REFERENCES

1. Bajec, M., Vavpotič, D. & Krisper, M. 2007. Practice-driven approach for creating project-specific software development methods. Information and Software Technology. 49: 345–365.

2. Beck, K. 2000. Extreme Programming Explained. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.

3. Brinkkemper, S. 1996. Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Inf. Software Technol. 38(4): 275–280.

4. Carroll, J.B. (ed.). 1956 and 1997. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

5. Cockburn, A. 2000. Selecting a project's methodology. IEEE Software. 17(4): 64–71.

6. D'Souza, F.D. & Wills, A.C. 1999. Objects, Components and Frameworks with UML: the Catalysis approach. Object Technology Series, G. Booch, I. Jacobson & J. Rumbaugh (eds). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.

7. Firesmith, D.G. & Henderson-Sellers, B. 2002. The OPEN Process Framework: An introduction. The OPEN Series. London: Addison-Wesley.

8. Flatscher, R.G. 2002. Metamodeling in EIA/CDIF: meta-metamodel and metamodels. ACM Trans. Modeling and Computer Simulation. 12(4): 322–342.

9. Henderson-Sellers, B. 1995. Who needs an OO methodology anyway? J. Obj.-Oriented Programming. 8(6): 6–8.

10. Kruchten, P. 1999. The Rational Unified Process: An introduction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

11. Kumar, K. & Welke, R.J. 1992. Methodology Engineering: a proposal for situation-specific methodology construction. In: W.W. Cotterman & J.A. Senn (eds). Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons 257–269.

12. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: what categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.

13. OMG. 2002. formal/2002-04-03. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4. Object Management Group.

14. OMG. 2003. omg/03-06-01. MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. Object Management Group.

15. OMG. 2006. formal/05-07-05. Unified Modeling Language Specification: Infrastructure, version 2. Object Management Group.

16. OMG. 2007. ptc/07-03-03. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification, version 2.0. Object Management Group.

17. Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory. 2006. WordNet. http://wordnet.princeton.edu/. Accessed on 4 February 2007.

18. Ralyté, J. & Rolland, C. 2001. An approach for method engineering. Procs 20th Int. Conf on Conceptual Modelling (ER2001), LNCS 2224. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 471–484.

19. Tolvanen, J.-P., Rossi, M. & Liu, H. 1996. Method Engineering: current research directions and implications for future research. In: S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen & R.J. Welke (eds). Method Engineering: principles of method construction and tool support. Procs. IFIP TC8, WG8.1/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering, 26–28 August 1996, Atlanta, USA. London: Chapman & Hall. 296–317.

¹ More accurately, situational method engineering. However, for the sake of simplicity, in this book we use the shorter “method engineering” (ME).