rap sheet on the defendant, the victim, and all witnesses. Knowing the criminal records of all the witnesses allows for their effective impeachment (impugning of their credibility) at trial. And it’s also a good idea for the defense team to probe the backgrounds of their witnesses to prepare for any challenges the prosecutor may bring.
Based on the evidence and potential witnesses, the prosecution may opt to offer the defendant a plea bargain, which is an attempt to settle the case, usually by reducing or dismissing some of the charges against the defendant or reducing the severity of the punishment in exchange for a no contest or guilty plea from the defendant. With a no contest (or nolo contendere) plea, a defendant neither admits to nor denies guilt for the charges. It essentially means that, although the defendant professes innocence, he concedes that he may be found guilty of the charges if the case were to go before a jury. Through plea bargaining, many criminal cases settle before they go to trial.
During the pre-trial stage, you enter on a calendar all the important dates for the attorney — everything from the arraignment (where the court advises the defendant of the charges and defendant enters a plea) to the actual trial date. In between, there may be hearings for bond reductions, pre-trial motions to suppress evidence from a search warrant or unlawful arrest, settlement conferences, readiness hearings, and discovery compliance hearings. As the paralegal, you make sure the attorney knows about these dates and isn’t surprised by anything on the calendar. When matters get continued, you generally run draft copies of orders around to other attorneys to get signatures and file these papers with the court.
About a month prior to the trial date, you develop a final witness list and prepare subpoenas the attorney will send out to all witnesses for trial. Scheduling witnesses can be a real challenge because you have to deal with individuals’ schedules as well as the court’s. And, trial dates can and often do change when the court grants a continuance, so you may have to reschedule everyone all over again. Whenever the trial date is moved, you need to advise prospective witnesses accordingly. If a witness is unavailable on the trial date, you need to advise your attorney so alternative plans can be made. A witness contact list is critical in order to communicate with the witnesses in a timely manner. (You can find a sample witness contact sheet in Chapter 14.)
You may be in charge of making sure your attorney has made appropriate demands for discovery and has responded to the other side’s discovery demands. In criminal law, the prosecutor and defense attorney have an ongoing duty and obligation to continuously respond to discovery as new information becomes available. You may further assist the attorney in drafting pre-trial motions and trial briefs, which requires you to conduct legal research to support your positions. (We cover legal research techniques in Chapter 13.) Naturally, the attorney does a final review of any such documents and signs off on them before you file them with the court. Eventually, you’ll put everything pertinent to the criminal case into the trial notebook for the lawyer.
If a criminal case isn’t settled through a plea bargain, a jury usually hears the case and it proceeds to the trial phase. About ten days prior to the trial date, your attorney usually attends a readiness hearing to declare that the matter is ready for trial. After the court notifies your office that a judge and courtroom are available to hear your trial, it’s time to rock ’n’ roll. You’ll probably accompany your supervising attorney to the courtroom where your attorney may want you to assist with jury selection. Chapter 14 explains your role in this process in more detail, but essentially your observations give the attorney valuable perspective as to the types of people he should look for to sit on the jury.
You probably provide the prosecuting attorney’s main contact with the victim and witnesses as they’re called to court to testify. If the rule on witnesses is invoked (which means that witnesses aren’t allowed to hear others’ testimonies), you make sure that witnesses remain outside the courtroom until it’s their turn to take the stand. This ensures that witnesses don’t hear each other’s testimony and thereby have a tainted version of the incident when they testify. You certainly don’t want the opponent’s witnesses hearing what your witnesses say in court so they can tailor their testimony. In addition, you don’t want the jury to think that your own witnesses have sat through the trial and had a chance to conform their testimony as well.
You’re also the eyes and ears of your supervising attorney when she must focus attention on the judge and witnesses as the drama of the trial unfolds. Taking notes on witness testimony — especially on any significant deviations a witness makes from what he told you in pre-trial statements — is critical. Also jot down the jury’s reaction to testimony as it comes in, whether it’s positive or negative. Your own take on what happens during the trial is invaluable to your attorney as she constantly tailors the trial strategy to meet new developments and challenges.
During trial, your attorney may need you to grab a court file from the clerk’s office, or he may request that you conduct some quick legal research of any new or unanticipated issues that arise. The attorney can’t easily leave the courtroom or perform research during the trial, so you’re the runner to make sure that things go smoothly for the lawyer. If a mistake occurs during trial — such as a witness who fails to appear — it’s often the paralegal’s job to resolve this courtroom crisis, which is almost impossible to anticipate but must be rectified to avoid losing at trial, and on appeal. Your job is to help the attorney make sure the job gets done right the first time, so when your side does win the case at trial, the favorable outcome can withstand a challenge on appeal.
If you work for the prosecutor, the worst words you’ll hear at the end of trial are, “We the jury find the defendant not guilty on all counts.” Perhaps the only sound worse is if you work for the defense and you hear the presiding jury utter a guilty verdict. But hearing the verdict doesn’t mean the case is over. Regardless of the outcome, you still have work to do.
Jurors may tell you which witnesses were believable, what evidence persuaded them, and which arguments made sense. You may also learn which witnesses, evidence, or arguments turned them off. A visit with the jurors after trial is like getting free advice from 12 jury consultants.
At the conclusion of the trial, either side may bring post-trial motions, including a motion for a new trial or motion to set aside the jury verdict. Generally, the defendant brings these types of motions. The prosecution usually doesn’t have the right to appeal a guilty verdict. Sometimes, if the court hands down a sentence that doesn’t comply with the law, either party may appeal that decision.
The party that appeals the decision of the lower court is called the appellant or petitioner. The party who defends the case on appeal is called the appellee or respondent. No consistent relationship exists between the plaintiff or defendant and the appellant and appellee. The plaintiff brings the original action in court, but that doesn’t mean the plaintiff brings the appeal, too.
If your supervising attorney’s side wins the trial court case, then you’ve already taken the first step toward winning the case on appeal. The odds favor the side that wins at the trial level in an appellate case. If you work for the prosecution, it’s extremely unlikely that the attorney can appeal an unfavorable decision. If the jury comes back with a not-guilty decision, you’re stuck. The constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy forbids trying a defendant for the same crime twice. If the case experiences a hung jury (that is, if it couldn’t agree on a verdict), the prosecution must decide whether to bring the defendant to trial again. You may assist your supervisor in the decision making process. Information gained from talking to jurors after the trial helps immensely.
If your attorney decides to file an appeal, check the state statutes or court rules to determine how much time you have to file a notice. Generally, the defendant has 30 days to file a notice of appeal after the court has pronounced the sentence. Of course, this timeframe varies depending on federal, state, and local rules.
The best way to think of a notice of appeal is that it has the same function as the original complaint but has a much simpler format. You can draft the notice of appeal for your attorney, and the pleading can be as simple as a one-line notice filed with the court that the defendant appeals the judgment and sentence of the trial court.
You may not know that the appellate court doesn’t hear the case all over again. One common mistake that new paralegals make is to assume that, because an appellate court is a higher court, it’s free to do whatever it wants. But the higher court only considers whether the lower court made an error of law. The court considers only the record of the case from the trial level. The record consists of a transcript of the witness testimony, the exhibits the trial judge admitted into evidence, and any pleadings, briefs, or other documents the parties have filed with the trial court.
After your supervising attorney has filed the notice of appeal, you help designate those portions of the record that are relevant to the appeal. If you need a transcript of the trial testimony, you may make arrangements with the court reporter to transcribe the testimony as soon as you can. If you’re working for the appellee, you look at the parts of the record designated by the appellant to decide if you should supplement the record with additional material because the appellant may designate only those portions of the record that would help its side.
When the transcript is ready and each side has supplemented the record as needed, the court of appeals sends out a notice to the parties that the record is complete. The court then sets a briefing schedule, or timeframe, for when the parties must submit their briefs to the court. The appellant goes first and writes the brief of the appellant. The appellee then submits a brief of appellee, and the court of appeals sets very strict timelines that the parties must conform to.
Appellate briefs are crucial because the appeals process doesn’t proceed like a complete trial. There’s no discovery phase, no jury, no witnesses, and no testimony. There’s usually more than just one judge sitting on an appellate court. Often, there are panels consisting of three or more judges. Sometimes, the higher court may hear the appeal en banc, meaning the entire body of the higher court hears and decides the appeal.
With very few exceptions, most courts in the United States are part of a three-level system: a large number of trial courts, a smaller number of intermediate appellate courts, and one supreme court.
Although every party has an absolute right to appeal from a trial court to the first level of appellate court, they don’t get an automatic appeal to the highest court. If a plaintiff or defendant wants to appeal to the next level of appellate court, she must file a petition for review. The higher court either grants or denies the petition. After the parties have exhausted all levels of appeals, the decision becomes final, and the highest court that heard the appeal issues a mandate (a written order of the court that terminates all review in the matter).
In many ways, the civil action closely resembles a criminal procedure. Cases follow a pre-trial, trial, and post-trial schedule, and the court documents are similar. As with criminal cases, many civil cases settle before trial, so they don’t even enter a trial phase. Chapter 5 defines civil law for you, so here we explain how a civil action makes its way from beginning to end.
A person, group of people, or business entity that seeks restitution from another usually consults with an attorney in an effort to resolve the dispute and obtain equitable relief or money damages. (Chapter 4 contains more-specific information about the kinds of legal and equitable remedies available in civil cases.) The attorney, often with the help of the paralegal, conducts an extensive interview with the client to ascertain the underlying facts and circumstances of the problem. From those facts and information gained from interviewing witnesses and performing legal research, the attorney and staff decide whether the prospective client has a cause of action (grounds to sue the other party).
If the attorney decides that the prospective client has a legitimate cause of action against the wrongdoer, the attorney and client begin the attorney/client relationship by executing the retainer agreement (a contract that says the attorney represents the client). After the attorney and client execute the retainer, the plaintiff becomes a client of the firm and all privileges and obligations pertinent to that relationship begin.
After the attorney and client establish a relationship, the plaintiff notifies the defendant of the damages she has sustained as a result of the defendant’s negligence through a demand letter prepared by the attorney. The attorney often delegates the letter-writing task to you, the paralegal. The demand letter spells out how much time the defendant has to answer the plaintiff’s allegations and requests a specific sum of money as restitution. If the defendant doesn’t answer the demand letter within the specified time period or if the defendant refuses to pay the requested amount of damages, the parties prepare for trial.
If you send the demand letter and the prospective defendant hasn’t responded in the required amount of time, the plaintiff’s side prepares for litigation by gathering as many of the facts bearing upon the case as possible. Before the plaintiff initiates litigation, the attorney and paralegal select the proper court to file the case in. So, they have to establish proper jurisdiction.
Civil courts can exercise three types of jurisdiction over parties:
If a court exercises in personam jurisdiction, it has the authority to determine the rights or duties of the parties involved in the dispute. The court also has the power to bind the parties personally to a settlement agreement or other court remedy. A court has in personam jurisdiction if it meets one of the following qualifications:
Under in personam jurisdiction, the plaintiff must serve the defendant with proper and timely notice of the impending action. The plaintiff’s attorney has the responsibility of serving the defendant while the defendant is present in the county or when the defendant can be contacted to consent to jurisdiction. Generally, the notice of the impending action can’t take on a form other than personal service and can’t be made by publication. (For more about the rules concerning service of process, see Chapter 7.)
In personam actions fall into one of two categories:
In the present court system, the law determines in personam jurisdiction through mutual consent of the parties much more heavily than it used to. Corporations who do business in a state and motorists who drive across a state are said to have consented to the jurisdiction of that state’s trial court under the long-arm statute, which makes it easier for a state to prosecute lawbreakers who don’t reside in the state where they violated the law.
All in rem jurisdiction actions are local. A court with in rem jurisdiction can rule on property that’s located within its county and matters that occur within its county. Notice to satisfy in rem jurisdiction may be made by publication, most commonly by legal notice in the locality’s officially designated newspaper. As long as a matter occurs within or involves property located within the county’s limits, that court has in rem jurisdiction.
Quasi in rem jurisdiction is exercised rarely, usually only in cases where a court is “grasping at straws” to obtain jurisdiction. A court may have jurisdiction over a party to an action if that party owns some property, such as real property or municipal bonds, within its confines even if that property is not involved in the dispute, as long as a judgment can be satisfied by that property.
Courts may also determine jurisdiction by the subject matter of the case. In general, cases originate at either the state or federal level. Federal courts try to severely restrict access to their process when parties want to bring a typical state claim. Specific requirements dictate jurisdiction at the federal level. Courts with specific limited jurisdiction include the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, the U.S. Tax Court, the U.S. Court of International Trade, and the U.S. Claims Court.
To originate in the U.S. District Court, a case must meet one of the following requirements:
State statutes determine the jurisdiction requirements at the state level. Factors include the amount of monetary damages sought and the type of matter that the court will hear. In many states, matters asking for damages exceeding $25,000 originate in the trial court. There are also courts with specific jurisdiction like water courts and family law courts.
After you determine proper jurisdiction, you choose the trial’s venue (location). Generally, the venue for the trial is chosen for the convenience of the defendant, because venue plays an important role in allowing defendants to receive an impartial jury and a fair trial.
The bases for determining the venue of each dispute are as follows:
Note: Where the venue rules allow a choice of venue, the plaintiff usually gets to make the choice. For example, if the defendant resides in Orange County and the cause of action arose in Riverside County, the plaintiff usually has the right to decide whether to bring the lawsuit in Orange County or Riverside County.
Either party may request a change of venue to another county or district. The defendant usually is the party that requests a change of venue. Where the case has received wide publicity before trial, a party may seek a change of venue in an effort to secure jurors who haven’t formed an opinion about the case or to provide a neutral forum not charged with local bias. The parties might also request a change of venue for the convenience of witnesses. Finally, a party might request a change of venue based on that party’s claim that the judge hearing the case has a conflict of interest that would prevent that judge from being completely unbiased during the trial. This formal request is traditionally called a motion to recuse.
If initial attempts to negotiate are unsuccessful, the plaintiff initiates the cause of action by serving the defendant with a summons and complaint. (In some states, a complaint is termed a petition, and a summons is called a citation.) Chapter 10 contains detailed hints on drafting the more common documents of the pre-trial stage of litigation, like these pleadings and motion documents:
After the filing and service of the last pleading allowed by court rules, the parties begin the discovery period. Paralegals assist their supervising attorneys in the discovery process. Discovery assumes two very similar forms: oral and written. Oral discovery consists of depositions, and written discovery consists of interrogatories, request for admissions, request for production of documents, and request for mental or physical examinations.
Either party to a lawsuit may request discovery in an effort to ascertain the facts necessary to prepare for trial, prevent surprises at trial, and, ideally, settle the action. Without a court order, written discovery can only be served upon parties to the lawsuit, but the parties to a lawsuit can require both parties and non-parties to undergo a deposition.
Because paralegals create many of the questions for written discovery, and because so much of written discovery is easily stored in the law office’s computers, attorneys like to explore this relatively inexpensive discovery technique prior to administering more expensive depositions. Unless limited by court order, rule, or statute, most supervising attorneys have their staffs prepare a massive amount of discovery. After the law office receives the answers to written discovery, the requesting party might then depose the other party in an effort to clarify responses and resolve questions.
Even though answers to both oral and written discovery are provided under oath, the deposition responses are spontaneous and may be more helpful. Some attorneys conduct depositions rather that written discovery at the close of pleadings in an effort to get the most accurate information possible. Written discovery may then follow the deposition testimony. A deposition is an out-of-court statement that a party to or witness of an action gives under oath. Under the statutes and rules in most states, either party in a civil action may take the deposition of the other party or of any witness. To be effective, a notice to take deposition must be served upon the deponent accompanied by a subpoena and a check for mileage and witness fees.
Attorneys frequently take depositions of important witnesses to preserve their testimony if they can’t appear in court or if they reside in other states or countries. These witnesses may be friendly, neutral, or even hostile toward your office’s client. Their deposition testimony assists in determining the nature of the evidence that they would testify to if subpoenaed as witnesses in the trial. The deposition may take the form of answers to written questions or of oral examination followed by cross-examination. A deposition isn’t a public record and isn’t available to the press unless it’s made public by court order.
If a witness is absent from the jurisdiction or is unable to attend the trial in person, her deposition may be viewed or read into evidence. If a person who has given a deposition also appears as a witness at the trial, the deposition may be used to attack the witness’s credibility if oral testimony at the trial is inconsistent with that contained in the deposition.
Either party may submit written discovery questions (called interrogatories) to the other party. The receiving party must answer these questions under oath. Unlike depositions, parties do not routinely file written discovery unless the court orders it.
Other discovery documents include the following:
If the other party doesn’t provide responses to discovery, a party may file a motion to compel. Because an underlying purpose of discovery is to uncover all relevant evidence and to promote settlement of the case, the courts liberally construe and apply discovery techniques. So, the court will more than likely force a party to provide the information required by the discovery process even though that same information may not necessarily be admissible at the ensuing trial.
After each of the parties finishes conducting discovery and the case is determined to be at issue, many courts set the case for a pre-trial hearing or pre-trial conference. Generally, the attorneys appear at this hearing without their clients. In the presence of a judge, the attorneys seek to agree on undisputed facts and issues called stipulations. These stipulations may include such matters as the time and location of an accident; the use of pictures, maps, or sketches at trial; and other matters, including points of law.
The objective of the pre-trial hearing is to shorten the actual trial time without infringing upon the rights of either party. Pre-trial procedure frequently results in the settlement of the case without a trial, and case settlement is actually a primary purpose of the pre-trial conference. If the case doesn’t settle, the court assigns a specific trial date for the case.
After the court assigns a date for trial, the case takes on a new light. The attorneys and their paralegals prepare trial notebooks containing pleadings, digested depositions and other discovery information, motions, exhibits, trial briefs, and any other information that may be pertinent to the trial. Organization of these trial notebooks differs with each attorney; your supervising attorney will provide you with careful instructions on how to prepare these devices. (You can find more information on preparing trial notebooks and other ways paralegals assist attorneys during trial in Chapter 14.)
On the first day of the trial, the parties engage in voir dire, which is the process of selecting the jury. During voir dire, the attorneys question potential jurors to determine whether there is any reason for the attorneys to exclude any of them. In most trials, the attorney has a certain number of exclusions that can be made for no reason. These are called peremptory challenges. Practically speaking, attorneys use the voir dire process to exclude any jurors who may appear to be harmful to a party’s case. (For information on how you can help the supervising attorney during voir dire, turn to Chapter 14.)
After the parties select the jury, the attorneys make their opening statements. The plaintiff speaks first. In the opening statements, the attorneys lay out the facts and points of law regarding the case.
After the defendant’s opening statement, the parties begin to introduce evidence. Again, the plaintiff goes first. Evidence consists of exhibits of information and the testimony of witnesses. The party that calls the witness asks the first set of questions, called direct examination. Then the opposing counsel has the opportunity to cross-examine the witness. After cross-examination, the first party is allowed to redirect the examination of the witness. When all the witnesses for one party have testified, the opposing counsel brings her witnesses to the stand and repeats the process.
After the parties have concluded their witness testimony, the attorneys make their closing arguments. The plaintiff presents the closing arguments first. The plaintiff’s attorney may request an additional amount of time after the defendant’s closing statement so he can speak last as well. It may seem inequitable for one party to speak first and last. However, the plaintiff almost always has the burden of proof, and is therefore allowed to initiate and finalize the closing arguments. The plaintiff’s attorney may not bring up new arguments in rebuttal but may only address those points raised by the defense.
After the parties finish their closing arguments, the judge instructs the jury on the law of the case. The attorneys usually propose these instructions to the judge, and the parties have generally agreed to them ahead of time. After receiving the instructions, the jury recesses to deliberate. Deliberation may take as long as is necessary for the jury to reach a decision. When deliberations are finished, the court enters a verdict and renders the judgment.
After the judgment is rendered, two procedures remain. If the court awards monetary damages, the winning party must collect the judgment. The two means of collecting judgments from an uncooperative defendant are garnishment of wages and attachment of assets. Collection of the judgment in full finalizes the dispute.
As in criminal law, some civil cases go on to the appellate stage. A party who wants to appeal the original court’s decision must file a motion for a new trial within the prescribed amount of time in order for the appeal to be heard. Procedural rules in the appellate stage differ from those in the trial stage. The losing party files a notice of appeal with the trial court and the appellate court. The appellant files an opening brief with the appellate court, and the appellee files a respondent’s brief. The appellant may file a reply brief to address new issues raised by the appellee.
You can appeal a trial court decision only when it makes an error of law. Appellate courts don’t consider new evidence except under very restrictive situations. If the appellate court decides to listen to the attorneys argue their points, it may allow them to present oral arguments. These arguments are short — usually 15 to 30 minutes in length. Based on each party’s written briefs and oral argument, the appellate court renders its decision to affirm, modify, or dismiss the lower court’s rulings. The ruling of the appellate court finalizes the case, unless one of the parties appeals the decision to the state supreme court or possibly the U.S. Supreme Court. The higher court doesn’t necessarily have to hear the appeal. These discretionary appeals are rarely granted.