SEO is part of design, and design is part of SEO—and the evolution of search shows us why. You don’t need to know every detail of SEO’s history to integrate search standards into your design process, but a little context will help a lot. We promise.
We’ll start off by defining what SEO is (and isn’t) and describing how search engines work, and then walk through the history of search algorithms and ranking factors. Finally, we’ll talk about the process Google uses so we can better understand how design, content, and UX impact the search experience—and ultimately how much visibility your site merits.
Most user experiences don’t start on our carefully designed websites, but on a list of Google search results. In fact, over half of all website traffic comes from organic search, which means that SEO, for better or worse, is part of a user’s overall experience of a site (http://bkaprt.com/seo38/01-01).
While its name might imply that we’re optimizing for search engines, that’s only half of the story. The practice of SEO is as much about understanding people—the tasks they want to accomplish, the questions they have, the problems they’re trying to solve, and the language they use to describe things—as it is about making sure web crawlers (the kind that read web pages and organize them into a search index) can find and understand your content.
Optimization can take myriad forms, many of which fall into more than one category. To keep things simple, we’ll say SEO primarily affects the following five areas:
And within these five areas, there’s a lot of subject matter to cover and gain expertise around. That’s why, much like the disciplines of user experience design or content strategy, SEO has different areas of focus, each with its own set of goals:
It’s unusual to find someone who excels at every kind of SEO. Although there are a few unicorns out there, most professionals worth their salt will specialize in just one or two areas. If you’re working with consultants or adding an SEO professional to your team, make sure their strengths align with the kind of work you’re trying to do, or work with an agency that has a team of experts across the spectrum.
Even though you now have a picture of what the general practice of SEO looks like, you’re probably still wondering what exactly SEO can and can’t do. There are a lot of misconceptions around that, so let’s clear them up!
SEO can:
SEO cannot:
Google is the standard for how we frame search, its evolution, and where things stand today. It’s the only search engine that really matters in SEO. Are there search engines besides Google? Sure. Baidu is important if you’re doing SEO for mainland China. Yandex is important if you’re optimizing for visibility in Russia. Does anyone still use Bing? Possibly. But with more than 90 percent of the search market share worldwide at the time of writing, Google easily represents the majority of users (http://bkaprt.com/seo38/01-02, http://bkaprt.com/seo38/01-03).
So Google doesn’t just lead the search market share—it dominates it. Google sets the standard for search algorithm development, as well as crawling and indexing technology (i.e., how search engines work). Therefore, we’ll focus on how SEO has evolved under Google’s leadership and the search standards the company has set. Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, let’s dive in.
In its Beginners Guide to SEO (which we highly recommend to anyone who wants to get a more comprehensive overview of SEO basics), SEO software and data company Moz says that search engines “exist to discover, understand, and organize the internet’s content in order to offer the most relevant results to the questions searchers are asking” (http://bkaprt.com/seo38/01-04).
To do this, search engines have four main directives (Fig 1.1):
Google cares about giving people what they want. Even its webmaster guidelines on optimizing for search suggests asking yourself: “Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn’t exist?” (http://bkaprt.com/seo38/01-05)
So why did anyone ever try to game the system? Well, for a while there, gaming algorithms was just plain easier than meeting peoples’ needs—and it worked. Early on, Google relied on overly simple ranking factors like keyword matching to indicate relevance, and backlink volume to indicate value. If a lot of people are linking to a site, then it must be good, right?
But this ranking system was pretty easy to manipulate. Google’s early algorithms weren’t sophisticated enough to take quality and legitimacy into account—so with a little strategic keyword stuffing and some backlinks from fake sites, you could be well on your way to appearing on the first page of Google search results!
Back then, leveraging those loopholes in search algorithms became commonplace. But it was only a matter of time until Google figured out how to reinstate order amid the chaos.
SEO has changed a lot since its spammy early days, and Google has worked hard to codify the complexity of human search behavior. They’ve gradually built a smarter, more sophisticated search algorithm with the power to deliver meaningful, valuable, and relevant results.
Keep in mind that nobody but Google really knows the details of how their search algorithm works; it’s a highly guarded secret. To discourage people from trying to game the system, exact ranking factors aren’t disclosed.
However, Google does give us a lot of clues through their guidelines and best-practices documentation. It’s safe to say that the algorithm looks at:
Thankfully, the SEO community has run myriad tests to try to suss out which factors matter more than others, and our own experience has shown us what kind of site improvements really move the needle. We can use that collective knowledge to get a better understanding of how to optimize for relevant factors. Here’s a deeper look into what we know matters.
Quality can be complex and subjective. It’s even more challenging to assess algorithmically, though Google tries. Of course, Google does not disclose the specifics of how they assess content quality, but they do offer writing guidelines that place a lot of focus on factors like trustworthiness, quality control, and alignment with readers’ genuine interests (http://bkaprt.com/seo38/01-06).
Think of links to your site from other sites as weighted votes. A link from a large, well-known, and respected site counts for a lot, while a link from a lesser-known site counts just a little. In aggregate, links help determine how authoritative your content is and exert a positive influence on how Google sees your site’s value.
But as we said earlier, this kind of system used to be easy to manipulate. After they adjusted the algorithm to home in on quality, Google turned its attention to filtering out sites engaging in fake link-building and keyword-stuffing practices. And, holy shit, was there ever a mountain of garbage to clean up. These days, you’ve got to earn your links if you want them to count.
In 2013, Google released a significant algorithm update (more like an overhaul) called Hummingbird, which put greater emphasis on natural-language queries, focusing on context and meaning over individual keywords. It drastically improved the search engine’s semantic understanding of the web and how topics of information relate or connect to one another.
Hummingbird focused on synonyms and theme-related topics, so exact-match (meaning exactly the same word for word) keywords don’t matter as much as much as they used to. Google shows results that are relevant to the search, rather than only the searcher’s keywords. That means you don’t have to know the one correct phrase to match user queries, as long as you’re using semantically relevant language and navigation labels to clearly communicate your content.
Following the Hummingbird update, Google made further refinements to their natural-language processing capabilities with a machine-learning artificial intelligence system called RankBrain, which continuously “teaches” Google how to understand semantics better.
More recently, Google implemented BERT, which stands for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers. BERT uses natural language processing (NLP) to understand not only nuances in words’ meanings, but also how meanings change when words are used together (http://bkaprt.com/seo38/01-07). It’s one of the biggest steps forward in the history of search.
You can see these advancements at work when you search for something like “Italian plumbers.” Previously, you might get an actual listing of plumbers in Italy, but now (unless you are performing this search in Italian while located in Italy), Google understands that you probably aren’t looking for plumbers—you’re searching for video game characters. Because BERT can understand these nuances, Google shows images of Mario and Luigi (Fig 1.2).
Google understands what searchers want and need—it understands their intent. That’s a big deal, and it means that doing the work to understand and address search intent on your site is incredibly important.
Design—including the content, code, and interface—matters in SEO because design shapes how users behave. Most SEO professionals believe Google assesses a site’s user experience by incorporating behavioral data in its ranking systems. As we’ve mentioned, Google keeps its exact use of behavioral data secret, but these are likely factors:
Whether these signals are being used as direct ranking factors, feedback to train the algorithm, or something else entirely is unclear. But most SEO practitioners recognize that Google is analyzing some level of user satisfaction to ensure it sends users the most appropriate results.
No matter how the algorithm has evolved, one theme stands out: search intent matters. In a comparison of Google’s ranking signals from 2014 to 2019, Rand Fishkin, cofounder and CEO of SparkToro and formerly of Moz, demonstrated that intent had moved from the sixth most critical ranking factor all the way up to number one (Fig 1.3).
Furthermore, there’s a theme with all the ranking factors that now carry more weight in the algorithm, like intent matching, content structure, comprehensiveness, and content accuracy: they’re user-centric. As Google becomes more sophisticated in understanding what users are looking for, along with gaining a better understanding of the meaning of our content, people have become more important. At the same time, purely technical ranking factors that can be easily manipulated and have less of an impact on user experience, like keyword matching and inbound anchor text, have declined.
This evolution of search algorithms means that what Google really wants is for you to make pages primarily for users, not search engines! It wants you to avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings and do the hard work required to provide a good user experience.
It also means that one of the most important things you can do to improve search visibility for your site is to satisfy search intent—to think about why someone would come to your site in the first place, and ensure their expectations are met. In the next chapter, we’ll take a closer look at what search intent is and how you can uncover it on your own.